About IMAO



Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy!


Buy funniest book ever!





IMAO Podcasts
IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter

Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!

About IMAO
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just, 
And this be our motto--'In God is our trust.' 
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave 
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK.

About Frank J.

Bloggers:
Frank J.
Harvey
RightWingDuck
Cadet Happy
spacemonkey
Laurence Simon
SarahK

Popular Categories
Fred Thompson Facts
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
lolterizt
IMAO Condensed
Know Thy Enemy
Editorials
Frank the Artist
In My World
Other Content
Ode to Violence
Brief Histories
IMAO Audio Bits


Read the Essay
Own the Shirt
Peace Gallery
Search IMAO
Google
Web www.imao.us
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds

"Unfunny treasonous ronin!"
-Lou Tulio*

"You, sir, are a natural born killer."
-E. Harrington

"You'll never get my job! Never!!!"
-Jonah Goldberg

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO."
-No One of Consequence

"A blogger with a sense of humor."
-Some Woman on MSNBC
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Blackfive
Captain's Quarters
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
The Corner
The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!)
Dave in Texas
Eject! Eject! Eject!
Electric Venom
Hot Air
Puppy Blender
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Michelle Malkin
Pereiraville
Protein Wisdom
Rachel Lucas
Right Wing News
Scrappleface
Serenity's Journal
Townhall Blog

IMAO Blogroll
Bad Example
Cadet Happy
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
mountaineer musings
Right Wing Duck
SarahK & Cadet Happy snark TV
This Blog Is Full of Crap

Fred Thompson Links
Fred File
Blogs for Fred
Fred Thompson Facts
Awards



 

June 26, 2006
Why Does the New York Times Want Us Dead?
Posted by Frank J. at 03:32 PM | View blog reactions | Comments (25)

Due to their decreased circulation, the New York Times is apparently now just focusing on helping terrorists and exposing any spying operation we have against those who wish to kill us. But why? Did the NYT take out insurance policies on all of us? How do we check that?

This is a good opportunity for President Bush to show leadership in the War on Terror and increase his poll numbers. He should say how he vehemently disagrees with the NYT's decision to publish details on spying operations done against terrorists. Then he should bomb the NYT headquarters and kill its leaders. The rest of the NYT staff should be hunted down just like Al Qaeda and sent to Gitmo. People will then say, "Wow; Bush really is serious about protecting us. Look how he killed and captured so many people involved with the New York Times."

At Gitmo, after weeks of intense interrogation, it can then be revealed that Paul Krugman knows absolutely nothing. The same thing can be then determined about Maureen Dowd with a just brief glance at her.

Rating: 2.1/5 (5 votes cast)

Best of IMAO 2006
Email This | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
25 Responses To "Why Does the New York Times Want Us Dead?"

The terrorists pay top dollar to media outlets to kill all of us. After all, they paid enough to Speilberg to convince him to turn against his own blood!

#1 - Posted by: on June 26, 2006 03:35 PM

Of course it is outrageous. Check out Michelle's site for those of you who have not. Frank has a convenient link right here at IMAO. From there you can email the DOJ and let them know how you feel. Michelle has many letters posted already.

Anything to undermine the Bush administration. That is all this is about and nothing more. They are not setting out to help the enemy; but if the enemy is helped by their actions then so be it. The only thing that matters to the NYT is hurting Bush and any other perceived neo-cons. Remember everyone, our President is the enemy as far as the "left" is concerned. None of the bullshit that comes out of the NYT should surprise any of you.

#2 - Posted by: Cary from Houston on June 26, 2006 03:41 PM

Dear Readers of IMAO,
I feel just awful for publishing that article. We at the New York Times stand by America in all we do in the open. The fact is, we have been working with several double agents in the White House, CIA and NSA to get information to such freedom fighting groups as Al'Queda, but have always done so in secret. Unfortunately, my secretary took the wrong article and had it published. The article we meant to run with was about troop movements in Iraq, though painted as though we were talking about how tragic the latest deaths were.

I apologize profusely for my mistake; you were never supposed to discover that we at the New York Times are a branch of the organization fighting to liberate the world from the infidels, Al' Queda.

Again, sorry,
Bill Keller

#3 - Posted by: BillKeller on June 26, 2006 03:49 PM

Actually, we do not need Guantanamo for Krugman. Reading his writings will prove that he knows nothing and is simply a partisan shill.

#4 - Posted by: Writer on June 26, 2006 03:51 PM

You have just won a walking pilgrimage to Mecca or Fátima.
But would Freud say about your explosion fixation?
The best way to enjoy piglet Club Med style is never to move the corpse more than 25 miles, unless it´s already roasted, and to be sure the piglet eats nothing but mother's milk.
Echelon contribution: CLUB MED, TC, CFR, NYT, moon base alpha, space, 1999.

