About IMAO



Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy!


Buy funniest book ever!





IMAO Podcasts
IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter

Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!

About IMAO
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just, 
And this be our motto--'In God is our trust.' 
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave 
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK.

About Frank J.

Bloggers:
Frank J.
Harvey
RightWingDuck
Cadet Happy
spacemonkey
Laurence Simon
SarahK

Popular Categories
Fred Thompson Facts
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
lolterizt
IMAO Condensed
Know Thy Enemy
Editorials
Frank the Artist
In My World
Other Content
Ode to Violence
Brief Histories
IMAO Audio Bits


Read the Essay
Own the Shirt
Peace Gallery
Search IMAO
Google
Web www.imao.us
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds

"Unfunny treasonous ronin!"
-Lou Tulio*

"You, sir, are a natural born killer."
-E. Harrington

"You'll never get my job! Never!!!"
-Jonah Goldberg

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO."
-No One of Consequence

"A blogger with a sense of humor."
-Some Woman on MSNBC
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Blackfive
Captain's Quarters
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
The Corner
The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!)
Dave in Texas
Eject! Eject! Eject!
Electric Venom
Hot Air
Puppy Blender
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Michelle Malkin
Pereiraville
Protein Wisdom
Rachel Lucas
Right Wing News
Scrappleface
Serenity's Journal
Townhall Blog

IMAO Blogroll
Bad Example
Cadet Happy
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
mountaineer musings
Right Wing Duck
SarahK & Cadet Happy snark TV
This Blog Is Full of Crap

Fred Thompson Links
Fred File
Blogs for Fred
Fred Thompson Facts
Awards



 

April 15, 2004
Frank Answers: To Infinity and Below, Quoting Frank, Bigfoot, and the Dark Secret Behind the Theory of Relativity
Posted by Frank J. at 12:41 PM | View blog reactions | Comments (32)

Rally round the family... with a pocket full of shells!
We rally round the family... with a pocket full of shells!
We rally round the family... with a pocket full of shells!
We rally round the family... with a pocket full of shells!

Sorry, one of my favorite Rage Against the Machine songs was on the radio as I drove back from picking up lunch. BTW, today is tax day and free cookie day at Subway if anyone forgot.

Anyway, here are some Frank Answers™ to some frank questions.

* * * *

Todd writes:
Finally I have found someone with the significant cerebral capacity to tackle my most baffling brainteaser:
If 1/Infinity is always 0, and anything/itself is always 1, what is infinity/infinity? 1 or 0?

Actually, I've posed this same math question to a number of mathematicians, and, not liking any of their answers, I dismissed them. The way I usually phrase the questions is what is the product of infinity times zero? My answer is one. Reasoning: infinity (i.e. everything) times zero (i.e. nothing) equals finite (i.e. something). It just makes sense. Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot and never returned the mechanical pencil I lent him.


Chris from Baltimore writes:
In some of my conservations with people, I find that I sometimes have to use your words of wisdom to get my point across. Is there a proper manner in which I should quote you, so that you can get proper credit for your wisdom?

The preferred form is either "As the most learned Frank J. once said..." or "As the exalted one spaketh...". Being me, I don't need to preface my own quotes in such a way, and usually start a statement with "Hey, goober!"


Sam from Buford, GA writes:
I have a classification question for you. Is bigfoot technically a monkey? If not, where does his allegiance lie? Also, is a 45 enough to stop bigfoot, or do I need to get a 44 magnum like Dirty Harry?

Now, I personally don't believe in bigfoot, but, if he does exist, then the most likely explanation is he is some sort of monkey conspiracy to design a uber-monkey to one day overpower man. Now, while I revere the .45, I'd say, when in any area there are bigfoot sightings, treat it like your in an area with known grizzly attacks and thus keep a .44 magnum handy. My dad bought his first .44 magnum for when fishing in Alaska, and, though he encountered neither bear nor bigfoot, it's just the smart thing to do.


Sderrick writes:
Alright, here’s a science question that I got confused over at first and my hippy boss tried to make me feel stupid about. If two particles are traveling at each other at the speed of light, what is their relative speed? The answer should be obvious but the real question is why.

