Obama’s Resolution for 2014

Posted on January 6, 2014 9:15 am

(AP) – Washington DC – Having solved the healthcare crisis in America, Barack Obama and his administration have now turned their attention toward solving the ever present problem of income inequality in the nation.  Toward that end, Barack met with the press and read the following statement from his teleprompter.

“So far under my administration, the income gap between the rich and the poor has increased significantly, and something must be done to rectify this inequality and finally introduce social justice to America.  Sociologists have concluded numerous times that the poor in America differ from the wealthy in two important ways.  The poor do not graduate from high school, and they do not wait until marriage before they start having children.  Studies have indicated that if a person minimally graduates from high school and doesn’t have children out of wedlock, they will not be poor.

“Armed with this knowledge, the solution to income inequality in America becomes simple.  We will begin by banning high schools and colleges entirely and requiring that all people in America have at least one child out of wedlock, preferably during their teenage years, thereby eliminating this unfair advantage that the wealthy have over the poor.  We really need to level the playing field in this respect.  Dumbing down graduation requirements and teaching teens how to procreate in school just haven’t been sufficient to achieve equality, so we need to take more drastic action.  The ruling class, of course, will be necessarily exempt from such restrictions since they are all obviously altruistic and above the fray.

“We understand this solution may not be perfect.  We understand that some Americans may be sterile or too homely to effectively reproduce, and that is ok.  In those cases we will provide children to these individuals.  Anthony Weiner, being currently unemployed, has personally volunteered to visit these individuals and rectify the situation as part of his civic duty, no matter how many tries it takes, and if Weiner is unsuccessful, forced adoption is always an option.  In addition, there may be precocious individuals that will try to learn on their own and develop an unfair advantage over their peers.  Such individuals can be dealt with through roofies, electroshock therapy and other novel approaches to induce appropriate limitations to their skills and intellect.  We all know the dangers that can spring from a knowledgeable and well informed populace, and such attributes must be curbed.

“One of my goals for 2013 was to finish the short story I was working on, and I finally finished reading it yesterday.  Has anyone read Harrison Bergeron?  It was a beautiful tale of a perfect society, until that uppity couple at the end threw off their restraints and soared.  I think a suitably edited version of that tale will be required reading in our new socially just utopia.

“Of course, none of this will remedy the current income inequality in America, but that is easy to fix.  For decades politicians have been arguing about a fair minimum wage.  I think they have been going about it all backwards.  We shouldn’t be arguing about a fair minimum wage when the problem is the fair maximum wage.  I am proposing that a fair living wage be established as an across the board minimum and maximum wage.  Problem solved.  Once the populace has enough to live on, do they really need any more?  At that point, haven’t they earned enough money?  Wouldn’t it be better to let the experts in the federal government decide how best to use the remaining resources?  It worked so well with healthcare, after all.”

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (6 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

8 Responses to “Obama’s Resolution for 2014”

  1. Oppo says:

    Re: “maximum wage”: … A good lib-mus test:

    Think of any job, profession, avocation, or form of employment…Any at all….

    Can you think of any limit — any limit at all??– on the salary that an employee/hiree should receive? Any?

    {Grader’s Tip: The more a person can enumerate, the more conservative they are.}

  2. RAML says:

    #1 I consider myself quite conservative so maybe I am misreading your question. I think the max. wage the person gets depends on what the person has proved him/her selve to be worth modified by market conditions

    Minimum wage on the other hand is not intended to support an individual, much less a family. It’s a first job for a teenager, extra money for a college student, or backup up money for secondary source of income for a family.

    what did I miss

  3. Oppo says:

    RAML:

    You missed only my ham-handedness in expressing myself.

    What I meant was:

    Q: Should the employee receive a paycheck equal to the employer’s paycheck?

    If not, why not?

    Q: Should the employee make more than the employer, in order to re-distribute the world’s wealth more uniformly?

    If not, why not?

    Sometimes, I admit, I suck at slinging my sarcasm….. You, above all, have proven yourself a pretty cool conservative. (Likewise, jw and jimmy, if you’re reading.)

  4. Oppo says:

    Oh, and I forgot Harvey and . . . now that I think of it, all the regular commenters. . . . .

  5. 4of7 says:

    When the employer and the employee get the same salary – that’s called a partnership.

  6. RAML says:

    Sorry to take so long to respond:

    Your first question is still covered by my first answer

    Your second question would be still covered by my first answer except you threw in the “re-distribute the world’s wealth more uniformly line” In that case my answer would be No.

  7. Oppo says:

    Yeah, my fault still.

    Damn!

    What I want to convey, to Elizabeth Warren and Occupy Wall Streeters everywhere, is that you can’t say “The workers control the means of production, so now we demand they will earn $X,000 per hour! Great GOODNESS!”

    And if you ask a reasonable person why that would not work, they could come up with several reasons — the more reasons they come up with, the smarter the person, hence the more conservative.

    In the case of stereotypical businesses, the reason is obvious. If there’s more money going out the door for salaries than coming in from the sales, the business is doomed.

    But if you’re thinking of an artist selling his skills to the highest bidder, I still say you must know there is Some limit to the price of what you offer.

    There are only a limited number of purchasers at any high price — even for artwork. They may be willing to pay X thousand once . . . But repeatedly? Unsustainable business model.

    So I say, the more examples or scenarios that you can think of for “any limit at all” on what you feel someone should be paid, the more realistic you’ll be.

  8. RAML says:

    I think we are on the same page. I have “worth modified by market conditions ”

    you have “Your last four paragraphs”

    Warren and Occupy Wall Streeters everywhere were raise min wage to unworkable amt . I am still going to hang with
    the
    Minimum wage on the other hand is not intended to support an individual, much less a family. It’s a first job for a teenager, extra money for a college student, or backup up money for secondary source of income for a family.
    comment

    It appears we are on the same side

    In any case I have had my sleeping and I am wandering off
    Goodnight

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>