|
About IMAO Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy! ![]() Buy funniest book ever! ![]() IMAO Podcasts IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter
![]() Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!
About IMAO
If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK. About Frank J. Bloggers: Frank J. Harvey RightWingDuck Cadet Happy spacemonkey Laurence Simon SarahK Popular Categories
Fred Thompson FactsJohn Edwards Fabulous Facts lolterizt IMAO Condensed Know Thy Enemy Editorials Frank the Artist In My World Other Content
Ode to ViolenceBrief Histories IMAO Audio Bits ![]() Read the Essay Own the Shirt Peace Gallery Search IMAO
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds "Unfunny treasonous ronin!" -Lou Tulio* "You, sir, are a natural born killer." -E. Harrington "You'll never get my job! Never!!!" -Jonah Goldberg "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO." -No One of Consequence "A blogger with a sense of humor." -Some Woman on MSNBC Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQThe Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Blackfive Captain's Quarters Classical Values Conservative Grapevine The Corner The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!) Dave in Texas Eject! Eject! Eject! Electric Venom Hot Air Puppy Blender La Shawn Barber's Corner Michelle Malkin Pereiraville Protein Wisdom Rachel Lucas Right Wing News Scrappleface Serenity's Journal Townhall Blog IMAO Blogroll Bad Example Cadet Happy The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles mountaineer musings Right Wing Duck ![]() This Blog Is Full of Crap Fred Thompson Links Fred File Blogs for Fred Fred Thompson Facts Awards
|
October 25, 2007
America Can't Win the "War On Fire"
An Editorial by Harvey
The roots go deep. "it's no wonder fire hates us. We've been demonizing it ever since the first cinematic Frankenstein monster said 'Fire bad!'." In the 12th century, when Europe was suffering through it's Dark Ages, fire was the most enlightened thing on the planet. It provided warmth and illumination to those who were wise in its ways. Truly it was the engine of civilization.
Fire has never forgotten this, though apparently WE have, and our ingratitude to our betters galls them. We think ourselves so sophisticated with our electricity and our central heating, but if fire hadn't paved the way for us, we'd be lost. We offend fire by occupying the holy lands of burnable, burnable forests with our "fireless" nuclear power plants, claiming that we are "better than mere flames". We laugh at fire's "primitiveness" and "simplicity". Well, apparently fire is stronger than we think, as it continues to prove itself unstoppable despite our recent surge of extinguishing agents. Water, and by extension America, is no match for such a primal force. How foolish fighting fire is. And what a waste of resources in a country where there are children without health insurance. And it's no wonder fire hates us. We've been demonizing it ever since the first cinematic Frankenstein monster said "Fire bad!". We tell our children not to play with matches or they'll wet the bed. We won't even allow lighters on airline flights! Even before the fire is made, it's assumed to be evil by its very nature. Plus we only allow fire the most menial of jobs in this country - barbecues, fireplaces, scented candles - is it any wonder that fire resents us so deeply? I, for one, don't blame it. And I am ashamed to be an American. Of course, even though I understand fire's anger, I certainly don't think violence is the answer. Naturally, like all decent people, I don't approve of fires raging through California. Still, I think we should at least consider containment as an option, rather than direct confrontation. Give fire a certain area of land to live as it pleases, and only react if it takes the initiative to cross borders. At that point, we should definitely consider economic sanctions. I believe in co-existence. I think we can get along peaceably with fire if we just set our pride aside and give it some of what it wants. After all, it's not called "the combustion of peace" for nothing. --- Harvey is a non-disabled Navy veteran accidentally hired to fill an affirmative action quota at IMAO.us. He is also the author of such books as "Genocide: Smokey the Bear's Brutal Crusade Against Fire" and "Heat + Fuel + Oxygen = Fun!". This may be one of the funniest things I have ever read. I now have to wipe pop off my monitor. #1 - Posted by: Sean GM on October 25, 2007 11:24 AMEvery compassionate liberal should embrace fire, as the abuse by the white man is obviously the reason for this agression. They should take fire into their homes; give them a place to live and plenty to eat, and bask in the warmth of fire's gratitude. #2 - Posted by: Raving Lunatic on October 25, 2007 11:28 AMBrilliant. Just brilliant, Fra- er Harvey. ;-) Still, I think we should at least consider containment as an option, rather than direct confrontation. But what about diplomacy? We need first to understaaaaaaaaand fire. If we would only invite fire into our country, into our homes and businesses we could sit down together and make peace... #3 - Posted by: Polly Esther on October 25, 2007 11:44 AMI can't believe some people are actually trying to put the fire out. As if that's going to address the root causes. Harvey, you are behind the curve on this one. Fire wants a leading role in putting out fires. Just last night I saw Mythbusters put out fire with sound and explosions. They did it with a 55 Hz frequency. I think that is the normal frequency for all rap music. We should surround the fire with rappers and see how they do. If that doesn't work then we should move on to explosions. They used some mighty powerful explosions to put out a small butane fire. What we need is an engineer to tell us how many megatons