Comments on: A Marine Being Held Hostage… in Mexico?

By: Basil

Basil — Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:34:17 +0000

Actually… the First Amendment? That whole freedom of speech and freedom of religion thing?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Note the “Congress shall make no law…” part. This blog isn’t Congress. You don’t have the right to say whatever you want here. If the blog owners (or his authorized representatives) decide to remove it, for any reason whatsoever, tough titties.

Note that a comment not being removed doesn’t imply agreement or consent. It’s sometimes an open invitation for other commenters to tear the offending commenter a new one. Which, I suppose, is where your Seventh Amendment reference was going: trial by peers.

By: Border Patrol

Border Patrol — Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:07:14 +0000

All of this is for enteraniment purposes. I am cover by the 1st and 7th amendmentl. Freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

By: Border Patrol

Border Patrol — Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:00:08 +0000

Every body we are currently on a mission to save the marine. We might have to brake him out so we will. Mexico is a piece of turt that can be whipped out in minutes. Therefore, F@#$ them and the SSA is working with the FBI to do this as as soon as possible. This news will not be tolarated outside this nation and all who read this must keep shut.

By: Larry Lenwell

Larry Lenwell — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:01:49 +0000

The story said that the gun was declared on the US side of the border. That does not mean anything and antique or not, you should NEVER try and bring a gun into Mexico. I guess the whole story would be so much different if a Mexican tried to bring a gun into the US, huh?

By: John

John — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 04:44:19 +0000

He was going hunting in Costa Rico were hunting is now banned, maybe they wanted to be the last to hunt there, before the ban went not affect? To carry a firearm into Mexican you have to get a temporary permit from the Mexican government. If this young man had a permit then why not say he had a permit issued by the government of Mexico?

Does the story read Mexican government issued permit to man to carry gun into country then arrested him?

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:06:23 +0000

To the halls of Montezuma!!

By: Cyrus

Cyrus — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:29:51 +0000

I say we trade them one 2000 bomb for every day that man is held… Don’t worry, we’ll deliver… In fact, we’ll have a Marine deliver them from his F/A-18!

By: T Rich

T Rich — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:20:23 +0000

Just to be sure! Right Rayfan?

By: Rayfan87

Rayfan87 — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:13:25 +0000

Don, the cartels might be involved, they have all the guns sent from F&F and stolen from the Mexican army. Send in a force the size of the D-day landing, then nuke Mexico City from orbit.

By: Son of Bob

Son of Bob — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:11:20 +0000

I guess the only permitted weapons are the ones given to the war-lords by the Soros/Obama administration.

By: DonMegel

DonMegel — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:40:52 +0000

A Division? I think two Marines and a sharp stick would do the job

By: jw

jw — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:35:03 +0000

i suggest that we either exchange a million mexicans for him or send a division of marines to get him. too bad obama won’t. where is our brilliant SecState? oh, right. its clinton.

By: Boilers2000

Boilers2000 — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:07:46 +0000

No fear of Obama… if Reagan (or Bush) were in office, this doesn’t happen.