Promoted Comment: Rephrasing the Liberal Hobby Lobby Argument

Posted on July 3, 2014 7:00 pm

From this post. Dodsfall nails it [High Praise!]:

“If my employer refuses to buy firearms for me, are they denying my 2nd Amendment rights?”

Send to Kindle
1 Star (Hated it)2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (Awesome) (5 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

2 Responses to “Promoted Comment: Rephrasing the Liberal Hobby Lobby Argument”

  1. D-Rock says:

    And you get to be choosy about the firearm. Those 16 types they offer just aren’t good enough. It’s those 4 that are extra deadly. Those are the ones you want.

  2. CCO says:

    Yeah, the ones with three settings on the safety–safe, fire, and rock ‘n’ roll.

    (That’s actually legal under federal law at present, if you have a federal firearm collector’s license; of course, then you have to buy the ammo. Come to think of it, due to the consumable nation of contraceptives (for the most part), it’s more like buying ammo.)

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>