"How do you force-feed idiots like that a clue?"

Nine millimeter lead supposotory?

I think our support for Malkin is visibly slipping down the page.

monkey,
Well, she didn't pay for support... unlike the advertisers.

"...so let's all be ready to support Michelle Malkin's decision to be a woman and a minority."

Interesting choice of words. So Michelle could make a decision to not be a woman... kinda like gays can decide not to be gay?

Kevin,
Let's not get into that whole "you're born that way or it's a choice" debate about women and minorities. The point is liberals, as observed, hate women and minorites and conservatives tolerate them and refrain from hateful slurs.

So now she has a RIGHT TO BE A WOMAN AND A MINORITY?

Hmmm... rights can be (unjustly) denied. If Michelle is denied the right to be a woman and a minority... what would she then be?

It's a good thing Michelle wasn't wearing a cross or a star of david; leftards REALLY get wacky about other peoples religious stances. Anyone read up on Sally Jacobsen & her flock of feminist f**kheads? She's another prime example of "liberal thinking" in the higher education institutions.

Kevin-

An un-born baby perhaps? They get denied any rights.

It's a good thing Michelle wasn't wearing a cross or a star of david; leftards REALLY get wacky about other peoples religious stances.

What? No star and crescent moon? Oh... that's right, that would be representative of "other peoples religious stances" which Michelle very much gets wacky about.

Do you folks really think any of this thru before you post it?

Since the support is slipping down the page, maybe RWD should become a woman, since he is already a minority, that would really show some support!

PS - I have no desire to see the outcome should he decide to show his support that way!! EEK!

Kevin - You're kinda slow, ain'tcha?

Kevin,

I think everything through (traditional spelling, looks smarter), but you would not believe it because my conclusions might often be opposite yours. You assume that since I conclude that you're just another chronically constipated troll out picking fights I'm not really thinking things through. Your snotty little comment fits illustrates your belief that anyone, especially high profile folks like Ms. Malkin, whose opinions are different must be stupid.

D'oh! Now I look stupid because I forgot to remove "fits" when I was editing.

I am so smrt!

I think everything through (traditional spelling, looks smarter), but you would not believe it because my conclusions might often be opposite yours. You assume that since I conclude that you're just another chronically constipated troll out picking fights I'm not really thinking things through. Your snotty little comment fits illustrates your belief that anyone, especially high profile folks like Ms. Malkin, whose opinions are different must be stupid.

So in other words, you can't actually defend this post or debate what Kevin is saying..and you're reduced to what you wrote above.

Oh I assure you, PaleoMedic, I don't believe for a second that Ms. Malkin is stupid. She clearly is quite intelligent. That doesn't mean she's correct about half of what she rants about, though. And it certainly doesn't mean that she's honest. Heck, a good con has to be intelligent.

Chronically constipated troll? Did you stay up late thinking that one up?

Now that we have the niceties out of the way... would you care to respond to any of my actual points?

You had a point? I thought you were just trying to impress carla, since she appears to be on the same page as you. Maybe you both should take your obvious enlightened thinking somewhere else.
No, I didn't list religious icons for islam, hinduism, buddhism, or any other religions, but didn't think I was getting graded, either.

BTW, you'd never make a good con.

BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN!

Wow... let's calm down there....

and Kevin, I'm pretty sure that FrankJ. was joking about the decision part. So why on earth would you think he was being serious; it is Frank, that's what he does.

"Now that we have the niceties out of the way... would you care to respond to any of my actual points?"

The only thing you have made a point of is your propencity for "whining". Trying to relate the obvious facetiousness of "Michelle Malkin's decision to be a woman and a minority" to the question of the decision to be gay or not. Come on!!??

My guess is your sexually frustrated lefty, who is feeling inadequate by being outwitted by the likes of Michelle Malkin.

We do agree on one thing. She is not correct on about half of the stuff she rants about. I would say she she is 100% correct!

Kevin?
Carla?

Is that you, Hitzik?

sew phunny two sea liberals git they're panties inn a twist win thay git penned down!

uh, for kevin's benefit, i MEANT to use the wrong words above...just to be clear.

and it is clear that he has a point, but if he wears a hat, no one will see it.

