|
About IMAO Giving money to Frank J. makes you happy! ![]() Buy funniest book ever! ![]() IMAO Podcasts IMAO Merchandise and Newsletter
![]() Cool shirts, mugs, stickers, and what-not!
About IMAO
If you want to send something by snail mail, e-mail with subject "P.O. Box" to get mail information for Frank J. and SarahK. About Frank J. Bloggers: Frank J. Harvey RightWingDuck Cadet Happy spacemonkey Laurence Simon SarahK Popular Categories
Fred Thompson FactsJohn Edwards Fabulous Facts lolterizt IMAO Condensed Know Thy Enemy Editorials Frank the Artist In My World Other Content
Ode to ViolenceBrief Histories IMAO Audio Bits ![]() Read the Essay Own the Shirt Peace Gallery Search IMAO
Testimonials
"All quotes attributed to me on IMAO are made up... including this one."
-Glenn Reynolds "Unfunny treasonous ronin!" -Lou Tulio* "You, sir, are a natural born killer." -E. Harrington "You'll never get my job! Never!!!" -Jonah Goldberg "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And He did despair, for in His omniscience, He did know that His creations had but three-fifths of the splendor of that which would be IMAO." -No One of Consequence "A blogger with a sense of humor." -Some Woman on MSNBC Blogroll
Ace of Spades HQThe Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Blackfive Captain's Quarters Classical Values Conservative Grapevine The Corner The Daily Gut (with Jim Treacher!) Dave in Texas Eject! Eject! Eject! Electric Venom Hot Air Puppy Blender La Shawn Barber's Corner Michelle Malkin Pereiraville Protein Wisdom Rachel Lucas Right Wing News Scrappleface Serenity's Journal Townhall Blog IMAO Blogroll Bad Example Cadet Happy The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles mountaineer musings Right Wing Duck ![]() This Blog Is Full of Crap Fred Thompson Links Fred File Blogs for Fred Fred Thompson Facts Awards
|
January 15, 2008
63 Responses To "Where's the Thompson campaign?"
From the picture, it looks like he has already covered most of the southwest and is heading east... #2 - Posted by: Rubeus on January 15, 2008 11:48 PMHmmm he is trying to get on the Today show as a weather man? #3 - Posted by: Selene on January 15, 2008 11:53 PMWherz Fraldo??? Fraldo has now had his ass kicked by three of the Republican candidates. Can he make it to four? #4 - Posted by: Dave on January 15, 2008 11:53 PMHe's right behind me, isn't he? aww crap.... #5 - Posted by: TBinSTL on January 16, 2008 12:12 AMFred Thompson has already campaigned across all the US. Now he's busy threatening foreign countries to give us their oil or die. #6 - Posted by: Joel on January 16, 2008 12:13 AMYou know, if he could just eke out a win in South Carolina, this race could then officially be classified a clusterf--k - allowing Rudy to jump back in it in Florida, right before Super Tuesday. Sadly though, I'm betting Fred bows out after a disappointing distant third-place showing in South Carolina - which means one more week of Huckabee, and then Mitt and McCain to the finish. Hooray... #8 - Posted by: bunkerboy on January 16, 2008 01:01 AMHey Dave- Who do you want to vote for? Thanks for asking. I want to see four or five Republican candidates get all the way to May and us still not know who the GOP candidate will be. I'd also like to see a few dozen more debates along the way. #9 - Posted by: Dave on January 16, 2008 01:15 AMThat's a big change for you bunkerboy. What happened to your fondness for Guiliani? #10 - Posted by: Jimmy on January 16, 2008 01:37 AMYou know, if he could just eke out a win in South Carolina, this race could then officially be classified a clusterf--k - allowing Rudy to jump back in it in Florida, right before Super Tuesday. Sadly though, I'm betting Fred bows out after a disappointing distant third-place showing in South Carolina - which means one more week of Huckabee, and then Mitt and McCain to the finish. Hooray... I was thinking Romney's win could dampen enthusiasm for McCain in SC giving Huck or maybe even Fred an opportunity