What was she thinking?

Posted by Cadet Happy on October 27, 2008 at 10:18 pm

I don’t know what it is about her, but she creeps me out.

(22 votes, average: 3.45 out of 5)

 Loading ...

This entry was posted on Monday, October 27th, 2008 at 10:18 pm and is filed under The Usual Stuff. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

20 Responses to “What was she thinking?”

1. Socrates H. Muhammed says:
   October 27th, 2008 at 10:27 pm

   Why is her head not covered, as befits a female?

   Cursed infidels.

2. Joe the Plumber says:
   October 27th, 2008 at 10:45 pm

   I’d hit it.

3. Z Ryan says:
   October 27th, 2008 at 11:00 pm

   From the Mao collection.

4. Jimmy says:
   October 27th, 2008 at 11:02 pm

   Too dark for a pumpkin. International orange? A signal?

   You can’t tell a book by its cover, Cadet. Also, if you’re legs were as long as hers, you’d forget the scarf, too, Muhammed al Socratastie.

5. Jay says:
   October 27th, 2008 at 11:12 pm

   Public funds man…the wardrobe budget is all going to (tongue firmly in cheek) Caribou Barbie. I voted for her I can say it!

6. dixiemink says:
   October 27th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

   I dunno kids- worked for Churchill : he wore this to mow the lawn: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Flight-suit
   it was Orange in his day.

7. Michael R. says:
   October 28th, 2008 at 12:43 am

   If you don’t mind me asking, who is that?

8. Son of Bob says:
   October 28th, 2008 at 1:41 am

   Beats the hell out of that giant transvestite that Obama’s married to.

9. Paleo Pat says:
   October 28th, 2008 at 2:04 am

   I’d hit it.

   Ewww! Gross!

   Now her daughter Megan now, that’s another story…

   When I got done with Megan, she’d be walking funny and would have white stuff running out her nose….

   (did I say that, in public?!?!? )

10. Paleo Pat says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 2:07 am

    She does have the evil Vulcan look about her, don’t she?

    (However, now that I think of it, the Vulcan people were not evil…)

11. HCG says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 2:07 am

    #7 Michael. That is Cindy McCain – beer heiress, future first lady (maybe).

    Hey Cadet! Are you channeling that Blackwell pufta? Who cares what she is wearing?

12. acroso says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 4:37 am

    Ya she’s no good.

    I just cast my ballot for Chuck Baldwin!

13. Corona says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 9:29 am

    Maybe it’s the beer talking, but is her torso like 1 tenth the length of her legs? WTF?

14. Kent says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 10:38 am

    I understand that there is something slightly unsettling about her eyes. That said, I think I trust her heart after hearing what she’s done in third world countries. A lot of people will give lip service to helping there. A few celebs will adopt children and have them raised by nannies while issuing press releases. She quietly adopted a daughter she had no intention of adopting even as she took the child to the US. And John went along with it without question. That tells me something about his heart as well.

    Also, don’t expect flattering photography if you got this off a press site. I didn’t trace the images, but if they are from just about anywhere but the McCain web site, I half expect it’s deliberately unflattering. Anyone who is a size zero photographed from that angle is going to look like that. As for the jacket, though. I’m afraid Cindy you’re on your own with that one. Yeesh.

15. ELKnight says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 11:45 am

    Some people who have had a stroke get that glazed look in their eyes sometimes. I think she is just spacing out, or thinking, “Michael Jackson when I kill you. SOUNNNNND!”

    That outfit is making me less enamored of this season’s fashion trends.

16. cataalex says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    I saw her the other night at a John McCain rally in Ohio. She is not the hard looking type that the camera portrays at all. I actually think she is kinda of shy just from the way she acted.

17. ILoveMyFreedoms says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    Shame on the photographer. And shame on Cindy’s dresser for neglecting major fashion points. Red on red is only a spectacular plus during a wilderness rescue.

    That being said, I’m sticking with her – for heart and soul, not runway potential.

18. NunyaB says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 6:31 pm

    Yeah same here #17. Unfortunate choice of outfit for a most public stage, but if that’s the worst they can come up about her it tells more about the opposition than it does Cindy.

    Same goes for my gal Sarah – gorgeous inside and out, no matter what she wears.

19. 5 of 7 says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 10:04 pm

    Maybe she wore it to draw media sniper fire away from Sarah. What a gal!

20. Mark says:
    October 29th, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    Be careful with your anti-BO remarks unless you’d like a visit from the Truth Squad.

Leave a Reply