<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Proper Response to the Sotomayor Nomination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/</link>
	<description>Unfair. Unbalanced. Unmedicated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanmahair</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-32003</link>
		<dc:creator>seanmahair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-32003</guid>
		<description>This woman reminds me of a character in the Harry Potter series.  Dolores Umbridge, grand inquisitor, dark arts instructor (pitiful) and shill for the Minister of Magic who despite all evidence continued to disbelieve everyone was in terrible danger.  

 Hmmmmmmmm life imitating art again.  

I really hate when that happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This woman reminds me of a character in the Harry Potter series.  Dolores Umbridge, grand inquisitor, dark arts instructor (pitiful) and shill for the Minister of Magic who despite all evidence continued to disbelieve everyone was in terrible danger.  </p>
<p> Hmmmmmmmm life imitating art again.  </p>
<p>I really hate when that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 of 7</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31957</link>
		<dc:creator>4 of 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31957</guid>
		<description>I read an editorial today by E.J. Dionne (Washington Post)
&quot;GOP must embrace nomination&quot;

&lt;b&gt;&quot;She also upheld a ban on federal funds going to family planning groups that provided abortions overseas. Sotomayor wrote that &quot;the Supreme Court has made clear that the government is free to favor the anti-abortion position over the pro-choice position, and can do so with public funds.&quot;
Dan Gilgoft, on his excellent &quot;God and Country&quot; blog, points out that Sotomayor also ruled in favor of a group of Connecticut anti-abortion protesters who asserted that police &quot;used excessive force against them at a demonstration.&quot; He concluded that her &quot;thin record on abortion is most likely a relief&quot; to pro life groups.&quot;

Is this LiveFreeOrDie&#039;s crazy plan taking root? 
The rest of the editorial made her out to be a centrist-moderate - but they tried to present the Marxist-in-chief the same way, so I can&#039;t take much assurance from that!

PS. Jimmy, Kentucky AND Tennessee vs Illinois? I&#039;ll take those odds. (will we have a choice?)&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an editorial today by E.J. Dionne (Washington Post)<br />
&#8220;GOP must embrace nomination&#8221;</p>
<p><b>&#8220;She also upheld a ban on federal funds going to family planning groups that provided abortions overseas. Sotomayor wrote that &#8220;the Supreme Court has made clear that the government is free to favor the anti-abortion position over the pro-choice position, and can do so with public funds.&#8221;<br />
Dan Gilgoft, on his excellent &#8220;God and Country&#8221; blog, points out that Sotomayor also ruled in favor of a group of Connecticut anti-abortion protesters who asserted that police &#8220;used excessive force against them at a demonstration.&#8221; He concluded that her &#8220;thin record on abortion is most likely a relief&#8221; to pro life groups.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this LiveFreeOrDie&#8217;s crazy plan taking root?<br />
The rest of the editorial made her out to be a centrist-moderate &#8211; but they tried to present the Marxist-in-chief the same way, so I can&#8217;t take much assurance from that!</p>
<p>PS. Jimmy, Kentucky AND Tennessee vs Illinois? I&#8217;ll take those odds. (will we have a choice?)</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adagioforstrings</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31845</link>
		<dc:creator>adagioforstrings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31845</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Live Free Or Die says: May 27th, 2009 at 3:06 pm 
Along with being super-enthusiastic, Republicans should characterize Mayor Soto as a Pro-Life Catholic Homophobe who reveres the Constitution. When she, or the Industrial Media Complex, or the O-bah-muhh administration deny this as ’slander’, Republicans say prove it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Telling lies with the hope that it will compel the Obots to tell the truth is the Blanche DuBois, relying on the kindness of strangers approach, &amp; destined to fail. The Obots talking points are that Obama&#039;s nominee is a mild mannered centrist. If you repeat that she&#039;s a mild mannered nonpartisan centrist, the Obots will just assume that you are a stupid RethugliKKKan with a very little brain. If you disagree with them, they&#039;ll still assume that you are an evil RethugliKKKan with a very little brain,  but an very evil &amp; dangerous one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Live Free Or Die says: May 27th, 2009 at 3:06 pm<br />
Along with being super-enthusiastic, Republicans should characterize Mayor Soto as a Pro-Life Catholic Homophobe who reveres the Constitution. When she, or the Industrial Media Complex, or the O-bah-muhh administration deny this as ’slander’, Republicans say prove it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Telling lies with the hope that it will compel the Obots to tell the truth is the Blanche DuBois, relying on the kindness of strangers approach, &amp; destined to fail. The Obots talking points are that Obama&#8217;s nominee is a mild mannered centrist. If you repeat that she&#8217;s a mild mannered nonpartisan centrist, the Obots will just assume that you are a stupid RethugliKKKan with a very little brain. If you disagree with them, they&#8217;ll still assume that you are an evil RethugliKKKan with a very little brain,  but an very evil &amp; dangerous one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ussjimmycarter</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31825</link>
		<dc:creator>ussjimmycarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31825</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m open to the first state that passes mandatory carry for all law abiding citizens and no buggering!  I&#039;m there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m open to the first state that passes mandatory carry for all law abiding citizens and no buggering!  I&#8217;m there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ss396</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31820</link>
		<dc:creator>ss396</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31820</guid>
		<description>Actually, &quot;What&#039;s your favorite color?&quot; is a very good question.  Based upon her stated emphasis of her Latina heritage, I would guess that it is not white.

