Faster Trains!

Posted by Frank J. on February 9, 2011 at 1:02 pm

So Biden announced a $53 billion plan to build high speed rail. He said this is about “seizing the future.” So, I guess we already gave up on winning the future and are going to do a snatch and grab on it.

Of course, how are we going to get to the future using a strategy from the second half of the 19th century?

BIDEN: “Let’s build trains!”

AMERICA: “No one uses trains anymore.”

BIDEN: “But these are really fast trains?”

AMERICA: “Faster than planes?”

BIDEN: “No.”

Yeah, let’s definitely spend those billions we don’t have to make choo choos, ’cause if one thing is holding back our economy it’s not enough choo choos. And after we use our advanced technology to build a better train, let’s then focus science on inventing a better horseshoe.

Of course, if we all want to be about saving money and being green and what not, shouldn’t we focus more on not going places since we have like our internet and stuff now. I mean, physically going places seems so last century. You didn’t have to go any place to get IMAO; why even go outside at all, I say.

1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (22 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

23 Responses to “Faster Trains!”

  1. acrazymic says:

    They need the train rails for when they ban all the vehicles we drive, and/or they tax us so much during the onslaught of totalitarian socialism and/or communism that we ordinary citizens can no longer afford to own a vehicle. Look at old Russia and North Korea and China, all commies that have mainly govt. run public transit systems for the people. The average commie citizen cannot afford privately owned transportation unless it has two wheels, a chain, and pedals. Building railways is a stepping stone for the democrats to impliment their “progressive” communist agenda and if it takes them 150 years, they will fight for 150 years. 2012 will be crucial to the future of this country.

  2. shane says:

    I figure that after the Tea Party Beat Down of 2010, a conversation in the White House went something like this:

    BHO: What’s got these people all wee-weed up?
    Aid: We’ve heard a lot of them talking about some “Atlas Shrugged” book some woman wrote.
    BHO: A woman? Why would a book about shoes, chocolate, and feelings cause all this trouble?
    Aid: Well… I don’t think that’s what the book is about, really…
    BHO: Then someone who can read, figure this out and report back to me

    6 months later (it’s a really, really long book)…

    BHO: Well… What’s this all about?
    Aid: The central character is a woman who works for a railroad and she’s trying to expand, but the government keeps getting in the…
    BHO: THAT’S IT!!! These people want more trains! I can do that! Hell, we’ll even make them some of those bullet trains like those Japanese and Europeans have… Everyone thinks European trains are great, right? Joe! Write me some trains into the State of the Union Speech!

  3. MarkoMancuso says:

    A difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals support trains that are still too slow and run on government subsidies whereas conservatives support trains that do not try to be as fast as other modern forms of transporation but rather try to look look cool and sound cool while burning coal ripped from the bosom of Mother Earth by giant steam shovels.

  4. Son of Bob says:

    This is going to be even cooler than all those empty buses that we pay to drive around cities in the name of “public transportation.”

  5. automatkas says:

    is this high speed rail for passenger trains or for high volume cargo shipment trains?

  6. Anon says:

    I think the real problem is: there are no businessmen with handlebar mustaches or lamb chop sideburns anymore. All the bestest robber barrons had some serious facial hair. THAT’s what built America!

  7. hwuu says:

    Maybe if the trains were pulled by dinosaurs…..

  8. Basil says:

    I might go along with the idea of building really fast trains if they put the tracks along the border. That way, when somebody tries to sneak into the US, they will get run over by a train.

  9. DamnCat says:

    Don’t miss Iowahawk’s take on this…

  10. Buster_dog says:

    Lets give the $53 billion to these guys: http://www.cartercopters.com/

  11. Live Free Or Die says:

    Al Czervik, 2011: “Golf Courses, cemetaries, and Railroad Property are the biggest waste of prime real estate in America.”

  12. Burmashave says:

    #3 MarkoMancuso says:

    …but rather try to look look cool and sound cool while burning coal ripped from the bosom of Mother Earth by giant steam shovels and all the while gloriously spewing out the smokestack a mighty river of the richest, blackest hydrocarbons known to man.

  13. Outback Jon says:

    So, Amtrak is doing so well that they need more high speed trains? Seriously? Amtrak doesn’t just bleed money, they hemorrhage it. My daughter went to Florida (from NY) last year. It was $50 cheaper to FLY there than to take the train. (Even after adding in luggage fees) And the plane got her closer to where she needed to go. (Amtrak still hasn’t opened several routes that were closed after Katrina) And she didn’t have to spend a day and a half flying…

  14. MarkoMancuso says:

    We have a common bond, Burma. I’m glad.

  15. Elle T. says:

    Actually, they have come up with better horseshoes. If the price of oil keeps going up, that may prove to be a good thing.

  16. Terry_Jim says:

    I think we’d be better off if Congress
    were only allowed to travel
    between home and Washington DC
    by stagecoach.

    Amhoof.

  17. 5of7 says:

    Biden still can’t say it beats dealing with the airline-companies!
    http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/153058/it-beats-dealing-with-the-airline-companies
    Warning: sort of gross.

  18. Chris says:

    Soon they’ll be trying to make us jealous that high speed rail is a Shelbyville type of idea.

  19. Ivan Ivanovich says:

    First Moron (Wetback); I knew a guy that was killed by a weasel.
    Second Moron (Biden); A weasel? How could he be killed by a weasel?
    First Moron; Well he was walking down the tracks and he didn’t hear the weasel!

    My dad told me that many years ago and I wondered why he was telling me such a stupid story. Now I know. It was so that I could repeat this stupid story at IMAO and remember him. Thanks Dad.

  20. ussjimmycarter says:

    If these trains go like 2,000 miles per hour that would be cool. I’d ride on one of those bad boys! But a government train must be a safe train, so I doubt that they will exceed 55 mph with every passenger belted in with a 3 point harness and helmets will be mandatory!

  21. Idahoser says:

    now see, those subsidies for the buggy-whip industry were necessary after all.

  22. Harvey says:

    Seizing the future.

    In the same sense, I assume, as seizing an engine.

  23. 4of7 says:

    They’ll need new trains to haul all those boxcars with shackles installed that FEMA ordered.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>