Comments on: Fighting Back for Palin

By: Freemon Sandlewould

Freemon Sandlewould — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:04:26 +0000

LOL oh yeah the secrete cervix comment. Shrimp like Louisiana Pron is my favorite. Chicken Gumbo Luxurious fantastic.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:25:57 +0000

See, Freemon, you woke-up Frank’s heuristic spam engine. It thought your last sentence in #29 was large, shrimp-like Louisiana prawn (pron).

By: Freemon Sandlewould

Freemon Sandlewould — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:02:06 +0000

Wooot ….. I am a comment. I am in moderation limbo. I thought limbo was a game. Mmm… maybe I am stuck in the Bermuda Triangle? Or was I abducted by aliens. Probing discussion I am having with myself.

By: Freemon Sandlewould

Freemon Sandlewould — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:57:14 +0000

seanmahair – these patriots NOT in the news……..one of my gripes about Bush is he was lazy about getting himself into the news. It was like he was bunkered down. The think that is needed are patriot politicians who WANT to be in the news ALOT!!

EXAMPLE: I would like to get elected senator from any state. Then go to Washington D.C. and gentleman filibuster absolutely everything. When I am offered bribes of one sort or another by other politicians I will have tape rolling the whole time by my 100% of the time video camera crew. After aforesaid attempted bribe I email the videos to every blog that exists and continue filibustering. The people need a champion to shut the place down and make it entertaining as hell for them to watch the 1 man rebellion.

By: Freemon Sandlewould

Freemon Sandlewould — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:52:47 +0000

One further note: Palin needs to do only 1 thing: Cut all the overused key catch phrases like: Track record | maverick – ( this one makes me want to puke ) | etc. ….or at least back it down a notch. I’m a diehard Sarah fan but the repetitive use of pithy catch phrases are the one thing she needs to work on. Her use of language when talking with Greta Van Sustren was MUCH much more appealing. Not pre-canned. No trite phrasing. I wanted to walk up to her and hug her……but I dare not because I would start hugging and rubbing and kissing and pretty soon the secrete cervix would be toting me off to jail.

By: Freemon Sandlewould

Freemon Sandlewould — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:44:36 +0000

When I was 4.5 years old I was going to Sunday School with my Mom. I looked up at her and said “None of this can be true” …its simply impractical. Thus I establish my bona fides as an atheist. If you had the current age of the universe to try and convince me I would not be convinced there is a god or that religion is anything more than a good story like those of Aesop.

This is why I find it so very ironic when the left picks on the religious. My reaction? MMmm……my choices are

-1- christians who by and large leave me alone and do not ask me directly to pay higher taxes for their beliefs

-2- lefty nutjobs who believe in the Church of Later Day Global Warming. They campaign daily to attempt to change my life in measurable ways.

………and they have the chutzpah to talk about Palin’s religious beliefs. I’ll take the christians every time!

By: Sulamie

Sulamie — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:31:36 +0000

I agree with MarkoMancuso. Both times he said it.

I want more Sarah. She is the real deal. She has my support 150%.

By: Rick

Rick — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:33:47 +0000

I’m down with Sarah. She’s my first choice for 2012. And I can’t help but notice that, for the moment at least, 64% of Republicans agree.

By: seanmahair

seanmahair — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:31:39 +0000

The ONLY way we are going to be able to save this country is if we managed to find some real live patriots out there somewhere. People who do not want to go to Washington to make a lot of money, people who do not seek to see their names in the news nightly, people who have real jobs that they plan to go back to after they’ve done their duty. What we need are people who are of the same stamp as the founders of this country.

Today we have selfish, egotistical, self serving, foul mouthed, degenerate, voyeurs who have NO clue what sacrifice is, they can’t even begin to get their minds around the idea of PUBLIC SERVICE, and the idea of “Sacred Honor” does not even compute. We have allow the fringe, the idealogues, the rabidly uncivilized and the eternally self involved to come between us and our children, our families our communities and our God.

That’s right WE allowed it. Every time we didn’t fight, every time we knuckled under, every time we tolerated some new outrage.

We have met the enemy and he is us. (and he’s on line at Kos Kindergarten every day).

By: Basil

Basil — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:50:22 +0000

-Ed is a horse. He lives with -Wilbur.

By: DC

DC — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:44:07 +0000

Hey, can I ask what this whole “-Ed” thing is? Are you like two people in one body or something?

By: chancelot

chancelot — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:33:09 +0000

Wasn't Rocky in Russia during that part of the movie? I guess Palin could see him. But maybe I would feel worse for her if she hadn't spent the last two months calling me unamerican because I don't live in a trailer in Appalachia and have read books and stuff. Just sayin'. [I'm pretty sure she only called you a douche the past two months and maybe implied you're unAmerican -- though that's open to interpretation. I'm still not sure why she singled you out. -Ed.]