to win SC. Don't see why G-man couldn't still win Florida no matter what happens in SC. If Fred can win SC and Giuliani wins Florida then we could have five people with wins. Amazing! #11 - Posted by: Dave on January 16, 2008 01:49 AMDelegates you say? From Hugh Hewitt: Race At A Glance Those are the numbers before Michigan, which won't help Thompson. But!!! South Carolina is just 4 days out - Saturday - with 45 delegates up for grabs. Me thinks Fred is about to get found. :) Those are the numbers before Michigan, which won't help Thompson. But!!! South Carolina is just 4 days out - Saturday - with 45 delegates up for grabs. Me thinks Fred is about to get found. :) South Carolina only has a measly 24 delegates total to give. The GOP penalized them for moving up the primary. #13 - Posted by: Dave on January 16, 2008 02:18 AMSouth Carolina only has a measly 24 delegates total to give. The GOP penalized them for moving up the primary. Get lost with your crummy facts! And he still didn't answer the question... Go figure. #15 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 02:30 AMIf Cadet thinks that South Carolina is not important, he needs a swift beating like the hippie he is. #16 - Posted by: Sakaki on January 16, 2008 02:47 AMAlanABQ, Don't worry about Dave. The results I saw for yesterdays vote had Thompson at 4%. 4%! That's half of the fruitcake Ron Pauls' numbers I know the man is going to be busy canvassing the state the next few days. When going to look for - -whoever, height matters. Whoever stocks his warerobe this bad would definitely find themselves under the gaze of Fred Thompson. Rubber never runs, but warerobe designers run when they have Fred coming after them. #19 - Posted by: erg on January 16, 2008 07:00 AMOh yea of little faith! It's all part of Mr. Fred Thompson's Master Plan to capture the White House in a miraculous campaign that the "experts" said was impossible. Sit back and watch as Fred now destroys the rest of the field...Muwhahahahah!!!! #20 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on January 16, 2008 07:46 AMIt's gonna be unfortunate if Fred doesn't win, because he is the most trustworthy republican we have running. It is one of the only times I can listen to a candidate and actually believe what the man says. It'll be a shame if one of the other candidates wins and shows his style of "conservatisms". Us Fredheads will be there, though, to say "I told you so." #21 - Posted by: doonuts on January 16, 2008 08:15 AMWhen Fred Thompson wins, he will immediately consign all who mocked his campaign to a long-term sentence as Hillary Clinton's sex toy... #22 - Posted by: ussjimmycarter on January 16, 2008 08:21 AMTo those who still believe in Fred Thompson, repeat after me and then you can be brainwashed just like everyone else: PUNDITS AND POLLS ARE ALWAYS RIGHT What a bunch of noobs. Wait until SC, if he doesn't do well then you can all run your stupid monkey mouths. #23 - Posted by: bgrx on January 16, 2008 08:21 AMC'mon, South Carolinians! Remember, Fred strangles his opposition with his bare hands... and then giggles with glee... #24 - Posted by: MJ on January 16, 2008 08:30 AMBLC posted: "The results I saw for yesterdays vote had Thompson at 4%. 4%! That's half of the fruitcake Ron Pauls' numbers..." BLC, you should understand a bit more about the race in Michigan before getting too uptight about Fred's showing here (I 'live' in Michigan, unfortunately). 