About IMAO



Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy!


Buy funniest book ever!





IMAO Podcasts
IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter

Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!

About IMAO
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just, 
And this be our motto--'In God is our trust.' 
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave 
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK.

About Frank J.

Bloggers:
Frank J.
Harvey
RightWingDuck
Cadet Happy
spacemonkey
Laurence Simon
SarahK

Popular Categories
Fred Thompson Facts
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
lolterizt
IMAO Condensed
Know Thy Enemy
Editorials
Frank the Artist
In My World
Other Content
Ode to Violence
Brief Histories
IMAO Audio Bits


Read the Essay
Own the Shirt
Peace Gallery
Search IMAO
Google
Web www.imao.us
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds

"Unfunny treasonous ronin!"
-Lou Tulio*

"You, sir, are a natural born killer."
-E. Harrington

"You'll never get my job! Never!!!"
-Jonah Goldberg

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO."
-No One of Consequence

"A blogger with a sense of humor."
-Some Woman on MSNBC
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Blackfive
Captain's Quarters
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
The Corner
The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!)
Dave in Texas
Eject! Eject! Eject!
Electric Venom
Hot Air
Puppy Blender
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Michelle Malkin
Pereiraville
Protein Wisdom
Rachel Lucas
Right Wing News
Scrappleface
Serenity's Journal
Townhall Blog

IMAO Blogroll
Bad Example
Cadet Happy
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
mountaineer musings
Right Wing Duck
SarahK & Cadet Happy snark TV
This Blog Is Full of Crap

Fred Thompson Links
Fred File
Blogs for Fred
Fred Thompson Facts
Awards



 

February 17, 2005
Frank Reads the Bible: Genesis 14-17
Posted by Frank J. at 03:04 PM | View blog reactions | Comments (40)

I hadn't posted on this in a while because what I read was boring, but it ends up I stopped right before the mother lode that is Chapter 17. I could write a ton on that chapter alone.

Anyway, let's go quick through 14 to 16. Lot gets captured, and Abram comes to save his ass (he's the first action hero). Then God keeps going on and on about how many descendants Abram will have (who is probably like thinking to himself, "Okay, I'll have as many descendants has dust on the earth and stars in the sky... I get it. Could You stop bugging me!"). Then Sarai, who I remind you is barren, lets Abram get it on with her maid Hagar (does not sound like the name of a beautiful woman), and, surprisingly, this causes animosity. But then Hagar gives birth the Ishmael when Abram is 86, making him the second oldest new father after Larry King (who I think is the son of Japheth).

Now, at this point, I'm like, "Okay. This is all fair and good, but why do we care about Abram and this Sarai?" I'm not well versed in the Bible, but I thought the big people in the Bible after Noah were Abraham and Sarah. Then I read Chapter 17...

Abram and Sarai are Abraham and Sarah!

Am I only one who didn't know that?

Anyhoo, God goes renaming crazy, and grants Abram a ham to make him Abraham (or I guess it's more of a "ha" that goes between his 'a' and 'm'). He then downgrades Sarai's 'i' one letter to an 'h' to make her Sarah. Abram and Sarai just seemed to accept this, 'cause, if the almighty Lord says your name is now "Polly Prissy Pants," then you better go introducing yourself as "Triple-P" if you don't want a smiting.

Now comes the weird thing. God order circumcision has a symbol of his covenant. Why that? My guess is that God decide the human wang was just too weird looking, but it was too late for Him to change it. Thus, he had people fix it themselves. Whatever the reason, this shows how harsh the Old Testament is compared to the New Testament. Jesus just wanted you to splash some water on yourself, but God wanted you to put a knife to your wee-wee. I just hope Abraham didn't have much feeling down there when he did the deed at age 99.

Now here are a few points I'd like discussed by everyone who takes this seriously (sorry, no atheist allowed for this part):

First, look at God's statement to Abram (Gen. 15:5):

Then He brought him outside and said, "Look now toward heaven, and count the stars if you are able to number them." And He said to him, "So shall your descendants be."

If you take that literally, then the apocalypse can't be for a long long time if Abram is going to have that many descendants.