#5 - Posted by: Club Med on June 26, 2006 03:56 PM

I favored NYC getting more assistance on security until I heard Chuck Schumer make the point. Apparently according to him, A) NYC matters more than the rest of the US combined and B) they deserved by virtue (I use that term loosely) of being NYC. The sheer ego dripping without a hint of civility or tact was sickening.
Now with the second gaff by the NYT, and the coverage on www.hughhewitt.com of how vain THAT lot are, I officially no longer give a crap if NYC is attacked by terrorists. Liberals claim that the US lost all its goodwill after 9/11 by defending itself. Today I think this is far more accurate of NYC - If the Times gets burned to the ground, they'll fully deserve it.

Yo, terrorists! Newspaper facilities contain LOTS of flamable paper! Go for it!

#6 - Posted by: Kent on June 26, 2006 04:03 PM

I hope they all get sent to Jail. The "people" at the NY Times are a bunch of treasonous bastards who hate you, you, me, and every single American. Sickos

#7 - Posted by: Cee on June 26, 2006 04:06 PM

Oh, but just wait... there is a lot more to come! I just got word from one of my anonymous sources at the LA Times, who heard from a guy at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, who heard from a guy at the Atlanta Journal Constitution who has first hand knowledge from the first cousin of the wife of Paul Krugman's Nephew's bestfriend's uncles sister that BOOOOSH financed the entire Al Qaeda operation to enlist monkey's who were spying for ninjas which were sent to break into the local Quickee mart to steal credit card receipts from dead soldiers in Iraq. All this information was supposed to reveal that President BOOSH himself was in on an assassination attempt of himself. Wow... Word has it that when he was to interrogate himself he would give up all the information that Al Qaeda was really after... Where is this Jack Bauer? But alas, the New York Times got ahold of the story and the Chinese were able to find where Bauer was.

#8 - Posted by: Jay on June 26, 2006 04:11 PM

Now, can anyone just explain to me what I just wrote? I think my fingers got to walkin' again...

#9 - Posted by: Jay on June 26, 2006 04:12 PM

Did the NYT take out insurance policies on all of us? How do we check that?

I'm with the Vice-President on this one. If there's even a 1% chance that the NYT wants us dead, we should act as if they do - and kill the entire staff.

#10 - Posted by: Silicon Valley Jim on June 26, 2006 04:18 PM

Global warming will kill us all before the terrorists even light the fuse!!! What about the children???

#11 - Posted by: Al Frankengore on June 26, 2006 04:34 PM

The top 10 reasons the New York times wants us dead:

10)No-one reads the New York Times anymore so they thought it didn't matter
9) They are trying to brown-nose their arab overlords
8) They're trying to prove their street creds to the KOS kids
7) They're typical self-loathing liberals
6) They've hired so many illegals that they actually think they live in Mexico
5) Because bodies sell papers
4) Their prescription to xanex ran out
3) The terrorists have a right to know!
2) Poor math skills - they can't tell the difference between the fourth estate and a fifth column

And the number one reason the New York Times wants us dead: It's the only way they can think of to stop having their stupid liberal monkey-faces punched in every day.

#12 - Posted by: Pat Rand on June 26, 2006 04:37 PM

I think they just want to make sure the war on terrorism is faought fair. I mean, really, don't you?

#13 - Posted by: Punch Sulzberg on June 26, 2006 05:36 PM

Punchy:

Nah, not really. I like to fight dirty, usually involving cheap shots and sucker punches, but that's just me.

#14 - Posted by: Jay on June 26, 2006 05:45 PM

First, the New York Times blames the Bush Administration for faulty intelligence gathering in Iraq.

Then they actively work against the government's attempts to gather intelligence in the hopes of casting a shadow of civil rights violations on Bush.

Maybe Bill Keller just wanted to expose the operation before they found his link to Al Qaeda vis-a-vis his bank accounts. Now if they find it he'll just accuse Bush of PLANTING that money in his accounts.

Come on, Keller, come clean and just go ahead and rename the paper "New Jihad Times".

#15 - Posted by: Man-At-Arms on June 27, 2006 02:13 AM

I am going to order a subcription to the New York Times, so I can CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION to the New York Times!!!

#16 - Posted by: Ticked Non-Subscriber on June 27, 2006 02:31 AM

FIGHT BACK!!!
---------------------------------
No, wait. I've come up with a way to fight back even if you're NOT subscriber.

If you have a pet, collect the doody, go to the nearby coin-operated NYT dispensary, insert a quarter, open the door and poor the doody on top of the papers.

HA HA!!!!!! Instant decreased circulation.

And remember: It's not illegal to pile cr@p on cr@p.

