Comments on: Shocking DNA Results!

By: Dohtimes

Dohtimes — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:59:02 +0000

The DNA sample was not at all damaged when Mark Fuhrman delivered it to the lab so the results can’t be doubted.

By: Uncle Kevvie, That's Who

Uncle Kevvie, That's Who — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:10:37 +0000

That Brown, lumpy, smelly one, right over there…….

By: Son of Bob

Son of Bob — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:16:17 +0000

Carolyn, actually it was a mummy. You could tell because it was actually better preserved than Nancy.

By: CarolyntheMommy

CarolyntheMommy — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:59:03 +0000

Do you think it was an awkward moment when they went to take tissue samples from the 40,000 year-old mummy only to discover it was actually just Pelosi taking a nap?

By: CTCompromise

CTCompromise — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 03:50:22 +0000

The 40,000 year old DNA. Amazing what Botox and good Nip/Tuck guys can do these days!

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:36:18 +0000

Nancy is related to Sasquatch who is related to some unknown, extraterrestrial male.

I thought you’d have known that!

By: Oppo

Oppo — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:00:58 +0000

DNA and RNA, like the
DNC and RNC,
Self-replicate
And then mutate
And that kills off their host, you see.

By: Oppo

Oppo — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:49:29 +0000

Which 40,000-year-old DNA sample was Pelosi’s? The one responsible for Jurassic Pork (in every spending bill).

By: Oppo

Oppo — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:46:52 +0000

I thought Boehner was the ‘cave’-man.