Second, and of the most curiosity to me, why Abram/Abraham? What makes him so special that God picked him to be the great father of all? Or did he try it with others who just got too tired of God droning on about how many descendants they would have?

Anyway, I know Abraham is big in the Muslim religion too, so I'm going to keep a close eye on him as I read further and make sure he doesn't blow anyone up. Later, thumpers.

Rating: 2.6/5 (4 votes cast)

Frank Reads the Bible
Email This | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
40 Responses To "Frank Reads the Bible: Genesis 14-17"

Yeay Bryan look i'm first! Finally.

#1 - Posted by: SolarWind on February 17, 2005 03:06 PM

Told ya there were pictures. I can find you lots of pictures of that particular bio-mod.

"Father Abraham had many hams....many hams had father Abraham..."

Kinda explains that no pork rule. That would be like caniballism.

#2 - Posted by: greg zywicki on February 17, 2005 03:17 PM

"as many as the stars" is just another way of saying innumerable, not a literal count, as im sure is apparant

besides, in ancient time before cities and artificial lighting, obviously the night sky had a lot more stars visible, making the statement more dramatic

#3 - Posted by: johnny on February 17, 2005 03:22 PM

johnny,
Yeah, in NY that would mean like having four descendants.

#4 - Posted by: Frank J. on February 17, 2005 03:24 PM

of course, it abra(ha)m did stay up all night and got an exact count of the visible stars, and God decided to be a smarty and make it literal, maybe we are all screwed

#5 - Posted by: johnny on February 17, 2005 03:24 PM

Then He brought him outside and said, "Look now toward heaven, and count the stars if you are able to number them." And He said to him, "So shall your descendants be."
If you take that literally, then the apocalypse can't be for a long long time if Abram is going to have that many descendants.

I think it is simply supposed to convey "innumerable." Although what is the number of stars visible to the naked eye? That might be an interesting little side-fact.

Second, and of the most curiosity to me, why Abram/Abraham? What makes him so special that God picked him to be the great father of all?

Nothing at all. I think that's one of the central themes of how God operates - He picks out people seemingly at random, who have nothing really going for them, and He raises up these people from humble circumstances, presumably to better demonstrate His own glory? probably something interesting to look into.

#6 - Posted by: Andy on February 17, 2005 03:36 PM

Oops, sorry about the bold. Got a little tag-happy there :)

#7 - Posted by: Andy on February 17, 2005 03:37 PM

AHA! So That's how Bill Gates did it. God was taking a stroll and picked out the nerdiest he could find to confound future ages. Thousands of years from now Frank J the 537th will be doing his bible blogging about the book of Gates. That's the secret to God's plan. Go with the underdog and if it works out it makes it even more awesome.
Action heros of the Bible does not have an Abraham (he does have a video though in the Hero's of the Bible series https://www.booksofthebible.com/p5281.html)

#8 - Posted by: ptownmatt on February 17, 2005 04:05 PM

According to the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory star catalog, there are 39 'bright' stars between visual magnitudes from -2 to +2. There are 413 'less bright' stars between magnitudes of +2.01 and +4.00. There are 4291 'faint stars' between magnitudes of +4.01 and +6.00.
--http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q2110.html

If Abram's offspring doubled every 100 years it would take only 1200 years to reach the promised number. Good thing God knew more astronomy than the Hebrews.

#9 - Posted by: Noumenon on February 17, 2005 04:06 PM

If God has a specific number in mind then there are precisely as many stars in the sky as there are grains of sand at the beach...

I agree with those who said the point is Abraham's going to have more descendants than we can count.

#10 - Posted by: John Allan on February 17, 2005 04:12 PM

If you take that literally, then the apocalypse can't be for a long long time if Abram is going to have that many descendants.

Actually, there are about 6-7,000 stars visible to the naked eye, so the Apocalyps should have happend already =)

#11 - Posted by: Greg Sullivan on February 17, 2005 04:37 PM

Yeah, I remember A-bra -(ha)m! He's a fraternity brother of mine. He was the king of porkers, dude! Had that tent out back of the frat house and ran sororities through there like a swine-herder (you'll get to them later in The Bible, Frank). Abraham was his frat-name: females lined his tent with their pinned-up bras, or, if not wearing a bra, their "ham-holders"; Bra or Ham, Baby? Anyway, I digress. "A", as he is known to friends, went on to fame and fortune. I don't know about the Star-Offspring math, but as far as "A"'s seeds filling the night sky goes, well....?

