|
About IMAO Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy! ![]() Buy funniest book ever! ![]() IMAO Podcasts IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter
![]() Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!
About IMAO
If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK. About Frank J. Bloggers: Frank J. Harvey RightWingDuck Cadet Happy spacemonkey Laurence Simon SarahK Popular Categories
Fred Thompson FactsJohn Edwards Fabulous Facts lolterizt IMAO Condensed Know Thy Enemy Editorials Frank the Artist In My World Other Content
Ode to ViolenceBrief Histories IMAO Audio Bits ![]() Read the Essay Own the Shirt Peace Gallery Search IMAO
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds "Unfunny treasonous ronin!" -Lou Tulio* "You, sir, are a natural born killer." -E. Harrington "You'll never get my job! Never!!!" -Jonah Goldberg "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO." -No One of Consequence "A blogger with a sense of humor." -Some Woman on MSNBC Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQThe Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Blackfive Captain's Quarters Classical Values Conservative Grapevine The Corner The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!) Dave in Texas Eject! Eject! Eject! Electric Venom Hot Air Puppy Blender La Shawn Barber's Corner Michelle Malkin Pereiraville Protein Wisdom Rachel Lucas Right Wing News Scrappleface Serenity's Journal Townhall Blog IMAO Blogroll Bad Example Cadet Happy The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles mountaineer musings Right Wing Duck ![]() This Blog Is Full of Crap Fred Thompson Links Fred File Blogs for Fred Fred Thompson Facts Awards
|
July 30, 2007
Perhaps a More Appropriate Name for Them Would Be an Angry Exclamation of "That's Not Funny!"
Now, Sadly, No! -- a left-wing humor site -- has latched on to our Fred Thompson Facts. By itself, it's not that notable. It seems to be a lashing out at how the left-wing blogs' favorite candidate Edwards is perceived as being "swishy," and now they must be further frustrated on that count since Edwards took time out of the last debate to criticize Hillary Clinton's outfit. The humor seems borne more out of being angry than being clever, but their audience seems to like it so I can't really criticize. Anyway, what was interesting to me was the monologue preceding the humor where this bit caught my eye: Not that we don’t have a begrudging sort of respect for the I.M.A.O.s of the world. After all, it’s sort of mulishly courageous to tackle humor as they do, from the opposite end of what is actually funny. Very few humorists can find comedy in the violent victimization of the marginalized by the overclass, largely because there isn’t any. But points to I.M.A.O. for trying. And even if their output isn’t — how shall we put it? — ‘funny in the slightest,’ at the very least it makes for a nice sort of homage to the Golden Age of Beer Hall comedy. . .a kind of living monument to the jackbooted stylings of those brownshirted stand-ups who, once upon a time, quite literally ‘killed’ at venues across Europe. Now, if this was meant in jest, it's exceptionally clever. Basically they're poking fun at their own side and how many have an overwrought hatred of any one with a different political viewpoint. It's much more self-aware than you'd find anywhere on DailyKos. If it's meant even partly serious, though, then it's rather sad. And that's the problem with a humor site with politics like that of the popular left-wing blogs. If you handed me something written by Glenn Greenwald and said, "Here's this hilarious parody of a left-winger I wrote!" I'd think it was some genius satire and admire the work you put in it ("Wow. You kept it up for like five pages."). When I first read Amanda Marcotte, I thought she was joking as she preached a kind of feminism I had long thought was made up by the older conservatives to scare us. So, when a left-wing site is sometimes trying to be funny, how can you tell when it's saying something in jest or when it's saying something ridiculous with a hilarious though somewhat sad earnestness? When many on that side honestly believe the government is