|
About IMAO Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy! ![]() Buy funniest book ever! ![]() IMAO Podcasts IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter
![]() Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!
About IMAO
If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK. About Frank J. Bloggers: Frank J. Harvey RightWingDuck Cadet Happy spacemonkey Laurence Simon SarahK Popular Categories
Fred Thompson FactsJohn Edwards Fabulous Facts lolterizt IMAO Condensed Know Thy Enemy Editorials Frank the Artist In My World Other Content
Ode to ViolenceBrief Histories IMAO Audio Bits ![]() Read the Essay Own the Shirt Peace Gallery Search IMAO
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds "Unfunny treasonous ronin!" -Lou Tulio* "You, sir, are a natural born killer." -E. Harrington "You'll never get my job! Never!!!" -Jonah Goldberg "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO." -No One of Consequence "A blogger with a sense of humor." -Some Woman on MSNBC Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQThe Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Blackfive Captain's Quarters Classical Values Conservative Grapevine The Corner The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!) Dave in Texas Eject! Eject! Eject! Electric Venom Hot Air Puppy Blender La Shawn Barber's Corner Michelle Malkin Pereiraville Protein Wisdom Rachel Lucas Right Wing News Scrappleface Serenity's Journal Townhall Blog IMAO Blogroll Bad Example Cadet Happy The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles mountaineer musings Right Wing Duck ![]() This Blog Is Full of Crap Fred Thompson Links Fred File Blogs for Fred Fred Thompson Facts Awards
|
August 12, 2004
Frank Answers: Impressing Women, Socks, Sea Monkeys, SarahK, and Robots vs. Monkeys
Beo writes: So, my question is this: when you consider the effects of parallax, and the difficulties involved in the relatively infinitesimal length of the base used for ASA triangulation in which errors as small as one-millionth of a degree can result in a measurement error of tens of thousands of light years, why do some scientists pretend that they actually know how far away stars are? Are they all just a pack of liars, or are they just trying to impress women or something? Since the beginning of time, everything man has ever done was to impress women. Topple empires, invent computers, shower daily - all to impress women. Why did John Kennedy vow to send men to the moon? Because one day Marilyn Monroe probably said something like, "I bet it would be neat to go to the moon." Probably one day some woman said to a scientist, "I wonder how far away those twinkly things in the sky are?" Thus the scientist ran out to do some hasty calculation (and I bet he still didn't get any). So keep that in mind when reviewing any scientific data.
1. Hillary is the Avatar of Evil, but that has nothing to do with the rest of the question. As for Socks the cat, I don't trust cats and think he was probably involved. As for what Sandy Berger was up to, he was probably just stuffing his pants to impress women. 2. Sea monkeys are just stupid little shrimp sold to gullible children. Even Aquaman can beat them by just drinking one of those little aquariums they come in (and he could understand their screams of terror… muh ha ha). As for what I'd do for a Klondike bar, I'd go to the store and buy one... but only if I was already going to the store to pick up a few other items.
That reminds me, didn't I have an announcement or something to tell you people...
But robots build more robots. Isn't that what I, Robot was about? I didn't go see that movie because it looked stupid. * * * * Frank Answers™ is now by invitation only, so stop sending me questions because I hate you. 51 Responses To "Frank Answers: Impressing Women, Socks, Sea Monkeys, SarahK, and Robots vs. Monkeys"
We don't send you questions because you hate us. We send you questions to humor you. #1 - Posted by: Nathan on August 12, 2004 12:59 PMYou're going to get shot if you don't give us that announcement. This is your final warning. :-) #2 - Posted by: Trucido on August 12, 2004 01:03 PMcongress includes the senate. the "and senate" was redundant... #3 - Posted by: J I Erde on August 12, 2004 01:09 PMI haev to say it ... Sound is just the PERCEPTION of propelled vibrations in mass. Therefore, while the objects around the tree would still VIBRATE since the tree fell, it becomes a semantic arguement about whether "sound" is a perception, or an accurate description of the vibration. If no one had a sense of hearing, we wouldn't call it sound, we'd say that "everything around the tree vibrated." That statement would be true. A sound is simply how we perceive that vibration through our senses. #4 - Posted by: craig1f on August 12, 2004 01:11 PMAll right! The big announcement is on it's way! What can it be? Is it that Soylent Green is made of people? I can't wait, the suspense is killing me...Holy cow a blue car! What was I talking about? #5 - Posted by: Exile on