The KKK formed a chapter in a town in North Dakota. There weren’t a whole heck of a lot of black people for them to hate, so they decided to burn crosses in front of a Catholic church and a Jewish Synagogue. The priest and the rabbi had a meeting the next day. That night persons unknown started a bon-fire in front of the home of the secret head of the KKK.
Problem solved.

Wait . . .

If Reverend Wright had inserted liberal after “white”, he would have been on to something.

About three years ago, I had a forum discussion with a liberal who might as well have been Boxer. His mentality was such (and likely still is)that he felt he could make an intentionally degrading remark about a certain black conservative official for being a black conservative and it did not reflect on him as a racist. His mantra was, basically, “I’m a Democrat and Democrats support civil rights!” As if that was supposed to discredit any point I made about his remark. He became very upset when I refused to follow the DNC script and slink away.

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/28017/

July 17th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
F#@k the moon NUKE CALIFORNIA Rid ourselves of those subhuman things (Boxer and Pelosi)

That’s what I thought at first, too, but if you look at her comments, especially near the end, it sounds like she’s basically saying “I’m trying to build support for this measure. These other black people support it. You should also support it, since you and your organization are also black!”

The notion of “the individual” is incomprehensible to the leftist mind.

and How did Frank J get that knot on his head? Let me guess.. he gave SarahK a used vaccuum for her birthday?

Boxer is the typical Lefto-Liberal: ideologically radical and intellectually shallow because she has been hornswaggled by the thinly disguised anti-American values and clever doublespeak propaganda of the hardcore Left. And this didn’t just start in the 1960s; it was in the Progressiveism throughout the 20th century, and going back to Marx and Darwin. Like all her fellow brainwashed Progressives, she is also clueless to the clear reality right in front of her: she doesn’t listen to people because she isn’t interested in anything but her own view. Just like Obama and Geithner, Frank and Dodd, Kennedy and Schumer, and all the Lefto judges and justices. Does Boxer realize that she’s being closed-minded, or is it that she just doesn’t care if we see it because she feels so secure in her position of power? She and her Lefto-Lib comrades are all-too-willingly, eagerly dismissive of people if they don’t fit her politically correct view and its sympathetic concept of the quintessentially utopian society and world. Well, Mr. Alford has opened the door and wedged it open. We had better follow up with similar words and other actions, or we’ll be seeing America, One-World Nation Under the God-Obama and his Leftist horde of degenerates.

AND … during a part of the exchange between Alford and Boxer, she allows the black man “the privilege” of calling her “ma’am” (instead of her “worked hard for” title of Senator), and he used it multiple times. This, about two weeks after she viciously humiliated a brigadier general — a white man — who was being respectful, and had gotten out about 8 words total, including “yes, ma’am” . And the Libs wonder why some of us come to the conclusion that “talking to them” isn’t worth the time (not to mention our breath, which apparently is pollution that must be controlled down to the atom by the Federal Government).