Since her Latina heritage is an important basis for her thought processes, and most Latinas are Christian, we should expect her to bring a greater emphasis on Christian doctrine to bear on her SCOTUS decisions.  She should be asked about this.

Since her Latina heritage informs her judicial decisions, and most legal Latinas (especially those of long residence) are disdainful of, and alarmed by, the illegal migration from south of the border, we can expect her to take a dim view concerning the rights of illegal aliens.  She should be asked about this.

Since her Latina heritage guided the development of her mental processes, and most Latinas grew up in a culture where personal firearms are prevalent, we can expect her to exhibit strong support of the 2nd Amendment.  She should be asked about this.

Since her Latina heritage stands a point of personal pride to her, and most Latinas are not homosexual or bisexual, we can expect her to have a fundamental character bias against legislative and judicial challenges to DOMA.  She should be asked about this.

Perhaps instead of lambasting identity politics, we should take a lesson from FrankJ and celebrate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, &#8220;What&#8217;s your favorite color?&#8221; is a very good question.  Based upon her stated emphasis of her Latina heritage, I would guess that it is not white.</p>
<p>Since her Latina heritage is an important basis for her thought processes, and most Latinas are Christian, we should expect her to bring a greater emphasis on Christian doctrine to bear on her SCOTUS decisions.  She should be asked about this.</p>
<p>Since her Latina heritage informs her judicial decisions, and most legal Latinas (especially those of long residence) are disdainful of, and alarmed by, the illegal migration from south of the border, we can expect her to take a dim view concerning the rights of illegal aliens.  She should be asked about this.</p>
<p>Since her Latina heritage guided the development of her mental processes, and most Latinas grew up in a culture where personal firearms are prevalent, we can expect her to exhibit strong support of the 2nd Amendment.  She should be asked about this.</p>
<p>Since her Latina heritage stands a point of personal pride to her, and most Latinas are not homosexual or bisexual, we can expect her to have a fundamental character bias against legislative and judicial challenges to DOMA.  She should be asked about this.</p>
<p>Perhaps instead of lambasting identity politics, we should take a lesson from FrankJ and celebrate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkoMancuso</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31816</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkoMancuso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31816</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s those zombies from the north that’ll getcha.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sad, but true. Although here in Central PA, it&#039;s the south. Maryland just can&#039;t help but spread its disease. 