August 12, 2004 01:23 PMCraig1f is a smacktard. #6 - Posted by: beo on August 12, 2004 01:25 PMHere is the definition of sound. The definition actually shows that sound will remain sound, whether it can be percieved or not. #7 - Posted by: Trucido on August 12, 2004 01:28 PMI just realized something. Osama Bin Laden said he would have assasinations. What if they were talking about Frank J? It makes sense doesn't it? It would demoralize half of the country! Hide Frank Hide. #8 - Posted by: rightwingduck on August 12, 2004 01:33 PMYou had something to do with this site, didn't you Frank? http://www.moveonplease.org/ #9 - Posted by: Joe !! on August 12, 2004 01:34 PMAnnouncement? There's an announcement? #10 - Posted by: jonag on August 12, 2004 01:55 PMAnnounce already, dammit! #11 - Posted by: Rob on August 12, 2004 01:58 PMWonder if the big news is that Frank is no longer a virgin. #14 - Posted by: James Old Guy on August 12, 2004 02:28 PMIf a tree falls in the woods with no one around to hear it, how do the hippies spin it to make it Bush's fault? #15 - Posted by: gaskar on August 12, 2004 02:37 PMBy saying, "It's Bush's fault! No bark for oil!" #16 - Posted by: Trucido on August 12, 2004 02:50 PMTake quantum physics into it (or a theory anyway) and the tree doesn't fall. It's just fallen when someone walks there to find it. Otherwise, it's there. If something cannot be percieved/witnessed, it doesn't happen. RWD, I was going to make a joke about how the monkies (the old groovy-rock band) and robots taking over could affect things, but then I double checked, and the band's name is actually spelled Monkees. So no joke to be had. Now if monkeys took over, well, we'd have issues. #18 - Posted by: Turkeyhead on August 12, 2004 03:31 PMIf a tree falls in a forest and kills a mime does he make a sound? Does anyone care? #19 - Posted by: Faith+1 on August 12, 2004 03:33 PMWhoa... You posted at 3:33. That's cool. #20 - Posted by: LC Trucido on August 12, 2004 03:46 PM"Whoa... You posted at 3:33. That's cool." I strive for odd ways to express my coolness....I usually fail so I tend to resort to just being a smartass a lot... P.S. Yes, I got beat up a lot as a kid... #21 - Posted by: Faith+1 on August 12, 2004 03:50 PMWoo! The Monkees are my favorite band ever. It's defintely spelled with two 'ee's.....go Monkees! Lol. #22 - Posted by: Jen on August 12, 2004 03:58 PMsince the monkies were given new genes to work....i think the scientists have found something! we can use this gene on hippies because they don't like to do anything and like Kerry's head would, their heads would explode..thus one problem population would be wiped from existence. Of course Hillary is the Avatar of Evil. And the Devil Incarnate, and Beelzebub too. Only dummies and democrats (redundant, I know) don't know this fact. And cats think the world revolves around them, so this makes them democrats too. They only love you when you feed them. #24 - Posted by: azlibertarian on August 12, 2004 04:51 PMSneaky, Frank, very sneaky... nice dodge of the question. ^_^ #26 - Posted by: 007 on August 12, 2004 05:35 PM"So, my question is this: when you consider the effects of parallax, and the difficulties involved in the relatively infinitesimal length of the base used for ASA triangulation in which errors as small as one-millionth of a degree can result in a measurement error of tens of thousands of light years, why do some scientists pretend that they actually know how far away stars are? Are they all just a pack of liars, or are they just trying to impress women or something?" Modern Astronomy only used ground based parallax for relatively close measurements; say up to 100 parsecs (about 320 light years). The Hipparcos satellite used extremely precise parallax measurement of about a million starts to push that distance out to about 300 parsecs (about 1000 light years). For distances further then that astronomers use two separate methods to calculate distance. One is to us Cepheid variable stars as a form of standard candles to calculate distance. Cepheid’s have a well known relations ship between their brightness and the length of time it takes to go from their maximum to minimum brightness. This method is used to calculate the distance to galaxies or stars within our own galaxy. The other method is to measure the apparent red shift of a galaxy’s light along with the Hubble constant to calculate the distance and velocity of a galaxy due to the expansion of the universe. Now what I want to know is how many women are impressed? (Guys don’t count.) If you throw a cat inside a lead box with a device that could either kill it or do nothing and there is no way to figure out if it's dead or not then which is it? According to Schrodinger in this article, it is both dead and alive at the same time: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/4/7/2 So in that case, if a tree falls in the forest, it is both standing and fallen at the same time (You really gotta exercise your doublethink abilities with this one). #28 - Posted by: Justin on August 12, 2004 06:29 PMannounce! announce! what's the announcement? SarahK is dying to know! #29 - Posted by: sarahk on August 12, 2004 07:16 PMI would like to commend Frank on his master plan. Quite ingenious. #30 - Posted by: 007 on August 12, 2004 07:19 PMI've figured out what the announcement is. Like Carl Rove, I've consulted the forces of darkness (ie: magic 8 ball). Forces that I dare not name indicate that Frank is somehow "involved" with the NJ Governor scandal. Not that there's anything wrong with that, as someone once said. SarahK, now that this unpleasantness has been exposed, you will obviously need a shoulder to cry on. Feel free to come to your old buddy Exile. #31 - Posted by: Exile on August 12, 2004 07:57 PMSay it ain't so Frank!! Not with a Democrat!!! #32 - Posted by: jonag on August 12, 2004 08:57 PMexile, 1) you're married. 2) that's not the announcement. frank, you hate me? #33 - Posted by: sarahk on August 12, 2004 08:59 PM"If you throw a cat inside a lead box with a device that could either kill it or do nothing and there is no way to figure out if it's dead or not then which is it? According to Schrodinger in this article, it is both dead and alive at the same time: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/4/7/2 So in that case, if a tree falls in the forest, it is both standing and fallen at the same time (You really gotta exercise your doublethink abilities with this one)." WOW. I bet John Kerry just LOVES an example like this...being on two sides of an issue at the same time and having mathematical proof to back it up... #34 - Posted by: Faith+1 on August 12, 2004 09:10 PMJustin, Metallica Rat -- Quantum mechanics adds absolutely nothing to this debate, it simply makes such yin/yang thinking more palatable to the Western mindset. QM has an observer problem -- namely, what counts as an observer? Both Schroedinger's cat and the tree in the forest are asserting that only humans are observers. I say hooey, cats make fine observers; the cat's observation of whether or not it is alive or dead is enough observation to collapse the incoherence. The tree too can observe whether or not it's standing. That QM presents us with such situations is a testimony to how poorly we can make sense of the math that predicts the observations right now, not an evidence that we live in a universe where voting both for the Iraq War and against it is a logical way to handle reality. #35 - Posted by: Capitalist_B on August 12, 2004 09:36 PMIt's not so much rather the tree is observed to be standing or fallen, but rather that the tree's wavefunction contains having made sound and not having made sound. Observation only collapses the wavefunction to one of the two cases, but both exist. That's not to say that every situation has such dual realities. ie Michael Moore will always be worthy of being S.M.I.T.E.ed - there are no other alternatives. #36 - Posted by: Orms on August 12, 2004 10:02 PMWas there a winner chosen for the Kerry in the bunny suit caption contest. #37 - Posted by: Chris D on August 13, 2004 12:30 AMExcuse me, but when a tree falls in a forrest and no on is there to hear it it does NOT make a sound. The Universe does depend on our perceptions. In fact. The tree hasn't even fallen until someone comes along to see it lying on the ground. #38 - Posted by: RTO Trainer on August 13, 2004 12:32 AMI was just throwing a (monkey) wrench in. RTO Trainer sounds like a Terry Pratchett fan! That's a good thing, as the Very Strong Anthropic Principle needs you to believe in it to make it true. And it is true - if I wasn't here my universe would not exist, and you are my universe. So you exist solely because I observe you. Now try and get that cat back into the darn box! #40 - Posted by: Drew on August 13, 2004 12:50 AMRTO Trainer -- are you some fan of some form of an anthropic principle then? I happen to think that a universe without consciousness is every bit as real and true as one with, but I believe in God anyway so it's a moot point; once God sees the tree fall, "someone" has seen in lying on the ground whether any humans or other conscious creatures ever happen to observe anything. Orms -- does a wavefunction you can't do anything with have a meaning? QM is useful because you can find cases where the entity behaves in a state that is neither quite like a particle nor quite like a wave. When does the tree behave indeterminely between making sound and not making sound? Can the tree create an interference pattern with itself? Does it cross energy barriers via tunneling because it has a wavefunction? I'm firmly with the camp that says that multiple realities is a misinterpretation; we simply have multiple observers. From the tree's point of view, while it was going about its merry way, the earth got closer and the sound came from the earth closing in on the tree, not any of this "falling" business, so why don't you collapse the wavefunction of the earth instead -- it either made the sound of smacking into the tree or didn't after all. #41 - Posted