#12 - Posted by: twolaneflash on February 17, 2005 04:37 PM

John Allan, which beach? Pismo? Venice? Acapulco?

#13 - Posted by: aelfheld on February 17, 2005 04:43 PM

>Abram and Sarai are FrankJ and SarahK!

Now everything makes sense!

#14 - Posted by: Francesco Poli on February 17, 2005 05:25 PM

Now they better get to the begatting.

#15 - Posted by: Andy on February 17, 2005 06:04 PM

Frank -- Abraham's important to Muslims because his bastard kid Ishmael (you know, from his concubine, Hagar) actually has something to do with like, Mohammed, and launching the whole Muslim religion. Or so I was told. You might want to look that up.

#16 - Posted by: Redman on February 17, 2005 07:16 PM

About that name change...

Abraham [Heb.,=father of many nations] or Abram [Heb.,=exalted father]

The name change went along with the promise "father of a multitude"

http://opera.infoplease.com/ce6/people/A0802195.html

#17 - Posted by: David on February 17, 2005 07:43 PM

Yep, just a literal name that reflected the change because of the covenant.. "father of many".

You got to wonder though, what Abraham's response to God was about the circumcision.

Abraham: "tell me again why I need to do this"?

the LORD: "So people will know you belong to me".

Abraham: "couldn't I just wear a lapel pin"?

#18 - Posted by: Dave in Texas on February 17, 2005 08:37 PM

Redman, i believe you are correct. That Hagar story has bothered me from day one - shes a slave so in theory she might have wanted NO PART in the conception process, then she gets kicked to the curb when its done anyway! Has anyone else felt anger at this part of the story, or is it just me?

#19 - Posted by: heidi on February 17, 2005 08:37 PM

The name change explanation that I heard (from my father who is a minister) is that the "ah" at the end of the name was from the beginning of Yahweh (or Jehovah) and so their names were being identified with God.

We say "What is your Christian name?" meaning what name were you given at baptism. This was kinda like that.

That's what I was told anyway.

#20 - Posted by: Undercover Hippie on February 17, 2005 09:01 PM

Heidi, didn't she and her son mock Sarah or Sarah's child later? Its seems she did something before getting kicked out, it wasn't just "oh, I don't need you now, see ya".

#21 - Posted by: random m on February 17, 2005 09:02 PM

Oh, and the Ishmael thing...

Yeah, that is all correct. The Muslims believe that the promised one was Ishmael, and not Isaac. They also believe that it was Ishmael that was almost sacrificed by Abraham, and not Isaac. And, yes, the Arabs are descendants of the Ishmaelites.

Also of note, when you get toward the end of Genesis, is that Isaac's son, Jacob, has a brother who becomes the father of the Edomites, who many believe are today the Palestinians. (This is debated ... but a pretty popular view.)

#22 - Posted by: Undercover Hippie on February 17, 2005 09:05 PM

Okay, you keep me going here...

Yes, Hagar and Ishmael were mocking Sarah. Sarah threw her out because Abraham said she should do what seemed right to her. The interesting part of the story is that God kept His promise to bless Abraham's descendents regardless of who they were.

While, as a Christian, I don't believe that God promised to bless the world through the line if Ishmael (i.e. - bring the Messiah) that He DID promise Hagar that He would not forget them. In God's view, they are still descendents of Abraham. (Keep reading, you'll get to the promise to Hagar.)

#23 - Posted by: Undercover Hippie on February 17, 2005 09:10 PM

"The name change explanation that I heard (from my father who is a minister) is that the "ah" at the end of the name was from the beginning of Yahweh (or Jehovah) and so their names were being identified with God."

"Yah" would be the ending you are thinking. "Ah" is the feminine singular ending for the feminine case in Hebrew. The confusion is the migration of the OT names from Hebrew to Latin to German to English. Thus, names like Jeremiah have been which have the ending "Yah" in Hebrew have been changed to "ah" through the transliteration of so many languages.