Kevin and Carla,

You are aking us about a point? All right...in simple terms, the first thing you overaged or wannabe hippies always seem to bring up is the race card. We are just stating the fact that we don't care, period. But then again, I've noticed you lefties don't have much of a sense of humor. The fact is that for people who always claim to be the ones with feeeeelings and understaaaaanding, it seems as though the minuit you open your filthy sewers, it's apparent YOU are the ones that belong underneith a white, pointed hood (history lesson...the KKK was a creation of the Southern DEMOCRATIC party). The truth is that you can't stand it the minuit any non-white heterosexual male begins to think for themself. Next time you decide to troll, why not make a point yourself?

Kevin (and Carla),

I agree with Alan, didn't really see your point, except that you have no sense of humor. You do realize that this is a humor site above all else, and your weird tangents help make a point, that some people are unable to laugh at anything. And no, it didn't take me all night to come up with "chronically constipated troll." You, see, it's that pesky "tongue in cheek" thing that helps me deal with the myriad stupid things that occur daily in this country. I have no clue who you are, your body rhythms may be funtioning optimally. I was just guessing based on the scores of uptight people like you I run into every day.

You are a troll, however.

I think MS was right... they might be one in the same. I like the fact that Hiltzik did all that milti-name blogging. It just might shed some light on a certain mental disorder suffered by many leftards.

I posted the banner/link on my blog last night, and I'm not that Hilzik fellow...

...or am I...?

Nope. I'm not.

Anyhoo. Looks like this thread has attracted a couple of trolls who, like most on the left, can't detect irony, sarcasm, or satire.

I have a simple question they and the man who keeps trying to post the link to the map to Malkin's house might be able to wrap their little brains around:

How does using racist & sexist language and implying threats against the children of people you don't agree with politically make someone a 'progressive liberal?'

Of course, the other leftards would need to have a pesonality BEFORE they could suffer from MPD.

...and it certainly doesn't help the whole "enlightened and tolerant" image to portray conservatives (i.e. most of America) as some sort of sub-human, incapable of good humor, honesty or being "correct" (whatever that means).
Seriously, do these people go through their entire days without having any contact with conservatives? I have friends that are liberals. They're PEOPLE. I don't feel the need to associate only with human beings that I have given an arbitrary label.

Interesting choice of words. So Michelle could make a decision to not be a woman... kinda like gays can decide not to be gay?

I can only imagine the blank stare Kevvy had on his face as he wrote this. I mean, how do you explain something to somebody who JUST DOESN'T GET IT!!!!! It's like a little kid asking you "why is water wet?" Except Kevin is an adult(?), and he really needs to start doing hand exercises so he can get some kind of grasp on the obvious.

I'm betting he's already doing some sort of hand exercise involving a jar of extra crunchy Jiff & a pic of Cindy banSheehan.

Oh jeez...

Garret, I was just being pedantic... giving Frank a bad time about his choice of words. All in good fun. Which PaleoMedic returned in kind by poking fun at how I'd shortened a word.

Lighten up, guys!

Undecided, sexually frustrated? LOL... no, I'm having the best sex of my life by far. Turning 42 this Sunday. Thanks for caring, though.

Wolfman Dan, I'm not a lefty nor am I a Democrat. In fact the only organized political party I've ever belonged to was the GOP when I was younger. Iran/Contra cured me of that, though. Since then I've been quite happy as a centrist Independent.

BTW, I voted for Dole in 1996. Where the hell were all you conservatives that voted for Bush just four years later? Lovin' that Clinton economy too much to give it up until he was term-limited out, huh?

PaleoMedic, how do you figure I'm a troll? Frank linked to my blog in the post above. That's the only reason I came by... to see what he'd written. And to rib him about his grammar, of course. ;-)

Vox Poplar, I've never claimed to be either a progressive or a liberal. You'll have to take that up with someone who does. All I've done is to be a bit pedantic and to point out that Michelle fails the "wacky" test by AlanABQ. Her... let's be overly generous and called it "antipathy" towards Muslims is well known.

bgrx, I used to be a conservative. The current term for what I was is PaleoConservative, as most of what passes for "conservative" these days is a bastardized mixture of fascism and NeoConservatism which finds its roots in the Democratic party of the 60's. Most of y'all wouldn't know a real conservative if (s)he smacked you upside the head.

All right... I think that covers most of the questions and comments since I last stopped by.