Their relative speed will be the speed of light, as nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Seems like a paradox, doesn't it? That's because it is. Einstein realized this early on as a flaw to his theory of relativity, so he took the only remedy available: blackmail. Apparently, thought his research in physics, Einstein found some flaw in the universe so glaring that God would never want anyone to find out about it. So Einstein threatened God to make his speed of light paradox true or he would release his findings. God, Who is no stranger to paradoxes since He can both lift anything and make a rock He cannot lift, consented, but then cursed Einstein's hair so that no comb made by mortal man could tame it. And thus the theory of relativity was given substance.
(Source: Fundamentals of Physics by David Halliday)

* * * *

Please keep the questions coming (I would especially like more science and math questions), e-mailing me with the subject "Frank Answers" and include your name and town after the question and blog URL if you have one. Since I like the whole name and town dynamic, if you don't give me a place you're from, I'll randomly select one.

Rating: 2.9/5 (5 votes cast)

Frank Answers
Email This | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
32 Responses To "Frank Answers: To Infinity and Below, Quoting Frank, Bigfoot, and the Dark Secret Behind the Theory of Relativity"

First!

Brilliant post as usual.

#1 - Posted by: Frank J. on April 15, 2004 12:43 PM

Praising your own post in the hopes that others will see the praise & emulate it, not realizing that it came from the post's author?

d00d, j00 4r3 4 14m3r!!!!

Anyways, I would like to remind the omniscient & omnipotent, most high reverend muckity muck Frank that there is a situation in which you can evaluate infinity/infinity. Limits! L'Hopital's rule!!

*runs away from computer in horror as Buck the Marine jumps out from the screen looking for fresh blood*

#2 - Posted by: James Sloan on April 15, 2004 01:24 PM

that only works of the functions are differentiable, 0/0 is not differentiable because it is not a function...

#3 - Posted by: Jessew on April 15, 2004 02:35 PM

Frank poops his own pants!

#4 - Posted by: jonag on April 15, 2004 02:51 PM

Infinity x 0 = Infinity.

Einstiens theroy is only partly right as quarks and neutrinos are proven to travel faster than C.
Even though they are sub-atomic, they are still particles and have mass.

#5 - Posted by: joatmoaf on April 15, 2004 03:08 PM

Q: If 1/infinity = 0 and x/x = 1, then does infinity/infinity = 0 or 1?

A: I suspect that 1/infinity does not equal 0, but rather "goes to zero", which is how it was described in my math books. In the same way that infinity is not just a very large number but is defined as "larger than any number", an infinitesimal isn't zero but is smaller than any possible fraction. So the first premise is false, the second is true, and infinity/infinity = 1.

Maybe.

#6 - Posted by: Just John on April 15, 2004 03:09 PM

More formally, the limit of 1/x as x approaches infinity is equal to zero. That's not technically the same thing as saying 1/infinity equals zero. You just can't evaluate infinity/infinity.

However, since there are different sizes of infinity, I don't know what would happen if you tried to divide a small one by a large one, or vice versa...

#7 - Posted by: Ann on April 15, 2004 03:20 PM

I so love math geeks. And the Frank J who posted a comment first is right, brilliant as usual.

#8 - Posted by: sarahk on April 15, 2004 03:34 PM

Talkin' about infinity always gives me a headache. That's why I live in Tennessee. No one talks about infinity here.

I'm starting to wonder if infinity was invented by Advil.

#9 - Posted by: Pumpk!nHead on April 15, 2004 03:36 PM

And I bet Advil is made by the joooooos!

#10 - Posted by: Frank J. on April 15, 2004 03:38 PM

That ruralassed chickenshit university I went to must have been using a rent-a-prof for calculus classes. As best I remember 1/infinity only APPROACHES zero. It never gets there. It has been over 20 year though, and I may have forgotten some details.

