Something about Rudy just doesn't pass the 'smell test' with me. This confirms it.

Yeah, ChisA, I know what you mean. That guy just ain't right (I think the NY firefighters have it right). So, the only thing I CAN say is that Rudy would be better than Hillary.

A one term actor politician who was elected on a "pro-choice" stand. He also supported the McCain-Feingold "reform". Now he hits the spotlight and he is "pro-life."

Is his brain on drugs or does he just talk----real-------slow?

Just say no to Fred "Goober" Thompson.

He's a two-term Senator, son. (Spoken real slow, WB, like they do in Tennessee when they're making their fine whiskey.) Goober? Is that like your fav guy, Gomer Pile?

I'm not surprised you don't "get" Fred!, WB, as he tends to appeal to those with the intellect and integrity to appreciate the finer things in life.

Rudy would be better than Hillary or Obama, but by how much?? In my opinion not much--I am pro-life but that is between a woman and God, I am also very pro-gun. Rudy is as bad as Bloomberg when it comes to guns, and I say us pro-gun, pro-life, patriots need to stand up and in one fluid motion back-hand the loons back into kool-aid-land. Anyone who believes that Rudy is pro-gun need only to look at his record as mayor of NYC.

Guiliani isn't even an after thought for me. He was good for NY in 2001, but in light of 9/11, he should've made gun ownership mandatory for people who live within 500 feet of a mosque. That might have put a healthy respect for us infidels on their conniving little black hearts.

Rudy will govern like a conservative when I develop a “hankerin” to DO Hillary! Ain’t gonna happen…EEVER!!! These liberal pricks come along after governing as left wingers and then want our votes? With Pelosi and Reid in charge of Congress? Yea…whatever!

Yeah, from what I hear about certain New York burrows now, they're gonna WISH guns were legal there during the next "911."

"and I don't think anything other than him bowing down and asking for forgiveness for past sins will be accepted."

not even that. There's a contribution going to Fred as we speak...

Let's all hope the "country club" branch of the Republicans don't shove Rudy down our throats.

The election would lose some luster with a RINO at the top of the ticket.

Rudy is a conservative in much the same manner that King Kong was just a Harmless ape or Godzilla an innocent little lizard. I cannot abide the man. Fred! all the way.

Frank makes a great point: While Rudy may be able to finesse the abortion question he cannot explain to millions of gun rights advocates how he could ever support the litigation strategy proposed by gun control zealots. Liability suits against firearms manufacturers was a scheme promulgated by the Clintonistas to obviate the need for legislated gun restrictions. Rudy jumped in with both feet, and the assault on the Constitution continues under Lil' Mike Bloomberg.
Of course, in a choice between Hillary and Rudy I will hold my nose and pull the lever for Guliani, but I won't like it.

Fred! is the answer.

ONE DAY, THERE WILL BE FRED THOMPSON

I'd happily support Rudy -- but for VP, with FRED! at the top of the ticket.

There is nothing wrong with a little honest political diversity between the two members of the ticket in order to appeal to the broader audience. But the more conservative man needs to be at the top, and the less conservative man needs to spend his time as VP proving he really is a conservative if he wants to be on top 8 years later.

If Rudy spent 8 years as VP promoting gun rights, his sins would be forgiven as far as I am concerned.

I don't think anything other than him bowing down and asking for forgiveness for past sins will be accepted.

I'd rather he didn't. Let him stand up for his record, and go down with it.

F--kin A to Frank J

F--kin A to Frank J

You all like to bash the Kos Kids when they indulge in their feverish Bush dictatorship fantasies, but I gotta tell ya, you sound just like them when you go on about who's gonna take your bang-bangs away.

Nobody's taking your guns away, especially in the boonies where it seems most IMAOers live. Please don't get hung up on non-issues like gun control and abortion. I mean really, how long are we gonna go on about abortion, for God's sake?

The opening moves of WW III are being made as we speak, and unless you want Hillary as the Commander in Chief when the shit hits the fan, you better get behind Rudy. He is the only Republican who can beat her, no matter how much you like Fred.

Look, I don't expect any of you to believe me, but the fact of the matter is this thing will all be over by February 5th. You have my solemn oath to pull the lever for Fred in November '08 if he is the nominee. Just promise me you won't be cleaning and loading your guns, lost in some "Turner Diaries" fantasy when it comes time to pull that lever for Rudy.

Wow. I don't even know where to start on that one.

I could go into a history overview (from what I think) about the civil war, state governing independence & the right to bear arms (and why it most certainly matters), but you're alluding to how we might be just acting like reactionaries to rumors; I disagree.

It's one thing to get worked up about 9/11 theories and secret negotiations with Al Qaeda, but it's different to fight FOR certain American liberties that, if they were absent, the idea of being a citizen of the republic would be a mere title bestowed by the ruling class; even seemingly non-issues have their importance simply because we get the choice to fight for them.

I don't think Giuliani would be so terribly bad as a leader. He might be very effective & we've seen that in him already, but he wouldn't be my first choice if Thompson commits.

Wow, Alan. I just came back to read this post again on 8/22/07. And I gotta say for the record: YOU ARE SPOT ON. One of these days, I AM gonna buy you dinner, sir. (You probably won't read this. That's OK.)