Now... read thru the thread and notice who is calling others childish names and who isn't. Or is that supreme irony lost on y'all too? Not once did I call any of you a derogatory name. Not once. Yet comment after comment directs derogatory names at me. And this is supposed to all have stemmed from a post claiming that it's the liberals who hate?

Y'all seriously need to look in a mirror. You have become that which you hate the most. One more minor reason why I'm no longer a conservative or a Republican.

Kevin,

My bad. You're a good sport.

I voted for Dole in '96 also. And being 40 myself, I'm surprised how drastically my political views have changed, and now my conservatism is mostly fiscal (ie, massive tax reform, right now!). Otherwise I'm much more libertarian than I ever thought possible.

Aloha

I am not in the least surprised by the ability of Kevin and his ilk to choose to see what they want to see. Nothing that Michelle did in response to the irresponsible actions of the SAW kids was wrong, nor was it out-of-line.

Kevin seems to have forgotten the bedrock principle of our Representative Federalist Democracy. That we are responsible for our own actions and the ensuing consequences. Be they ill or well.

Though he makes no claims of being a Liberal, he decides to argue the same tired screed that is spouted by that end of the political spectrum. He is also showing his true colors by siding against personal responsibility, across the board that is, which is what the Left has been at for some time now. We are the ultimate arbiters of our own actions, therefore, any consequence derived therefrom is the sole responsibility of the individual.

I support Michelle. Because she is right. I do not support the threats and racial slurs and sexist slurs directed at her by the folks Kevin feels most at home with. She published public information. She denounced death threats and other attacks as that was not her intent when posting the names.

The SAW members need to realize that it's eat the cake or keep the cake. No middle ground.

And Kevin, just because you cannot understand the words, or agree with the statements made here, that does not mean that they are not intelligent, cogent, and honest discourse. Respect diversity is your ilk's motto. So, start respecting it, you librofascist pig.

Kevin-

I guess I'm not seeing your point after all. As near as I can tell, you've made stance to be middle-of-the-road. I'm not saying that to talk trash to you; I'm just not sure what you're getting at.
In my opinion, Malkin's attitude is neither "antipathy", nor against all Muslims. I see several posts about the atrocities carried out by Islamofacists and sharia law governments, but I haven't seen her displaying fear & hatred to all Islam.

Sorry Kevin. It seemed to me you were taking it seriously.

Well said AlanABQ IRT Ms Malkin's stance on Islam. Many good points here, but you gotta admit, Kevin makes a point about the invective. When we resort to name calling, these comments can be linked to on other sites to prove how intolerant and hate-filled we ALL are.
If anyone linked here from a left-leaning web site, please at least check out the comments sent to Michelle. I think any person of character, right or left, would be appalled.

Well Said DesertElephant!!

That's very true, Brian. Invective speech tends to obscure the point. However, I wasn't looking for chances to make cheap shots, and as as I wasn't quite clear about Kevin's position, it was easy to objectify.

Agree or not, you WERE a good sport about it, Kevin.

PaleoMedic, I can relate to the libertarian streak. In fact that's one of the things that most disapoints me about the current GOP. The conservative movement has always had a very strong libertarian undercurrent running thru it. Yet I look at the warrantless phone tapping, Gitmo Bay, some of the provisions of the Patriot Act and the "members only" Bush/Cheney '04 campaign events and I don't recognize this as the same GOP that I once loved. Which pisses me off, to be blunt. And my blog writing reflects that. But, it would be a mistake to assume that I therefore prefer Democrats. I don't.

Anyway, this is neither the time nor the place to go on a rant. You've been genial and I respect that. We can agree to disagree without being disagreeable about it.

Cheers

btw, click on my name to see my other blog. All Indie all the time. We're as hard on Dems as we are on GOPers over there.

AlanABQ, we'll have to agree to disagree about Ms. Malkin's views of Muslims. To my mind there's no question but that she's clearly very prejudiced against Muslims.

DesertElephant said: you librofascist pig

Oh yeah... keep that up and you are sure to lose the House and the Senate to the Dems this fall.

The simple fact of the matter is that neither the Dems nor you GOPers have the sheer numbers to win diddly on the national stage with your own members. Moderates and Independents have decided the vast majority of national races for decades. And we'll decide this one too.

But hey... go ahead and keep up the snark. I'm sure it plays well with the choir. And maybe that'll console you after the general election is over.

prejudice
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics

Kevin, under which one of these definitions is Michelle "prejudiced" regarding Muslims?