#11 - Posted by: Sticky B on April 15, 2004 03:56 PM

As far as I`m concerned there is only 1 infinity.
It is the largest number, but as time passes it gets larger (quantum mechenics/quantum physics) and while there is only 1 infinity in the here and now (present) whose number may be bigger than the infinity of a billion years ago (past) it is still the ONLY infinity and the last digit of either cannot be found.
( I have a theory that just like pi, the last digit is 0)
If this Universe is an Entropic one (expansion/contraction) then infinity should follow the same laws.
Starting at zero point/time/number, expanding to ultimate point/time/number, and reversing to zero again. However at no point in time could infinitys last digit be calculated.

#12 - Posted by: joatmoaf on April 15, 2004 04:02 PM

joatmoaf: The last digit of pi is zero? then why write it? It makes as much sense as saying that the last digit of 0.25 is zero, since you can just as easily write 0.250.

#13 - Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 15, 2004 04:38 PM

Still, that`s my theory.

#14 - Posted by: joatmoaf on April 15, 2004 04:39 PM

I never thought I would again hear the word "uber-monkey". I really thought those years were behind me.

#15 - Posted by: LibertyBob on April 15, 2004 04:40 PM

Zero (in pi) is the last digit in which the numbers are not repetitive. Pi is not the same as .25, or any number for that matter and 0 holds as much weight as any other number.

#16 - Posted by: joatmoaf on April 15, 2004 04:43 PM

I`ve called upon my MathWizards to settle this.
Hopefully they should materialize here shortly.

#17 - Posted by: joatmoaf on April 15, 2004 05:01 PM

Just John is right.

1/I approaches 0, but is infitesmally greater than 0, therefore the first premise is incorrect, and I/I = 1.

The only real problem here is Infinity's kids in the back seat asking over and over "Are we there yet?" and "what about now?"

#18 - Posted by: krakatoa on April 15, 2004 05:10 PM

I am also with john.
i had this roomate way back when...
In an attempt to better understand infinity, he painted his entire room black, and would lay in bed staring at the ceiling with the lights off.
i remember fondly the day when we found some glow in the dark/transparent in the light paint and wrote LOSER! all over the ceiling and walls.

and as for contemplating infinity...
(not that i am saying there is none)....
but.....WHAT REASON COULD THERE POSSIBLY BE?

Adam

#19 - Posted by: adam from utah on April 15, 2004 06:32 PM

Dear Frank,

This goes back so far I read it on dead tree, years before the Internet, yet never figured it out.

It goes like this:

At a brain-trust symposium, the professor at the lectern proclaims: "You can never go anywhere, and I can prove it."

He uses the room they're sitting in as an example. "Suppose you wanted to cross to the other side of this room. First you must reach the halfway point. Halfway to that point, you must first reach the quarter-point, halfway to the quarter point the 1/8 point, then 1/16, 1/32 and so on to infinity. Ergo, you can't move at all, QED.

Incensed, another professor jumps from his chair and stomps around the room, to prove you can, indeed move from place to place.

BUT HE FAILED TO FIND THE FLAW IN THE FIRST PROFESSOR'S ARGUMENT.

Your thoughts?

Cordially,

Charles

#20 - Posted by: Charles Compton on April 15, 2004 08:04 PM

Charles,
Good question, but please e-mail it properly and I'll add it to a later Frank Answers.

#21 - Posted by: Frank J. on April 15, 2004 08:29 PM

*brain collapses*

Yeah, I'm not old enough to understand those things.

Well, I dunno about God creating a rock too heavy for him to lift up. That's a paradox, since he is omnipotent, and God is not irrational. He could limit his power and do so, but at his full strength, it isn't possible. He's rational.

Well, that's my un-learned opinion.

#22 - Posted by: Kya on April 15, 2004 08:35 PM

Hey I use Fundamentals of Physics in my physics class. What page is that on about the Einstein blackmail? I have the sixth edition, which incidentally has on the cover a volcano with lightning coming out of it, which is possibly the coolest thing on earth.

#23 - Posted by: Ryan on April 15, 2004 08:47 PM

--Frank, why didn't you assign a random place for Todd and Sderrick? Why do they get to break the rules with impunity?? What kind of Frank Answers are you running here??

--(Sorry... guess I'm still bitter about the whole not being chosen for judge thingy... and the salt on the wound- not being mentioned by the stupid limey.)