1. Ron Paul campaigned extensively in Michigan. There were commercials and posters everywhere with Ron Paul's name. His results are probably the same as what Ralph Nader would have gotten with similar advertising. To what end? No delegates, spent campaign funds. ~V~ #25 - Posted by: ~Vortex~ on January 16, 2008 08:42 AMSorry, guys, Fred's showing is sad. 4%? Ron Whakado Paul got 6%, Rudy got 2% and didn't even show up. Uncommitted got 2%. And with Romney's win, he'll now be a factor in South Carolina and Nevada, which Means Fred will come in fourth in SC and fifth in NV, which pretty much means it's over for him after Saturday. Watch today, Rush Limbaugh will suddenly discover a new love for Romney and his magic underwear. #26 - Posted by: JoeB131 on January 16, 2008 08:52 AMBLC, When he started talking tough in the debate last week I started to buy back into the myth, but this guy is NOT the character he plays on screen. Actually he only plays characters who are essentially Fred. He is not a great actor who can play any part. His parts are pretty much all the same. His first part, after all, was to that of Fred Thompson (that would be himself)in a movie. I think we see pretty much what we would be getting if he were elected. His perceived lack of "fire in the belly" for the office is one of his more desirable traits. I get the impression from most of the candidates that they just really want to be president. With Fred, I think he feels compelled to serve. #27 - Posted by: echo5a on January 16, 2008 09:31 AMHey Jimmy (#10) - My fondness for Giuliani hasn't changed, but I'm not crazy about the campaign he's run (you know the feeling, Fredophiles). His nomination was always problematic; even if they could accept his social positions, would middle America pull a lever for some DAY-go outta New York? This might not be the time yet for an ethnic president. However, if you look at the line of ethnicities, i.e. Dutch, German, Irish, and the order of their arrivals here in America, they've all had their presidents. In keeping with that line, it IS the Italians' turn. Unless, God forbid, it's Homey's turn... #28 - Posted by: bunkerboy on January 16, 2008 09:34 AM"Homey"? I think the problem is that Rudy could actually do damage to the coalition. He's the one candidate who could trigger a migration of evangelicals/religious conservatives to a third party. Even with Huckabee, economic "please, sir, may I have another" conservatives will realize he's less of a worry than Hillary or Obama. Huckabee will need to win SC to stay afloat, otherwise people will doubt him. Romney could survive a second place showing, or even a third, because McCain and Huck are pretty close to almost out of money. Fred is dead after SC. Rudy needs to win Florida, and then score well on Super Tuesday. I'm still betting on McCain as the "Bob Dole" consensus candidate (and we all know how well that worked out.) #29 - Posted by: JoeB131 on January 16, 2008 09:51 AMQuiet, everyone! You'll wake Fred Thompson and we all know how much he needs his naps. #30 - Posted by: Xenophore on January 16, 2008 10:37 AMsean quixote, Why are you looking at your brother's penis? #31 - Posted by: Michael R. on January 16, 2008 10:58 AMOh, llook at the conservatives. How cute tryin to figure out a canidate to beat us. Too bad. All your canidates suckkkkkkkkkkkk! #32 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 11:09 AMSo anonymous is obviously a democrat. Who are you supporting? #33 - Posted by: Michael R. on January 16, 2008 11:13 AMI woner if ther's ever been any other races in history where a different canidate won each primary. Perhaps the Roman civil war(s) would be a good example to look forward to. #34 - Posted by: Pantera on January 16, 2008 11:25 AM#33 - Posted by: Michael R. on January 16, 2008 11:13 AM Anybody but your patheric canidates. I would nevah suppport your racist, bigoted, xenophobic party! #35 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 11:30 AMWhere's the Thompson campaign? It's standing in front a map of the US on top of a Where's Waldo page. #36 - Posted by: Sir Andrew on January 16, 2008 11:41 AMAt some point is someone in the Republican party going to ask the question, "Why are our opening primaries all held in somewhat (or completely) liberal states? It's like asking the people of San Francisco who they want to be the Republican candidate. #37 - Posted by: Son of Bob on January 16, 2008 11:47 AM#37 - Posted by: Son of Bob on January 16, 2008 11:47 AM It doesnt matter where you bigots hold your