#17 - Posted by: Ticked Non-Subscriber on June 27, 2006 02:46 AM

George Bush visits a school to give a speech about his politics. After the speech Bush tells the children they can ask whatever they want. One child raises his hand. Bush asks his name.
-My name is Bob.
-What´s your question Bob?
-I have three questions:
1-Why have the USA invaded Iraq without the U.N.'s support?
2-How come you are president when Al Gore got more votes than you, sir?
3-What happened to Osama bin Laden?
When Bush was about to start answering, the scholl bell rang and Bush told the children they would resume after the break.
-Where were we, oh yes, the questions, does anyone want to ask something?
Another kid raises his hand, George asks his name.
-My name is Steve.
-What´s your question Steve?
-I have five questions:
1-Why have the USA invaded Iraq without the U.N.'s support?
2-How come you are president when Al Gore got more votes than you, sir?
3-What happened to Osama bin Laden?
4-Why did the bell rang twenty minutes earlier?
5-Where´s my friend Bob?
Moral:
"You never know your history is going to be like until after you´re gone."
George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 5, 2006

#18 - Posted by: porto do graal on June 27, 2006 08:28 AM

I would like to understand why Americans use the word football, resulting from the words foot and ball, to designate a game mainly played with the hands. Who was the dim-witted quadruped with such an idea?

#19 - Posted by: Club Med on June 27, 2006 08:36 AM

George Bush visits a school and a little kid raises his hand to ask,"Mr. President, why do whiners like Porto keep yammering away at the same loser talking points when the fact is they'll never have the right answer because those dumb monkey-faced liberals don't believe in anything that's right?"

The President pondered this a moment and then smiled lovingly at the child as he answered, "It's called free speech and even though dumb monkey-faced liberals like Porto don't believe in free speech that disagrees with their point of view, they just keep on hoping if they whine long and loud enough they'll get what they want. It's a good thing little kids like you know better though, ain't it?"

#20 - Posted by: shimauma on June 27, 2006 01:17 PM

Shimauma,
I thought you braindead morons would agree and find quite factual that piece that some monkey faced liberals find funny.
There is communication only between equals.
No worries.

#21 - Posted by: porto do graal on June 27, 2006 02:28 PM

That was gay, porto! Very Gay!

Stop being Gay, Porto... That's a bad Porto!! ::SMACK::

#22 - Posted by: Jay on June 27, 2006 02:37 PM

Hey, Porto!

Here are some answers to "Bob's" questions.

1. Because the US doesn't need the UN's support. This may be a shock to you, but the United States is supposed to be a soveriegn country, independent of the United Nations. In other words, the UN is not America's daddy. -- Oh, yeah, the coalition with the US in Iraq? It's UN sponsored. Even though their support is unnecessary, the US has it anyway.

2. Bob, this is an understandable question. When you get to the point when the schools teach you government, you will find out that the President is elected by the electoral college. Usually, but not always, this process elects the same canidate the popular vote does. In the case of the 2000 election, Florida's electoral votes were in dispute. According to the courts (and we all know how much they love Republicans), Bush won those votes. Of course, it's hard to sympathize with the other guy in this election, whose party tried (unsuccessfully, thank you) to discredit votes from the military (overwhelmingly Bush supporting in that election). So, to summarize, Bush won the electoral votes, which is what is necessary to win the Presidential election, not the popular vote. As a side note, however, I would support changing that.

3. Osama Bin Laden is still on the run, hiding out somewhere. Most analysts believe he is in Pakistan, close to the Afghan border.

Of course, Bob would know all this if he was actually receiving an education (gasp!) in the public school system. We should all thank Porto for showing us just how inadequate the public school system has become. Thanks, Porto! Keep up the good fight!

#23 - Posted by: on June 28, 2006 09:35 AM

Ha! I said TAKE THAT BIATCH!

This is fun!

#24 - Posted by: Jay on June 28, 2006 11:21 AM

Well at least their stock in plummeting. Maybe it's not just a handful of right wing whackjobs who are upset about this?

#25 - Posted by: jonag on June 28, 2006 12:38 PM
Post a comment




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

 

Buy IMAO T-Shirts


IMAO T-Shirts

The IMAO T-Shirt Babe
(winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!!
Yay! Books!





Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24
American Idol
Aqua-Adventures
Barackalypse Now
Best of IMAO 2002
Best of IMAO 2006
Bite-Sized Wisdom
Editorials
Election 2008
Filthy Lies
Frank Answers
Frank Discussions
Frank on Guns
Frank Reads the Bible
Frank the Artist
Fred Thompson Facts
Friday Cat-Blogging
Fun Trivia
Hellbender
Hellbender Take Two
Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths
Humor
I Hate Frank
If I Were President
ignis fatuous
IMAO Condensed
IMAO Exclusives
IMAO for the Non-Deaf
IMAO Reviews
IMAO Think Tank
In My World
In My World - Fan Fiction
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
Know Thy Enemy
lolterizt
Michael Moore
Mitt Romney Ads
News Round-Up
Newsish Fakery
No, McCain't
Our Military
Permalink Contest
Precision Guided Humor Assignments
Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
Ronin Profiles
Ronin Thought of the Day
SarahK's TV stuff
Scary Evil Monkey
Simpsons Trivia
Songs & Poems
State of the Frank Report
Superego
Totally True Tidbits
WEsistance Is Facile
Why Me Laugh?
Yvonne's Ashes
By Month
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
March 1933