|
About IMAO Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy! ![]() Buy funniest book ever! ![]() IMAO Podcasts IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter
![]() Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!
About IMAO
If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK. About Frank J. Bloggers: Frank J. Harvey RightWingDuck Cadet Happy spacemonkey Laurence Simon SarahK Popular Categories
Fred Thompson FactsJohn Edwards Fabulous Facts lolterizt IMAO Condensed Know Thy Enemy Editorials Frank the Artist In My World Other Content
Ode to ViolenceBrief Histories IMAO Audio Bits ![]() Read the Essay Own the Shirt Peace Gallery Search IMAO
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds "Unfunny treasonous ronin!" -Lou Tulio* "You, sir, are a natural born killer." -E. Harrington "You'll never get my job! Never!!!" -Jonah Goldberg "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO." -No One of Consequence "A blogger with a sense of humor." -Some Woman on MSNBC Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQThe Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Blackfive Captain's Quarters Classical Values Conservative Grapevine The Corner The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!) Dave in Texas Eject! Eject! Eject! Electric Venom Hot Air Puppy Blender La Shawn Barber's Corner Michelle Malkin Pereiraville Protein Wisdom Rachel Lucas Right Wing News Scrappleface Serenity's Journal Townhall Blog IMAO Blogroll Bad Example Cadet Happy The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles mountaineer musings Right Wing Duck ![]() This Blog Is Full of Crap Fred Thompson Links Fred File Blogs for Fred Fred Thompson Facts Awards
|
September 08, 2006
34 Responses To "IMAO EXCLUSIVE: Democrats Have Captured Their Greatest Threat and Placed Him in Gitmo!"
Minnie and Goofy evade capture and are hiding in the rugged terrain of Space Mountain.....Pluto, no longer a dog, was taken off the watch list.... #1 - Posted by: Evillegenius on September 8, 2006 11:47 PMI thought that THIS guy was the Dem's Public Enemy #1? #2 - Posted by: Steve on September 8, 2006 11:50 PMThe Bush administration runs Gitmo so you must be saying that Bush thinks Mickey Mouse should be thrown in Gitmo for fictionalizing 9/11 in their docudrama. But Mickey isn't a terrorist-just a little greedy. You know who should really be in Gitmo? Osama. But Bush sucks at terrorist capture and failed to get him. He even gave sweet F16s to Pakistan in hopes they would help us but then Pakistan just recently said they will let Osama go if he promises to be peaceful. Bush is wimpish and can't stand up to Musharaf. Meanwhile, Bush lied about the relationship between Saddam and al-Zarqawi. Saddam saw him as a threat not an ally like liar Bush told us. Saddam Hussein regarded al-Qaida as a threat rather than a possible ally, a Senate report says, contradicting assertions President Bush has used to build support for the war in Iraq. Bush = Flat out liar to America. Iraq was a bugus war. Incompetent Bush has let American troops get killed for no reason. The Bush administration's Turd Blossom is desperately trying to make America focus on 9/11 fiction and forget there is a poorly managed war going on in Iraq which was based on Bush administration lies and misleads. But Americans aren't going to buy it. #3 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 9, 2006 01:14 AMDoes Sarah know where Frank went? #4 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on September 9, 2006 05:08 AMGee Sarcasm Man, Saddam was SUCH a nice guy! He never, ever payed terrorists to kill Jooos. He didn't lock his own people up in prisons to be tortured, then promote the torturers, or anything nasty and evil like that. We didn't find any nasty diseases in a refridgerator waiting to be weaponized and used against the infidels. And he was so nice allowing the UN inspectors to inspect everything and make sure that he both had no WMDs, and was not retaining/seeking any capacity to make WMDs, like they were supposed to BY INTERNATIONAL LAW. Bush is so evil for taking down poor Saddam. Thank you for helping me see the light about the great Iraqi leader, and our terrible leader, Bushilter! I feel so unsafe with Bush as president. I mean, yeah, we haven't been attacked once since 9/11, while we were repeatedly attacked, just smaller scale, under Clinton. But Bush is just...Bush! We're unsafe! What do we do! Ahhhh! Thanks again Sarcasm man! #5 - Posted by: on September 9, 2006 07:52 AMSarcasm Man...you are a dick head and not making any converts here on imao. Perhaps you should go preach to the the rest of the losers at DKOS! #6 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on September 9, 2006 10:16 AMThis should be the disclaimer shown before the mini-series: The scene of one attempt to kill or capture Bin Laden being screwed up by Clinton staff is fictional - it is a compilation of nine other screwed up opportunities that occurred in fact. A scene depicting people not communicating intelligence between the FBI and CIA passively is fictional - it is a toned down version of the active