&quot;We need to escape Maryland because of the high taxes. Then we&#039;ll vote for Democrats when we get to Pennsylvania!&quot;

Is there a cure for blindness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s those zombies from the north that’ll getcha.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sad, but true. Although here in Central PA, it&#8217;s the south. Maryland just can&#8217;t help but spread its disease. </p>
<p>&#8220;We need to escape Maryland because of the high taxes. Then we&#8217;ll vote for Democrats when we get to Pennsylvania!&#8221;</p>
<p>Is there a cure for blindness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31813</guid>
		<description>I like Tennessee, 4 of 7 - a lot.  Got a son who homeports there.  But I figure Socrates&#039;s&#039;s&#039;s State of Illannoyed will invade both it and Kentucky and that&#039;ll be it.  It&#039;s those zombies from the north that&#039;ll getcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Tennessee, 4 of 7 &#8211; a lot.  Got a son who homeports there.  But I figure Socrates&#8217;s's&#8217;s State of Illannoyed will invade both it and Kentucky and that&#8217;ll be it.  It&#8217;s those zombies from the north that&#8217;ll getcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 of 7</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31797</link>
		<dc:creator>4 of 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31797</guid>
		<description>PS. few mosquitoes, good BBQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. few mosquitoes, good BBQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4 of 7</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31796</link>
		<dc:creator>4 of 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31796</guid>
		<description>#5 - Live Free or Die,
&quot;You know, it&#039;s a crazy plan, but it just might work!&quot;
#22 - Jimmy,
Tennessee just passed 2 state laws, One allowing permit holders to carry guns into bars and restraunts that serve alcohol (as long as you have a &#039;designated shooter&#039;) and the other allowing permit holders to carry guns into public and state parks. 
No income tax, no casinos, and Fred Thompson.
&quot;Come for the Freedom, Stay for the Revolution&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 &#8211; Live Free or Die,<br />
&#8220;You know, it&#8217;s a crazy plan, but it just might work!&#8221;<br />
#22 &#8211; Jimmy,<br />
Tennessee just passed 2 state laws, One allowing permit holders to carry guns into bars and restraunts that serve alcohol (as long as you have a &#8216;designated shooter&#8217;) and the other allowing permit holders to carry guns into public and state parks.<br />
No income tax, no casinos, and Fred Thompson.<br />
&#8220;Come for the Freedom, Stay for the Revolution&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31795</guid>
		<description>Whoa, Tink, Alaska in the winter.  If I were young, I might try it.  But it has ussjimmycarter-grade mosquitoes in the summer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, Tink, Alaska in the winter.  If I were young, I might try it.  But it has ussjimmycarter-grade mosquitoes in the summer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chocolatier007</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31794</link>
		<dc:creator>chocolatier007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31794</guid>
		<description>Have we even seen her arms yet? I haven&#039;t seen her on Access Hollywood or Entertainment tonight so far. How do we know that she is even qualified to be in Washington?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have we even seen her arms yet? I haven&#8217;t seen her on Access Hollywood or Entertainment tonight so far. How do we know that she is even qualified to be in Washington?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWingTink</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31793</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWingTink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31793</guid>
		<description>Jimmy~~Considering I&#039;m originally an Okie, I&#039;ll go back there or Texas. I&#039;ll go to Alaska, too; lived there for 6 months during the winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy~~Considering I&#8217;m originally an Okie, I&#8217;ll go back there or Texas. I&#8217;ll go to Alaska, too; lived there for 6 months during the winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31786</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31786</guid>
		<description>A couple of serious suggestions:

1 - They should ask some tough questions about her judicial philosophy during the confirmation, but they shouldn&#039;t put up a fight.  First, Republicans argued left and right that the President was owed deference in judicial picks, so they&#039;d lose all credibility if they put up a fight now.  Second, they probably couldn&#039;t filibuster anyway, so they should take the high road now and build up some credibility for later.  And third, anybody Obama puts forward is going to be a reliably far-left liberal, so we should at least be hopeful that this one might not be able to influence the squishes (sorry, &quot;moderates&quot;) on the Court.  

