Your Schadenfreude Moment: Gun Control Advocate Gets Verbal Beatdown

Posted on February 17, 2013 10:00 pm

[High Praise! to Blarg]


[YouTube direct link] (Viewer #148,908)

It starts a little slow, but it just keeps getting better as every straw man the stuttering, twitchy liberal tosses out gets calmly and professionally napalmed.

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (13 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

18 Responses to “Your Schadenfreude Moment: Gun Control Advocate Gets Verbal Beatdown”

  1. CarolyntheMommy says:

    Yes.

  2. CarolyntheMommy says:

    It says protect and defend on the cars. Oh, so that means they have to protect and defend. I wonder what he thinks it means when a black woman wears Victoria’s Secret sweats that say “Pink” on the butt.

  3. rumcrook™ says:

    yeah the cops are gonna show up in the nick of time and save the day. just like they did in sandy hook.

    when seconds count the police are always minutes away.

    unless this assclown keeps a cop folded up in his back pocket he’s in the same boat with the rest of us
    when it comes to the cops saving his life in a head to head confrontation with criminals intent on doing
    him harm`~~~~f—n tool.

    when the L.A riots went down korean store owners saved thier own asses with ar 15′s and the cops had retreated to
    well defended enclaves leaving everyone else to thier own devices and the tender mercies of roving thugs.

  4. John says:

    The fact that every 2A infringement (except this new one in NY) exempts the police is an admission that gun control doesn’t work. If it did then the police wouldn’t need high capacity magazines or modern rifles, since no one else would have them either. Of course, I think the left gave up pretending this was about safety, crime and public protection long ago. It’s about control.

  5. Rob in Katy says:

    Just something that I happened to notice, every time the police arrive at a scene to “protect” someone, there is a citizen there first that could use that weapon to defend himself. Who is first on the scene, the person without the gun that now has to wait on the po-po to finish the donuts and come save them – and they roll up with AR or M16s, sure would make more sense for the person in need to have that weapon instead of waiting on it.

  6. NoMoBama says:

    If the cops are so good at protecting people to the point that nobody else needs a gun, why does anyone ever get shot? Half the time, when they have the chance to put an end to people like that freak in Colorado, they don’t because even they are afraid of shooting someone because they might get sued/fired etc. Now we have to watch the guy get off because he’s “insane”, all the more reason to kill him on the spot, end of problem. Instead, all these nuts who don’t off themselves get to become “famous” and they love every minute of it.

  7. blarg says:

    I think ‘to protect and to serve ” is just LAPD and clearly that’s just the motto of the police union. It’s referring to the fact that the police protect and serve their own interests. Ever notice that “cop killers” get special treatment beyond killers of regular people?

  8. Writer says:

    Typical

    Lefties never want speak logically in an argument. Emotions are all that matter to them.

  9. Sus says:

    That was a beautiful smack-down. It brought a tear to my eyes.

  10. Ogrrre says:

    The guy did make a couple of mistakes. One the commentator made mention of assault weapons. The gentleman proceeded to tell him that was a media-coined term, that assault rifles were fully automatic weapons. (Correct so far) The commentator then proceeded to say they had been used in recent mass shootings, and Mr. Morgan did not correct the lib. No automatic weapons were used in any of the mass shootings.
    Again, toward the end of the clip, Mr. Morgan said something along the lines of “if you ban assault weapons…” thereby conceding to the lib that these weapons were, indeed, assault weapons suitable for military use. Besides, the M1 Garand was a military weapon, but was not an “assault rifle”, and I’d give the lib’s eye teeth for a good M1.

  11. Harvey says:

    @10 – Granted, not perfect, but he hit a lot of stuff out of the park. I’d definitely call it an above-average performance.

  12. Son of Bob says:

    I guess he never saw the videos of police officers cowering behind police cars outside Columbine while the children inside were being shot.

  13. Jack Deth says:

    Son of Bob said:

    “I guess he never saw the videos of police officers cowering behind police cars outside Columbine while the children inside were being shot.”

    Or the LAPD running from their units to gun shops during the bank shoot out in February of 1997. To get Bushmasters and Steyr AUGs to be equally gunned against robbers with body armor, trauma plates and semi auto AKs. Because their issued sidearms and shotguns weren’t cutting it. Or that the LAPD considered issuing Bushmasters along with shotguns for its non SWAT police units immediately afterward.

  14. Uncle Kevvie, That's Who says:

    If and when Barry and all His Buddies decide that this is “a line in the sand that cannot be crossed”
    and decide to outlaw this, that, or the other thing we will see a rejection of this mindset that will
    make Booze Prohibition look like a pimple on an Elephant’s Ass.
    All over America, Jails are being emptied of non-violent offenders and ‘they’ seemingly wish to create an entire new class of criminals who by the way have dome nothing wrong, according to laws in effect right this very minute.

    So, luxuriate in your lawlessness, American Rifle Owners. Someone, please, point me to a new-age speakeasy, where I can go and get me some of that ‘banned stuff’……and don’t think “someone”, right this minute, is just sitting still wondering about this same topic………..

  15. Harvey says:

    @14 Clandestine indoor gun range: “shooteasy”

  16. Oppo says:

    Come on in and get reloaded.

  17. Bill says:

    Cops are good at putting that yellow tape around the crime scenes. Also pretty good at outlining bodies. Stay armed

  18. CarolyntheMommy says:

    #14 the thought has crossed my mind. I’d only do it if everyone dressed like it’s the 1920′s, though.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>