behind 9/11 and that President Bush is going to establish a dictatorship before leaving office, how can you tell when they're joking about something? If I were to guess, I'd say who wrote that at Sadly, No! meant it seriously. That's because it's extremely rare to see left-wingers use self-deprecating humor about their own politics. I could write a whole paper on the reasons why for that, but just think about: How often do right-wingers make jokes using the left-wing's stereotypes of them? We here at IMAO do it about every other post; it's fun to pretend to be a mindless warmonger who hates the poor. Now how often have you seen a left-winger make a jokes using the right-wings stereotypes of them. I can't think of very many instances; they really hate those perceptions of them and don't find anything about them funny. So, if I'm wrong and that statement from Sadly, No! was completely in jest, it was all the more exceptional. What do you think? Do you think they were joking, or do they really think our humor makes us like Nazis? If so, then which posts are the Nazi ones? Maybe it was the one where I drew Kos with exaggerated Jewish features. UPDATE: I got a response in the comments from what seems like a dour, humorless person. I'd thought I'd put it here with my response: 1: Power. The powerless use humor to try to deflate those with power over them. That's one use of humor, but it's far from the only use. Most people who play the game of "[insert group here] can't be funny" start by making up their own esoteric definition of what constitutes humor, trying to make complex a simple human impulse. When the powerful make fun of those beneath them, that's not funny, it's cruel. It comes off like cheerleaders mocking the poor kids for wearing hand-me-downs. Brandi and Candi might laugh, but it's not "humorous." Ridiculing is actually the basis of all humor (or so I argue). Still, calling all the humor of one side "bullying" shows a very narrow mind which probably isn't open to actual discussion in the first place. It also shows absolutely no understanding of humor (which isn't to say the person is incapable of humor; just incapable of understanding it outside partisan blinders). It's hard to make stuff funny when one side is dedicated to bringing Americans together to make things better for all of us and the opposing side is devoted to accentuating the divisions between different groups to increase their power. Of course, this is just one person's retarded viewpoint of the world which is shared only by a small fringe. Who gets to say what it funny and what isn't is the audience to the humor. You can't just say that it's only humor if people with my own narrow political viewpoint thinks its funny; everyone can play that game and its completely pointless. 2: Fringe reality. The fraction of Kosites who believe that Bush was ACTUALLY behind 9/11 is roughly the same as the fraction of $Con_site who believe that Hillary is ACTUALLY a lesbian Mossad agent who had Vince Foster murdered b/c he wouldn't keep quiet about Bill importing planeloads of cocaine into Arkansas. It's a big country full of weirdos of all types and the internet just makes them a lot louder. Of course, this is more a political than a humor argument. Those viewpoints make the recommended diaries (though 9/11 conspiracies are now verboten from Kos). Polls -- as useful as they are -- show those viewpoints are significant among Democrats and thus even more significant among the fringe that is Kos. I don't think most fervently believe the conspiracies, and it's mainly just how silly their partisanship has gotten that they even consider them. Anyway, the person who wrote this comment obviously has a silly little viewpoint and takes himself way too seriously. From his own definition, that makes him the pompous one to deflate using humor. If this is the writer of the Sadly, No! post, then they really should change their name to the exclamation of "That's not funny!" UPDATE 2: Phelps has an example of how the violent victimization of the marginalized by the overclass can be hilarious. I laughed. 36 Responses To "Perhaps a More Appropriate Name for Them Would Be an Angry Exclamation of "That's Not Funny!""