failure imposed by Jamie Gorelick by design. Why she appeared on the 9/11 commission instead of before it remains a mystery. Attempts by Sandy Burger to claim that we pulled things from our ass should be tempered by the fact that this is the man who shoved evidence of Clinton Administration incompetence in his underwear never to be seen again. We just followed the 9/11 commission evidence where it lead. We apologize for making the Clinton administration look incompetent in fiction rather than ragingly and deliberately stupid as occurred in fact. This is due to the fact that we only have five hours to show what happened. For this we apologize. #7 - Posted by: Kent on September 9, 2006 01:03 PMI dunno... I think Sargasm "Man" may have a convert here. He seems to have ALL the facts & come to think of it, why would he lie? I've never known a liberal to lie- under oath- about anything, not even a former presnit. It's not as though they would go out of their way to make one person look bad in order to make themselves look less incredibly incompetent... would they? No, that would just be stupid. It'd be like a fat moron wasting everyones time making a fictional "documentary" about 9/11 & glorifying the previous administration that not only ignored the threat, but actually facilitated it. #8 - Posted by: Lefty Glasscock on September 9, 2006 01:27 PMOn Closer analysis... One would think the Democrats would be in favor of this show airing in its entirety. That way they will have a "scape goat" to blame when they lose market share in the House and Senate come November. Pretty much the same way that 14 VietNam vets turned the whole election in 2004. If they lose with no excuses, they might have to re-examine their message and admit that lunacy does not sell well to the American voters. #9 - Posted by: Burt on September 9, 2006 02:47 PMWhat's with the low-slung pants? Bah! Joshua - It's lonely down at Club Gitmo... Maybe a jihadi mouse-mullah does it for him... (I think he just found "Mr. Happy"). #11 - Posted by: Infidel Castrol on September 9, 2006 08:10 PMCome along and scream "Allah" and blow yourself to bits, M-I-C ... See you in hell! K-E-Y ... Why? Because you're an infidel! M-U-S-L-IM Alalalalalalalalalalalaaaaaa! #12 - Posted by: Tommy the Towelhead on September 9, 2006 10:38 PMThe low slung pants in back are what happens after you go through the 72 virgins. You either go with the 72 now hoes or you get this guy. That or he was only in the cave to fix the plumbing and got caught up by mistake. #13 - Posted by: Moneyman on September 9, 2006 11:45 PMI think anyone who goes around killing innocents to claim his 72 virgins should get exactly what he deserves. He should be given to 72 virgins. No matter how sex starved someone is, an eternity giving to 72 women would get really old after a while. ( no matter what they looked like) I think this is only fair. As far as Sarcasm Man is concerned, he wouldn't know the truth if it reared up and bit him on the butt. Why let the fact influence your thinking. Lexus Nexus search some of those "facts" you're spouting, you'll be horrified to find that your "Savior" slick Willy was up to his dyed locks in coverups. They covered up the Foster affair, the Rose law firm problem, the bimbo brigade, the Chinese mess, and the Bin Laden debacle. There is only one thing the Clinton White House could really do well and that's cover up. That is what we expect from Libs and Dems however. A total disregard of the facts and a disconnect from the reality the rest of us are familiar with. I have not seen "Path". I have heard from those who have, that it's not so much about Clinton or Bush, but more about the threat of Al Qaeda, Islamo-Fascism, and other terrorist organizations. The question occured to me: "Who are Reid, Clinton, et al really trying to protect?" Maybe this Global War on Terror is more insidious than I first imagined. Yes, I know I am questioning someone's Patriotism... But, If I am unsure of something, I have the right to ask. Come on... If you're gonna dress'em in something, try Porky Pig... Th...th...th...that's all folks... #16 - Posted by: Strnj1 on September 10, 2006 08:18 AMDon't feel bad Burt. I question the patriotism of many people on a regular basis! I don't want to say who, but I think we all know who they are (hint: they're liberals). #17 - Posted by: Algo on September 10, 2006 09:36 AMAlgo, George said: In the global war on terror, you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists. I find it instructive to note how loudly and repetitively the liberals have proclaimed their allegiance. #19 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 01:47 PMI remember an old essay by Harlan Ellison about the one day he worked at Disney. He showed up in the morning and went to lunch at their cafeteria with his friends who were also working there. At lunch he thought he'd be cute playing film director horsing around imaging directing a porn film starring Mickey, Minnie and the gang. At first his friends were amused but then they clammed up and decided that lunch was over. You see somebody had walked up behind Harlan and in