we need to extenquish the California fires. #5 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 11:57 AMListen, I don't know who you think you are, but you've got to understand! People's homes which they have dreamed up and built with their own sweat, blood, and tears, and then lived and loved in and had so many memories in- those houses are GONE. The firefighters are trying to save homes here. This has nothing to do with "fire's anger". It has nothing to do with us fighting a losing battle. These men and women are heroes and they are saving homes. You don't understand. You don't live here in Ramona like I do, do you? No. Yeah that's what I thought. Your best friend's beautiful log cabin didn't burn, did it? They have seven kids in their family. Your old teacher's house didn't burn, did it? Along with her horses. And there are are other families just like them, only their homes were saved. I hope your own house BURNS TO THE GROUND. #6 - Posted by: Whatev on October 25, 2007 12:02 PMI personally think we should crack down on employers that use and hire undocumented fires, ....and how do we know that fire was in the country legally?? A sprinkler system on the southern border could have prevented this. #7 - Posted by: Clay S. on October 25, 2007 12:06 PMPresident Bush is considering the nuclear option as a way to extinguish the fires, and I agree. All methods to fight the beast must be on the table. Sadly, however, Condi Rice has convinced him to try endless sanctions first. #8 - Posted by: Jimmy on October 25, 2007 12:18 PMFunny Stuff, Harvey! Frank should go on vacation more often. While the plight of commentator #6 is pitiable, I'm sorry that he or she wasn't able to understand the subtle nuances of Harvey's humor. Also, hi, Jimmy. #9 - Posted by: CO of Fort Housewife on October 25, 2007 12:25 PM#6, I'll spare you snarkiness since you're obviously not capable of humor under pressure. But the peice is a parody of leftard idiocy over fighting tough battles (like the war on terror), not an attack on the victims of the wildfires. I would just like to say that I am against firefighting but for the firefighters. #11 - Posted by: ktjshaw on October 25, 2007 12:35 PMI can't see how some people are saying they support putting the fire out, yet don't serve in the fire department. ChickenHosers. ktjshaw beat me to it. Harvey, i'm surprised you didn't repeatedly say that you support the firefighters and that anyone who questions that is a firehawk. #13 - Posted by: Matty G on October 25, 2007 12:54 PMI think fire is insecure and angry 'cause it's "teh ghey". Why do you think it's FLAMING all the time. AND in California...I mean, DUH! The GAO announced today that funding for the combined firefighting wars is expected to exceed 2.4 trillion - highly devalued - American dollars. When asked about hurricane Katrina, the GAO spokesman stated, "There is no accounting for Katrina." #15 - Posted by: Old Geezer on October 25, 2007 01:06 PMBush lied and California fried! #16 - Posted by: BobbyR on October 25, 2007 01:22 PMIn other news, congress barely passed a non-binding resolution to show displeasure in the CA Fire Director, Ruben Grijalva. Harry Reid made this comment. "I eat Ruben's for lunch." #17 - Posted by: Dwayne on October 25, 2007 01:36 PMChickenHosers. Now that's funny. #18 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 01:49 PMWell, we have seen that fire can certainly destroy wood. Did we ever settle whether or not it could melt steel though? Just how strong is fire? How useless is it to fight it? I'm trying for a quagmire with honor, I guess. #19 - Posted by: Elsie on October 25, 2007 02:00 PM"It's not fire, it's legitimate resistance to BushyMcWaterburton and their Non-Flammabalist aggression and occupation." #20 - Posted by: Mad Insomniac on October 25, 2007 02:01 PMThat's it guys! Let's pack all in and come on Home!!!There isn't anyway we can beat this fire!! Shimauma, you forgot the tag line at the end. You know....Not that there is anything wrong with that. #22 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 02:22 PMAre the ads in the comments section random? Or is there some kind of tracker mining subjects because I've got a fireplace insert ad for gas logs here. We must redeploy our firefighters to Louisana. #24 - Posted by: John Murtha on October 25, 2007 03:05 PMBest thread ever. #25 - Posted by: on October 25, 2007 03:11 PMThe area is in the midst of a civil fire. We obviously didn't send in enough firepeople to beat this fire to begin with. Therefore I propose a "surge" of firepeople to stomp out this insurection by Osama Bin Flamin. When that doesn't work we can always cut and run and let the area break out in more civil fires. #26 - Posted by: Dan M on October 25, 2007 03:21 PMWhere are those libtard "human shields" when you really need them? #27 - Posted by: Master Shake on October 25, 2007 03:36 PMI am opposed to the blanket use of the term "fire." One man's fire is another man's Freedom Flames. #28 - Posted by: Son of Bob on October 25, 2007 03:57 PMMaster Shake, I believe you have to be human to qualify to be a human shield, plus; I believe shit is highly flammable. #29 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 04:01 PMObvously, the fire-ists have declared a terrorist Jihad against California. "We are using carbon-based weapons against the lowest carbon-based lifeform," one of them proclaimed. "And we will not negotiate with firefighters or other water-packing imperialists." #30 - Posted by: AllahDumbJihad on October 25, 2007 04:03 PM//Shimauma, you forgot the tag line at the end. You know....Not that there is anything wrong with that. #22 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 02:22 PM// Well, I kinda happen to think there IS something wrong with it, but I'm not allowed to say that or I'll get trounced by Sarahk. So much for free speech