About IMAO



Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy!


Buy funniest book ever!





IMAO Podcasts
IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter

Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!

About IMAO
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just, 
And this be our motto--'In God is our trust.' 
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave 
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK.

About Frank J.

Bloggers:
Frank J.
Harvey
RightWingDuck
Cadet Happy
spacemonkey
Laurence Simon
SarahK

Popular Categories
Fred Thompson Facts
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
lolterizt
IMAO Condensed
Know Thy Enemy
Editorials
Frank the Artist
In My World
Other Content
Ode to Violence
Brief Histories
IMAO Audio Bits


Read the Essay
Own the Shirt
Peace Gallery
Search IMAO
Google
Web www.imao.us
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds

"Unfunny treasonous ronin!"
-Lou Tulio*

"You, sir, are a natural born killer."
-E. Harrington

"You'll never get my job! Never!!!"
-Jonah Goldberg

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO."
-No One of Consequence

"A blogger with a sense of humor."
-Some Woman on MSNBC
Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQ
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Blackfive
Captain's Quarters
Classical Values
Conservative Grapevine
The Corner
The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!)
Dave in Texas
Eject! Eject! Eject!
Electric Venom
Hot Air
Puppy Blender
La Shawn Barber's Corner
Michelle Malkin
Pereiraville
Protein Wisdom
Rachel Lucas
Right Wing News
Scrappleface
Serenity's Journal
Townhall Blog

IMAO Blogroll
Bad Example
Cadet Happy
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
mountaineer musings
Right Wing Duck
SarahK & Cadet Happy snark TV
This Blog Is Full of Crap

Fred Thompson Links
Fred File
Blogs for Fred
Fred Thompson Facts
Awards



 

December 06, 2007
Question
Posted by Frank J. at 05:42 PM | View blog reactions | Comments (23)

Do you think Romney's speech today was aimed at people who were considering not voting for him because he's Mormon or people considering not voting for him because they think people won't vote for him because he's Mormon? Or was it just a pointless grab for attention?

I ask, because I personally couldn't bring myself to care about it. I know what Mormonism is, I think I have a fairly good idea who Romney is, so I didn't feel their was anything worthwhile to glean from his speech. He is my second choice right not out of the Republican frontrunners, and I don't think a speech on religion is going to change that. Who is the target audience that would have their opinions changed by his speech?

Rating: 1.8/5 (2 votes cast)

Email This | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
23 Responses To "Question"

I think it was for the Inhumans

#1 - Posted by: spacemonkey on December 6, 2007 05:53 PM

I was expecting him to come out as gay. Oh well. Maybe he will do that in his next speech. Or Thompson will. Or Hackberry will. It would not be a surprise at all.

#2 - Posted by: Mucinex on December 6, 2007 06:29 PM

I know only Mormons get to go to heaven. And they're a bit smug about it. Always being nice to people and smilling and crap. All the while they're thinking " You're going to Hell, buddy!"

#3 - Posted by: will.see on December 6, 2007 06:33 PM

Mainstream media can hardly mention Romney without mentioning his religion or the challenge that his religion poses to him. I think he is just trying to stem the tide of negative messages that the "average" voter is getting. I thought it was a great speech and I'm not even Christian.

#4 - Posted by: BigD on December 6, 2007 06:54 PM

will.see has no idea what he is talking about. This is an idea that comes directly from South Park. Spouting off things like this is no different than getting your "news" from Stephen Colbert or John Stewart.

What a load of crap. And to say Mormons are "smug" about it too. Pathetic. Really.

#5 - Posted by: tom on December 6, 2007 07:06 PM

You're right tom, saying Mormons are smug about it is incorrect. How about "Gleeful," is that better?

Mormons have great family values, but did Romney explain the coffee and Amway thing? I wouldn't vote for him if I couldn't have coffee anymore.

#6 - Posted by: Robert on December 6, 2007 07:23 PM

Isn't "gleefull" a code word for GAY? So maybe the mormon cult, even tho they want multipul marriage, really is a GAY cult? We know the catholic cult is GAY cuz the priests can't have sex with women. And muslims? The high "holy" men in that cult spell out how to have sex with goats.

