About IMAO



Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy!


Buy funniest book ever!





IMAO Podcasts
IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter

Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!

About IMAO
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just, 
And this be our motto--'In God is our trust.' 
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave 
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK.

About Frank J.

Bloggers:
Frank J.
Harvey
RightWingDuck
Cadet Happy
spacemonkey
Laurence Simon
SarahK

Popular Categories
Fred Thompson Facts
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
lolterizt
IMAO Condensed
Know Thy Enemy
Editorials
Frank the Artist
In My World
Other Content
Ode to Violence
Brief Histories
IMAO Audio Bits


Read the Essay
Own the Shirt
Peace Gallery
Search IMAO
Google
Web www.imao.us
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds

"Unfunny treasonous ronin!"
-Lou Tulio*

"You, sir, are a natural born killer."
-E. Harrington

"You'll never get my job! Never!!!"
-Jonah Goldberg

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO."
-No One of Consequence

"A blogger with a sense of humor."
-Some Woman on MSNBC
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Blackfive
Captain's Quarters
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
The Corner
The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!)
Dave in Texas
Eject! Eject! Eject!
Electric Venom
Hot Air
Puppy Blender
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Michelle Malkin
Pereiraville
Protein Wisdom
Rachel Lucas
Right Wing News
Scrappleface
Serenity's Journal
Townhall Blog

IMAO Blogroll
Bad Example
Cadet Happy
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
mountaineer musings
Right Wing Duck
SarahK & Cadet Happy snark TV
This Blog Is Full of Crap

Fred Thompson Links
Fred File
Blogs for Fred
Fred Thompson Facts
Awards



 

September 08, 2006
IMAO EXCLUSIVE: Democrats Have Captured Their Greatest Threat and Placed Him in Gitmo!
Posted by Frank J. at 11:40 PM | View blog reactions | Comments (34)

World is now declared safe.

(fauxtography by cadet happy)

Rating: 3.1/5 (5 votes cast)

IMAO Exclusives
Email This | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
34 Responses To "IMAO EXCLUSIVE: Democrats Have Captured Their Greatest Threat and Placed Him in Gitmo!"

Minnie and Goofy evade capture and are hiding in the rugged terrain of Space Mountain.....Pluto, no longer a dog, was taken off the watch list....

#1 - Posted by: Evillegenius on September 8, 2006 11:47 PM

I thought that THIS guy was the Dem's Public Enemy #1?

PUBLIC ENEMY #1

#2 - Posted by: Steve on September 8, 2006 11:50 PM

The Bush administration runs Gitmo so you must be saying that Bush thinks Mickey Mouse should be thrown in Gitmo for fictionalizing 9/11 in their docudrama. But Mickey isn't a terrorist-just a little greedy.
Why are cruel conservative blogs calling Mickey Mouse a terrorist?

You know who should really be in Gitmo? Osama. But Bush sucks at terrorist capture and failed to get him. He even gave sweet F16s to Pakistan in hopes they would help us but then Pakistan just recently said they will let Osama go if he promises to be peaceful. Bush is wimpish and can't stand up to Musharaf. Meanwhile, Bush lied about the relationship between Saddam and al-Zarqawi. Saddam saw him as a threat not an ally like liar Bush told us.

Saddam Hussein regarded al-Qaida as a threat rather than a possible ally, a Senate report says, contradicting assertions President Bush has used to build support for the war in Iraq.

Released Friday, the report discloses for the first time an October 2005
CIA assessment that before the war, Saddam's government "did not have a relationship, harbor or turn a blind eye toward" al-Qaida operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi or his associates.

Bush = Flat out liar to America. Iraq was a bugus war. Incompetent Bush has let American troops get killed for no reason.

The Bush administration's Turd Blossom is desperately trying to make America focus on 9/11 fiction and forget there is a poorly managed war going on in Iraq which was based on Bush administration lies and misleads. But Americans aren't going to buy it.

#3 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 9, 2006 01:14 AM

Does Sarah know where Frank went?

#4 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on September 9, 2006 05:08 AM

Gee Sarcasm Man, Saddam was SUCH a nice guy! He never, ever payed terrorists to kill Jooos. He didn't lock his own people up in prisons to be tortured, then promote the torturers, or anything nasty and evil like that. We didn't find any nasty diseases in a refridgerator waiting to be weaponized and used against the infidels. And he was so nice allowing the UN inspectors to inspect everything and make sure that he both had no WMDs, and was not retaining/seeking any capacity to make WMDs, like they were supposed to BY INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Bush is so evil for taking down poor Saddam. Thank you for helping me see the light about the great Iraqi leader, and our terrible leader, Bushilter!