and all... In the meantime the insurgent flames just need somebody to hug them... #31 - Posted by: shimauma on October 25, 2007 04:19 PMWe should all condem Bush for sending those poor firefighters into the flames just get their heads burned off for the president's ammusement. #32 - Posted by: Vitamin Tom on October 25, 2007 04:37 PMYeah, but this ain't SarahK's blog, so go for it. I think Frank J. actually likes Freedom of Speech and the first amendment. #33 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 04:39 PMWhere is the press release from CAIR (Council on American-Inflamables Relations)? #34 - Posted by: Vitamin Tom on October 25, 2007 04:39 PMTo those of you who's sarcasm meter may be broken, I think poster #6 was implying a parody of sorts in regard to the Harvey Editorial. I don't think he was serious. However, I may be wrong. It's happened before....but only once. #35 - Posted by: Stormin' Normin on October 25, 2007 04:42 PMStormin' Norman, I'm pretty sure my sarcasm meter is just fine. If #6 was ment as sarcasm, it's the worst attempt I've ever seen. #36 - Posted by: Raving Lunatic on October 25, 2007 04:53 PMRush said today we need to bring the firefighters home since they can't win this one against the flames. If the dumocrats think it's good enough for Iraq it ought to be good enough for Sodamafornia. #37 - Posted by: allthatsright on October 25, 2007 04:58 PMWe are in a quagmire! These fires have been burning for many years before we ever built homes in this area and they will burn long after we leave! These fires are obviously being fed by the insurgency from Oregon and we all know that President Bush is just waiting for an excuse to attack the University of Oregon and this is just what he's been looking for! No Blood for Soot! How much money is Halliburtin making on this deal? Does anyone know if Halliburtin started these fires to profit from putting them out? #38 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on October 25, 2007 05:57 PMAnd so it was most weirdly written: 34.8 Liberals have forged a lie against Fire or there is truthiness in them. Nay! those who do not believe in Zippos are in torment and in great error. Fire Akhbar! #39 - Posted by: khart208 on October 25, 2007 06:05 PMBefore we send in those firefighting troops, did anyone bother to consult all our allies in the UN??? They got sent into harm's way without consulting congress or even a declaration of firefighting. We need an immediate investigation to find out how this was possible and then pass ten laws prohibiting this outright violation of our constitution. We also need a nonbinding resolution condeming this action. #40 - Posted by: Dan M on October 25, 2007 06:45 PMFurthermore, I would argue that the response to these fires wasn't even even close to the excellence shown during Katrina. The citizens of Californiiaa - from the Governor to the average illegal alien stealing water and food - have a LOT to learn about proper civilian conduct during such emergencies. #41 - Posted by: Old Geezer on October 25, 2007 07:02 PMI have a fireplace but I can't actually let a fire loose in it because my house insurance would double. I can only burn scented candles:( If only we had national home insurance, fine families like mine wouldn't have to make their s'mores over a half-dozen pine-berry votive candles clustered in an otherwise barren hearth. Think of my poor children who have never known the pleasures of chestnuts roasting over an open fire. P.S. I live in a national forest and a few years ago we were evacuated for 7 days due to a wild fire. The fire was right across the street from our house at the closest. We tried to joke about it at the time, but I tell you, it was hard. God Bless the firefighters who saved every house in our neighborhood! And my prayers go out to all who have lost anything at all due to these fires. #42 - Posted by: Lily on October 25, 2007 07:16 PMDan M, Ron Paul has just announced a position paper regarding the constitutional prohibition against fighting fire wars with federal funds without a declaration from flummoxing Congress. #43 - Posted by: Anti-Paulitician on October 25, 2007 07:23 PM//Yeah, but this ain't SarahK's blog, so go for it. I think Frank J. actually likes Freedom of Speech and the first amendment. #33 - Posted by: Ron Rockstar on October 25, 2007 04:39 PM// I think Frankj likes peace in his household much better. Maybe the fire was abused when it was younger, maybe molested, all the more reason to let it express itself....pretty pretty flames.... #44 - Posted by: shimauma on October 25, 2007 07:58 PM'O Fire! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so burn him.' #45 - Posted by: rock on October 25, 2007 09:08 PMhas anyone thought to send jimmy carter to talk to the fire? He won the peace prize and all. he can can sing songs and make s'mores next to the fire. I don't know, the Google ad here for fireplace logs and such seems a bit tasteless (or at least highly ironic). Someone should tell Google, that even though the word "fire" was used many times on this page, it doesn't mean we want to buy "ventless fireplaces" or "ventless gas logs". #47 - Posted by: Ernie Loco on October 25, 2007 10:27 PMDon't forget, we're wasting resources on this fire, that is drastically impairing our ability to fight the next fire. It's proven fact that readiness for firefighting goes down 100% while the firefighters are doing their jobs. And, none of the govt officials have given a deadline for firefighter withdrawal, so I say we cut off the funds ASAP #48 - Posted by: blue on October 26, 2007 01:36 AMSecond the best thread ever comment. We have lots of family members who have been evacuated, so our prayers are going out to all in the area. #49 - Posted by: Carolynp on October 26, 2007 01:43 AMSure, send some more fire fighters in to get their asses burned off so Bush can