About IMAO



Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy!


Buy funniest book ever!





IMAO Podcasts
IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter

Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!

About IMAO
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just, 
And this be our motto--'In God is our trust.' 
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave 
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK.

About Frank J.

Bloggers:
Frank J.
Harvey
RightWingDuck
Cadet Happy
spacemonkey
Laurence Simon
SarahK

Popular Categories
Fred Thompson Facts
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
lolterizt
IMAO Condensed
Know Thy Enemy
Editorials
Frank the Artist
In My World
Other Content
Ode to Violence
Brief Histories
IMAO Audio Bits


Read the Essay
Own the Shirt
Peace Gallery
Search IMAO
Google
Web www.imao.us
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds

"Unfunny treasonous ronin!"
-Lou Tulio*

"You, sir, are a natural born killer."
-E. Harrington

"You'll never get my job! Never!!!"
-Jonah Goldberg

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO."
-No One of Consequence

"A blogger with a sense of humor."
-Some Woman on MSNBC
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Blackfive
Captain's Quarters
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
The Corner
The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!)
Dave in Texas
Eject! Eject! Eject!
Electric Venom
Hot Air
Puppy Blender
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Michelle Malkin
Pereiraville
Protein Wisdom
Rachel Lucas
Right Wing News
Scrappleface
Serenity's Journal
Townhall Blog

IMAO Blogroll
Bad Example
Cadet Happy
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
mountaineer musings
Right Wing Duck
SarahK & Cadet Happy snark TV
This Blog Is Full of Crap

Fred Thompson Links
Fred File
Blogs for Fred
Fred Thompson Facts
Awards



 

May 23, 2006
Unfortunately, It's True - Thief Steals Data on 26 Million Military Veterans
Posted by Harvey at 11:30 AM | View blog reactions | Comments (14)

Thought our Veteran readers should know about this:

The Department of Veterans Affairs reported Monday that a laptop computer containing the names, dates of birth and Social Security numbers of over 26,000,000 veterans was stolen from the home of an employee who had taken the data home without authorization.

A copy of the letter being sent to affected veterans is available at the link.

Meanwhile, if you're an affected Veteran, here are other steps you can take:

1) Find out who stole the laptop.

2) Gut him like a trout.

3) Place his head on a pike as a warning to others.

Honestly... how stupid do you have to be to screw with 26 million professionally-trained killers?

[alerted via an e-mail from One Happy Dog Speaks]

Rating: 1.0/5 (2 votes cast)

Email This | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
14 Responses To "Unfortunately, It's True - Thief Steals Data on 26 Million Military Veterans"

Why did one laptop have info on that many vets to begin with? What was the position of the "owner" or that laptop?

#1 - Posted by: knight_308 on May 23, 2006 11:36 AM

After thinking about it for the last day or so, I have to agree it's rather suspicious. It's been suggested that this guy's home wasn't actually burglarized, but that the burglary was faked to cover the theft of the personal information. I haven't been given any evidence of this, but it sure smells fishy.

#2 - Posted by: Michael Hampton on May 23, 2006 11:44 AM

Yeah, I speculated that such a "theft" was a setup, too. And I blogtificated for quite a while on how this has affected my oh-so-wonderful job. Whee!

#3 - Posted by: SilverBubble on May 23, 2006 12:52 PM

//...how stupid do you have to be to screw with 26 million professionally trained killers//... who was that liberal guy that was all over your comments pages a week or so ago?

#4 - Posted by: mudshark on May 23, 2006 01:20 PM

Here is an important money quote;
"Affected veterans can ask any of the credit reporting agencies to place a fraud alert on their accounts, which will help prevent criminals from opening new credit accounts in their names."

We've had a theft like that at my company.
We all had to undergo an electronic training and certification because some doofus got the stuff stolen just like this.

The company paid for one year of monitoring by the credit bureaus. The vet's effected really need to do that.

#5 - Posted by: _Jon on May 23, 2006 01:34 PM

I find some of that strange too. 26,000,000 is a big number. I don't think MS Access could handle that. And usually you don't run database servers on laptops. So why was that much info on one laptop in the first place?

#6 - Posted by: slapout on May 23, 2006 01:40 PM

And how do they know where to send the warning letters if all the vets' information was stolen?

#7 - Posted by: c on May 23, 2006 03:46 PM

"Hey... where's that back-up laptop?"

"I took it home so that I could finish working on that project I was working on when the other laptop got stolen."

"DOH!"