#24 - Posted by: husbandofheidi on February 17, 2005 09:26 PM

Same thing with "Jehovah," its the German equivalent of "Yahweh."

I think those translation issues are kinda intriguing. Like how "Jesus Christ" and "Yeshua Messiah" are the Greek & Hebrew equivalents of each other. (I may have spelled those completely wrong, tho.)

#25 - Posted by: Andy on February 17, 2005 11:21 PM

God chose Abraham because he had a gene that needed to be passed around. That's why they made him a breeder, right?

#26 - Posted by: Effeminem on February 17, 2005 11:44 PM

Abraham's not done begatting, btw. After Sarah dies (did I ruin that part of the story?) he remarries and has six more sons, whose descendants all become various tribes (Amalekites and, um, others).

As for why God chose Abraham....because He wanted to. There's a verse in Romans about how Abraham would train his children to know God, so God chose him and gave him kids. But there's another verse in Romans -- "Jacob have I love and Esau have I hated" -- from one of the Prophets, when God basically said He does what He does for His own reasons.

#27 - Posted by: Deon on February 17, 2005 11:44 PM

The name "Sarai" was the name of one of the moon gods of Ur. The name "Sarah" means "Princess". Isn't that sweet?

#28 - Posted by: jonag on February 18, 2005 12:34 AM

Ditto to name change because God was revealing his plans for Abraham (and the world) little by little. Because Abraham believed God (Gen 15:6), therefore God accepted Abraham at another level, and changed his name to reflect his plan. Multitude of grains of sand = children according to the flesh (Israelites) and multitude of stars = children according to the spirit (believers in the Savior, see Romans 4, whoever believes in Him is a child of Abraham by faith). God is a people God, and always works his plan through people. Now you can become a child of Abraham by believeing in the Messiah, or in the Lord Jesus Christ. Romans 10:8-10.

#29 - Posted by: David Christian on February 18, 2005 03:30 AM

Frank calls me Princess.

#30 - Posted by: sarahk on February 18, 2005 07:02 AM

SarahK is it because he wants you to dress up like princess leia and but muffins on your ears and tell him hows "he's your only hope"?

LOL keep up the bible reading it brings back fun memories from an otherwise painful childhood. I thought i was the only one it didn't make sense too

#31 - Posted by: Tim on February 18, 2005 08:56 AM

aelfheld,

You're reinforcing my statement. Who knows which beach, what's it matter? We can't count every last grain of sand.

The point is Abraham is going to have more descendants than can be counted.

#32 - Posted by: John Allan on February 18, 2005 09:56 AM

"(I may have spelled those completely wrong, tho.)"

Posted by Andy

Well, yeah. The hebrew version should look squiggly and have no vowels, and the greek version should look like a really hard calculus problem.

#33 - Posted by: greg zywicki on February 18, 2005 10:02 AM

Frank:
You mentioned why God chose Abraham. One question even deeper, is why did God choose anyone in the first place?

If you remember back in early Gen, right after the fall, when God curses the serpent, He tells Adam & Eve that "the seed of the woman shall crush the head of the seed of the serpent." Well, Cain, Abel, Seth, and further descendents didn't accomplish that. The reason God keeps establishing these covanents with people is to show that His promise will still be fulfilled that Satan will be crushed. The line from Jesus to Adam is traced through all of the individuals God makes his covanent with (Abram was a decendent of Shem [Noah's son], the last folks God made a specifc covanent with). And the promise wasn't even partially fulfilled until Jesus's first Advent, and it's not necessarily totally complete yet (depending on how you look at it). All the people familiar with the Torah way back when, knew to be expecting the fullfillment of this promise, and it's not as evident to us when we read it.

Sorry, there wasn't anything humorous about this post. But you did say it was a real question, so there's a real answer. Peace.

#34 - Posted by: J Mac on February 18, 2005 01:15 PM

Well, first of all, Abraham is the "father" of the arabs, too. The original muslims are descendents of - guess who - Ishmael. The bastard children of Abraham.

Second, and more importantly - wait until you get to chapter 22 to see why God chose Abraham. All those repetitious references to Abraham having descendants through Isaac by way of Sarah were for a very good reason.