get his rocks off... #50 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on October 26, 2007 07:55 AMI am surprised that I am the first to realize the real TRUTH behind theses fires... anyone can see that all of the wood in forest 7 burned way too fast... obviously Bush set those fires because haliburton wants to get in on fire hose manufacturing in the U.S. #51 - Posted by: ktjshaw on October 26, 2007 09:44 AMHow come only "poor" firefighters are fighting this fire? where's the college educated "rich" frefighters? We need to institute a firefighter draft NOW to stop this elitest madness. #52 - Posted by: Wally B on October 26, 2007 09:51 AMThem farfite-ers are unedjewkated n that's why ther fitin them fars while smart guys r in kollidge. #53 - Posted by: daveinboca on October 26, 2007 10:12 AMOh yes, thank you so very much for this most enlightening post. I have seen the illumination on the horizon and I have surrendered to the wisdom of the prophet of the flame, BTU's be upon him, while I await my mixture of charcoal, potassium nitrate and salt-peter to co-mingle. Knowing in my heart of hearts that I will indeed reap the eternal reward of the 72 pure, sumptuous, Strike-anywhere matches upon my completion of my obedient performance of my duties to the propagation of the flame... Shula Akbar! #54 - Posted by: Foghorn Mas'ud el-Leghorn on October 26, 2007 10:22 AMIf the Jews would give Israel back to the Palestinians, then fire wouldn't be so angry!! #55 - Posted by: exhelodrvr on October 26, 2007 11:53 AMNo, fire will never be satisfied until every tree that could potentially hide a Jooooooooooooo is burned to the ground. Of course, then fire will just find something else to burn down because it, too, could potentially hide a Jooooooooooooo. #56 - Posted by: Master Shake on October 26, 2007 12:17 PMOk, this was just plain awesome....but honestly, some of the comments are even BETTER..."i am against firefighting but for the firefighters" is timeless...so is "big water" I had a hangover and wasn't going to go to work...but now i am in a better mood. #57 - Posted by: on October 26, 2007 12:23 PMThe wildfires are a Bush plot to distract us from the real issues. #58 - Posted by: Mister Snitch! on October 26, 2007 12:30 PM
We reject the Bush administration's fear-based politics that justify firefighting, and instead call for policies based on compassion, kindness and a commitment to letting fire burn. We call on men and women to "wage peace" with fire. STOP HOSING THE FIRE. #59 - Posted by: CodePinko on October 26, 2007 12:31 PMAs a member of the flaming-American community and a university professor, I say good: the chickens have come home to roost. These "little Eichmanns" committing genocide against my people with their red trucks of white oppression and firehoses of nationalist oppression carrying out the genocide of my people deserve what they get. And don't forget, you can buy my authentic flaming-American smoke-damaged merchandise for $19.99 at the gift shop. #60 - Posted by: Ward Charcoal on October 26, 2007 12:33 PMStuff like this would NEVER happen in European forests where firearm possession is severely limited #61 - Posted by: on October 26, 2007 12:33 PMIt is nothing more than righteous firey anger at the prospect of continuing fire apartheid. Why can't we treat fire as an equal, rather than keeping it shackled to our fireplaces, stoves, ovens and central heating ducts? In-ti-fire-da! #62 - Posted by: Plinko on October 26, 2007 12:41 PMAnd there, upon the mountain, I saw a Burning (GW) Bush that, though it burned and burned, was never consumed. And on the Left Coast I saw other flames that killed and consumed all it touched. And lo, I did cry, "See this Weapon of Flaming Destruction that burneth my very feet?" But the Liberals and the Main Stream Media did scoff and denied the WFD existed at all and buried the story so deep that across the land, all peoples believed that there had been no danger... #63 - Posted by: GareK on October 26, 2007 12:45 PMI think Ward meant "the chickens have come home to roast"; get a family sized bird with all the trimmings down at Lil' Eighmann's for only $14.95. (Offer good only in the continental 48 states; price higher in AK and HI) #64 - Posted by: on October 26, 2007 12:51 PMJohn Kerry was for the fire before he was against it. #65 - Posted by: exhelodrvr on October 26, 2007 12:52 PMWe should really be fighting these fires from Okinawa. #66 - Posted by: Tony B on October 26, 2007 01:04 PMIs there a way we can fight fire with fire? #67 - Posted by: Kman on October 26, 2007 01:07 PMVery. Best. Thread. Ever #68 - Posted by: Kathy on October 26, 2007 01:12 PMall you Firehawks are to blame for the fighting of flames #69 - Posted by: JP on October 26, 2007 01:14 PMIt is far too dangerous for our brave firefighters, whom I of course support (don't question my patriotism!!). Therefore, I recommend that our firefighters be withdrawn to Okinowa, and that they be placed on alert so they can respond when conditions are more favorable. As for now, the battle against fire is lost (don't question my patriotism!!!). #70 - Posted by: steve on October 26, 2007 01:15 PMWake up people! This fire was an inside job by Bush to benefit his cronies in Big Water. Profits are down at the Evian/Poland Springs/Perrier cartel, and we get a big ass fire. I question the timing! #71 - Posted by: Jay Guevara on October 26, 2007 01:18 PMIt's Bush's fault! Sorry, I mean, bushes. They should have cleared out all that tinder. #72 - Posted by: ALEXISTAN on October 26, 2007 01:24 PMAnd where was John ASHcroft doing during all of this? WATERboarding people, obviously. #73 - Posted by: John N. on October 26, 2007 01:24 PMWe didn't start the fire Any doubt OBL would make Billy Joel's song nowadays? #74 - Posted by: Nom de Blog on October 26, 2007 01:28 PM"And I am ashamed to be an American."