I feel so unsafe with Bush as president. I mean, yeah, we haven't been attacked once since 9/11, while we were repeatedly attacked, just smaller scale, under Clinton. But Bush is just...Bush! We're unsafe! What do we do! Ahhhh!

Thanks again Sarcasm man!

#5 - Posted by: on September 9, 2006 07:52 AM

Sarcasm Man...you are a dick head and not making any converts here on imao. Perhaps you should go preach to the the rest of the losers at DKOS!

#6 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on September 9, 2006 10:16 AM

This should be the disclaimer shown before the mini-series:

The scene of one attempt to kill or capture Bin Laden being screwed up by Clinton staff is fictional - it is a compilation of nine other screwed up opportunities that occurred in fact.

A scene depicting people not communicating intelligence between the FBI and CIA passively is fictional - it is a toned down version of the active failure imposed by Jamie Gorelick by design. Why she appeared on the 9/11 commission instead of before it remains a mystery.

Attempts by Sandy Burger to claim that we pulled things from our ass should be tempered by the fact that this is the man who shoved evidence of Clinton Administration incompetence in his underwear never to be seen again. We just followed the 9/11 commission evidence where it lead.

We apologize for making the Clinton administration look incompetent in fiction rather than ragingly and deliberately stupid as occurred in fact. This is due to the fact that we only have five hours to show what happened. For this we apologize.

#7 - Posted by: Kent on September 9, 2006 01:03 PM

I dunno... I think Sargasm "Man" may have a convert here. He seems to have ALL the facts & come to think of it, why would he lie? I've never known a liberal to lie- under oath- about anything, not even a former presnit. It's not as though they would go out of their way to make one person look bad in order to make themselves look less incredibly incompetent... would they?

No, that would just be stupid. It'd be like a fat moron wasting everyones time making a fictional "documentary" about 9/11 & glorifying the previous administration that not only ignored the threat, but actually facilitated it.

#8 - Posted by: Lefty Glasscock on September 9, 2006 01:27 PM

On Closer analysis...

One would think the Democrats would be in favor of this show airing in its entirety. That way they will have a "scape goat" to blame when they lose market share in the House and Senate come November. Pretty much the same way that 14 VietNam vets turned the whole election in 2004.

If they lose with no excuses, they might have to re-examine their message and admit that lunacy does not sell well to the American voters.

#9 - Posted by: Burt on September 9, 2006 02:47 PM

What's with the low-slung pants?
(Far right in the back)

#10 - Posted by: Joshua on September 9, 2006 05:33 PM

Bah!

Joshua - It's lonely down at Club Gitmo... Maybe a jihadi mouse-mullah does it for him... (I think he just found "Mr. Happy").

#11 - Posted by: Infidel Castrol on September 9, 2006 08:10 PM

Come along and scream "Allah" and blow yourself to bits,

M-I-C ... See you in hell!

K-E-Y ... Why? Because you're an infidel!

M-U-S-L-IM Alalalalalalalalalalalaaaaaa!

#12 - Posted by: Tommy the Towelhead on September 9, 2006 10:38 PM

The low slung pants in back are what happens after you go through the 72 virgins. You either go with the 72 now hoes or you get this guy.

That or he was only in the cave to fix the plumbing and got caught up by mistake.

#13 - Posted by: Moneyman on September 9, 2006 11:45 PM

I think anyone who goes around killing innocents to claim his 72 virgins should get exactly what he deserves. He should be given to 72 virgins.

No matter how sex starved someone is, an eternity giving to 72 women would get really old after a while. ( no matter what they looked like) I think this is only fair.

As far as Sarcasm Man is concerned, he wouldn't know the truth if it reared up and bit him on the butt. Why let the fact influence your thinking. Lexus Nexus search some of those "facts" you're spouting, you'll be horrified to find that your "Savior" slick Willy was up to his dyed locks in coverups. They covered up the Foster affair, the Rose law firm problem, the bimbo brigade, the Chinese mess, and the Bin Laden debacle. There is only one thing the Clinton White House could really do well and that's cover up.

That is what we expect from Libs and Dems however. A total disregard of the facts and a disconnect from the reality the rest of us are familiar with.
What a maroon!

#14 - Posted by: seanmahair on September 10, 2006 12:25 AM

I have not seen "Path".

I have heard from those who have, that it's not so much about Clinton or Bush, but more about the threat of Al Qaeda, Islamo-Fascism, and other terrorist organizations. The question occured to me: "Who are Reid, Clinton, et al really trying to protect?" Maybe this Global War on Terror is more insidious than I first imagined. Yes, I know I am questioning someone's Patriotism... But, If I am unsure of something, I have the right to ask.