2 - While taking the high road, Republicans should nonetheless remind people every chance they get that it was &lt;b&gt;Democrats&lt;/b&gt; who probably kept a Latino from reaching the bench earlier.  Miguel Estrada was viewed as a likely Supreme Court nominee under President Bush, so Democrats filibustered his appointment to the most important appeals court (the D.C. Circuit) back in 2001.  Bush reportedly was high on the idea of appointing the first Hispanic to the Supreme Court.  If not for the Democrats, he probably would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of serious suggestions:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; They should ask some tough questions about her judicial philosophy during the confirmation, but they shouldn&#8217;t put up a fight.  First, Republicans argued left and right that the President was owed deference in judicial picks, so they&#8217;d lose all credibility if they put up a fight now.  Second, they probably couldn&#8217;t filibuster anyway, so they should take the high road now and build up some credibility for later.  And third, anybody Obama puts forward is going to be a reliably far-left liberal, so we should at least be hopeful that this one might not be able to influence the squishes (sorry, &#8220;moderates&#8221;) on the Court.  </p>
<p>2 &#8211; While taking the high road, Republicans should nonetheless remind people every chance they get that it was <b>Democrats</b> who probably kept a Latino from reaching the bench earlier.  Miguel Estrada was viewed as a likely Supreme Court nominee under President Bush, so Democrats filibustered his appointment to the most important appeals court (the D.C. Circuit) back in 2001.  Bush reportedly was high on the idea of appointing the first Hispanic to the Supreme Court.  If not for the Democrats, he probably would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon Y. Mous</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31783</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon Y. Mous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31783</guid>
		<description>I think the real unpredictable thing for the Republicans to do would be to put up a fight. I won&#039;t be holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real unpredictable thing for the Republicans to do would be to put up a fight. I won&#8217;t be holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31782</guid>
		<description>The proper response is: &quot;Crap.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proper response is: &#8220;Crap.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanABQ</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31779</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanABQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31779</guid>
		<description>So, any word on how she intends on protecting the borders from the invasion of less-than-Americans? Is committed to the US constitution or, as is the case so many nauseating times here in the SW, does she consider herself a constituent of &#039;La Raza&#039;?

Do I have the same rights - the same equal protection under the law of THIS land - or am I just another &quot;guero&quot; &amp; my wife a &quot;mayate&quot; here in (snicker) Aztlan?

Feel free to look those terms up if you don&#039;t already know what they mean. If anyone tries to say that &quot;guero&quot; just means &quot;white&quot;, ask them why they don&#039;t just say &quot;white&quot;. And Aztlan, from the way I define it, means &quot;Land traded for money &amp; booze&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, any word on how she intends on protecting the borders from the invasion of less-than-Americans? Is committed to the US constitution or, as is the case so many nauseating times here in the SW, does she consider herself a constituent of &#8216;La Raza&#8217;?</p>
<p>Do I have the same rights &#8211; the same equal protection under the law of THIS land &#8211; or am I just another &#8220;guero&#8221; &amp; my wife a &#8220;mayate&#8221; here in (snicker) Aztlan?</p>
<p>Feel free to look those terms up if you don&#8217;t already know what they mean. If anyone tries to say that &#8220;guero&#8221; just means &#8220;white&#8221;, ask them why they don&#8217;t just say &#8220;white&#8221;. And Aztlan, from the way I define it, means &#8220;Land traded for money &amp; booze&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31777</guid>
		<description>DE: Options could include Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska, two of which have salt water! Am I leaving anyone out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DE: Options could include Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska, two of which have salt water! Am I leaving anyone out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31775</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31775</guid>
		<description>18: I didn&#039;t say apologize for principles. I didn&#039;t say do nothing.  I said forget about this nomination. It is a no-win and a hopeless site for a battle.

