Comments on: Iran

By: DesertElephant

DesertElephant — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:16:00 +0000

BobA, IUDs? We’re going to give the Iranians Birth Control? I agree that we need less of them, so birth control’s a great idea, but I’m still uncertain how we can kill them with IUDs. Maybe Toxic Shock Syndrome?

By: IH8Socialist

IH8Socialist — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:38:25 +0000

Sounds like ACORN was helping with the elections in Iran.

By: Bob A

Bob A — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:02:01 +0000

This is the way totalitarians do things. Nothing will happen in Iran until the US starts supplying the angry militants with IUD’s, automatic weapons and rocket propelled grenades. Its time for a little quid pro quo, but Obama would never hurt his terrorist friends.

By: ussjimmycarter

ussjimmycarter — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:32:55 +0000

“If you said Jimmy Carter you’d be correct, so I think we can say that Obama is the new Jimmy, so where the Hell is my New Ronald Reagan?”

Hunting Moose in Alaska and making David Letterman look like a foolish old letch!

By: Carolynp

Carolynp — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:37:19 +0000

Heh, I’m with Frank. Who knew these guys gave a rip about who ruled them? When you have to get your husband’s permission to leave the house when you’re 5 cm dilated in labor, I’m thinking you have more of a cultural problem. I also find the administration’s response so far to be refreshingly honest. “I’m sorry, we’re a little busy robbing the USA right now. Get in line and we’ll be over to rob you as soon as we’re finished.”

By: cincinnati_bob

cincinnati_bob — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:22:55 +0000

KingJamesTheCapitalist

Plus the Carter administration created the Dept of Energy to ween us off foreign oil, while he and the dumbocrats have done their damndest to keep us from drilling for oil anywhere else. Or using alternate forms if energy that work, like Nukes. We’ve been spending bilions upon billions every year maintaining that ‘department’ since the late 70′s, and have gotten No Where, Zero Accomplishments.

Actually, you could argue, like every other democrat program, they’ve actually generated negative results, so Zero would be a compliment for those vermin.

By: cincinnati_bob

cincinnati_bob — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:17:49 +0000

With respect to Allahpundit, we knew Acmafriggajig was completely gone when “he had the green Aura around him at the U.N. and no one blinked the entire time he was talking”.

But I agree, if you’re going to rig the election, and the mullahs are in charge, why not use the standard misdirection ploy that works so well in the US of A.

Seems they want the revolution to proceed.

If there’ll even be one.

You know how whackjobs spout off over here every time there is an election and jack squat comes of it.

By: MarkoMancuso

MarkoMancuso — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:23:48 +0000

“…above my paygrade.”

By: KingJamesTheCapitalist

KingJamesTheCapitalist — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:58:06 +0000

Whose Presidency am I describing?

Economy is in the Crapper
Iran is getting all kinds of F***ed up
Israel is feeling a little self defensive
Korean Nuclear Problems
Energy Issues

If you said Jimmy Carter you’d be correct, so I think we can say that Obama is the new Jimmy, so where the Hell is my New Ronald Reagan?

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:49:16 +0000

Maybe that country will now boil over resulting in a regime change. It could be a good thing – or a friggin’ disaster. Flip a coin. Whatever happens, I’m sure this “president” of ours will do the wrong thing.

By: seanmahair

seanmahair — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:58:32 +0000

Ah yes, he could have taken his noble peace prize, it makes a really good weapon. Maybe BO could have sent the thugs from Philly over to oversee the election. The New Black Panther Party would have been a powerful tool, I’m surprise Mr. Emmanuel didn’t think of it. Oh that’s right we need them to keep the right wing extremist under control.

My Bad.

By: FormerHostage

FormerHostage — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:49:13 +0000

Gee, maybe they should’a had Jimmah Carter there as an election observer?