primary. This country hates conservatives like you jacka$$es. #38 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 12:00 PMnameless idiot #37: if by "this country" you mean "other idiots i know" then we obviously can't argue with your logic. see... more of that "blind squirrel" and "nuts" thing working out... #39 - Posted by: shane on January 16, 2008 12:20 PM#26- Not to respond to myself, but I called it for anyone who listens to Rush. I thought he was going to declare himself a Mormon he was so effusive in his praise. #40 - Posted by: JoeB131 on January 16, 2008 03:00 PMAnonymous bitch from yesterday's monkey-robot post has a small point- We're all a bunch of mean ol' poopy-heads. It's a sad state for anon that, in a fit of impotent rage, he still can't find the balls to spell out a swear word. But he's right; you're all still a bunch o' bigoted crackas. #41 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 04:15 PM#41 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 04:15 PM Yeh make jokes. You know the truth. Bigot #42 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 04:25 PMDo you need a tissue, anon? Those tears are going to get in the way of seeing your screen. Maybe you just need a biiiig hug, li'l guy. #43 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 04:27 PMOh dear. Trolls. Aren't they just the cutest things? Keep it up dickweeds, you'll piss off enough people to actually get the one TRUE conservative, FRED!, into the White House and a Congress worth a damn. These communist slime you want are nought but that, income redistributional rectal socialists. Get off your ass, work, save, and make a life for yourself. As opposed to the government giving you a piece of someone elses. #44 - Posted by: cmblake6 on January 16, 2008 04:29 PM#43 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 04:27 PM Go to he11 bigot. I dont need to see the screen. You xenophobes just spew the same racist sh!t night and day. #45 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 04:31 PM"he11" It keeps showing up here. He eleven? #46 - Posted by: Jimmy on January 16, 2008 04:38 PMJimmy, It is obvious he is hopped up on He11, a compound made of 11 Helium atoms. A terrible gas. But it is obvious he is too scared to even make up a user name. I guess he is afraid us bigots will find him. #47 - Posted by: Michael R. on January 16, 2008 04:48 PMHere you, go anon: *HUUUUG* I hope that helps calm your tiny fists of rage. But don't get the wrong idea; your lifestyle choices are your own. As for me, I like females (of all races!). Just to be clear, I am afraid of XenU. And I kinda like XenA... y'know, the Warrior Princess. #48 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 05:02 PMYo bigoted xenophobes! You suck! Your canidates suck! Rethuglicans! #49 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 05:07 PM"Yo bigoted xenophobes! You suck! Your canidates suck! Rethuglicans!" Holy crap! Yesterday you trolled and stole my name for one post. Today you ran out of steam, troll. You do need a hug. Poor name-stealing troll. #50 - Posted by: MarkoMancuso on January 16, 2008 05:09 PMCadet Happy also likes to jump nekkid into pit of ravenous wolves, with raw meat attached to himself. Wanna play a fun game of Russian Roulette? I, uh, gotta go grad dinner. I'll be riiiiight back. Yeah. #51 - Posted by: ochagirl on January 16, 2008 05:13 PMI don't think that's the same one, Mark- This one didn't edit his spelling of "suck". He does exemplify it, though... #52 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 05:20 PM#52 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 05:20 PM Yeah, but he does seem similar. What with all the bigot talk. Whoever that douche was I want to beat the crap out of him. #53 - Posted by: MarkoMancuso on January 16, 2008 05:27 PMI think a few trolls (anonymous or not) aren't really leftist and/or democrats/liberals. It's not that he/she sounds stupid but that he/she sounds like he's being stupid on purpose. This "we're-gonna-w1n-an-u-suckas-r-not-gunna"-kind of rhetoric doesn't sound inspired, exactly. #54 - Posted by: ochagirl on January 16, 2008 05:27 PM"Yo bigoted xenophobes! You suck! Your canidates suck! Rethuglicans!" He definitely improved my opinion of trolls. /sarc #55 - Posted by: MarkoMancuso on January 16, 2008 05:29 PMActually, I think there are several "blankers" roaming around IMAO. Their schtick is a little too perfect - and consistent - to be believable. #56 - Posted by: Jimmy on January 16, 2008 08:00 PMMichael R. (#47): Thanks for the analysis. I'm thinking He11 is actually a brand-new isotope of Helium, He-11. It's so strange that it might have super-fluid properties - you know - the kind that allows it to climb the walls of its container. #57 - Posted by: Jimmy on January 16, 2008 08:05 PMSo Jimmy, you were watching that PBS special too, yeah? That was a cool show (no pun intended). I think the low end of the Kelvin temperature scale could be useful in describing Hillary's sexual prowess... See, PBS isn't always totally useless. Just most of the time. #58 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 16, 2008 08:54 PMHi Alan - indeed, I was. And it reminded me of all the science I've forgotten! Hillary is quite possibly a Bose-Einstein condensate, a strange state of matter where particles lose their identity and are neither here nor there. In other words, brain dead, but dangerous. #59 - Posted by: Jimmy on January 16, 2008 09:08 PMif Fred loses S.C. it's not because of him,it's the medias fault. They have sucessfully painted him as a lazy Southern hick. They have not allowed him on the shows. The Huckster and McCain have me sooo mad!!! I am telling you right now if Huckster wins I will not vote. And MCCAIN??? it's Bob Dole vs. Clinton all over again...Bob Dole was a buffoon....I only wish the 527s and all the McCain Feingold Moveon.orgs turn on McCain and just watch the monster McCain created turn on the creator!!!! The best I can hope at this time is Romney makes Fred his VP. #60 - Posted by: charmingtail on January 16, 2008 09:11 PM#60 - Posted by: charmingtail on January 16, 2008 09:11 PM Nooo its cause he's a moron. Even idiotic rethuglican voters can see dat. #61 - Posted by: on January 16, 2008 10:41 PMOOOH! BUUUURRRN! Anon, you're so witty. I bet you're the wittiest girl in the 3rd grade. #62 - Posted by: AlanABQ on January 17, 2008 12:07 AMI made a few trips up to NH during their primary. I can do that because I, unfortunately, live in the "People's Democratic Socialist Republic of Massachusetts" under the rule of Swimmer Ted and Company. I was really excited about Fred before he got in because i am familiar with his legal and legislative back ground and thought he would be a worthy successor to the Conservative crown. Post a comment
|
Buy IMAO T-Shirts
![]()
![]()
IMAO T-Shirts
The IMAO T-Shirt Babe (winning picture) YOU BUY NEW SHIRTS NOW!!! Yay! Books!
Capitalism
Archives
By Category
24American Idol Aqua-Adventures Barackalypse Now Best of IMAO 2002 Best of IMAO 2006 Bite-Sized Wisdom Editorials Election 2008 Filthy Lies Frank Answers Frank Discussions Frank on Guns Frank Reads the Bible Frank the Artist Fred Thompson Facts Friday Cat-Blogging Fun Trivia Hellbender Hellbender Take Two Hillary Clinton Terrible Truths Humor I Hate Frank If I Were President ignis fatuous IMAO Condensed IMAO Exclusives IMAO for the Non-Deaf IMAO Reviews IMAO Think Tank In My World In My World - Fan Fiction John Edwards Fabulous Facts Know Thy Enemy lolterizt Michael Moore Mitt Romney Ads News Round-Up Newsish Fakery No, McCain't Our Military Permalink Contest Precision Guided Humor Assignments Ron Paul, Ron Paul, Ron Paul Ronin Profiles Ronin Thought of the Day SarahK's TV stuff Scary Evil Monkey Simpsons Trivia Songs & Poems State of the Frank Report Superego Totally True Tidbits WEsistance Is Facile Why Me Laugh? Yvonne's Ashes By Month
December 2008September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 March 1933
|