In fact the entire Capitol and Washington D.C. is a hopeless site for the GOP or Conservatives (with or without a capital c).  The GOP has no strength left there.  A handful of Senators with principles, a few dozen Representatives.  Even in party caucus they are outnumbered by those who will sell out for the smallest earmark or favor. 

And the other check and balance, the SC,  will soon be a tame parrot on Obama&#039;s shoulder.

Out in the states there is some hope.  And that is where any comeback must take root.  Town by town, county by county, for every legislative seat and state office.  I don&#039;t expect it will work, and certainly I won&#039;t live to see it, since the federal government will sabotage and undermine every attempt.  But I am certain nothing will work at the federal level and expending effort on national races is a suicidal hunger strike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18: I didn&#8217;t say apologize for principles. I didn&#8217;t say do nothing.  I said forget about this nomination. It is a no-win and a hopeless site for a battle.</p>
<p>In fact the entire Capitol and Washington D.C. is a hopeless site for the GOP or Conservatives (with or without a capital c).  The GOP has no strength left there.  A handful of Senators with principles, a few dozen Representatives.  Even in party caucus they are outnumbered by those who will sell out for the smallest earmark or favor. </p>
<p>And the other check and balance, the SC,  will soon be a tame parrot on Obama&#8217;s shoulder.</p>
<p>Out in the states there is some hope.  And that is where any comeback must take root.  Town by town, county by county, for every legislative seat and state office.  I don&#8217;t expect it will work, and certainly I won&#8217;t live to see it, since the federal government will sabotage and undermine every attempt.  But I am certain nothing will work at the federal level and expending effort on national races is a suicidal hunger strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31774</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31774</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s a Republican? Isn&#039;t that one of those people that used to be around back before the first Bush was president? I haven&#039;t seen a real Republican in years, I didn&#039;t known they still existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s a Republican? Isn&#8217;t that one of those people that used to be around back before the first Bush was president? I haven&#8217;t seen a real Republican in years, I didn&#8217;t known they still existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertElephant</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31772</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertElephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31772</guid>
		<description>#14,  So then the GOP Senators will keep acting the way they have since hObama got elected?

They may as well just rename the party to Castrati.  Everyone wants to compromise and moderate and that should never be a position.  You never have to apologize for your principles if your principles are right.  Sadly,they keep apologizing for adhering the the very principles that founded this great nation.

The GOP is dead.  It&#039;s just shambling around like a recalcitrant zombie.  Conservatism lives, but it has 40 years of leftist tendrils and brainwashing to overturn.  This isn&#039;t a war, they&#039;ve already won.  And they did it while we were all sleeping.  I love my country and want it to return to its Constitutional roots, but it seems almost as if she may still be breathing, but the brain died a long time ago.

So, see you all in Montana or Wyoming when we decide which state we want to turn into our own nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14,  So then the GOP Senators will keep acting the way they have since hObama got elected?</p>
<p>They may as well just rename the party to Castrati.  Everyone wants to compromise and moderate and that should never be a position.  You never have to apologize for your principles if your principles are right.  Sadly,they keep apologizing for adhering the the very principles that founded this great nation.</p>
<p>The GOP is dead.  It&#8217;s just shambling around like a recalcitrant zombie.  Conservatism lives, but it has 40 years of leftist tendrils and brainwashing to overturn.  This isn&#8217;t a war, they&#8217;ve already won.  And they did it while we were all sleeping.  I love my country and want it to return to its Constitutional roots, but it seems almost as if she may still be breathing, but the brain died a long time ago.</p>
<p>So, see you all in Montana or Wyoming when we decide which state we want to turn into our own nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: storm1911</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31771</link>
		<dc:creator>storm1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31771</guid>
		<description>We need to have all  the republicans show up with soft drink cans relabeled &quot;sodameyer&quot;. Fizzy, tastes like root beer, with a hint of salsa. Whenever she speaks a can could be pooped open and fizz out, like her fizzy thinking. Lame, but sarcastic. It would drive the dems crazy.

