With Liberals, Fault Is Always External

Posted on February 11, 2013 4:00 pm

In an interview with MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, David Axelrod attributed Chicago’s murder rate to the lack of gun-control laws in “surrounding areas”.

Sure, and Michael Moore is fat because his friends are dieting.

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (5 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

10 Responses to “With Liberals, Fault Is Always External”

  1. Dohtimes says:

    Well there is a maximum range for even he best of snipers. No reason for not having a few at the Wisconsin/Illinois border though.

  2. FormerHostage says:

    Soooooo the rising violent crime rate in Southern California can be attributed to Orange County’s must issue law?

  3. Carpenter says:

    Chicago’s murder rate can be directly attributed to the ideology promoted in that area.

    When there is no hope and you have nothingness or Hell awaiting you, when the almighty State promises to give you everything (for a vote) then fails in that promise, when you are told that you are the victim of whitey racist discrimination from the day you were able to say maw maw….

    when your entire life adds up to you’re being a tool of the Devils’ Marxist machine, killing people seems justified. I meaqn at that poing what do you have to lose?

  4. Jimmy says:

    Sure, and Katie Couric is homely because Conservative women are hot.

  5. Son of Bob says:

    Liberalism is a mental disease.

  6. NoMoBama says:

    So the follow up question was: So why is the crime rate in those areas so much lower…..right?
    Maybe those communities are just better organized.

  7. DamnCat says:

    Actually, Axlerod has a point. Because everywhere else makes it easier for their residents to buy guns to shoot criminals with, more criminals move to Chicago.

  8. zzyzx says:

    Liberals don’t seem to understand that pointing to where the guns in Chicago come from doesn’t explain why the violence mostly occurs there.

  9. zzyzx says:

    The above statement didn’t originate with me, I found it on the internet…but I could not of said it better.

  10. Ogrrre says:

    As I posted in another blog: If the reason the gun violence rates in places like Chicago and DC are because of the availability of guns in surrounding areas, why aren’t those surrounding areas as violent, if not MORE violent than Chicago and DC? If the DC gun laws are keeping violent crime rates there down to Beirut levels, why aren’t Fairfax, VA or Silver Springs, MD free-fire war zones? It’s the guns causing the violence, right?
    The argument that less dradonian laws in surrounding areas are the reason for increased violence in cities with draconian laws is a complete non sequitor.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>