By: hansen

hansen — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:26:07 +0000

was that a funny?

By: Jared

Jared — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:08:24 +0000

The Democrats have your back, too! 4 more years!

By: WAL

WAL — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:45:52 +0000

Damn, bold not working on that first part – oh well.

By: WAL

WAL — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:44:23 +0000

To win an election in the United States of America you need to be visible to the public and talking about current events so the public hears your ideas and your thoughts and your views.

It’s nice to hear that you regard George W. Bush as being every bit as articulate as Obama.

Fortunately Bush wasn’t “too far to the right to be electable” himself, though it is odd that praise of both him and this country only emanated from your side after November 4th.

Since you are very knowledgeable about what it takes to win an election in the United States, I look forward to your own campaign to become governor of a state. It isn’t it odd that Palin won it, yet an accomplished experienced person such as yourself hasn’t obtained it yet?

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:33:16 +0000

But here in the United States of America, we have successfully politicized everything as we manage to stick our nose into everyone’s business, including their wallets, religion, medical practices, personal beliefs, utterances… everything. But, hey, the United States of America is after all, the United States of America and we are a government of laws and not of men in the United States of America so the solution is obviously to pass more laws! In the United States of America, we can count on our elected officials and their employees to carry out the laws of The United States of America. And if the law isn’t carried out in The United States of America, pass a law requiring them to do so! Only in the United States of America is it possible to do this. We are, after all, The United States of America.

By: hansen

hansen — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:32:51 +0000

We’ve Got Your Back Palin!
Its time true conservatives backed a true conservative no matter what! I hope the lessons that will be learned over the next 4 years will wake up some of the ones that “sold out” if not – screw ‘em, we’ll broaden our base by getting the youth as energized as Obummer did!
Jindal / Palin or Palin / Jindal 2012 either way It sounds good -

By: BathroomRelief

BathroomRelief — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:09:32 +0000

We sure do hope Palin returns in two thousand and twelve and gets the republican party nomination. After this election she can not way find her way back to the center and therefore cannot win a general election in this country, the United States of America. It is wrong what the media is doing to her. She is entitled to her views and her clothes. She is not stupid. But she is too far to the right to be electable. I do not believe she should spend her time in Alaska, United States of America if she wants to win. The blogger who wrote this must not be very knowledgeable about what it takes to win an election here in the United States of America. Maybe this blogger is actually in India or something. To win an election in the United States of America you need to be visible to the public and talking about current events so the public hears your ideas and your thoughts and your views.

[Chicago! -Ed.]

By: JonWV

JonWV — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:42:00 +0000

Living here in the edge of the south my preacher (who by the way is originally from Wisconsin)
advocates the south (and I’ll include Alaska and any other red state) secsession again……..
(this was said in jest buttttttttttttt………)

Gov. Palin the ONLY reason I and most of my friends voted for Mcain. Run Sarah Run!!!!!

By: Son of Bob

Son of Bob — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:24:43 +0000

You gotta laugh when the most damning piece of evidence against Sarah in that linked editorial is that she was linked to a Kenyan.

By: cataalex

cataalex — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:13:54 +0000

You know what, let’s just all move to Alaska for the next four years and hope and pray that Obama doesn’t count Alaska as one of his 58 states!!!!

By: MarkoMancuso

MarkoMancuso — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:05:51 +0000

I’ll repeat my previous statements: Anyone who smears Palin must be cut!

By: Ricky

Ricky — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:04:56 +0000

BadAndy has a point. It would seem that the candidate the left fears most is the one that gets the majority of their vitriol. Although, Romney wouldn’t have been a good candidate for the conservative base because the majority of Christians wouldn’t vote for him, myself included. Good Lord, it was a struggle for a long time for me to put the pen beside McStain’s name and then only after considering the result would be a bigger obamination of the presidential office. So, if you see the mainstream media “selecting” another “maverick”, it should be crystal clear now not to put that guy on the ticket.
Knowhatimean?

By: BadAndy

BadAndy — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:52:44 +0000

I don’t know Jeff, maybe we should let the Dems and liberal media pick our candidates — only not the way they did it this time. Here’s what I’m thinking: we go through the regular primary process and let them try to skew things the way they always do. But instead of nominating the person with the most votes/states, we track the amount of negative press each candidate gets. That measure will tell you which person they are most afraid of — the one they think will be the most formidable opponent. Then we pick that person. In this past election, this system would have picked Mitt Romney. Anybody think he wouldn’t have won given the current economic situation? Would not have been close.

Only problem is we have to ignore the primary process to do this. Maybe we set the primary process up to do it this way and then publish a fake statement to the press on how it’s going to work this time.

What do you guys think?