I guess he is Fred Thompson and is super awesome and he'd better be! I am a consultant myself and I can't get a damn thing done in 19 hours!

It took God 144 hours to create Heaven and Earth and he must have done a lot in 19 hours but I don't think Fred is at that level...

That sounds fairly minor and not likely to upset much of his potential base. The auto comparative of a door ding. Hopefully Fred if president won't stop cloning, chimera and android research. We need to experiment with zygotes and embryos and nanobots and find ways to live hundreds of years long and expand our abilities and intelligence.

NOBODY from Ron Paul's home planet was ever even 0.01% pro-choice, ergo we must all vote for him.

Excelsior!

Seriously, though, 19 hours of Fred!'s time must have advanced the cause of abortion more than all other advocacy efforts since Roe v. Wade combined, so I consider it a serious issue.

Thats an intersting question. Ron Paul's a pseudo-libertarian, so isn't he supposed to be pro choice?

And seriously, how am I supposed to guilt trip whores into suicide without abortion??

I'm noticing a flow of uncouth comments coming from my fingertips this morning. I must be cranky.

Libertarians don't have to support legalizing infant murder Ringmaster...

As if something that trivial could dissuade someone as awesome as me from voting for someone as awesome as Fred Thompson.

John McCain, even if his campaign were not floundering, would not be not close to Fred in pro-life credentials. McCain is supportive of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, whereas Fred is not. And in 2000, McCain told a reporter that he would leave it up to his daughter whether to get an abortion if she ever got pregnant. I wouldn't give McCain more than 75%, if that.

Ron Paul's probably the most prolifiest candidate (see here) which is his one big weakness.

Clearly it was not Fred Thompson!, but his evil mirror universe counterpart !Fred Thompson. That mustashio'ed troublemaker isn't content to use his superpowers for evil in his own universe, he must cross over into ours as well. Only the desperate efforts of Mirror Ron Paul have been able to hold him in check so far.

At least Fred can find his billing records...

Any candidate with two first names is way too gay to ever get my vote!

Are gay people pro-life? ...or are they socially aberrant body snatchers?

FrankJ:

I think you are a little confused. It is not just that Fred was not pro-life. It was that he was taking money to help further the pro-abortion political agenda. In other words, he was not just "demonstrably not fully pro-life." He was, in, I believe, the words of your movement "demonstrably pro-baby killing"

Also this was not the only instance of his support for the killing of the unborn. Some hippie commie who supports that pinko Mitt Romney put together a handy list of evidence of Thompson's past support for the pro-choice movement/lack of support for the pro-life movement.

http://theactblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/more-on-thompsons-abortion-record/

Some highlights:

1994
Eagle Survey: Thompson checks the box indicating he opposes "criminalizing abortion", later says he "doesn't remember" checking the box. (Gosh, Fred certainly seems to forget a lot of things when they concern his former positions on abortion. Are we sure we want such a forgetful person as president? Or is his forgetfulness another of his super powers?)

1996

Tennesseans For Choice Survey: Thompson checks "no" when asked if he favors criminalizing abortion. (I wounder if Fred has had a chance to "forget" about this answer yet?)

1997

Letter to a TN Constituent: "I believe that government should not interfere with individual convictions and actions in this area [abortion]."

Many more examples at the link.

Maybe we can use all of this to develop a new Fact of the Day about Fred Thompson.

"Fred can flip his position on abortion when it suits his political purposes so fast it will not just make your head spin, but fly right off."

What do you think?

Peace,

Monkey Faced Liberal

FrankJ:

I think you are a little confused. It is not just that Fred was not pro-life. It was that he was taking money to help further the pro-abortion political agenda. In other words, he was not just "demonstrably not fully pro-life." He was, in, I believe, the words of your movement "demonstrably pro-baby killing"

Also this was not the only instance of his support for the killing of the unborn. Some hippie commie who supports that pinko Mitt Romney put together a handy list of evidence of Thompson's past support for the pro-choice movement/lack of support for the pro-life movement.

http://theactblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/more-on-thompsons-abortion-record/

Some highlights:

1994
Eagle Survey: Thompson checks the box indicating he opposes "criminalizing abortion", later says he "doesn't remember" checking the box. (Gosh, Fred certainly seems to forget a lot of things when they concern his former positions on abortion. Are we sure we want such a forgetful person as president? Or is his forgetfulness another of his super powers?)

1996

Tennesseans For Choice Survey: Thompson checks "no" when asked if he favors criminalizing abortion. (I wounder if Fred has had a chance to "forget" about this answer yet?)

1997

Letter to a TN Constituent: "I believe that government should not interfere with individual convictions and actions in this area [abortion]."

Many more examples at the link.

Maybe we can use all of this to develop a new Fact of the Day about Fred Thompson.

"Fred can flip his position on abortion when it suits his political purposes so fast it will not just make your head spin, but fly right off."

What do you think?

Peace,

Monkey Faced Liberal

Fred is nothing but a Washington insider lobbyist with a 1 term senate run in which he accomplished nothing notable (other than landing a very nice looking lady 25 years younger than he is). Stick with Hollywood or buck up and run for real instead of dancing around and bending FEC regulations.