So God has repeatedly promised Abraham a great nation will be born through Isaac. Now God asks Abraham to sacrifice Isaac on Mount Moriah. So there's the test - does Abraham believe God's promises? Will Abraham believe that God can keep his promise even if Isaac is killed?

When Isaac asks his father "where is the lamb for the sacrifice," Abraham makes the amazing statement, "God himself will provide the sacrifice." To give away the end, he does believe God and is just about to do the deed when God stops him and commends him for his obedience and faith. God then provides a ram as a substitute sacrifice (with its horns caught in a thicket of thorns - anyone seeing the picture here? Christ's crown of thorns; Christ as the substitue sacrifice for our sins so that we may live...)

By the way, Mount Moriah, which was out in the wilderness then, was later the site of Jerusalem. The mountain on which Abraham was to sacrifice Isaac is the same place where God would sacrifice Jesus ("God himself will provide the sacrifice") thousands of years later.

The test was essentially, "Abraham, are you willing to sacrifice your son in obedience to me, knowing that I have the power to raise him from the dead?" The answer was of course yes. "In that case, I shall provide my son as the sacrifice, so that your sons may live." Wow.

#35 - Posted by: Beo on February 18, 2005 02:45 PM

WOW is right,...

Beo,... you rock. Thanks for posting.

#36 - Posted by: Roger on February 18, 2005 03:45 PM

In Gen 15:5, God answers Abram's doubts about progeny by taking him outside and telling him "count the stars-if indeed you can count them. . . . So shall your offspring be", and Abram believes Him. The discussion continues and in verse 12 the sun sets. God had asked Abram to count the stars in the middle of the day. The point is not how many decendants Abram will have, but that he understand that he can trust that they will be there even when he can't see them.

I find interesting the suggestion that 3000 years BP people understood that the stars were obscured by the Sun, rather than that the day sky and the night sky were parts of a big bowl passing over head.

#37 - Posted by: Seán Fitzpatrick on February 18, 2005 03:53 PM

Man, you think this is boring, wait till you get to Leviticus and Numbers!

Hang in there, though - the part where Lot screws his daughters is coming up...

#38 - Posted by: nolo contendre on February 18, 2005 07:30 PM

undercoverhippie wrote:(Keep reading, you'll get to the promise to Hagar.)

God's conversation with Hagar, Jacob's reconsiliation with Esau, and Joseph's reconsiliation with his brothers are a few of the most moving accounts in the Bible.

#39 - Posted by: cerebron on February 19, 2005 03:26 AM

Frank, it seems to me that concerning circumcision you're not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer. Not that you pretend to be.

Keep reading.

#40 - Posted by: McWert Deglieb on February 23, 2005 07:23 AM
Post a comment




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

 

Buy IMAO T-Shirts


IMAO T-Shirts

The IMAO T-Shirt Babe
(winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!!
Yay! Books!





Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24
American Idol
Aqua-Adventures
Barackalypse Now
Best of IMAO 2002
Best of IMAO 2006
Bite-Sized Wisdom
Editorials
Election 2008
Filthy Lies
Frank Answers
Frank Discussions
Frank on Guns
Frank Reads the Bible
Frank the Artist
Fred Thompson Facts
Friday Cat-Blogging
Fun Trivia
Hellbender
Hellbender Take Two
Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths
Humor
I Hate Frank
If I Were President
ignis fatuous
IMAO Condensed
IMAO Exclusives
IMAO for the Non-Deaf
IMAO Reviews
IMAO Think Tank
In My World
In My World - Fan Fiction
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
Know Thy Enemy
lolterizt
Michael Moore
Mitt Romney Ads
News Round-Up
Newsish Fakery
No, McCain't
Our Military
Permalink Contest
Precision Guided Humor Assignments
Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
Ronin Profiles
Ronin Thought of the Day
SarahK's TV stuff
Scary Evil Monkey
Simpsons Trivia
Songs & Poems
State of the Frank Report
Superego
Totally True Tidbits
WEsistance Is Facile
Why Me Laugh?
Yvonne's Ashes
By Month
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
March 1933