Goofy's voice asked if he could play too? and Harlan told him no but he could be the producer without even looking at him. This individual turned out to be Roy Disney. Harlan continued his schtick without realizing this and after lunch returned to his office. There on his desk was a pink slip. Harlan said the moral was "Don't F*** With the Mouse!" Republicans have spent over a generation enjoying negative media bias in the MSM, Democrats seem determined to change that for us. First the Plame affair in which they convince the NYT to undertake a series of news stories that sends one of their reporters to jail and fails to uncover anything since the prosecutor had all the answers by the end of the first week and now these threats against ABC's broadcast license. I remember during the brouhaha about "The Reagans" the worst Reagans admirers (mostly Republicans true) threatened was to change the channel. #20 - Posted by: David on September 10, 2006 02:34 PMIt is funny how liberals assume that if they say someone else is stupid often enough, they think this makes it so or somehow makes them correct. I don't contribute this to the "big lie" of Nazism so much as the neo-pagan concept (echoed by the worst of the televangelists) of speaking things into existence by magic. And when they do cherry pick data, they present it completely out of context. For example, 600 troops die per year in accidents in peacetime, so maybe we avoid peace because it's also dangerous in the liberal mind. We still have troops in Kosavo, Korea, Germany, Japan, and the southern and western parts of the United States. Are these quagmires to the liberal mind? Apparently quagire is Liberal for "war that happens under Republican president", even if that president didn't start it (Vietnam). #21 - Posted by: Kent on September 10, 2006 03:19 PMGeorge said: In the global war on terror, you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists. I find it instructive to note how loudly and repetitively the liberals have proclaimed their allegiance. "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." -- Therefore, blind submission like that followed by dumb Burt is the lowest form of traitor scuminess there is. Of course that's Bush in your quote Burt you idiot. He said that because he doesn't want any dissent. How convenient for Bush. If you disagree with the administration you are a terrorist? What a crock of poop. That goes back to my point about Bush supporters being a bunch of mindless drones that don't think for themselves. Oh I'm such a little puke that I have to believe every single word Bush says. If everyone who disagrees with Bush is a terrorist you are going have to put at least 60% of the U.S. population in jail. Those of you who are Bush/Cheney worshipping morons should look at something Cheney said about Iraq in 1992 before he had all the heart attacks and probable strokes -- we can't be sure he had strokes because the lying freakoid won't release his medical records. #22 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 03:29 PM Sarcasm Man: I believe you have made it abundantly clear which side you support in the GWOT. You really don't need to repeat yourself, or call names to convince us of where you stand. #23 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 03:49 PMI don't contribute this to the "big lie" of Nazism so much as the neo-pagan concept (echoed by the worst of the televangelists) of speaking things into existence by magic. And when they do cherry pick data, they present it completely out of context. For example, 600 troops die per year in accidents in peacetime, so maybe we avoid peace because it's also dangerous in the liberal mind. Wow, Kent that has to be the most pathetic and cruelist argument ever made in defense of the Iraq War. Is that something you would want to write on the dead Iraq soldiers tombstones? Kent's brilliant tombstone idea: Here lies Soldier X. He died in the Iraq War but seriously he might have died from a peacetime accident anyway so what's the big deal? Seriously, Kent that was a really stupid defense for the Iraq War. The Iraq War casualties I cited, which are far above anything that occurs during peacetime, are from this website which sources the Pentagon -- the are not some magic numbers I made up you massively ignorant poophead. #24 - Posted by: on September 10, 2006 03:51 PMI believe you have made it abundantly clear which side you support in the GWOT. You really don't need to repeat yourself, or call names to convince us of where you stand. And you have made it abundantly clear that you are a mindless Bush drone. I'm against the Bush administration's lie-based Iraq War and Al-Qaeda Burt. You are dumb ignorant moron for not understanding people can be against both the Bush administration's Iraq War policies and the terrorists. #25 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 03:55 PMSarcasm Man: Hmmm. The name calling is nearly starting to change my position. Perhaps if you tried it with all caps, you could convince me. #26 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 04:39 PMStoned-gasm "man", Woah look what illogical