#15 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 07:51 AM

Come on... If you're gonna dress'em in something, try Porky Pig...

Th...th...th...that's all folks...

#16 - Posted by: Strnj1 on September 10, 2006 08:18 AM

Don't feel bad Burt. I question the patriotism of many people on a regular basis! I don't want to say who, but I think we all know who they are (hint: they're liberals).

#17 - Posted by: Algo on September 10, 2006 09:36 AM

Algo,
I question your patriotism and intelligence as well as many of the others here. Doesn't patriotism include questioning your leaders when they are pathetic and killing our troops for no reason? If you truly love this country don't you want to make absolutely sure our troops aren't killed based on lies and incompetence? If someone questions the leadership in this country isn't that patriotism? Patriotism is not worshipping the Bush administration and all that they do like some dumb sheep. Seriously, how incredibly pathetic and loserish are you if you think that is what makes you a good citizen. Doesn't that just make you the lowest of the low. Doesn't it just make you all enormously stupid and idiotic sheep-like morons? Do you have no thoughts of your own? Aren't all you just echoes of Bush and Cheney's thoughts -- mindless drones who wander around chanting Bush and Cheney are heroic gods that we must worship and cheer on no matter how pathetic, incompetent, stupid and awful the Wars they get us involved in become? Aren't you being massively stupid by supporting an administration that has allowed nearly 3,000 troops to die and nearly 20,000 injuries in Iraq all based on lies about WMDs and a pathetic postwar plan. And now Afghanistan is going south as well thanks to Bush's Iraq distraction. You all are no different from the leftists who can't see that illegal immigration is a problem no matter what the evidence shows. You are just as pathetic, dumb and blind as they are only about Iraq instead of immigration.

#18 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 01:04 PM

George said: In the global war on terror, you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists.

I find it instructive to note how loudly and repetitively the liberals have proclaimed their allegiance.

#19 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 01:47 PM

I remember an old essay by Harlan Ellison about the one day he worked at Disney. He showed up in the morning and went to lunch at their cafeteria with his friends who were also working there. At lunch he thought he'd be cute playing film director horsing around imaging directing a porn film starring Mickey, Minnie and the gang. At first his friends were amused but then they clammed up and decided that lunch was over. You see somebody had walked up behind Harlan and in Goofy's voice asked if he could play too? and Harlan told him no but he could be the producer without even looking at him. This individual turned out to be Roy Disney. Harlan continued his schtick without realizing this and after lunch returned to his office. There on his desk was a pink slip. Harlan said the moral was "Don't F*** With the Mouse!"

Republicans have spent over a generation enjoying negative media bias in the MSM, Democrats seem determined to change that for us. First the Plame affair in which they convince the NYT to undertake a series of news stories that sends one of their reporters to jail and fails to uncover anything since the prosecutor had all the answers by the end of the first week and now these threats against ABC's broadcast license. I remember during the brouhaha about "The Reagans" the worst Reagans admirers (mostly Republicans true) threatened was to change the channel.

#20 - Posted by: David on September 10, 2006 02:34 PM

It is funny how liberals assume that if they say someone else is stupid often enough, they think this makes it so or somehow makes them correct. I don't contribute this to the "big lie" of Nazism so much as the neo-pagan concept (echoed by the worst of the televangelists) of speaking things into existence by magic. And when they do cherry pick data, they present it completely out of context. For example, 600 troops die per year in accidents in peacetime, so maybe we avoid peace because it's also dangerous in the liberal mind. We still have troops in Kosavo, Korea, Germany, Japan, and the southern and western parts of the United States. Are these quagmires to the liberal mind? Apparently quagire is Liberal for "war that happens under Republican president", even if that president didn't start it (Vietnam).

#21 - Posted by: Kent on September 10, 2006 03:19 PM

George said: In the global war on terror, you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists. I find it instructive to note how loudly and repetitively the liberals have proclaimed their allegiance.

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." -- Therefore, blind submission like that followed by dumb Burt is the lowest form of traitor scuminess there is.

Of course that's Bush in your quote Burt you idiot. He said that because he doesn't want any dissent. How convenient for Bush. If you disagree with the administration you are a terrorist? What a crock of poop. That goes back to my point about Bush supporters being a bunch of mindless drones that don't think for themselves. Oh I'm such a little puke that I have to believe every single word Bush says. If everyone who disagrees with Bush is a terrorist you are going have to put at least 60% of the U.S. population in jail.

Those of you who are Bush/Cheney worshipping morons should look at something Cheney said about Iraq in 1992 before he had all the heart attacks and probable strokes -- we can't be sure he had strokes because the lying freakoid won't release his medical records.



