He’s Not Literally Made of Wax, Is He?

Posted by Frank J. on January 19, 2009 at 10:30 am

I hear Henry Waxman is try to lead the way in Congress to stop global warming, which makes sense because it kinda looks like his face is melting.

1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (17 votes, average: 4.94 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

7 Responses to “He’s Not Literally Made of Wax, Is He?”

  1. cactusod says:

    Good Lord….how can any man be that singularly unattractive and bizarre-looking? No wonder he is so pissed off at all of us….and clearly looking to get even.

    I say we impeach him for impersonating a human.

  2. Freemon Sandlewould says:

    The ugliest man on earth-Can Nostrildamus see the future? Astral Navigators or Nostril Alligators? You be the judge. To test seeing the future you must look up his nose. To do this you must schedule an appointment as he has a full time crew of mexican yard workers on nose hair grooming duties. Attention Black and Decker: They can not get their weed wackers to last more than a few weeks. Guru is only another word for boogers from the root of your soul. The greatest insights on the future come from the highly prized 2 knuckle nuggets. They are poured over by liberal think tanks looking to gain an edge with predictive action against terrorists. Note: Will someone please alert the Discovery Channel that their opportunity to film the booger man has arrived.

  3. Basil says:

    In a fight between Waxman and Aquaman … everybody wins!

  4. Freemon Sandlewould says:

    He is “the face” of the democrat party

  5. ussjimmycarter says:

    I’ve been tough on AquaMan over the years but I must admit that I think he could take this twit!

  6. jamesflames says:

    he looks like the love child of mr. ed and al franken

  7. Wacky Hermit says:

    This lovely piece of… work… Waxman is one of the prime movers behind CPSIA, the law that on Feb. 10 is set to put thousands of people out of their jobs. He helped write the law that was supposed to protect kids from lead poisoning, but instead makes everybody who makes a product for kids prove that their products are lead-free– and it applies retroactively to everything, including children’s libraries, playgrounds, thrift stores, school supplies, science kits, jewelry, clothing, and toys. The testing is expensive and, in many cases, completely unnecessary. Believe me, I have some really good plans for if I ever get ahold of the mother****ers who wrote this law. I’m gonna lock ‘em in a room with my kids and a roll of duct tape.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>