I’ll take the dumb and smell explanation. I don’t think that insulting chickens is called for in this case…

True, chickens are genetically cowards, they have an excuse.

Could it be a reaction caused by Patchouli and Bong resin?

There are two kinds of people in terms of politics. The first kind are those who hold their political beliefs because they have deduced, after much consideration, that their position is the correct one. The second kind are those who choose and defend their position because it feels right or because of peer or familial pressure. Whether they are liberal, conservative, or something else, I'd rather deal with the first type any day over the second type. The second type knows how to protest, scream, and throw ad hominem attacks, but they haven't got a clue how to argue their point. Most of the latter type that I've met are liberals. As the old saying goes, "instead of raising your voice, you should reinforce your argument."

I love the Wiki link for Bumblebee thrown in. That was Franking awesome!

An erudite and astute group of observations carried to the logical conclusion.

After much reading of your blog comments, and due consideration for each aspect of your viewpoints, I find that I just love you fuckers.

There's another saying that I have seen:
"The stronger the words, the weaker the argument"

They are just really confused, so they have a hard time formulating their thoughts. An example: Liberals think that having a baby is punishment for sex, so they abort them. Conservatives know it is a reward, we raise them and mold them into good little conservatives. So, don't worry, soon there will be more conservatives than liberals and the cursing will stop.

Oh yeah!?!?

Well you can go to %&*@ you %*#@!

Liberal: "I feel as though you motherf**king Repugs don't care about anything but oil."

Neo-Con: "I feel like taking a shower after just standing near you. Now, shut your Hillary-hole, get a toothbrush & get outta my face."

I saw a bumper sticker on a Volvo: If you are not appalled you are not paying attention"

The libs need to be very angry to feel like they're getting it. They need to show how angry they are.

Of course, the rough drafts of all MY entries start out as nothing but a string of profanities (an old sailor habit, ya know), but I know SarahK reads my posts and she has the remarkable ability to hurl a frying pan from Florida to Wisconsin with stunning accuracy, so I clean them up a bit before posting.

Strange. I run a blog where 90% of the entries are about Andrew Sullivan fisting his beagle. But when it comes to obscenities, I use the old Beetle Bailey method. !#%**@!

I hope the "smell explanation" makes it's way into a hate-filled lefty comic one of these days.

After due consideration, I believe that the typical Leftie has room for no more than four or five letters in his head at one time.
The result being that the first word leaving his mouth or being typed has no more letters either, with successive limitations upon their vocabulary.
Fortunately the spew soon ends as keeping a single idea in his head is similarly difficult.

If you were a liberal male and spent most of your day taking it up the keister from other liberal males you might be a bit emotional too...

They're just emotional because their partner didn't have the common courtesy to give them a reach-around...

Fu$*&^g funniest Go*#&^mn muthafuc@#$%g post I ever read on IMAO. Does this vocabulary make me smell like chickens&#t?

On the contrary, Frank, "smelly" is quite easily deduced. Since most of the common "mentaly challanged" liberal's vocabulary relates to bodily functions or anal sex, one can easily see that their thought processes, speech and vocabulary eminates from the rectum.

hey. don't dog on the volvo. it works great. it confuses them.

when you're a shaved headed male, get out of a volvo dressed all in black with two earings and getting a guitar out of the trunk, you're expected to think a certain way (at least in their minds). Its great to listen to the closed minded diatribes (with no attribution mind you) and then wait the appropriate 30 seconds to shoot massive holes in the obscenity laden theories. the looks on their unwashed faces are priceless.

So then, it's wrong for me to conclude my point in saying that libtard diatribe is full of sh^t? Bummer. I have fun saying that.

Thank you my friend. I have wandered this way in past posts and am glad to know that others see this as well.

Here are a few questions I would like to ask the purveyors of such smutty prose.

1) Do you eat with that mouth?

2) Do you think this is 10th grade gym class?

3) Do you understand what you just said, and more important is it physically possible to do what you've just described?

4) Who paid for your college degree (BA,BS, MS, or PhD) Mommy and Daddy or the rest of us and when are we going to get our money's worth? Did you take an English class or just get lit, stoned or laid for however long it took to get a diploma?

5) This is for those who think the F bomb is a punctuation mark. (not a question, more of an observation)
Those who can DO, those who can't spend all of their spare time talking about it.

Yours linguistically, (yes, it's really a word- I looked it up)

C'mon, now. Don't dis Volvos just because many have the unfortunate fate to be owned by liberals. They're great cars, they're safe, and last forever (we have two). Even the ones owned by libs, though most libs don't know what "maintenance" or "common sense driving" means. As a testamony to their toughness, the lib-owned cars STILL keep goin' and goin'...!

I'll admit, I cuss like a China Marine with a case of the clap, but I use it mostly for entertainment purposes, and seldom in an argument, unless it's to inform the sebacious little twerp that I'm bored and am ending the debate.

And whenever I see Cindy Shehag, Algore, The Breck Girl or Hildebeest. But that's just a primal response of revulsion.

I just don't buy into the "they're dumb and they smell" conclusion.

I think it much more likely that they have the brains of chickens. This would also explain the "chickenhawk" arguments, since a chicken would naturally fear the predator.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Thanks for the snopes link at the end, don't know what it had to do with the rest of the post (the Hellbender and Bumblebee jokes I got) but from there I found that my dad's been lying to me when he told me that Texas had a provision when they joined that said they could secede...I'm probably not going to tell him that though. :-/

your kidding , right?

F@#k All Y'all
From: Kelly ------
Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:23 PM

Subject: f*&k you

f#$k you you liberal ass licker!!! Guess who is going to kick ass in November? THE CONSERVATIVES ARE YOU STUPID F*%KING LIBERAL WELFARE PIG!!!!!