"And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

#22 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 03:29 PM

Sarcasm Man:

I believe you have made it abundantly clear which side you support in the GWOT. You really don't need to repeat yourself, or call names to convince us of where you stand.

#23 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 03:49 PM

I don't contribute this to the "big lie" of Nazism so much as the neo-pagan concept (echoed by the worst of the televangelists) of speaking things into existence by magic. And when they do cherry pick data, they present it completely out of context. For example, 600 troops die per year in accidents in peacetime, so maybe we avoid peace because it's also dangerous in the liberal mind.

Wow, Kent that has to be the most pathetic and cruelist argument ever made in defense of the Iraq War. Is that something you would want to write on the dead Iraq soldiers tombstones?

Kent's brilliant tombstone idea: Here lies Soldier X. He died in the Iraq War but seriously he might have died from a peacetime accident anyway so what's the big deal?

Seriously, Kent that was a really stupid defense for the Iraq War. The Iraq War casualties I cited, which are far above anything that occurs during peacetime, are from this website which sources the Pentagon -- the are not some magic numbers I made up you massively ignorant poophead.

#24 - Posted by: on September 10, 2006 03:51 PM

I believe you have made it abundantly clear which side you support in the GWOT. You really don't need to repeat yourself, or call names to convince us of where you stand.

And you have made it abundantly clear that you are a mindless Bush drone.

I'm against the Bush administration's lie-based Iraq War and Al-Qaeda Burt. You are dumb ignorant moron for not understanding people can be against both the Bush administration's Iraq War policies and the terrorists.

#25 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 03:55 PM

Sarcasm Man:

Hmmm. The name calling is nearly starting to change my position. Perhaps if you tried it with all caps, you could convince me.

#26 - Posted by: Burt on September 10, 2006 04:39 PM

Stoned-gasm "man",
You demonstrate again why logic and rhetoric are lost on those whose mental growth was stunted during the terrible twos. I was pointing out the false logic of the left, by demonstrating that if the following is true:
"War is bad because soldiers die"
Then the following must logically also be true:
"Peace is bad because soldiers die".
Since "soldiers die" is the KPI of "bad" in the previous argument. But you simply demonstrate my point that you don't get rhetoric, logic, facts, or reality. You simply parrot the hate spew of your masters George Soros and Michael Moore. Worse yet, you are even dumber then these propaganda twits because they are at least clever enough to come up with false arguments and strawmen. You resort only to insults and links to propaganda sites. You are your own worst enemy - your own arguments are irrational, based on hatred, and the hatred is built on propaganda. What more proof do we need to prove you are wrong than you yourself? It is self-evident that you are not someone one would trust to walk a dog, let alone tell anyone what to think.

#27 - Posted by: Kent on September 10, 2006 06:53 PM

Woah look what illogical Kent dork came up with all by his little self...

"War is bad because soldiers die"
Then the following must logically also be true:
"Peace is bad because soldiers die".

You should really say "accidents are bad because soldiers die" because logically it is the accidents not the peace that kills the soldiers. You could also continue with...

  • More soldiers die at War than at Peace
  • Therefore, War is worse than peacetime
  • Soldiers killed in Wars based on lies die for no reason
  • Therefore, Wars based on lies are very, very bad.
  • Bush ordered a War based on lies therefore Bush is very, very bad.
  • The site I mentioned uses Dod numbers. It is not a propaganda site. The numbers can also be found here
    on the DoD website which shows 2662 dead soldiers and 19,945 injured soldiers. The DoD site is also not a propaganda site. What it doesn't say is that all those dead and injured soldiers were
    killed based on lies supported by morons like you Kent.

    #28 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 07:49 PM

    Bah! Capitalist swine! Do you not recognize the brilliance of the proletarian Sarcasm Man? You should be ashamed of your unworthiness to read his near Manifesto quality discourse!

    Bravo, Comrade Sarcasm Man! Bravo! Do not let their vicious veracity slow down the pace of your determined, and resolute series of well-reasoned and insightful Party Propaganda! Do not flinch in the face of their dastardly onslaught!

    Forge ahead (but not from a Kinkos in Texas) and be ever raucous even in the face of their dastardly onslaughts of logic and capitalist usage of fact! (DAMN THEM!)

    You can do it, my proletariat comrade, you CAN DO IT! Like an Lenin addled moth beating it's head intently against the porchlight of freedom... YOU MUST DO ALL YOU CAN TO EXTINGQUISH THE BRILLIANTLY GLOWING LIGHT OF A FREE AMERIKA!