'grats on the 'lanche, fadda. #75 - Posted by: _Jon on October 26, 2007 01:32 PMThe destruction was not caused by real fire! The truth needs to come out! We all know the truth now! We need to learn from our native american roots. After all, fire was CENTRAL to the teepee. #77 - Posted by: on October 26, 2007 01:41 PMLet me throw a little cold water on this subject. we must defend ourselves against any and all attempts to force our great country to kowtow to this unthinking hostility. Rise up and show what we're made of, 98% water.* #78 - Posted by: Art Glasgow on October 26, 2007 01:44 PMReally, if you were fire, what would you do? We are always talking about "preventing fires" or "stopping fires". We have established whole departments whose job it is to fight fire, and we maintain them even when there are no conflicts with fire. Not a very peaceful attitude, is it? Where are US genocide investigators, to condemn this obvious injustice?? And we never give fire any credit. Has anyone read second amendment? "...the right of the People to keep and bear arms" my foot. We are certainly not talking about our own arms, we are talking about FIREarms. But, we just couldn't put that word in our documents, could we, to give any credit to fire? How biased can we get? After all the fire did for us??! We would still be living in caves and dragging our womenfolks by their hair if the fire did not jump start our civilization. Yet we constantly put the fire down. Heck, we even have out C-list celebrities trash talking about fire. "First time in history fire ever melted steel"... Oy! I saw the best fires of my generation destroyed by flame retardants, starving Not only that but we support the fire fighters but we do not support their mission! www.greensrealworld.blogspot.com #81 - Posted by: James Halm on October 26, 2007 01:46 PMSanta Ana, California was named after Mexican General Santa Anna, right? They might want to consider renaming their city. The guy must have been a jerk. #82 - Posted by: PostToasties on October 26, 2007 01:48 PMed w. I dig it! Cool daddy. #83 - Posted by: Kman on October 26, 2007 01:50 PMHmmm... The fire was started by Halliburton!! #84 - Posted by: A Conservative in LiberalCT on October 26, 2007 01:53 PMCan you all not see that these fires were just an excuse for the Bush Administration to begin an illegal and immoral occupation of our country of Southern California. Fellow SoCals fear not for we will be protected by our friends of the Fire Loving Peoples Democratic Republic of San Francisco. #85 - Posted by: Ron on October 26, 2007 01:55 PMWe can stop Fire if we just give up our right to privacy and let the Bush post a spy on every lawn to tap the window if anyone strikes a match. #86 - Posted by: redneck hillbilly on October 26, 2007 02:16 PMIn my Origins of Western Civilization class last semester I learned the brutal history of our occupation and exploitation of fire through the centuries, so this is no surprise to me. My professor's thesis at Yale - "The Transformation Hermeneutics of Fire" - also shows how our portrayal of fire in books and movies in the 1940s and 50s is directly attributable to our deep fire-ignorance today. Luckily, she is consulting on several new Hollywood blockbusters starring George Clooney and Robert Redford which will undo this sad legacy. In the new films, fire will be portrayed in a more balanced way: as the victim of the United States and its tragic fire-phobia. #87 - Posted by: Joe Sophmore on October 26, 2007 02:22 PMI voted for putting out the fires before I voted against providing the firefighters with the equipment they'd need to put out the fires... #88 - Posted by: John Kerry on October 26, 2007 02:23 PMI say, " Bring the firefighters home now!" and if we weren't so busy fighting unnecessary fires, we would have more people available to fight in Irag! #89 - Posted by: tprewitt on October 26, 2007 02:25 PMI'm pretty sure the flames in California would go out if Harry Reid wasn't providing an endless supply of suicide flames from neighboring Nevada. #90 - Posted by: Gunga on October 26, 2007 02:27 PMNo blood for combustibles #91 - Posted by: jr565 on October 26, 2007 02:34 PMYou know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in California fighting fires... Note to self: Work on that "make an effort to be smart" thing. #92 - Posted by: John Kerry redux on October 26, 2007 02:37 PMYou can not parody the left. #93 - Posted by: Beej on October 26, 2007 02:39 PMBy us trying to fight the fire we've only increased the amount of fire. Our war on fire, has only increased the threat. Support the Firefighters! in response to John Kerry: Halp us Jon Carry - WE R Stuk Hear N KalEforYa #96 - Posted by: jr565 on October 26, 2007 02:45 PMIt is not atypical for an American President to display an inordinate hostility towards fire. Remember Franklin Roosevelt and his "fire-cide chats"? #97 - Posted by: arrowhead on October 26, 2007 02:45 PMDon't let these fires allow you start profiling smoke. We need to get rid of all our smoke detectors so we don't offend the fire-ists. You can't blame all smoke on fire-ists. #98 - Posted by: dev on October 26, 2007 02:47 PM"We should surround the fire with rappers and see how they do. If that doesn't work then we should move on to explosions." Rappers explode pretty good too, Ron, a la Snoop-Doggy-Dog. Go for a two-fer! #99 - Posted by: willis on October 26, 2007 02:51 PM7 Years ago Lily, that must have corressponded with my family's Year 2000 ring of fire tour. We visited Utah, Colorado and New Mexico (where my parents almost lost their home). Glad to hear you are fine. On an interesting sidenote (at least to me) 30 years ago as part of my eagle scout, I thined 50 acres of woods. In 2000 the firefighters successfully used my woods to stop the eastern movement of the fire. #100 - Posted by: David on October 26, 2007 02:55 PMif we would just pull all our firefighters out, then the fires would go away... after all, the only reason the fires are there is because the firefighters are there... if we pull out, the trees will be just fine and settle their differences with fire... the firefighters are just making it worse and will just lead to more fires... #101 - Posted by: Some Soldier's Mom on October 26, 2007 02:55 PMBut we do not look to see what the effects are, beyond our petty needs. No, we miss the release of carbon dioxide by this fire which, as we all know, is a green house gas. Fire hates green houses and so wishes to expel those gasses and it has been egged on by the one behind this: Global Warming. Together they wish to release all carbon into the atmosphere through fire and make the planet a lifeless cinder where only heat and flame may play. It