I dunno. I'm beginning to wonder about any one that "believes" in a 1500-2000 year old superstition where the "diety" hasn't been heard from lately.. At least the Smith guy from the mormons was an actual historical person.

But I wouldn't give money to any of them.

#7 - Posted by: Fiftycal on December 6, 2007 07:55 PM

There were two target audiences: Hillary and the leftist mainstream media. As one reader pointed out in another post, there is no necessary mystery or secrecy shrouding the religion, so it's best for Mitt that the facts get aired "at a time and place of [his] choosing" rather than later, over Hillary's PA system. Romney has never tried to run based on his religion, but the MSM wouldn't have it and simply won't let the issue rest. This is purely a defensive maneuver on his part.

#8 - Posted by: steadyrock on December 6, 2007 08:17 PM

#7 Fiftycal: I hear from the Deity all the time-- through His Word. Try it, you might like it.

#9 - Posted by: Granny Boo on December 6, 2007 08:21 PM

You go Granny Boo - thump His Word! Although I gotta admit, it'd be nice to hear something new...

#10 - Posted by: bunkerboy on December 6, 2007 08:36 PM

As for Romney, I don't care how many dancing Osmonds he puts together, until he's ready to stand up there in his holy underwear and explain what's up with that...

#11 - Posted by: bunkerboy on December 6, 2007 08:41 PM

Spacemonkey is funny.

#12 - Posted by: Jimmy on December 6, 2007 09:34 PM

still waiting for a green jell-o explanation.

#13 - Posted by: brownfly on December 6, 2007 10:26 PM

Mitt's speech was a desperate cry for more high temperature lithium grease in his gearbox. Had he come out and discussed Social Security, we would have known (by checking his fault warning light reference chart) that he needed us to top off his coolant.

#14 - Posted by: K T Cat on December 6, 2007 10:29 PM

Jimmy, you are in the minority.

#15 - Posted by: spacemonkey on December 7, 2007 08:43 AM

Well since ever debate, interview or news story contains a "MORMON" reference my guess is he got tired of dealing with the issue piecemeal and wanted to get it done and out of the way before the real campaigning started.

BTW: When was the a last time a candidates religion was mentioned in every article about him. Oh yeah that would be John Kennedy. Jimmma' Carter talked about his faith a lot but nobody cared. The rest of them may have had some kind of religious leanings but they were never considered important enough to write about. Could be that's the issue right there. People say they want someone who believes in God as a leader, just not someone who acts upon that belief.

Some people will just not let it go. That is why he addressed it. That is why he wasted valuable time dealing with it.

#16 - Posted by: seanmahair on December 7, 2007 09:15 AM

My thoughts on this were that he was dodging the issue.

The reason a lot of evangelicals and even conservative Catholics like myself are apprehensive about this guy, is because we know Mormons believe a lot of things that are just nuts. That doesn't make us bigots or haters, and the implication that we are is rather insulting.

Mormonism was started as a scam. Mark Twain recognized as much at the time. It's scientology plus 150 years. A lot of things that they take as gospel in the Book of Mormon, are demonstrably false. (No, there is no evidence that Israelites lived in pre-Columbian America.) His family has been heavily involved in the cult since the begining. We had a right to know how much of the Koolaid he's been drinking.

Romney avoided these questions deftly.

Still, I find Romney perferable to Giuliani or McCain, if it came down to that. He's probably my third choice.

#17 - Posted by: JoeB131 on December 7, 2007 10:32 AM

Romney was just trying to steal votes away from the surging Huckabee. He was kissing up to the Christians and saying anyone on bended knee is a friend and we all love Jesus - it was a pure political ploy to try to get the Christian votes on his side.

Friend to anyone who's prayed? That would include Saddam and Usama and heaven knows who. It didn't include me or any of the other non-religious conservatives, who now are hearing Theocracy alarm bells. Its all about religion.

From the Wall Street Journal:

"Some [Mormons] even see in him the potential to fulfill a 160-year-old premonition by Mormon founder Joseph Smith, known as the "White Horse Prophecy."

In 1843, according to followers of Smith, he predicted that one day American citizens would be denied their most basic rights and the U.S. Constitution would "hang like a thread as fine as a silk fiber." "A terrible revolution will take place in the land of America, such as has never been seen before; for the land will be left without a Supreme Government, and every specie of wickedness will be practiced rampantly in the land," Smith reportedly said.