by: Capitalist_B on August 13, 2004 01:06 AMTO: Frank J Men built civilization because of women. And women hated him for discovering their secret power over men. Regards, Chuck(le) #42 - Posted by: Chuck Pelto on August 13, 2004 06:51 AMSarahK, of course I'm married (and really very happily, so hon stop cleaning your gun and staring at me). I was just offering a shoulder to cry on. I'm a compassionate conservative, that's all. #43 - Posted by: Exile on August 13, 2004 07:24 AMTechnically, the ground falls on the tree as well. Does it make a sound? #45 - Posted by: josh on August 13, 2004 09:10 AMMy brain is full; may I be excused? #46 - Posted by: LC Trucido on August 13, 2004 10:15 AMI'm definitely opposed to the Weak Anthropic Principle in vogue with so many contemprary cosmologists. They're trying to have their cake and eat it too. Like whisky, why have it if you aren't going to have a strong one. The big trick in verifying the falling tree thought experiment is finding ane example wherein the falling of the tree was, in fact, completely unobserved. Fauna observations count and with research into the consciousness of flora, well... the tree may be able to observe its own state and subsequent states to begin with. And I do beleive in an omnipotent, omnipresent, omnicsient God, so unless he repeats his 7th day rest, that pretty well covers things. It is my own theory that this is why God created man on the 6th day--so someone could observe creation to that point and keep all the good work from disappearing. :) #47 - Posted by: RTO Trainer on August 13, 2004 01:59 PMWhy do people feel the need to argue perception to look smart?! You know what it means when someone says a "tree falling". And you know that just because you were not there doesn't make a lick of difference! How many times have you happened upon a fallen tree? Why didn't it wait for you to get there? Because it doesn't care about you! Do you think the sound it produced didn't occur? Even if you were there, the sound had to travel to get to you, so it existed before you heard it. Your ear HEARS a sound, it doesn't produce it. It's so dang arrogant of people to think that the laws fo physics and how the physical world goes about existing has any dependance on our or your perception of it. Trust me, you're not that important. Learn to accept that, and it's nothing but uphill from there. -Brian #48 - Posted by: I AM RIGHT on August 13, 2004 02:55 PMEnough about physics. I look at it at this way: the tree is a liberal, and whether or not it made a sound when it fell, we should just be glad it did. Hopefully some hippies will cry when they see it. Give it a hug or something. Now back to the IMPORTANT things...hey hey we're the Monkees....and people say we Monkee around...but we're too busy singing to put anybody down..... #49 - Posted by: Jen on August 13, 2004 03:42 PMA tree fell in my back yard a couple of months back... didn't see it, but I dang sure hear that s.o.b.! I really don't give a high flying bat patootie about did ya' or didn' ya' hear it/see it/sniff it/feel it blah, blah - makes my brain ache much like slurping down a slushie too fast, ow! Anyway,I was just frickin' happy the damn thing had the grace to fall into the 'woods' and not on my house! and Brian.. or 'i am right' fella.. I don't mean to be rude, but did the tree jump up your butt? I really don't think these folks here are all that serious about the observing tree falling/cat whatever theory. So be calm, m,kay?.. It's all good! Or it will be if FrankJ ever gets around to telling us what his frickin' announcement is already! #50 - Posted by: LokiDoki on August 14, 2004 02:48 AM http://www.justcigarette.com/index.htm http://www.justcigarette.com http://cigarette.justcigarette.com Post a comment
|
Buy IMAO T-Shirts
![]()
![]()
IMAO T-Shirts
The IMAO T-Shirt Babe (winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!! Yay! Books!
Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24American Idol Aqua-Adventures Barackalypse Now Best of IMAO 2002 Best of IMAO 2006 Bite-Sized Wisdom Editorials Election 2008 Filthy Lies Frank Answers Frank Discussions Frank on Guns Frank Reads the Bible Frank the Artist Fred Thompson Facts Friday Cat-Blogging Fun Trivia Hellbender Hellbender Take Two Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths Humor I Hate Frank If I Were President ignis fatuous IMAO Condensed IMAO Exclusives IMAO for the Non-Deaf IMAO Reviews IMAO Think Tank In My World In My World - Fan Fiction John Edwards Fabulous Facts Know Thy Enemy lolterizt Michael Moore Mitt Romney Ads News Round-Up Newsish Fakery No, McCain't Our Military Permalink Contest Precision Guided Humor Assignments Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Ronin Profiles Ronin Thought of the Day SarahK's TV stuff Scary Evil Monkey Simpsons Trivia Songs & Poems State of the Frank Report Superego Totally True Tidbits WEsistance Is Facile Why Me Laugh? Yvonne's Ashes By Month
December 2008September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 March 1933
|