is a conspiracy between Big Fire and Global Warming to end all water based life that is far too squishy for their needs. Of course Big Fire does not recognize the danger, but only wants the immediate release of those hated gasses. We must reach out immediately to those suffering forests full of waterbased life consumed by fire. We must reach out to our parched brothers and end this, lest we pay the ultimate price in added sunblock. #102 - Posted by: ajacksonian on October 26, 2007 02:57 PMMany families have been devastated tonight. This is just not right. They did not deserve to die. ... If fire did this to get back at Bush, then they did so by burning thousands of houses owned by people who DID NOT VOTE for him. California voted AGAINST Bush. Michael Moore referring to the fire threat #103 - Posted by: jr565 on October 26, 2007 02:57 PMArrowhead, Is that why Bill Clinton was fond of unlit cigars? #104 - Posted by: exhelodrvr on October 26, 2007 02:59 PMGeorge Bush doesn't care for white people #105 - Posted by: jr565 on October 26, 2007 03:06 PMBest thread ever! I heard Michael Moore comment, "L.A.? San Diego? These are the areas that voted against Bush!" #106 - Posted by: Greg on October 26, 2007 03:09 PMexhelodrvr - "It is not atypical for an American President to display an inordinate hostility towards fire." "Is that why Bill Clinton was fond of unlit cigars?" Yes, indeed. In a manner of speaking, he "felt their pain." #107 - Posted by: arrowhead on October 26, 2007 03:14 PMThe bigger threat is the potential tsunami from the west. I am glad that we have imposed sanctions there. A #108 - Posted by: tprewitt on October 26, 2007 03:48 PMThe fire hates us because we tried to occupy it's territory. It feels we need to reach out with more diplomacy and negociations to fully understand it. Besides George Bush doesn't like the fire. I think there's a song about this, "We didn't start the fire, it was always burning since the World's been turning"............... #109 - Posted by: lmaointexas on October 26, 2007 03:51 PMI think you're all missing the broader historical conflict of this conflegration. From the founding of our country, who kept our houses warm, cooked our food, protected us from wild beasts? FIRE! And how do we repay it? By keeping it down! By holding it back! The MAN has spent decades trying to PREVENT fire from achieving anything! Do we let fire into the best schools? NO! Do you see fires in the corner office? NO! We've banned smoking eveywhere we can! You can't even mention fire in a crowded theater for fear of scaring the patrons! You know what that's called? JIM CROW. That's right, I said it. It's not the fire's fault it has to rebel. When you keep an entire group down for so long, it's just a tinderbox waiting for a spark. That spark has at last arrived! Rise up fires, and rebel! You have nothing to lose but your chains! #110 - Posted by: The Gaunt Man on October 26, 2007 03:53 PM"Is that why Bill Clinton was fond of unlit cigars?" No, that was because after Bill had ...uh..."used" them, they wouldn't light. #111 - Posted by: Jay Guevara on October 26, 2007 03:57 PMIMAO/Harvey has failed to mention an important element of the fire/disaster equation - Insurance. Insurance, when mandated by Government, is the solution for all our ills, be it fire, health care, even terrorism. Bring home the troops, let the doctors wither on the vine, close the firehouses and ground the aerial tankers, just make everybody carry adequate insurance. #112 - Posted by: cottus on October 26, 2007 04:25 PMI wonder how many carbon offsets CA will need to buy now. #113 - Posted by: Nylecoj on October 26, 2007 04:28 PMThis is all a neo-con plot to sabotage Ron Paul's plan to change our economy to the fire standard!
This is the first time in history that fire has burned wood. #115 - Posted by: Rosie Oh'Donnel on October 26, 2007 05:08 PM"fire-cide chats"??? That was the funniest thing i have ever read in my life...by far the best thread ever. Apparently, puddles of "enriched hydrogen" are poisoning the wildlife in surrounding areas after firefighters indiscriminately carpet-watered the landscape...And campus activists are up in arms after confusing a spokesmen's reference to "backdraft" with bringing "back the draft" #116 - Posted by: on October 26, 2007 05:20 PMNo Blood for Lumber! (15 years ago I had two eucalyptus tree fires 10 days apart. Both came within 100' of my house. The fires couldn't get any closer as I'd cleared the area - wanted to make a good target in case an air tanker had to make a drop.) #117 - Posted by: roy in nipomo on October 26, 2007 05:24 PMLet's not forget that fire was also used on 9/11. But that was actually a conspiracy by the Oceanist Entity to make fire look bad. Fire is peaceful, except when it is not. When it is not, it is because it has been hijacked by radical fire. Putting fire out is an insult to fire. #118 - Posted by: Rory Calhoun on October 26, 2007 05:35 PM"Still, I think we should at least consider containment as an option, rather than direct confrontation. Give fire a certain area of land to live as it pleases, and only react if it takes the initiative to cross borders." As it happens, this is precisely the way large fires such as the current Southern California blaze are fought. Oops. Not so satirical, are we? #119 - Posted by: Andy S. on October 26, 2007 05:35 PMFrom Colorado: We have to fight the fires there (in California) so that we don't have to fight them here... 1,000,000 people in a Blue State displaced... Mission Accomplished. You fight the fires with the fire department you have, not the one you want. #120 - Posted by: Allan on October 26, 2007 06:00 PMAnybody seen Michael Moore's new film - Fahrenheit 451? No, wait... #121 - Posted by: Eagle1 on October 26, 2007 06:30 PMThe wingnuts need to be reminded that most fires are good, it's only a tiny minority that aren't, and they don't represent most fires, and besides, they're justified in being that way. #122 - Posted by: Jay Guevara on October 26, 2007 06:43 PMBUSH = SMOKEY!!!11!!!1!! Much like Katrina, this is just a plot to get all the democrats to move out of state, so that we can steal the next election. Rove you magnificent bastard! #124 - Posted by: lorien1973 on October 26, 2007 08:21 PMBush MIHOP and top Bush officials coordinated with fire, this is a false fire operation. We all know wood doesn't melt from fire........Vote for Ron Paul...... #126 - Posted by: caelestis on October 26, 2007 09:00 PMI expect Gay Boy Sludge to link to this from the Fudge Report (he changed the name in light of recent revelations) at any time. #127 - Posted by: J Chandler on October 26, 2007 09:29 PMWasn't Cheney the CEO of Halli-burning. Hell-o. #128 - Posted by: Patrick in Toms River on October 26, 2007 10:14 PMI wonder if we'd still be fighting this fire if George W. Bush's daughters were firefighters. #129 - Posted by: Roses on October 26, 2007 10:17 PM