    --We are counting on you.--

    Rejoice, Comerade! Though they now loom in silence (like a metaphorical can of Raid) , The Masses stand behind you waiting for one voice to utter such treatises openly and publicly in the town square! Rise up! Go out! Speak! You'll bask in the roar of the crowd's enthusiastic response!

    The masses are waiting!

    And if the masses happen to be friendly, try outside Berkley.

    #29 - Posted by: Infidel Castrol on September 10, 2006 07:54 PM

    Infidel,

    What does complaining that Bush took our country to a War based on a lie have to do with communism? Communism is about blindly supporting the government like a lot of the commentors on this blog desperately do on a daily basis. In fact they can't shout loudly enough about how patriotic they are and about there blind allegiance to the Bush administration. Isn't that a lot more like communism than complaining about the Iraq War?

    #30 - Posted by: Sarcasm Man on September 10, 2006 08:06 PM

    Sarcasm Man,

    Yeah, yeah, Bush 'lied'. Right.

    The fact is, he beleived Saddam had WMDs. Saddam told his own people he had WMDs. And he had mustard gas and all that.

    But the point is, I beleive in what we're doing, and I AM a soldier.

    War is a terrible thing, but I'd rather fight war than be at peace with people who want to murder us.

    Oh, and by the way... you're welcome. :)

    #31 - Posted by: SoldierOfEternity on September 11, 2006 01:22 AM

    Sarcasm Man-

    You've presented many facts about, well, everything. Is there anything you can't answer? I have only this one question: Are you a charlatan, or do you just want us to think so?

    #32 - Posted by: AlanABQ on September 11, 2006 05:10 AM

    Sarcasm Man,
    We are prosecuting the war incorrectly, but we have no choice since you Lefties have prohibited us from turning the subcontinent into a glassy runway and thereby ending the threat.

    #33 - Posted by: Writer on September 11, 2006 01:32 PM

    There is only one thing the Clinton White House could really do well and that's cover up.

    Heh, yeah...I don't think he did this that well with regards to a particular chubby intern.

    Anyway, as far as Kent's argument, I believe Billy Graham said the same thing. The odds of death are 1:1 (per Final Destination, part 3). If someone dies defending all of our country including the liberal whiny civilians who can't get it together enough to declare their own coup (mainly because they're too wussy to be rebellious), then that person died defending a noble and worthy cause. Freedom. Freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom to be an libtard or not.

    Seriously, libtards, if you hate the way things are going in our government, please do rebel, I dare you. That or move your whiny asses to canada.

    If you don't appreciate this solution maybe you should stop visiting right wing blogs that use your nonsense blather for ammunition to laugh at you as you deserve.

    #34 - Posted by: shimauma on September 11, 2006 01:47 PM
    Post a comment




    Remember me?

    (You may use HTML tags for style)

     

    Buy IMAO T-Shirts


    IMAO T-Shirts

    The IMAO T-Shirt Babe
    (winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!!
    Yay! Books!





    Capitalism
    Archives
    By Category
    24
    American Idol
    Aqua-Adventures
    Barackalypse Now
    Best of IMAO 2002
    Best of IMAO 2006
    Bite-Sized Wisdom
    Editorials
    Election 2008
    Filthy Lies
    Frank Answers
    Frank Discussions
    Frank on Guns
    Frank Reads the Bible
    Frank the Artist
    Fred Thompson Facts
    Friday Cat-Blogging
    Fun Trivia
    Hellbender
    Hellbender Take Two
    Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths
    Humor
    I Hate Frank
    If I Were President
    ignis fatuous
    IMAO Condensed
    IMAO Exclusives
    IMAO for the Non-Deaf
    IMAO Reviews
    IMAO Think Tank
    In My World
    In My World - Fan Fiction
    John Edwards Fabulous Facts
    Know Thy Enemy
    lolterizt
    Michael Moore
    Mitt Romney Ads
    News Round-Up
    Newsish Fakery
    No, McCain't
    Our Military
    Permalink Contest
    Precision Guided Humor Assignments
    Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
    Ronin Profiles
    Ronin Thought of the Day
    SarahK's TV stuff
    Scary Evil Monkey
    Simpsons Trivia
    Songs & Poems
    State of the Frank Report
    Superego
    Totally True Tidbits
    WEsistance Is Facile
    Why Me Laugh?
    Yvonne's Ashes
    By Month
    December 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004
    December 2003
    November 2003
    October 2003
    September 2003
    August 2003
    July 2003
    June 2003
    May 2003
    April 2003
    March 2003
    February 2003
    January 2003
    December 2002
    November 2002
    October 2002
    September 2002
    August 2002
    July 2002
    March 1933