The New Single Party Bipartisanship Is Here

Posted on January 30, 2009 10:05 am

It’s easy to make fun of Obama, but sometimes you have to admire his skilled unipartisanship. It’s pretty hard to make a bill so bad that you can’t even get one squish Republican to vote for it. Well, at least when the economy improves (as always happens when the government spends larges sums of tax money) the Democrats can take all the credit.

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (24 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5)

12 Responses to “The New Single Party Bipartisanship Is Here”

  1. Reality intrudes says:

    Castro is unpartisan too, just like Pelosi.

    And for the same reason: naked obscene buggy eyed ruthless power.

  2. Idaho Spud says:

    This is NOT a bad bill. It is full of pork! Muslims hate pork!

  3. Jimmy says:

    I was thinking his unipartisanship was the result of a single testicle. Either that or half a brain.

  4. Plentyobailouts says:

    So if we form a community organizing organization and call it the democratic peoples acorn as opposed t the acorn of democratic peoples, will we get 4.5 billion dollars? I could buy a vowell with that much money!

  5. T.N. Amaps says:

    Actually I think ilk like pelosi and her cronies are tripartisan. They try to be as partisan as possible while they try to look bipartisan. I want my conservative representatives to be as partisan as possible, and if the result is that the government doesn’t get anything new passed, all the better. I mean, I didn’t vote for them to pass a bunch of crap in the spirit of compromise.

  6. seanmahair says:

    O’vomit: From Zero to Zero in no time flat.

  7. Son of Bob says:

    Wow, are all communist rulers as partisan as Obama? Oh wait…yeah, I guess so. Never mind.

  8. Amer-I-Can says:

    The question is: Can the Conservatives stick to their guns, or will they fold like a bad poker hand after this initial show of unity? Any takers?

  9. Spyndrilleum says:

    They’re not bipartisan or partisan, unipartisan or even non-partisan . . .

    They’re a bunch of HOMOPARTISANS!

    ‘Specially B “Who’s Sane?” O.

  10. rangermom says:

    I’d run away from anything that makes Pelosi’s bug eyes get even more excited. Anyone else notice how she almost wrings her hands like the Dr. that created Franenstein!!!

  11. seanmahair says:

    If Republican politicians had integrity they’d stay true to what they say they believe. Democrats don’t claim to have integrity so Republicans are at a disadvantage there. If you don’t claim to have a moral high ground you can’t be faulted for not living up to it.

    Republicans are like the girls who wouldn’t put out in high school and didn’t get asked to the prom. They really didn’t miss much, saved a lot of money and probably were a lot safer, these girls you marry, make a family with, grow old with. Democrats are the sluts who did the football team, terribly popular but not someone you’d trust enough to spend the rest of your life with. Eventually the country will get tired of paying for the privilege of being screwed and will turn back to the boring, safe alternative. Unless of course God’s eternal patience becomes less eternal and more finite…….then grab you ankles and kiss you dumb butt goodbye. All bets are off.

  12. HCG says:

    #3 Jimmy
    You hit on a truth there. For many guys, their testicles do more thinking than their brains.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>