#8 - Posted by: Harvey on May 23, 2006 03:50 PM

Something isn't quite right here... One laptop - with the names and information of 26 million people on it? I don't friggin think so! What the hell kind of a laptop was this anyway and what the hell kind of DB was it running? I have NEVER seen a laptop that will handle a database this big and effectively sort records with this much data. Give me a break! C'mon! Somebody get with the program here!

#9 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on May 23, 2006 04:20 PM

What were they running? Oracle, Sybase or DB2 with Lynux? Maybe the laptop has a login access to a central DB on a RISC or Mainframe Server somewhere with 26,000,000 vetrans but I can guarantee you they ain't on that one machine. Hell the laptops I've carried can't even handle my little MS Mail address book before they blow chunks! I'm an IT Program Manager by trade, by the way...

#10 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on May 23, 2006 04:23 PM

Interesting... checking other news sources, I see some use the phrase "up to 26 million".

Also, this site:

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=66258

observes:

"There are only about 26.5 million living American veterans, and only a fraction of these have ever sought anything from the VA. More than two-thirds of us separated from the military well before the 1975 date that the VA alleges. So, the real story is: Why did VA have this data in the first place? How did they collect it? And why did they collect it? For what purpose?"

My current theory is that the VA said that they lost some data, but didn't know how many people were affected (since they didn't know exactly which database was involved). So the VA guy probably said something like "It could involve any number of America's 26 million vets," and the press just ran with the big number.

Truth is, it's probably no more than the number who applied for VA assistance.

UNLESS... I saw another source refer to a stolen "data disc". Maybe it was the complete Vet's database, and idiot-boy was just using it as a reference to update info on the smaller VA database. Maybe the complete database got stolen along with the laptop.

I'm sure we'll hear more in the next few days.

#11 - Posted by: Harvey on May 23, 2006 04:39 PM

Only if they can blame someone on the right. If 'idiot-boy' was a Dem, expect it all to get buried pretty quick.

#12 - Posted by: GEBIV on May 23, 2006 05:01 PM

There are a lot of theories on this one, but here's my 2 cents.

1) Was it really 26 million or up to 26 million? Up to could be 10,000 and 26 million could just be the number of vets.

2) The letters could be sent out because it's very likely the database and any other databases are backed up.

3) The laptop could have just been stolen because it's a laptop. That happens. BUY A CABLE TO LOCK YOUR LAPTOP! Probably useless though if it was stolen from the guys house.

4) As for the 26 million records thing being handled by Access, who says it has to be Access? MySQL 3.22 had a limit of 4 GB per table. Newer versions on a Windows NTFS filesytem have 2 TeraBytes and possibly larger per table. That would be sufficient for the records in question

However, even with that I still think any database that large would be centralized with an end user interface instead of each user having to store the whole database on each of their computers.

#13 - Posted by: Algo2 on May 24, 2006 11:27 AM

One of my few totally serious responses:

Idiot reporters: If the thief didn't know what he had when he took it, the newsdorks damn sure made it clear what was taken with the "26 MILLION Credit Records stolen!!!...." reports every 4 minutes on the news.

#14 - Posted by: Infidel Castrol on May 25, 2006 12:13 PM
Post a comment




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

 

Buy IMAO T-Shirts


IMAO T-Shirts

The IMAO T-Shirt Babe
(winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!!
Yay! Books!





Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24
American Idol
Aqua-Adventures
Barackalypse Now
Best of IMAO 2002
Best of IMAO 2006
Bite-Sized Wisdom
Editorials
Election 2008
Filthy Lies
Frank Answers
Frank Discussions
Frank on Guns
Frank Reads the Bible
Frank the Artist
Fred Thompson Facts
Friday Cat-Blogging
Fun Trivia
Hellbender
Hellbender Take Two
Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths
Humor
I Hate Frank
If I Were President
ignis fatuous
IMAO Condensed
IMAO Exclusives
IMAO for the Non-Deaf
IMAO Reviews
IMAO Think Tank
In My World
In My World - Fan Fiction
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
Know Thy Enemy
lolterizt
Michael Moore
Mitt Romney Ads
News Round-Up
Newsish Fakery
No, McCain't
Our Military
Permalink Contest
Precision Guided Humor Assignments
Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
Ronin Profiles
Ronin Thought of the Day
SarahK's TV stuff
Scary Evil Monkey
Simpsons Trivia
Songs & Poems
State of the Frank Report
Superego
Totally True Tidbits
WEsistance Is Facile
Why Me Laugh?
Yvonne's Ashes
By Month
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
March 1933