Or they could fill thye cans with kool-aid and pass then out to the dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to have all  the republicans show up with soft drink cans relabeled &#8220;sodameyer&#8221;. Fizzy, tastes like root beer, with a hint of salsa. Whenever she speaks a can could be pooped open and fizz out, like her fizzy thinking. Lame, but sarcastic. It would drive the dems crazy.</p>
<p>Or they could fill thye cans with kool-aid and pass then out to the dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IH8Socialist</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31767</link>
		<dc:creator>IH8Socialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31767</guid>
		<description>A good question for Sotomayor would be: What is your stance on Telepropmters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good question for Sotomayor would be: What is your stance on Telepropmters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP727</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31766</link>
		<dc:creator>IP727</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31766</guid>
		<description>THERE ONCE WAS A LITTLE CHICA NAMED SOTOMAYOR,
UPON THE HIGH COURT SHE WILL BE A PLAYER, 
UPON THE CONSTITUTION SHE WILL SQUAT,
HER FORTE WILL BE JUDICIAL FIAT,
KEEP ON HAND PLENTY OF BAYER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THERE ONCE WAS A LITTLE CHICA NAMED SOTOMAYOR,<br />
UPON THE HIGH COURT SHE WILL BE A PLAYER,<br />
UPON THE CONSTITUTION SHE WILL SQUAT,<br />
HER FORTE WILL BE JUDICIAL FIAT,<br />
KEEP ON HAND PLENTY OF BAYER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31764</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31764</guid>
		<description>The GOP Senators should do nothing.  Not answer media questions, not ask questions, not attend the hearings, and not vote yea or nay.  Forget her name and never let it pass their lips.

The media will crap on them for doing that.  But the media will crap on them anyway.  So why provide anything to distort?

It is an utter waste of time.  And besides, it means they needn&#039;t be in the same room as Specter.  That is a clean air bonus for any person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP Senators should do nothing.  Not answer media questions, not ask questions, not attend the hearings, and not vote yea or nay.  Forget her name and never let it pass their lips.</p>
<p>The media will crap on them for doing that.  But the media will crap on them anyway.  So why provide anything to distort?</p>
<p>It is an utter waste of time.  And besides, it means they needn&#8217;t be in the same room as Specter.  That is a clean air bonus for any person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/05/the-proper-response-to-the-sotomayor-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-31763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=4931#comment-31763</guid>
		<description>Now, now, ussjc, we must work up to a play on word-sounds &lt;i&gt;slowly.&lt;/i&gt;  See, I&#039;m stuck on &#039;Soto&#039; and &#039;Mayor.&#039;  Is she Mayor of Soto (Live Free Or Die, #5) or more correctly, Mayor of De Soto, MI?  Is she the &#039;soda mayor?&#039; &#039;Soda queen? &#039; &#039;Soda jerk?&#039;  That&#039;s it: she&#039;s a soda jerk from the Bronx.

I hear that 80% of her decisions have been overturned.  That&#039;s kinda like letting the bubbly out of the bottle before you pour it.  So, she&#039;s not a very &lt;i&gt;good&lt;/i&gt; soda jerk.

Can a Constitutional Convention shut down the Supreme Court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now, ussjc, we must work up to a play on word-sounds <i>slowly.</i>  See, I&#8217;m stuck on &#8216;Soto&#8217; and &#8216;Mayor.&#8217;  Is she Mayor of Soto (Live Free Or Die, #5) or more correctly, Mayor of De Soto, MI?  Is she the &#8216;soda mayor?&#8217; &#8216;Soda queen? &#8216; &#8216;Soda jerk?&#8217;  That&#8217;s it: she&#8217;s a soda jerk from the Bronx.</p>
<p>I hear that 80% of her decisions have been overturned.  That&#8217;s kinda like letting the bubbly out of the bottle before you pour it.  So, she&#8217;s not a very <i>good</i> soda jerk.</p>
<p>Can a Constitutional Convention shut down the Supreme Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