Kent dork came up with all by his little self... "War is bad because soldiers die" You should really say "accidents are bad because soldiers die" because logically it is the accidents not the peace that kills the soldiers. You could also continue with... The site I mentioned uses Dod numbers. It is not a propaganda site. The numbers can also be found here Bah! Capitalist swine! Do you not recognize the brilliance of the proletarian Sarcasm Man? You should be ashamed of your unworthiness to read his near Manifesto quality discourse! Bravo, Comrade Sarcasm Man! Bravo! Do not let their vicious veracity slow down the pace of your determined, and resolute series of well-reasoned and insightful Party Propaganda! Do not flinch in the face of their dastardly onslaught! Forge ahead (but not from a Kinkos in Texas) and be ever raucous even in the face of their dastardly onslaughts of logic and capitalist usage of fact! (DAMN THEM!) You can do it, my proletariat comrade, you CAN DO IT! Like an Lenin addled moth beating it's head intently against the porchlight of freedom... YOU MUST DO ALL YOU CAN TO EXTINGQUISH THE BRILLIANTLY GLOWING LIGHT OF A FREE AMERIKA! --We are counting on you.-- Rejoice, Comerade! Though they now loom in silence (like a metaphorical can of Raid) , The Masses stand behind you waiting for one voice to utter such treatises openly and publicly in the town square! Rise up! Go out! Speak! You'll bask in the roar of the crowd's enthusiastic response! The masses are waiting! And if the masses happen to be friendly, try outside Berkley. #29 - Posted by: Infidel Castrol on September 10, 2006 07:54 PMInfidel, What does complaining that Bush took our country to a War based on a lie have to do with communism? Communism is about blindly supporting the government like a lot of the commentors on this blog desperately do on a daily basis. In fact they can't shout loudly enough about how patriotic they are and about there blind allegiance to the Bush administration. Isn't that a lot more like communism than complaining about the Iraq War? #30 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 08:06 PMSarcasm Man, Yeah, yeah, Bush 'lied'. Right. The fact is, he beleived Saddam had WMDs. Saddam told his own people he had WMDs. And he had mustard gas and all that. But the point is, I beleive in what we're doing, and I AM a soldier. War is a terrible thing, but I'd rather fight war than be at peace with people who want to murder us. Oh, and by the way... you're welcome. :) #31 - Posted by: SoldierOfEternity on September 11, 2006 01:22 AMSarcasm Man- You've presented many facts about, well, everything. Is there anything you can't answer? I have only this one question: Are you a charlatan, or do you just want us to think so? #32 - Posted by: AlanABQ on September 11, 2006 05:10 AMSarcasm Man, There is only one thing the Clinton White House could really do well and that's cover up. Heh, yeah...I don't think he did this that well with regards to a particular chubby intern. Anyway, as far as Kent's argument, I believe Billy Graham said the same thing. The odds of death are 1:1 (per Final Destination, part 3). If someone dies defending all of our country including the liberal whiny civilians who can't get it together enough to declare their own coup (mainly because they're too wussy to be rebellious), then that person died defending a noble and worthy cause. Freedom. Freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom to be an libtard or not. Seriously, libtards, if you hate the way things are going in our government, please do rebel, I dare you. That or move your whiny asses to canada. If you don't appreciate this solution maybe you should stop visiting right wing blogs that use your nonsense blather for ammunition to laugh at you as you deserve. #34 - Posted by: shimauma on September 11, 2006 01:47 PMPost a comment
|
Buy IMAO T-Shirts
![]()
![]()
IMAO T-Shirts
The IMAO T-Shirt Babe (winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!! Yay! Books!
Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24American Idol Aqua-Adventures Barackalypse Now Best of IMAO 2002 Best of IMAO 2006 Bite-Sized Wisdom Editorials Election 2008 Filthy Lies Frank Answers Frank Discussions Frank on Guns Frank Reads the Bible Frank the Artist Fred Thompson Facts Friday Cat-Blogging Fun Trivia Hellbender Hellbender Take Two Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths Humor I Hate Frank If I Were President ignis fatuous IMAO Condensed IMAO Exclusives IMAO for the Non-Deaf IMAO Reviews IMAO Think Tank In My World In My World - Fan Fiction John Edwards Fabulous Facts Know Thy Enemy lolterizt Michael Moore Mitt Romney Ads News Round-Up Newsish Fakery No, McCain't Our Military Permalink Contest Precision Guided Humor Assignments Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Ronin Profiles Ronin Thought of the Day SarahK's TV stuff Scary Evil Monkey Simpsons Trivia Songs & Poems State of the Frank Report Superego Totally True Tidbits WEsistance Is Facile Why Me Laugh? Yvonne's Ashes By Month
December 2008September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 March 1933
|