Comments on: Anger at What You Don’t Understand

By: ErikW

ErikW — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:16 +0000

Amaps, I agree with #2 and #3 but not so much #1.

I believe that people are good and it seems like the left believes that people are drooling ‘tards.

FWIW

By: midwestconservitive

midwestconservitive — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:53:18 +0000

LIBERAL – noun– A person so open minded their brains have fallen out.

By: Son of Bob

Son of Bob — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:32:06 +0000

It can’t be easy being a liberal. Imagine going through life with an understanding of the day’s largest political issues that goes no deeper than a bumper sticker you saw on another liberal’s car.

By: IH8Socialist

IH8Socialist — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:08:45 +0000

I’d rather talk to a brick wall than a liberal, the wall dosen’t freak out out scream, howl, and fling poo. Punching, kicking, and hitting liberals with blunt objects is also better than talkiing to them. liberals are only good for one thing punching bags.

By: cjtony97

cjtony97 — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:01:00 +0000

The Liberal breeding facilities in Puerto Rico don’t help the situation AT ALL.

By: T.N. Amaps

T.N. Amaps — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:52:01 +0000

oops, here they are:
1. Liberals believe that people are basically good, where as conservatives believe that people are basically evil.
2. Liberals believe that global wealth is fixed and just changes hands, whereas conservatives believe that overall wealth grows and that people can generate wealth for themselves.
3. Liberals believe that truth is relative, where as conservatives that truth is absolute.

By: T.N. Amaps

T.N. Amaps — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:49:22 +0000

A friend of mine has determined that there are three principals that determine if someone is a liberal or conservative:

By: Emmett

Emmett — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:10:41 +0000

I live in Minnesota and hate my state more every day. Let’s repeal the 17th Amendment and never have to deal with this again.

By: Tman

Tman — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:07:39 +0000

The PJ O’Rourke essay “How to Explain Conservatism to Your Squishy Liberal Friends: Individualism ‘R’ Us” is usually what I use when trying to explain why collectivism is stupid and doesn’t work when I’m arguing with a liberal.

http://www.buildfreedom.com/tribute/orourke/explain.html

The only problem is that after they read it their brains go in to traumatic shock and they start drooling all over the place.

It just gets too messy.

By: NunyaB

NunyaB — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:37:21 +0000

Oh, so now we’re sposed to uuuuuuuuunderstand the Liberals? Kinda like we’re sposed to uuuuuuuuuuuuunderstand the terizts? (Liberal…terizt…same diff)

Oh wait, you said we should punch their dumb monkey faces; never mind.

Why can’t they just abort and euthanize themselves out of existence since they support both concepts so religiously?

By: Plentyobailouts

Plentyobailouts — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:32:48 +0000

Speaking of monkeys. minnesota just capitulated to communism and gave alfrankenstein the senate seat. We are doomed.
All red states should secede and now before the communists take over completely. Its a sad day for America. A sad day for freedom, and a sad day for the complete idiots in minnesota. Nothing like being a turd respresented by a big pile of steaming dung.

By: Live Free Or Die

Live Free Or Die — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:21:22 +0000

I’m sure Freud had some theory of the psychosis of Moonbats. The Great Gulf/Chasm is between the moonbats’ ears.The synapses just don’t fire on all cylinders in the moonbat brains. Any time a Liberal tries to contemplate conservative ideas, he/she/it overloads the circuits, thus the steam from their ears. Thankfully, they are easily diverted, or that burnt electrical smell would permeate the Earth’s atmosphere. Punching their dumb monkey faces DOES divert them, but in order to decrease their surplus population without resorting to Genocide, the one Big Government Program that Conservatives should endorse is Free Vasectomies and Tubal Ligations for Moonbats.

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:07:17 +0000

I can always tell when I’m losing an argument with a liberal, because it’s all he can talk about.

By: innominatus

innominatus — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:51:19 +0000

Frank, this topic would make a good PJM column. I can’t wait to see what kind of comments it would produce.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:46:25 +0000

And their arguments consist solely of screeching and the flinging of poo. Honestly, if you look through the comments sections at any major publication, the conservative viewpoint is typically being supported with facts and logic, while liberals call names and well basically they just call names. Sometimes they will cite a liberal screed from a liberal site like that is the be all and end all. But that is actually a rare occurrence.

By: DamnCat

DamnCat — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:54:47 +0000

Conservatives in general are much more capable of dealing with opposing viewpoints

Indeed
http://www.livescience.com/culture/090608-media-message.html

The Brigham Young University survey found that … liberals read almost exclusively liberal blogs, but conservatives tend to read both…

…stronger party affiliation, conservative political views, and greater interest in politics proved more likely to click on articles with opposing views, according to the Ohio State study.