It’s REALLY Hard to Properly Classify Obama Voters

Posted on November 29, 2012 8:00 pm

A constituency survey at Obama’s campaign website asks people to identify their gender as either “male”, “female”, or “other”.

Wanna bet some Obama voters STILL feel like they’re being excluded?

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (5 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

9 Responses to “It’s REALLY Hard to Properly Classify Obama Voters”

  1. CarolyntheMommy says:

    Male, female, or other? I’m offended: I don’t believe in labels!

  2. NoMoBama says:

    What if one of your fake identities is male and another is female, can you put “both”?
    Does it ask how many times they voted?

  3. CarolyntheMommy says:

    What if I’m male, but in my heart I feel female? I know it says ‘other’ as an option, but it doesn’t say to answer by actual gender or what you perceive your gender to be. I am offended. I’m not sure if I’m offended as a female or as a male (or other), but I’m offended and I feel excluded.

  4. Eric Praline says:

    A more apt question would be “malicious,” “ignorant,” or “both.”

  5. Joan of Argghh! says:

    Elizabeth Warren was unavailable for comment.

  6. zzyzx says:

    Male, female, or other? What ‘other’ could there be?

  7. AT says:

    Oh, good to know. So “other” is the politically correct term these days for “sheep.”

  8. jw says:

    i believe michelle checked “other”

  9. 4of7 says:

    They’re excluding ‘both’, ‘neither’ and ‘none of the above’.
    Snobs.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>