I would say that the words and deeds of Muslims worldwide have provided sufficient "grounds" to "rationally" consider them a threat to women, homosexuals, and non-Muslims. But then, I suppose I am "prejudiced" as well since, like Michelle, I have actually paid attention to what Muslims say and do, and what their "holy" book instructs them to do, rather than swallow their lies (takiyya) that "Islam" means "peace".

I guess some people are just more inclined to wear the special markings, pay the jizya, and bow and scrape before their Muslim masters like a good, little dhimmi.

Iran-Contra? Guantanimo Bay? Ahhh. I see. I'm sorry your medication is overdue.
It might surprise you to know that all of us here aren't Bush yes-men. There are several points on which I strongly dissagree. Points in case: his willingness to do noting on ilegle immigration (if you regular this site, I don't mean just Mexicans, and I've also helped several people become citizens the correct way) and letting the ACLU run the war policy, and exactly why he was willing to allow the UAW to run our ports. I am an independant conservitive. And yes, I do tend to be a bit on the angry side. Why? I spent several year in the Air Force under projects which I am still not allowed to speak. I got out just in time as socialism light (Clinton) came into office, and I've been watching the nation I served being sold up the river ever since. You see, those men in uniform are actually here to protect your rights. Pardon me for my rage when a bunch of students who have been brainwashed by Stallenst professors choose to spit all over those who have the patriotism and the balls to defend those rights.
I'll always tollerate another man voicing opinions, but, shall we say, don't go to Harlem and use the "N" word, then wonder why the locals are pulling wepons.
As far as the forementioned conspiracies...well..don't believe everything the modern day Tokyo Roses in the media tell you. I actually reaserch the stuff, and I know where it comes from.

Please add "The Western Seminarian" to your list of supporters of Michelle Malkin (PBUH).

Yours,
The Western Seminarian.

I know it's a late response, but to AlanABQ, I wasn't directing my reply specifically (sp?) to you. You make reasonable arguments.
Okay, let's get to the point. Do the regular readers here like to be called Rethugs, nazis, fascists? (IRT name calling)
Don't get me wrong, those A-holes at santa cruz deserve to be exposed.
There was a previous comment by one of those darn fascist rethugs which stated the aweful truth that most people have friends with other folks with different viewpoints...Wait a second...this is boring.

Screw it! At every anti-American demonstration, SHOW UP...SHOW SUPPPORT FOR AMERICA!

What's that you're saying? You have jobs and a life and have other priorities?

Maybe I shouldn't post after the first glass of wine.

Brian,
To be fair, I did make a flippant remark earlier. It wasn't really name calling, but it was crude (not that I mind talking trash to the usual caliber of trolls around here), and I noticed that even if Kevin was the moonbat we made him out to be, then at least he took the high road when it came to insults. Gotta give him points for that.

Cheers, Alan :)
I have nothing better than what you've offered because I'm a sailor and it's Saturday night...do the math.
Kudos for your good thoughts.
Best wishes
Brian

I will tapdance on the windpipe of anyone who tries to harm Michelle Malkin or her family.

All she has to do is say the word and an army of folks just like me will come runnin' to her neighborhood.

We will protect her like the Bikers protect our Military Families.

Richard Davis
Philadelphia, PA
USN Ret

Conservative bloggers have their moments but even the uninitiated can see how vicious and mean the left has become. To complain about what IS public information and to retailiate with personal and privilaged information is just plain wrong.

My parents taught me to take ownership for what I am personally responsible for. I.e. If I broke the neighbor's window I had to pay for it. So if these people want to flaunt their views and do it so publically then they should be man enough (no offense ladies) to take the crap storm they are now receiving. Death treats are wrong (unless you rape my wife or kids then all bets are off). But then you really don't read of that many coming from the good people of the Right.

As for the language.....The reason I don't read many liberal blogs is because of the filth that permeates most of their sites. I wish the left would recruit people with the intelligence to use other than four-letter words. Most of which start with the letter "F". Even though "fornicate" starts with "f" it would be refreshing to see them use it. At least they would sound intelligent.

Ropeboy,

The Left would never meet their recruitment quotas were they to screen out the unintelligent. Who the hell else would swallow their agenda and say it tastes sweet?

Quincy Mason Giovanni Kristofer Greyson Ramon