Comments on: No Boom?

By: Plentyobailouts

Plentyobailouts — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:50:15 +0000

Nope! Nope! Nope! gotta have boom. no boom? why bother. sure rail guns are deadly, but can we put explosives on them so they go BOOM?

By: ussjimmycarter

ussjimmycarter — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:25:16 +0000

So, no boom? How can we have awesome without the “see that was awesome” factor? A nuclear bomb or a MOAB certainly have the “see that was awesome” factor! I’m afraid that without a Boom, the railgun is not going to be the weapon of choice for either Fred Thompson or Sarah Palin! Perhaps you can peddle it to Barack “The Deep Bower in Chief” Obama!

By: redshirt

redshirt — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:26:18 +0000

well to paraphrase that quote of George Bush’s that comes on every hour and drives me nuts:

“America is ADDICTED to gunpowder”

By: Dr. Mayhem

Dr. Mayhem — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:55:49 +0000

What if instead of dinosaurs we put them on galloping crocodiles? (http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/nov/19/galloping-dinosaur-eating-crocodiles)

By: Son of Bob

Son of Bob — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:57:38 +0000

I’ve never met a dinosaur that didn’t like railguns.

By: jim

jim — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:52:38 +0000

I’m sorry I thought .50 cal WAS proportionate response

By: Ron Russell

Ron Russell — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:48:56 +0000

Don’t know much about rail guns, but they sound like a wave of the future. Let me regress I was wondering the other day what was the first man-made object to break the sound barrier. I came up with something, but I don’t know. I was thinking of the whip. The end is moving very fast when it makes that crack! Anyone else have thoughts on this.

By: motopolitico

motopolitico — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:39:21 +0000

Having been on the butt party at a long range rifle range, I can assure you that the supersonic crack of a bullet is much louder than the retort of the muzzle at 400 yards. SNAP..2..3..muffled boom. So, lose the muffled boom and increase the SNAP. That’s why subsonic ammo is SO much quieter out of a rifle than supersonic ammo is.

By: Ron Rockstar

Ron Rockstar — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:04:28 +0000

The original rail gun with a boom.

By: shiggz

shiggz — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:07:58 +0000

Robot army or magnetic weapons.. Must choose. Re-watch the Futurama where Bender sings show tunes anytime he gets his head stuck to a magnet.

Stealth and silent weapons can be very awesome. I have an idea for a weapon, merges M240 with a .22 also silenced and scoped. It has 1000 round factory sealed clips. The rounds are pre-treated with some cheap mass produced chemical or poison. Something that kills or causes paralysis and thus wounded have to be dragged from combat but cant fight. Hence 3 soldiers out of the fight. From a silent gunshot and bullet that feels worse then a bee sting to the unsuspecting. Enemy Soldiers could never sleep from being paranoid by every tiny sound. To say nothing that one guy looking down on a group could literally kill hundreds silently.

By: TerribleTroy

TerribleTroy — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:43:52 +0000

@11…. Please define “lived” cause you are brain dead…

By: urbuggeme

urbuggeme — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:01:58 +0000

If you are one of the lucky ones to have ever been shot (and lived) as I have; you know that you never hear the shot being fired; only the salience time standing still as you do hear the sound of the “projectile” as it first hits your clothing, passes through as time is still standing still, and you hear the sound of your flesh being ripped apart (like someone shredding a newspaper) then the sound of muscle as it tares away; they that last THUD as the “projectile” hits bone (which sounds like a 4 inch wooded leg of a hardwood table breaking)… and you are thinking to yourself oh… wow… this didn’t even hurt…. till just nOW!!! as time resumes, and you hear the gushing of your blood as it squirts out with every beat of your heart!

By: davis,br

davis,br — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:54:32 +0000

I’m telling you: Tungsten OWPs …but if you insist, sigh, railguns as anti sat-killers defence.

Babies.

By: Veeshir

Veeshir — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:48:33 +0000

Dick Cheney tested it on Bolton’s moustache.

It singed a hair so it’s ready to go. It might even be too powerful, but that’s not something Americans worry about.

If you’re gonna kill something, we might as well overkill it.

Why else do we have enough nukes to destroy the planet like 50 times? There’s only 9 planets (and of course our Moon) near enough to reach, so why the other 41? Because we’re Americans. .

Why else do we have three (3) .50 caliber rounds for handguns? Think of that, the .44 magnum is no higher than 5th or 6th on the power rankings anymore.

Well, technically one of the .50 cals is Israel’s, but they have a lot of America’s attitudes on weaponry.

Proportionate response is for pansies and EUnuchs.

By: IVI

IVI — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:45:01 +0000

I think there may infact be a “Boom”. I am assuming the projectile will travel in excess of the speed of sound, so there should be a loud “Boom” when it accelerates past the speed of sound. Unfortunately there would be no muzzle flash attributable to the acceleration, but maybe there would be one due to the raw awesomeness..

By: MDr

MDr — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:44:38 +0000

Maybe not a boom, but lots of screams and fire (from exploding heads) – strap a liberal on each projectile, force/restrain their eyes in the open position, ala A Clockwork Orange, and play Palin speeches and interviews for their inflight entertainment.

By: Sgt Relic

Sgt Relic — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:40:07 +0000

You already know what happens when we try and super collide. Won’t birds from the future just steal our railgun projectiles?

By: IH8Socialist

IH8Socialist — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:15:30 +0000

So when will Dick Cheney test the rail guns on the Death Star?

By: MarkoMancuso

MarkoMancuso — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:09:56 +0000

Wait… was I not supposed to mention the Dreadnoughts?

I read about it on ABC’s website yesterday.

By: Scott F.

Scott F. — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:36:40 +0000

I hate to have to point this out to a group of gentlemen normally known for their astute observations on all things awesome – but you’re all missing the elephant in the room.

The distinct lack of oxygen in space coupled with the incredible inefficiencies involved in laser technology makes a railgun our only viable space-based weapon system besides missiles, and lets face it, missiles are SO 20th century. If it doesn’t sling death across open space at near-relativistic speeds then it’s just not cool enough for the USAF’s secret fleet of Dreadnoughts.

Wait… was I not supposed to mention the Dreadnoughts?

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:16:05 +0000

If we’re genetically engineering the dinosaurs anyway, we might as well make them resistant to magnets. The only problem I can forsee is that the magnets might mess up the systems for the cyborg dinosaurs, but they can do close combat while the pterodactyls carry railguns as air support.

By: MarkoMancuso

MarkoMancuso — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:14:06 +0000

Gunpowder has done so much for humanity. I am saddened to see us abandon it for the latest hot trend.

By: Bailey

Bailey — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:08:06 +0000

To those who complain about a boom: You can’t handle the boom!