It would then be up to the Mormon people, symbolized by a white horse, to ride in and save the republic from collapsing."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110009193

#18 - Posted by: reality intrudes on December 7, 2007 11:08 AM

I've said it before and I'll say it again, disliking someone because of their religion is just intellectually lazy.

I mean, there are just so many reasons to dislike most people that there really is no excuse for using something like their religion or race.

Conversely, there are so few reasons to like most people, and so few people that it's actually possible to like, that it's pretty stupid to unnecessarily restrict the pool of people you can like because of their religion.

#19 - Posted by: Veeshir on December 7, 2007 11:41 AM

Hey Veeshir,

A lot of people I like have wierd ideas.

I have some great friends next door who are Mormons and we have had great in depth discussions (which is partly why I know so much about their religion).

I have liberal friends with wierd ideas too.

And if you have wierd ideas, we would probably be friends too. I like people with wierd ideas. I'd like to be your friend. Can you be friends with a heathen like me?

But I still don't want someone with really wierd ideas to be our President. Its scary.

I have a thing for honesty. The truth is out there. The truth shall make you free. No sacred cows in my world - Just people who should be friends and embrace the facts.

#20 - Posted by: reality intrudes on December 7, 2007 12:38 PM

That came from South Park?

So Saddam ISN'T up there surrounded by Mormons as punishment for repeatedly killing Satans' new boyfriend Chis only to begin a WMD program in heaven prompting the governmant to begin constrution of a tower to Heaven in order to inspect the site?

#21 - Posted by: will.see on December 7, 2007 08:38 PM

@reality intrudes: Yeah, I don't want somebody with wacky ideas ABOUT POLITICS to be president. Or if his wacky ideas are likely to generate wacky political policy, I don't want to vote for him either. This latter point was what the speech aimed at: letting people know that however wacky you find his beliefs, they won't translate into policy. I don't know about you, but I frankly don't care what other wacky ideas he has, so long as he's got his political head on straight.

That being said, I'm a Mormon and not a Romney supporter (I'm for Fred). I really liked what he did with the Olympics, and I thought he couldn't possibly pull it off, but he did. I just don't think it's the same skill set that one needs for the presidency... although, he might surprise me again.

#22 - Posted by: Wacky Hermit on December 8, 2007 11:41 AM

Nice he knows who Jesus is but somebody, if they had the guts, should ask him about Joseph Smith and just where are those tablets he decoded. How come they are not on public view? Apparently, the Bible isn't good enough but with the book of mormon, the way to salvation is clear. Not! It doesn't make any difference, all politicians claim some kind of faith which they practice only when they are running for some office--any office.
Ted

#23 - Posted by: Ted on December 9, 2007 03:52 PM
Post a comment




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

 

Buy IMAO T-Shirts


IMAO T-Shirts

The IMAO T-Shirt Babe
(winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!!
Yay! Books!





Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24
American Idol
Aqua-Adventures
Barackalypse Now
Best of IMAO 2002
Best of IMAO 2006
Bite-Sized Wisdom
Editorials
Election 2008
Filthy Lies
Frank Answers
Frank Discussions
Frank on Guns
Frank Reads the Bible
Frank the Artist
Fred Thompson Facts
Friday Cat-Blogging
Fun Trivia
Hellbender
Hellbender Take Two
Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths
Humor
I Hate Frank
If I Were President
ignis fatuous
IMAO Condensed
IMAO Exclusives
IMAO for the Non-Deaf
IMAO Reviews
IMAO Think Tank
In My World
In My World - Fan Fiction
John Edwards Fabulous Facts
Know Thy Enemy
lolterizt
Michael Moore
Mitt Romney Ads
News Round-Up
Newsish Fakery
No, McCain't
Our Military
Permalink Contest
Precision Guided Humor Assignments
Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul
Ronin Profiles
Ronin Thought of the Day
SarahK's TV stuff
Scary Evil Monkey
Simpsons Trivia
Songs & Poems
State of the Frank Report
Superego
Totally True Tidbits
WEsistance Is Facile
Why Me Laugh?
Yvonne's Ashes
By Month
December 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
March 1933