Did Obama Really Win the Debate?

Posted on October 11, 2012 11:00 am

You know, after all of the hoopla lately about the debate last week and how Romney sucker-punched Obama, and won by like 7 touchdowns or something, there has been one point that has been overlooked, one question unasked: Does Obama actually believe he lost?

By the weeping and gnashing of teeth from the leftward media, and the look on Michelle’s face post-debate, as well as the excuse factory that has been churning out stinkers for a week, it is clear that everyone, even Joe Biden, believes Obama lost badly. But does Barry-O think he did?

You have to consider who we’re talking about here. He isn’t just a narcissist, but also a clueless idiot. I mean, he doesn’t even know how simple economics works. You know, lemonade stand economics that even kids can comprehend. It does not compute with him that, if the price of lemonade ingredients, whatever they are, goes up, that Jimmy will fire his little sister from the lemonade stand. Otherwise he can’t make a profit, and profit means some money for the ice cream truck later.

In his mind, he actually is “The One”; some kind of mythological savior of the world. I bet he even puts on his pants two legs at a time just so he can say he doesn’t put his pants on the same way as other people. You know, because he is “The One”, and is like a Greek god or something.

Sure, he’s playing along of course. If all of these people want to believe the lie that he lost, he’ll just go along with it and tell little jokes and stuff. But he is taking notes…he knows who is propagating the lies…and he will make them pay during his next term. Because of course, he is going to be reelected. The idea that he might not win this election hasn’t even occurred to him. And the fact that he may get to pick one or two more Supreme Court justices during his next term isn’t lost on him either. He may be able to find a way to get more terms as president.

Captain Clueless surely believes he actually won that debate, and has already won the election. This is all just a bunch of formality to him…a silly song and dance number he has to suffer through every four years. Surely there is no way the people, who clearly love him like a god, wouldn’t vote for him indefinitely.

I mean…he’s Barack Hussein Obama! Who is this Mitt character? Mitt…what kind of dumb name is that? Barack means blessed warhorse of the Prophet PBUH, or something. Mitt is like a piece of sports equipment. And he’s a rich white guy. That’s so last century! There’s no way that people would vote for a rich white guy now. They’re like the Nazis of the 21st century.

You know what happened in the debate? Obama spoke and people listened. That’s what. Mitt just blabbered. How could that be a win for him? It isn’t. People just want it to be a win for Mitt. It wasn’t even close really. Obama won just by showing up.

Stupid pundits. Obama has more important things to do than listen to your “who won what” mambo-jumbo. Like eighteen holes worth of important things to do.

Fore!

____________

(High Praise! to Zaklog the Great for pointing out that this question remained unanswered.)

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (9 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

7 Responses to “Did Obama Really Win the Debate?”

  1. seanmahair says:

    Of course Obama won the debate. The same way the administration gave out wrong information but it’s wasn’t false. This exchange between Piers Morgan CNN and Wasserman-Schultz political water carrier tells the tale.

    Piers Morgan, CNN: The really important horse that should be flogged is the behavior and the statements of those who are in positions of responsibility and we would assume knowledge. And it’s pretty unAmerican, pretty unAmerican to be putting up completely false statements before you know the facts, isn’t it?

    Debbie Wasseerman Schultz, DNC chair: Piers, it is not okay for you to be saying that the administration was putting out completely false statements. They put out information that they had at the time based on the intelligence that they were given —

    Piers Morgan: That turned out to be completely wrong.

    Wasserman Schultz: Well that doesn’t mean it was false. It doesn’t mean that it was deliberate. It means that.

    I wish I could say I made this up but ……………..I really didn’t.

  2. Jimmy says:

    How’d you know I have a little sister?

    Years ago, I’m tellin’ ya she was really baked when I fired her.

    Her name is Lil’ Debbie.

    Because my lemonade stand was hard. It was a hard lemonade stand.

  3. zzyzx says:

    As I remember, when when Bush II said he thought there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq because the intelligence he was receiving that said there was, the media and the Democrats immediately branded him a liar. My how the times have changed. Anyway, the truth is as illusive to Watermelon-Shultz as is a good hair day.

  4. Son of Bob says:

    Obama won the debate…and, these aren’t the droids you’re looking for.

  5. NO_MO_BAMA says:

    So what are you trying to say, that he didn’t win? That is just RACIST!

  6. Fly says:

    Scooped by the Daily Mail! How embarrassing for the US news media. I liked the pic captioned thusly: “You liked my debate right? Obama and his team are desperately trying to repair the damage”

  7. CTCompromise says:

    Clueless??! This man and his administration spent a week convinced that Americans would believe that an attack against American targets on 9/11 was a “flash mob” of unplanned protest againt a YouTube video which had been posted some weeks before. Not only is HE clueless, but he believes that WE are the clueless ones. Plenty of leaders throughout history have underestimated the American people…but never before has our President been among them.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>