Please tell me Dick Cheney is best man.

I think Helen Thomas is a real hottie.

I was wondering who played that itty-bitty troll critter in that Stephen King movie "Cats Eye"

Boy that's an ugly woman.

You're giving Denny nightmares. Yikes!!

Finally. Flying saucers. I know that website. I know them all.

That's not a bad site. But even there, at least some of those allegedly "best" photos have been proven to be fakes.

If you were to waste your time making a detailed study of UFOs in general, I think you would come to two conclusions:

(a) PROBABLY some UFOS are extraterrestrial; and

(b) PROBABLY there is (are) some compartment(s) within the U.S. government that know(s) everything human beings can discover on the subject - however much or little that may be. And undoubtedly for very good reasons, the feds aren't talking.

If you were to waste your time making a detailed study of Roswell in particular, I think you would conclude that it was nothing more than a balloon. A secret government balloon, but still a balloon.

Anyway, so as to the general UFO question, why do I say 'waste'? After all, earth being visited from another planet - very likely from one or more other solar systems - is a very big deal.

Firstly, because unless you have some access unavailable to the general public (and I myself certainly don't), (a) and (b) are ALL you are going to find out - and they aren't much. You're not going find out anything you really want to know - where they come from, what they're like, why they are here, and how they do it.

Secondly, because the vast majority of stuff out there about UFOs is horrible, and the vast majority of those addressing the subject aren't worth listening to. And for heaven's sake, don't ever go to a UFO convention.

Hermann Oberth thought UFOs are real, and Peter Sturrock and Michio Kaku think so too.

Since UFOs probably are real, and their reality HAS to be enormously important to humanity, then why don't serious commentators, of national stature, seriously address this issue? I don't know. But then I also can't figure out - and I'm not speaking rhetorically here, I really don't know - why individuals like the Clintons and Ted Kennedy are honored and respected, when the evidence clearly establishes that they are bad people, and should be shunned by decent society.

So for someone like myself, the only thing to do is, very occasionally, check the few reputable sources, to see if something worthwhile has surfaced. In the past few years the more interesting things have been from old, retired military and government guys who aren't receiving remuneration for their revelations, are at a point where they don't feel bound by their secrecy oaths, and don't care about the consequences.

So why don't investigative reporters pursue leads from these old guys? Again, I dunno.

I'll bet she truly earned her white wedding dress.

Damn you! You found out my dirty little secret! Arrrgggghhhhh! Now the whole world knows.