Yes, and of course thse were distributed as objective works of journalism and factual evidence, right?

Methinks the whole lot of them must be on some good drugs. I just don't see any mustache on the Dean picture.

Following your link to dailykos I just spent the last hour reading over 200 entries in my continuing attempt to get a different perspective on how the monkey face liberals can think the way they do... it's a losing proposition... I know, I know... nevertheless, I try.

My feeling at the end was one of being dirty... as if I had stumbled into an attic or basement full of spider webs and frantically needed to wipe them off.

Fully 80% of the posts were of the "Me too!" variety... the kind to be instantly written off as cattle being led to the slaughter. Not an original thought in their head.

Others, who thought they were making a point, seemed to have too much difficulty getting past the "I hate Bush" and similar brainwashing (rammed down their throats for five or six years by their power support system, the MSM) to actually make a coherent point.

As I read through one posting I was amazed to recognize a feeling of empathy and understanding and caught my self thinking, "Now here's a liberal who might be worth having a discussion with..." before my hopes were dashed and I realized that the poster was a conservative trying valiantly to have his/her voice heard in the cacophony of sound like you would hear in the background of "Rosemary's Baby" or "The Exorcist".

Ultimately there were about three liberal posts that actually had anything worthy of reading in them.

So... they're upset about a Hitler Mustache on Dean, while they've been putting them on Bush, Pat Robertson and others for years?

(Don't forget Time Magazine's Man of the Year= American Soldier. They gave them arm patches and all)

Making my rounds for political news:

I was actually on the GOP site & saw that picture yesterday morning. After that, I went to Kos's stupid site (Yes, I like to keep up with what the Krazies are saying/thinking).....It made me go back to the GOP site to compare....there is a difference, the GOP's picture of Dean never had a "mustache"/shadow/whatever you want to call it superimposed on it.....Kos isn't trying to "spot" fauxtography, he's trying top break into the fauxtography business himself.

KOS... What a joke they are. I have an email from the GOP dated 8/9 that shows Dean without the mustache. The GOP never had the picture KOS is running with. Just like their buddies in the drive-by media, the best they can come up with is doctored evidence.

Actually, the picture on the GOP site has been corrected.

What I love about Kos' post is the bald-faced lie that is the headline: "Republican Party puts Hitler mustache on Dean"

He then goes on to link to a story at the Dependable Renegade blog which he falsely states shows evidence that "it was done on purpose." Quite the contrary, Dependable Renegade points out that the "mustache" was put on the original picture by someone else a while back, and the GOP just made the error of using that picture instead of the original "no-mustache" picture. Quite understandable, as there is no clear mustache there, just a shadow that could be seen as resembling one. So the picture on the GOP site has since been corrected with that proper version of the picture. Kos asserts that the GOP did it on purpose when he knows that not only did the GOP not even add the mustache themselves, it is also very unlikely that they realized that photo had been altered. What a buffoon.

Oops, forgot to put my name on the above post.

"...really, what planet are they from?"

Uranus. It's gotta be Uranus.

AlanABQ,
No, Uranus!

Either way, it's poo.

Damned Republicans! Probably photoshopped Kos to look like a zoned-out stoner in that picture as well.

Hey, can we photoshop Al Gore so that it looks like he has a spine?

Alan, or a pulse. Or a personality. Or an actual thought in his heaed.

Now THAT would be Fauxtography!