#24 - Posted by: Devil Dog on April 15, 2004 10:26 PM

Einstein stated that the speed of light is constant to anything that observes it.

#25 - Posted by: Me on April 16, 2004 09:09 AM

Being a calculus teacher at the university level, I just have to weigh in on these calculus questions.

First, those who assert that 1/infinity only approaches 0 are correct. However, an infinity/infinity indeterminate form can be made to approach any value you like. 1 is one such value, but so is 2, pi, and -7. If anyone is interested in the details, they can e-mail me privately (math@natividads.org) and I'll provide them. (Most undergraduates have never seen the proof of the infinitude of the rational numbers, so I'd have to lay that out first, and it would be longer than a comment should be.)

Finally, the flaw in the argument of the professor who couldn't get across the room (which, by the way, dates back to the ancient Greeks): he is assuming that each halfway-step takes the same amount of time as all the others, thus making his average speed something approaching 0/1 (remember speed is change in distance divided by change in time). The prof who actually got across the room has an average speed that approaches 0/0 (shrinking distance divided by shrinking time). And 0/0 is one of those indeterminate forms that can be made to approach any value you like (say, 100 mph) depending on how fast the distances and times shrink in relation to each other.

#26 - Posted by: Wacky Hermit on April 16, 2004 10:23 AM

"and so on to infinity" -- shouldn't it be "and so on to zero"?

#27 - Posted by: sarahk on April 16, 2004 10:33 AM

Wow, when I gave my answer to the inf/inf question, I was expecting to get either scoffing or nothing. Instead I get two agreements, an offer for more info from a calculus professor, and sarahk saying, "I so love math geeks." (In a sultry voice, no doubt.) I knew that calculus would get me love and respect! :D

#28 - Posted by: Just John on April 16, 2004 03:34 PM

Ha!

You think someone else is an idiot--

BUT I HAVE YOUR MECHANICAL PENCIL!!!

AND I'M GIVING IT TO A GIBBON!

HE'S GOING TO POKE YOU IN THE EYE WITH IT!

AH ha hah ha haaaaah!

Insult ME, will you? NOW who's the idiot? HEH? Say it or the gibbon pokes!

--The Math Major

#29 - Posted by: chap on April 17, 2004 10:29 AM

Here's a fun question, : If you are in a car going light speed, and you turn on your headlights, what happens?

And, by the way, there is more than one type of infinity.

#30 - Posted by: Lucky Eddie on April 17, 2004 08:40 PM

Frank, if Bigfoot is that much of a problem, you can always run the Remington +P .45ACP load or the IMI "carbine" load
in .45 ACP and get damn near .41 Magnum/10mm ballistics.

#31 - Posted by: Richard McEnroe on April 19, 2004 12:07 AM
Post a comment




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

 

Buy IMAO T-Shirts


IMAO T-Shirts

The IMAO T-Shirt Babe
(winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!!
Yay! Books!





Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24
American Idol
Aqua-Adventures
Barackalypse Now
Best of IMAO 2002
Best of IMAO 2006
Bite-Sized Wisdom
Editorials
Election 2008
Filthy Lies
Frank Answers
Frank Discussions
Frank on Guns
Frank Reads the Bible
Frank the Artist
Fred Thompson Facts
Friday Cat-Blogging
Fun Trivia
Hellbender
Hellbender Take Two
Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths
Humor
I Hate Frank
If I Were President
ignis fatuous
IMAO Condensed
IMAO Exclusives
IMAO for the Non-Deaf
IMAO Reviews
IMAO Think Tank
In My World
In My World - Fan Fiction
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
Know Thy Enemy
lolterizt
Michael Moore
Mitt Romney Ads
News Round-Up
Newsish Fakery
No, McCain't
Our Military
Permalink Contest
Precision Guided Humor Assignments
Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
Ronin Profiles
Ronin Thought of the Day
SarahK's TV stuff
Scary Evil Monkey
Simpsons Trivia
Songs & Poems
State of the Frank Report
Superego
Totally True Tidbits
WEsistance Is Facile
Why Me Laugh?
Yvonne's Ashes
By Month
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
March 1933