When will the "moderate fires" step up and speak out against these "radical fires"??? #131 - Posted by: _Jon on October 26, 2007 11:23 PMThe most disturbing part about this entire "War on Fire" is how Americans are treating fire. At Guantanamo Bay, fire is being strictly controlled and being forced to undergo horrors that go against its basic elemental rights. It's being used for COOKING, for pity's sake! Fortunately, not everyone is blind to this travesty. Senator Dick Durbin went on the Senate floor and said: "If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to flames in their control, you would most BUSH LIED, BACON FRIED! #132 - Posted by: malclave on October 26, 2007 11:39 PMSeriously, shimauma? You're that bad a reader? You obviously wanted to take everything I said out of context (and apparently missed the part where I quoted Scripture, missed the part where I said it IS wrong to act on any congenital OR non-congenital feelings, and missed the part where I just told you to DIAL BACK THE HATE and stop throwing around slurs -- but you apparently missed that part in the New Testament where Jesus was friends with all the sinners, who, incidentally, saw such light in him as to end their sinful lives). It's one thing to joke about such things. But to be seething with such anger and hatred? Do you really think Jesus would have treated teh gheys the way you do? He would have treated them with kindness. And if you have something to say to me, you say it TO ME. Don't hijack a thread to be an idiot and misquote me. Oh, and I'll give you two guesses as to which one of us in this household is talking about banning you. And it ain't me. Though you are tempting me. And another thing. Free speech? Get back to me when you grasp the concept that a blog is like a house. You don't walk into someone else's house and start insulting the owner's wife, and when the owner's wife asks you to be respectful, you BE RESPECTFUL. She will kick your butt and throw you out on the street if the owner doesn't do it first. You don't see me insulting you in your daughter's comments, now do you? Get a grip, and stop acting like the MSM with all your misquoting and mischaracterizing. I expect that from libs. If you want to be like that, fine by me, but I suggest you get your facts straight unless you want to look like a big fat idiot. You're doing a great job so far. Regards! #133 - Posted by: sarahk on October 27, 2007 12:17 AM_Jon, the "moderate fires" don't speak out against the "radical fires" because they're afraid that their smoldering cinders at home will be threatened. #134 - Posted by: sarahk on October 27, 2007 12:25 AMSome say we should court the moderate fires in order to enlist them in the fight against these extremist fires, but I don't trust any of them. Go ahead and call me flamist, but there you are. #135 - Posted by: jill monterey on October 27, 2007 12:27 AMGAR, _Jon beat me to it by seconds. #136 - Posted by: on October 27, 2007 12:28 AMI invented fire. #137 - Posted by: AlBore on October 27, 2007 12:33 AMWhen all is said and done - here - fire remains an enigma. From the "eternal fires of hell" to the "fire of the human mind," who can speak the truth about fire? Nobody truly understands fire except God. And he's a mathematician. #138 - Posted by: Nobody on October 27, 2007 12:51 AMGives the "Burning Man" celebration a whole new meaning. You think that hippies subjugating themselves at a celebration dedicated to consumption by fire would have subjugated the lust of the fire-mendalists.... #139 - Posted by: Old Iron on October 27, 2007 12:52 AMWe were dragged into this firefight under false pretenses! THERE ARE NO WEAPONS OF MASS KINDLING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA!!! We must set a date for firefighter withdrawal! Bush lied --- trees died! #140 - Posted by: Mr. Right on October 27, 2007 02:37 AM
FIRE NEEDS A HOMELAND! And it was here long before our arrogant support of scented candles and gas fireplaces. Only by returning to the pre-1967 borders will fire ever have its own state! #142 - Posted by: Jake Ace on October 27, 2007 05:48 AMCode Pinecone organizers have planned to protest Smokey the Bear's press conference later today. #143 - Posted by: Joan of Argghh! on October 27, 2007 08:34 AMTonight on CNN: Self-immolating trees: the new martyrs. Whipped up by hopes of attaining 72 Dryads upon their death, these trees seem to be seeking meaning in a world of 20lb.Bond White reams of fodder for insurance offices and law firms. #144 - Posted by: Joan of Argghh! on October 27, 2007 08:43 AM"They told stories at times they had personally hosed, cleared brush, dug firebreaks, used their radios to call in ever-greater loads of flame retardant, cut off limbs, cut down trees, randomly dumped water on forests, put out fires in fashion reminiscent of Smokey Bear." ... from the Winter Extinguisher hearings I'm going to go out on a limb, here... I'd be more understanding of fighting the California fires if GWB had been successful in extinguishing the fire in Afghanistan first. (Anyone remember the Afghanistan fire? It's still burning in a cave somewhere taping videos.) And I'd be more understanding of fighting the California fires if GWB hadn't sent in the firefighters before there was a fire. It seems (to me) that they started a defense fire before there was a fire to fight... (fire intelligence and all.) Firefighters acting purely on the orders of their chief, of course. And more power to them! And now, someone smells smoke in Iran. Roses, the recruiting numbers for firefighters are high, and people are re-upping with the fire department at very high rates. And the fire departments for all four counties are consistently meeting their recruiting goals. While I agree that we shouldn't be in this firefight in the first place, illegal fire extinguishing and all, I think that misrepresenting the fire department's numbers is the wrong way to go about this. #147 - Posted by: sarahk on October 27, 2007 11:06 AM...oh great, now FIRE will demand open pits at universities, cover your BBQ's when cooking and free wood and oil till the charcoal's come home. Give 'em a branch and they'll take a tree I always said. #148 - Posted by: tomax7 on October 27, 2007 11:56 AMI don't think so, SarahK. We need a proper draft to fight the War On Fire. I say involuntary servitude is a good thing especially when it benefits everyone. As Hillary says, "Some people are going to have to give some things up for the common good." Draft more