The funny thing is that the "Fixed Fred Thompson Facts" are just John Edwards facts in disguise. I suppose John Edwards may wish that he was Fred Thompson, and even lied about it to the gullible nutroots, which would cause them to believe that those are, in fact, accurate. #1 - Posted by: TR on July 30, 2007 04:20 PMSorry for double-posting, but for the sake of my honor, I have to say this. The TR who idiotically comments on SadlyNo is not me...I need a new name. #2 - Posted by: TR on July 30, 2007 04:25 PMIt's important to help young comedians. I'll help them craft properly progressive Comedy Gold: SadlyNo! Fred Thompson Fact of the Day: ::Daily Show-style "whoooos" from the studio audience:: 1: Power. The powerless use humor to try to deflate those with power over them. [That's one use of humor. Don't begin to believe humor is limited to your own small mind can think of.] When the powerful make fun of those beneath them, that's not funny, it's cruel. It comes off like cheerleaders mocking the poor kids for wearing hand-me-downs. Brandi and Candi might laugh, but it's not "humorous." [Bull. That's only one person's skewed perception of reality.] It's hard to make stuff funny when one side is dedicated to bringing Americans together to make things better for all of us and the opposing side is devoted to accentuating the divisions between different groups to increase their power. [Bull. You understand your viewpoint is just your own retarded perception and not shared by most Americans... and thus irrelevant to the humor?] 2: Fringe reality. The fraction of Kosites who believe that Bush was ACTUALLY behind 9/11 is roughly the same as the fraction of $Con_site who believe that Hillary is ACTUALLY a lesbian Mossad agent who had Vince Foster murdered b/c he wouldn't keep quiet about Bill importing planeloads of cocaine into Arkansas. It's a big country full of weirdos of all types and the internet just makes them a lot louder. [Again, bull. Those viewpoints make the recommended diaries (though 9/11 conspiracies are now verboten from Kos). Polls -- as useful as they are -- show those viewpoints are significant among Democrats and thus even more significant among the fringe that is Kos. I don't think most fervently believe the conspiracies, and it's mainly just how silly their partisanship has gotten that they even consider them. Anyway you have silly little viewpoint and take yourself way toooooo seriously. From our viewpoint, that makes you the pompous one to deflate using humor. -Ed.] #4 - Posted by: Since you asked on July 30, 2007 04:39 PMSince you asked You democrats aren't in power? What happened to the mandate(not a John Edwards Joke) of '06?? [And, I guess, since I'm more powerful, you can make fun of me but I can't make fun of you. Then again, you can take my whole blog down, so you do have enough power that I can make fun of you... it just wouldn't be wise. Because of your power. -Ed.] It's hard to make stuff funny when one side is dedicated to bringing Americans together to make things better for all of us and the opposing side is devoted to accentuating the divisions between different groups to increase their power. Both sides sincerely think this about the other. That's part of the problem. Identity plays a big part in humor too. Borscht Belt comedians made fun of other Jews, Chris Rock made great sport of African Americans, and Foxworthy & White take shots at rural whites. They're at their best because they LOVE their targets. Look at any great sitcom like I Love Lucy or Cheers. You can tell the writers hold genuine affection for each of the characters even though they are constantly the butt of jokes. That's vital for true humor. [True humor?] I don't see the need for the insults, Frank. You asked what I think about your humor and I answered nicely. [Perhaps I was pompous and need deflating through humor. And thus the cycle continues. -Ed.] P.S. 9/11 conspiracies have been banned from Kos since 2001. Trolls and Green party loons and LaRouche supporters try to poison the well and they keep getting deleted. #6 - Posted by: SYA on July 30, 2007 05:14 PMSomething I have noticed about right wing versus left wing satire. The left has some funny satire (Colbert, Billionaires for Bush, etc) because they can do something funny by taking conservative positions to their extremes. You look at Colbert and you realize "Hey, that guy is acting reidiculous -- and funny!") Our satire is different. Funny conservative satire (like IMAO) is mostly self deprecating. But when we try to satirize the left, we fail. Why? -- Because the left itself tends to shade off into parody. No matter how rediculous you try to make a left wing position look, no one realizes it is parody because some prominant leftists probably hold that position. Look at "Communists for Kerry" -- they pushed satire to the limit. They joined demostrations dressed like Lenin and the like and no one noticed! Fox News, Time and the Washington Post reported them as a straight story. Or look at libertarian group Bureaucrash -- they showed up at a state green convention and set up a table for "Progressives Against Progress" calling for, among other things, the Greens to nominate Fidel Castro for President. Not only did no one notice, people signed their castro petition. The left is beyond parody, so it is impossible to base humor on them. #7 - Posted by: Me on July 30, 2007 05:29 PMFred Thomas is red with anger over the Fixed Fred Thompson Facts. Luckily he has a large supply of Bella Pierre Autumn Glow Concealer for just such occasions! [That's kinda clever, it's just the whole thrust of the FFTF seems to me to be an odd choice. Then again, I'm not a left-wing blogger! -Ed.] #8 - Posted by: D. Aristophanes on July 30, 2007 05:38 PMVideo did not kill the radio star, Fred Thompson did. #9 - Posted by: Jolly Roger on July 30, 2007 06:11 PMFrank, why do you torment us by virtually inviting the smelly hippies from SadlyNoWeHaventCommittedSuicideYetButOurStashIsLow [Have you no interest in the name of science? -Ed.] #10 - Posted by: Master Shake on July 30, 2007 06:16 PMWhen I visit liberal sites (when I can stomach it, anyway), I'm amazed at how they so often disparage conservative sites for their humor or writing styles. Yet they turn around and copy them & do their own versions based on the stuff they were initially trying to ridicule. 'Anything you can do, I can do better...' SYA- Isn't that just another way to perpetuate the notion that all cheerleaders are haughty rich girls? And look at your choice of names for them. Do you think they're slutty pole dancers, too? I've known several cheerleaders who had names like Jen, Sarah, Nicole, Margaret, etc. & they were nice people. One thing, SYA, that may be the biggest difference between, let's say IMAO & DailyKos, is that those of us who contribute or comment here at IMAO generally don't seethe with hate for those whom we may be not agree with, as opposed to the constant verbal spewing & death wishes for all people non-liberal at DK. We don't celebrate for weeks when a perceived foe dies (Molly Ivins, for example. She passed on last year & was given a respectful write up here.), as opposed to the sheer elation & unbridled joy expressed by DKers over the deaths of Ronald Regan and Jerry Falwell. We get angry when stupid people do inexplicable things, like when Mr. Cho killed several schoolmates & a Professor at Virginia Tech, as opposed to writing him a flowery eulogy like a Kos contributor did. We get labeled by real winners at both sites with comments disparaging us all as being: Here's one that illustrates their grasp on reality: Cock-sucking homophobes... Does it get any funnier? It's like being called a racist juedo (juedo being a racist Latino term for a white man)! And your notion of power is pretty damn funny, too. You basically stated that one group can say whatever they want about another, but the other group can't reciprocate because... that'd just be wrong. That's about as absurd as the notion that minorities can't actually be racist towards Whites because they're minorities & their hate speech is just a form of cultural expression. Now THAT'S a joke. #11 - Posted by: AlanABQ on July 30, 2007 06:35 PM"It's hard to make stuff funny when one side is dedicated to bringing Americans together to make things better for all of us and the opposing side is devoted to accentuating the divisions between different groups to increase their power." Ah, got it. The poster is actually from that Mirror Universe place where all the good guys in this universe are bad guys with evil-looking gotees. Quick! jump back through the swirly thing before you cause a time... space... um, rip... or something. Either that or come to terms with the fact that, in this universe, most of the "bringing Americans together" folks are on the Right, not the Left. //"Hey, that guy is acting reidiculous -- and funny!"