Why Not Pick Caroline Kennedy to Head the CIA?
So what’s it with Leon Panetta as head of the CIA? I guess anyone who even has enough intelligence experience to know what CIA stands for is tangentially related to Bush’s policy (read: “pro-torture”), and Obama wanted to pick someone the left wouldn’t whine about.
Little tip for Obama: The left will always whine if you’re being practical. That’s what they do; they complain about reality and throw a tantrum until someone changes it. It’s best to just get used to the whining if you don’t want to be a complete failure.
You can also punch them in the nads, because the sound they’ll make from that isn’t anymore annoying than the whining. That another free tip from me to you; I’m being bi-partisan.
(27 votes, average: 4.81 out of 5)
Loading ...
January 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Is it not better to execute a well-placed kick as opposed trying to punch said nether region?
And pardon my ignorance, but do those of whom you speak, “the left,” actually have nads?
January 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Umm…liberals have nads? Who knew?
January 6th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
Frank I respect your opinion but Caroline Kennedy as New York Senator Kennedy is more realistic.
But I do have a suggestion California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Imagine our foes asking “Arnold? What the ….?”
January 6th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
CIA is also a TLA for “Culinary Institute of America”
http://www.ciachef.edu/
So perhaps Obama was confused by that. I think that Rachael Ray would be a better choice anyway.
January 6th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Nancy Pelosi, the adjustable wrench of nad punchin’ (she has a set of knuckle busters) has been feeling a little dissed at the decision.
January 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
First off, the left does have some nads. Just look at Hillary, she has bigger balls than Bill.
Secondly, Caroline should be made in charge of Gitmo. She’d be perfect to teach the terrorists how to sing Kumbaya.
January 6th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
Indeed: “Why Not Pick Caroline Kennedy to Head the CIA?”
Yeah, why not? She could complete the hamstringing and gutting of The Agency started under Clinton and partly rebuilt by Bush.
Off Topic Suggestion:
How about a post about IMAO’s predictions for 2009? It could be like Art Bell’s annual prediction show on that wacky radio program “Coast To Coast AM” I sometimes listen to when going to sleep.
January 6th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
At least he didn’t pick Cindy Sheehan, or Cynthia McKinney.
January 6th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
HAHAHAHA This will be my nominee for best post of 2009,
HarveyBasilFrank!January 6th, 2009 at 8:02 pm
If you will recall, Caroline’s daddy thought that CIA stood for Cuban Invasion Association.
January 6th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
for kennedys CIA means Chappiquidick Ivestigation Authority, or Club soda In Alchohol.
January 7th, 2009 at 8:53 am
Will the CIA guys all now wear pink panties and be given “we feel your pain” Advanced Pussification Training?
January 7th, 2009 at 9:59 am
Kennedy can’t run her hose. Maybe she’d be the best person for the job. They could send her on fact finding missions to Rodeo Drive, Paris, London, Rome. Keep her out of the office and go on with business as usual. With this intellectual lightweight in charge the professionals might actually get to do their jobs.
January 7th, 2009 at 10:01 am
lefties do have nads, they are just really shriveled like raisins. i’d bet michelle “gawdzilla” obama has bigger nads than hussein, in a side by side comparison.