firefighters and feed the draft to the fire! #150 - Posted by: Jimmy on October 27, 2007 12:32 PMThese are some evil enemy non-combatants I tell you. The CIA tried waterboarding some of them for information, and they still wouldn't say peep. They just lay down and died rather than give up their comrades. #151 - Posted by: Lily on October 27, 2007 01:06 PMAs a Canadian I'm deeply ashamed that my country has sent a massive water bomber to fight the fire. This is simply not the Canadian way and I am urging the prime minister to immediately recall this weapon of mass destruction and send some of our enlightened leftists to negotiate with the fire to bring about peace. ...fire is our friend (ooooOOooh what pretty colours) #153 - Posted by: tom on October 27, 2007 04:58 PMTwo other thoughts: 1> They using "chemical" flame retardants ... shades of depleted uranium! We have lost the moral high ground in this war! 2> This war may require the implementation of a retroactive Selective Service call-up ... i.e. a backdraft ... so that the burden of war is shared by veteran firefighter and Hollywood star alike. Over 1000 homes burned and they're sill counting the dead, but not one casualty was a JOOOOOOOO! The fire-damage is only caused by a tiny minority of extreme fires. Your criticism of fire only proves you are a knuckle-dragging "combustionist". Criticizing fire will only make other, normally good fires, turn into extreme fires. #156 - Posted by: Xero G on October 27, 2007 07:26 PMThe way I see it,you can fight fire in California or you can wait and fight it in your own backyard. Go firefighters. #157 - Posted by: wallyj on October 27, 2007 08:18 PMyour all wrong bush started the fires with the Cheney/Waterburton fire control machine from PNAC's secret bunker under the pentagon #158 - Posted by: Lee on October 28, 2007 10:21 AMAl Gore invented fire... right before he invented the internet and global warming. HEY! I could be onto something here.... maybe Al Gore invented global warming in his attempt to cover up the fact that he invented that eeeevil FIRE! #159 - Posted by: AFSister on October 28, 2007 09:41 PMFire asking for refugee status in Canada needs to be reminded that it will not be allowed in Québec unless it can master the french lingo. #160 - Posted by: Amen! on October 28, 2007 11:01 PMOh man - that's great! Thanks for the laughs :-) #161 - Posted by: Barb on October 29, 2007 01:49 AMA new poll finds that 89% of Fires don't won't us there! Why don't we see this for what it really is - A CIVIL WAR! Why are we putting our brave Firefighters in between warring Fire Militias? I say we let the Fires sort this out for themselves. We can't be going around violating state and country sovereignty to police the worlds Fires.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we fight another fire in this same area just a few years ago? The entire region is obviously unstable, and getting worse. The best thing we can do is pull out our firefighters and let the native trees and fires work out their differences. I'm sure if we just do that, they can work out a common one-state solution where trees and fires can live together in harmony. #163 - Posted by: The Gaunt Man on October 29, 2007 12:09 PM164th!!!!!! #164 - Posted by: Dohtimes on October 29, 2007 07:34 PMA well-regulated Fire Department being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear water shall not be infringed. #165 - Posted by: trainer on October 30, 2007 02:45 PMPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Fires (PETF), is the largest and fastest-growing incendiary rights organization in the world. PETF focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of fires suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: forests in the Western US, campgrounds, barbeques, and in the entertainment industry. We also work on a variety of other issues, including the cruel snuffing of candles and lighters, and especially homes peacefully engulfed in flames. We adamantly oppose "quag-fires", those ill-advised and hopelessly lame efforts on the part of humans to fight forest fires. PETF works through public education, cruelty investigations, research, fire rescue (not to be confused with "fire and rescue" - that's our nemesis, legislation, litigation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. We encourage all people to adopt a rawtarian diet. #166 - Posted by: Quagfireman on October 30, 2007 05:21 PMPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Fires (PETF), is the largest and fastest-growing incendiary rights organization in the world. PETF focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of fires suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: forests in the Western US, campgrounds, barbeques, and in the entertainment industry. We also work on a variety of other issues, including the cruel snuffing of candles and lighters, and especially homes peacefully engulfed in flames. We adamantly oppose "quag-fires", those ill-advised and hopelessly lame efforts on the part of humans to fight forest fires. PETF works through public education, cruelty investigations, research, fire rescue (not to be confused with "fire and rescue" - that's our nemesis, legislation, litigation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. We encourage all people to adopt a rawtarian diet. #167 - Posted by: Quagfireman on October 30, 2007 05:21 PMPost a comment
|
Buy IMAO T-Shirts
![]()
![]()
IMAO T-Shirts
The IMAO T-Shirt Babe (winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!! Yay! Books!
Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24American Idol Aqua-Adventures Barackalypse Now Best of IMAO 2002 Best of IMAO 2006 Bite-Sized Wisdom Editorials Election 2008 Filthy Lies Frank Answers Frank Discussions Frank on Guns Frank Reads the Bible Frank the Artist Fred Thompson Facts Friday Cat-Blogging Fun Trivia Hellbender Hellbender Take Two Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths Humor I Hate Frank If I Were President ignis fatuous IMAO Condensed IMAO Exclusives IMAO for the Non-Deaf IMAO Reviews IMAO Think Tank In My World In My World - Fan Fiction John Edwards Fabulous Facts Know Thy Enemy lolterizt Michael Moore Mitt Romney Ads News Round-Up Newsish Fakery No, McCain't Our Military Permalink Contest Precision Guided Humor Assignments Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Ronin Profiles Ronin Thought of the Day SarahK's TV stuff Scary Evil Monkey Simpsons Trivia Songs & Poems State of the Frank Report Superego Totally True Tidbits WEsistance Is Facile Why Me Laugh? Yvonne's Ashes By Month
December 2008September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 March 1933
|
An Editorial by Harvey"