From: David --
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 20:02:28 -0800 (PST)

Subject: so you found me out !!!

well goody for you ! You are a bunch of DILDOS ! Liberals and Democrats suck ass, they have given us political correctness...... what a crock of s@!t that is!! They want to take away my right to own guns ...... right you can have my gun when you pry it from my cold dead fingers! they give us the Kennedys...what a bunch of DOUCHEBAGS!!! and lets not forget HITLERY CLINTON!!!!!!!!!! she needs to F^%K OFF and go get in a plane crash like that other ass hat last month. so in closeing let me just say GO F$#K YOURSELF!! from the few , the arogant, the Punk Rock Republicans! yes mother f*%kers there is an ever growing punk/ alternative group that supports the Republicans. and I convert more of them every year! so go die Socialist scum!

Is That The Best You Got?
From: Ralph -------
>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:58:54 -0500
Subject: (no subject)

You f%$king idiots get dumber every day. your nf#$king brains are in your ass. anybody that disagrees with you is supposed to be stupid.the only stupid people are the f*&king democrats. what f#$king idiots.

Nice try, lefty. Where did you lift this from, DailyKOS or Rotten.com? This is why I can't get through more than 3 posts without exiting those sites. This is what's called the "MTV Generation" and "the public education system" at work. What the libs call "No Child Left Behind" should, in truth, be called "No Child Gets Ahead."

I shudder to think of what lefty's doing with his right hand.

I was looking at the dates on those obviously authentic emails. Did he(?) just travel through time to post that?

C'mon, lefty. It's '07 now; try to keep up.

Hey lefty, (yea, a troll, I thought they were extinct)
We're talking about popular blogs. Anyone can find crap, that's everywhere. Popular liberal blogs are so foul that most of us won't even go there on a bet.

If libs want people to take them seriously, then they should grow up, wash their mouths out with Comet, take a bath and develop some people skills. (or skilz for our happening liberal readers, spelling rules being not really rules simply guidelines)

"There are two kinds of people in terms of politics. The first kind are those who hold their political beliefs because they have deduced, after much consideration, that their position is the correct one. The second kind are those who choose and defend their position because it feels right or because of peer or familial pressure. Whether they are liberal, conservative, or something else, I'd rather deal with the first type any day over the second type. The second type knows how to protest, scream, and throw ad hominem attacks, but they haven't got a clue how to argue their point. Most of the latter type that I've met are liberals. As the old saying goes, "instead of raising your voice, you should reinforce your argument."

What I find so ironic is how liberals like to try and claim that as well. That they've "reasoned out their arguments" and conservatives are just 'voting like mom and dad do' (apparently dissing the fact that maybe - just maybe - mom and dad have years of wisdom and intelligence behind their decisions). I have to wonder how any political discourse can ever happen in this country when BOTH sides are claiming that they're the reasonable ones and the other side is just stupid.

Of course, it seems that "rightist" generally try to express their ideas in a way that 'leftists' could understand and it's leftists that just claim the rightists are all morons.

I scanned quickly, didn't see another
most obvious reason. I used to cuss
as bad as everyone else, sometimes still
do under my breath. But as a Christian,
that should be a rare thing and scripture
teaches against it:

Eph 4:29

Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth,

Ephesians 5:4. Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting,

We all sin, but how can filthy talk
be a believer's bent? It can't.
Oh... most Christians I know are
conservative.

So if this side of the house is the
less vulgar side, then the other side
will of course contain the courser
element.

Frank,
It has been a loooong time since I've visited your blog. I saw your comment at Hot Air and thought I'd pop over to share my concerns.

You know that I've admired your talent for many years. Unfortunately, what this uproar over the hiring of Amanda Marcotte and my friend Liss means that smart, funny people like you and she -- who use satire and humor online -- will be disqualified from working in politics.

Imagine. IMAO could be a permanant black spot on your resume.

The use of profanity on "lefty" blogs is an interesting topic for discussion. However, it isn't the most important issue in this case.

What you have here (reportedly) is a politician caving in to the objections of people who would never vote for him in the first place. Forget about partisanism. As a blogger who has written numerous "controversial" essays for several years, your future is at stake.

Unfortunately, there are many people who do not understand satire. They'll take everything you've written literally and condemn you for it. Think about the crazy comments and e-mails you've received from people who take your humor too seriously -- people just like Bill Donohue!

Here's an example of what your future may hold:

"Frank J. Fleming is a right-wing blogger who advocates the use of nuclear weapons. The Monterey Institute of International Studies Center for Nonproliferation Studies has written to Newt Gingrich asking that Fleming, recently hired to head Gingrich's online campaign strategy, be fired immediately.

"Fleming is a clown who jokes about the use of nuclear weapons. He sells t-shirts that depict an atomic explosion," said Center spokesperson Knowle Newques. "Anyone who shows that kind of disregard for the safety and future of mankind has no place in a presidential campaign."

I've known Liss for a long time. She's bright, funny, and I bet you'd like her. In spite of your political differences, you've got similar tastes in social satire. She certainly doesn't take herself too seriously. Depicting her as shrill and angry is just as much of a misrepresentation as depicting Frank J. as a "gun nut with a juvenile preoccupation with comic book violence." It would be easy to scan through your blog and misrepresent you in numerous ways. That's what Michelle Malkin is good at. And, there are many leftwing bloggers who are currently following her example.

One of the reasons my brother (the other Frank from early days you may recall) and I left blogging was the realization that the activity could negatively impact our personal and professional lives.

Now, I'm seeing friends losing their jobs and facing ridicule because of what they wrote in their personal blogs. This is something that could happen to bloggers regardless of their political leanings. Maybe a good review of a Pepsi product in 2001 will prevent someone from getting a job with Coke. Where do we draw the line?