// I don't know if that was a typo when you spelled ridiculous, but I like the change! #13 - Posted by: AlanABQ on July 30, 2007 06:42 PM>//"Hey, that guy is acting reidiculous -- and funny!"// >I don't know if that was a typo when you spelled ridiculous, but I like the change! >Posted by: AlanABQ on July 30, 2007 06:42 PM I would like to think it was on purpose, but I am a graduate of our public schools and should use spellcheck more! #14 - Posted by: Me on July 30, 2007 06:48 PMYou shameless hussy. #15 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on July 30, 2007 06:59 PMSprightly Touch: Basically that means they are going to gay them up for you, Hussy. #16 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on July 30, 2007 07:07 PM... it's extremely rare to see left-wingers use self-deprecating humor about their own politics. I could write a whole paper on the reasons why for that, ... I will look forward to reading the reasons why for that. #17 - Posted by: marc page on July 30, 2007 07:08 PMFunny conservative satire (like IMAO) is mostly self deprecating. But when we try to satirize the left, we fail. So true. I rarely tell jokes that aren't self-parodies, though I do it so much no one can tell when I'm joking anymore. Some people think I actually believe the French are more closely related to chimps then humans... #18 - Posted by: AR on July 30, 2007 07:13 PMIt's hard to make stuff funny when one side is dedicated to bringing Americans together to make things better for all of us and the opposing side is devoted to accentuating the divisions between different groups to increase their power. sorry for double dipping....my trigger finger gets twitchy sometimes.... #20 - Posted by: neocon cowgirl on July 30, 2007 08:26 PM"I suppose John Edwards may wish that he was Fred Thompson" bwahahaa. Yes, like Marilyn Monroe would have wished she was some other profoundly ugly and ungainly woman in her time. PS. Here's how you ranked on the humour scale last year. [Egads! We lost in an internet poll, the venue in which Ron Paul is the most successful politician ever! -Ed.] #21 - Posted by: Lesley on July 30, 2007 08:31 PM[Egads! We lost in an internet poll, the venue in which Ron Paul is the most successful politician ever! -Ed.] Coincidentally, Ron Paul and SadlyNoOurIQsAreNotEvenApproachingFreezingOnTheCelsiusScale.com have the same constituency - mentally retarded monkeys with internet access in their parents' basement/termite mound. #22 - Posted by: on July 30, 2007 08:48 PM"I suppose John Edwards may wish that he was Fred Thompson" bwahahaa. Yes, like Marilyn Monroe would have wished she was some other profoundly ugly and ungainly woman in her time. This was a shameful chapter in our country's history and it's time to move on from the 1950s - Admit it, Marilyn Monroe was a fat annoying ditzy chick. The only thing she had in commmon with John Edwards is I.Q. #23 - Posted by: on July 30, 2007 09:06 PMThere has never been and will never be anything funny that could not hurt someone's feelings. Comedy is cruelty and cruelty is apart of the human condition. Humorless leftists refuse to accept the unavoidable cruelty that just happens by living in a fallen world, and thus can never laugh at a Larry poking Curly in the eye. Poor stupid leftists. #24 - Posted by: NewAgeGOP on July 30, 2007 10:06 PMLesley- Not only that, but IMAO didn't even rank in 2001! #25 - Posted by: AlanABQ on July 30, 2007 10:30 PMAlso, we spell it 'humor', not 'humour', on the this side of the pond. If you're going to put us in our place, at least do it using the proper lexicon; that extra U just throws us for a loop. #26 - Posted by: AlanABQ on July 30, 2007 10:37 PMi'll tell you what's funny. Seeing that lardass Fred driving around in his pickup truck in my county, giving his good ole boy shtick. #27 - Posted by: on July 30, 2007 10:37 PMWhat the heck is La Roche Posay Rosaliac Gelee Micellar Make-up Removal Gel? Just copying and pasting it made my wrist limp and my voice climb three octaves. I think its a Harry Potter-style incantation to morph people into John Edwards clones. If I remember my anti-Edwards incantations correctly, the counter spell is ".40 hydro shocks in a Heckler & Koch USP with laser sights and a FOBUS paddle holster." There. I now have strength in my wrist again. "I suppose John Edwards may wish that he was Fred Thompson" bwahahaa. Yes, like Marilyn Monroe would have wished she was some other profoundly ugly and ungainly woman in her time. ........ So you just compared John Edwards to Marilyn Monroe. Classic. #29 - Posted by: TR on July 30, 2007 11:05 PM...to tackle humor as they do, from the opposite end of what is actually funny. LOL. As John McLaughlin would say, D. Aristophanes has stumbled uncontrollably into the truth. Humor is best when it's not conformist. #30 - Posted by: Anon Y. Mous on July 31, 2007 12:17 AMExpecting a Liberal to get the joke is like expecting Ted Kennedy to pick up the check for drinks or Bill Clinton to NOT hit on his new intern, assistant, waitress or the cashier at the "Stop and Go" on the highway out of Little Rock. The world might just end. (they'd be happy, the worst case scenario finally happened. #31 - Posted by: seanmahair on July 31, 2007 01:34 AMHaving someone with no sense of humor tell you that you'e not funny doesn't mean that you're the funniest person ever...but it's a good start! Where did I leave those jack-boots and that brown-shirt?...got me some victimizin' and oppressin' to do! #32 - Posted by: Gunga on July 31, 2007 08:07 AMHrm, brownshirts = Nazi reference = invoking Hitler. Since Godwin's Law technically applies to the whole Internet (even though you and this other asshat were not having a "debate" in the same forum), I think that means you win by default judgment. Nice work, Frank. #33 - Posted by: James on July 31, 2007 11:51 AMIt's pretty clear, I think, that the FFTFs are just not funny by any objective measure. I read the whole thread...this was the only one close to funny: "FTF: Fred Thompson’s gaze can kill small animals. FFTF: Every time a republican masturbates, Fred Thompson kills a kitten." Isn't that clever? She (he, perhaps, I'd hate to offend) took what actually makes the Fred Thompson facts funny and twisted it a little to make it funny from a liberal viewpoint. Given enough monkeys at typewriters, you'll eventually get something nearly as funny as IMAO. Most of the time you just end up with KOS, though. #34 - Posted by: MMW on August 1, 2007 10:52 AMWait, is this post satire or parody? Leftys cant go five minutes without showing how superior they are to other people. They are like the stuck up girl click in high school. Humor to them is a way to show their disdain for others who are not as cool as they are, and therefore everyone else uses humor exactly in the same way (at least in the liberal mind). So they are superior because their humor is "approved" because it "supports the victim" versus the "oppressors". IMAO is not funny because it is not part of the click, but it would be hilarious if it was reposted on Sadly No (and didn't make the left look bad). The concept of humor being funny for its own sake, or being satire, doesn't compute in leftopia. They can do no wrong, so there is no need to improve, and they can't make fun of themselves because it would break up the tribe and membership is the whole point. #36 - Posted by: the brain on August 2, 2007 09:55 AMPost a comment
|
Buy IMAO T-Shirts
![]()
![]()
IMAO T-Shirts
The IMAO T-Shirt Babe (winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!! Yay! Books!
Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24American Idol Aqua-Adventures Barackalypse Now Best of IMAO 2002 Best of IMAO 2006 Bite-Sized Wisdom Editorials Election 2008 Filthy Lies Frank Answers Frank Discussions Frank on Guns Frank Reads the Bible Frank the Artist Fred Thompson Facts Friday Cat-Blogging Fun Trivia Hellbender Hellbender Take Two Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths Humor I Hate Frank If I Were President ignis fatuous IMAO Condensed IMAO Exclusives IMAO for the Non-Deaf IMAO Reviews IMAO Think Tank In My World In My World - Fan Fiction John Edwards Fabulous Facts Know Thy Enemy lolterizt Michael Moore Mitt Romney Ads News Round-Up Newsish Fakery No, McCain't Our Military Permalink Contest Precision Guided Humor Assignments Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Ronin Profiles Ronin Thought of the Day SarahK's TV stuff Scary Evil Monkey Simpsons Trivia Songs & Poems State of the Frank Report Superego Totally True Tidbits WEsistance Is Facile Why Me Laugh? Yvonne's Ashes By Month
December 2008September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 March 1933
|