<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IMAO &#187; Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/category/polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imao.us</link>
	<description>Unfair. Unbalanced. Unmedicated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Republican strategy to beat Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2011/08/republican-strategy-to-beat-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2011/08/republican-strategy-to-beat-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Basil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=17270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good news for Republicans recently has been that polls have shown that a generic Republican beats Obama. The bad news is that when &#8220;generic Republican&#8221; is replaced with an actual Republican, Obama wins. Not any more. Latest polling shows that some actual Republicans beat, tie, or are within the poll&#8217;s margin of error, according [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news for Republicans recently has been that polls have shown that a generic Republican beats Obama. The bad news is that when &#8220;generic Republican&#8221; is replaced with an actual Republican, Obama wins.</p>
<p>Not any more.</p>
<p>Latest polling shows that some actual Republicans beat, tie, or are within the poll&#8217;s margin of error, <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/08/obama-in-dead-heat-with-romney-perry-paul-bachmann-in-gallup-poll.html">according to ABC News</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney leads Obama by a 48 percent to 46 percent margin, while Texas Gov. Rick Perry ties the president at 47 percent. Obama bests Ron Paul by a 47-45 divide and Michele Bachmann by 48-44 split.  All results are within a 4-point margin of error. </p></blockquote>
<p>What does this mean?</p>
<p>I dunno. Does anyone know what Americans&#8217; political thought processes are? I mean, a majority of voters actually elected Obama in 2008. So you can&#8217;t depend on most American voters to do anything that makes sense. So I&#8217;m not sure we can make any sense out of this poll.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not going to let that stop me from trying.</p>
<p>Maybe this means that Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Ron Paul (RONPAUL!!!1!!1!!!!), and Michele Bachmann are actually generic Republicans.</p>
<p>All this time, I thought Tim Pawlenty was. But, since T-PAW decided to drop out of the race, theres an opening for a generic Republican. And, it&#8217;s being filled by fake conservative (but good-for-business) Mitt Romney, almost conservative (but plays one on TV) Rick Perry, speaks right when facts aren&#8217;t involved (John Wayne/John Wayne Gacy, Elvis&#8217; birthday/death day) Michele Bachmann, or sh*t-house rat crazy Ron Paul (RONPAUL!!!1!!1!!!!).</p>
<p>What about the other Republicans? For example, my guy, Herman Cain?</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t ask. At least, when I read <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/149114/Obama-Close-Race-Against-Romney-Perry-Bachmann-Paul.aspx">the full poll</a>, I didn&#8217;t see where they paired up Cain and Obama. But, among Republicans, Cain and Perry has the smallest &#8220;unfavorable/strongly unfavorable&#8221; totals. As for favorable, Cain and Romney came in second in &#8220;favorable/strongly favorable&#8221; to Rudy Guiliani, who&#8217;s not running.</p>
<p>What all this means is that a lot of Republicans can beat Obama. Maybe even more than they poll.</p>
<p>This shows what the Republican strategy for 2012 will be: don&#8217;t be Obama.</p>
<p>Which sort of screws it up for Huntsman, who worked for the guy. But maybe not. Remember Romneycare and Obamacare? Mostly a matter of scale. But Romney beats Obama. So, maybe not even Jon &#8220;Obama&#8217;s a remarkable leader&#8221; Huntsman should be counted out.</p>
<p>Still, not being Obama looks like a winning strategy. Particularly since Obama appears to be still blaming Bush for everything.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not Obama&#8221; beats &#8220;I&#8217;m not Bush&#8221; hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2011/08/republican-strategy-to-beat-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriotic Battle of the Bands</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/06/patriotic-battle-of-the-bands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/06/patriotic-battle-of-the-bands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=5421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s &#8220;We the People&#8221;, by Lloyd Marcus &#8211; a conservative with some vocal talent &#8211; who bills this as &#8220;the NEW Tea Party Unity Song&#8221;: [YouTube direct link] The title (NOT the actual content) of the above song put me in mind of an old Schoolhouse Rock short called &#8220;The Preamble&#8221;: [YouTube direct link] Do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s &#8220;We the People&#8221;, by Lloyd Marcus &#8211; a conservative with some vocal talent &#8211; who bills this as &#8220;the NEW Tea Party Unity Song&#8221;:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3sCN34fyXEQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3sCN34fyXEQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
[<a HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sCN34fyXEQ">YouTube direct link</a>]</p>
<p>The title (NOT the actual content) of the above song put me in mind of an old Schoolhouse Rock short called &#8220;The Preamble&#8221;:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q_TXJRZ4CFc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q_TXJRZ4CFc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
[<a HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_TXJRZ4CFc">YouTube direct link</a>]</p>
<p>Do me a favor:</p>
<p>Watch both of these and vote for your favorite. </p>
<p>[poll id="6"]</p>
<p>Feel free to discuss the reasons for your choice in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/06/patriotic-battle-of-the-bands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most trusted name in made-up news</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2008/11/the-most-trusted-name-in-made-up-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2008/11/the-most-trusted-name-in-made-up-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Basil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a recent Zogby poll, &#8220;37.6% of those surveyed, news sources on the Internet are considered to be the most reliable.&#8221; More than Fox News. More than CNN. More than MSNBC. More than the New York Times. Think about that for a minute. I mean, if people believe the Internet more than news organizations, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a recent <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/webnewser/most_consider_the_web_most_reliable_source_of_news_101463.asp">Zogby poll</a>, &#8220;<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/media_project_poll_info.pdf" target="_blank">37.6% of those surveyed, news sources on the Internet are considered to be the  most reliable</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>More than Fox News. More than CNN. More than MSNBC. More than the New York Times.</p>
<p>Think about that for a minute.</p>
<p>I mean, if people believe the Internet more than news organizations, does that mean that they don&#8217;t trust CNN, but do trust CNN.com?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s something else on the Internet they trust. And what could that be?</p>
<p>BLOGS!!!</p>
<p>Yes, blogs &#8212; such as this blog &#8212; are the most trusted source of news. That has to be it!</p>
<p>As a dues-paying member of the Internets, I, for one, am proud of the faith you have placed us.</p>
<p>Misplaced faith, to be sure. But we&#8217;re not about to let your misguided notions of who to trust go to our heads.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll continue to make up stuff about liberals, never ceasing, never tiring, never stopping, ever growing, ever moving, ever rising till &#8230; well, you get the idea.</p>
<p>Like CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, the New York Times, or any of those &#8220;news organizations,&#8221; we&#8217;ll continue to be make stuff up and to have a tremendous bias.</p>
<p>Unlike CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, the New York Times, or any of those &#8220;news organizations,&#8221; we&#8217;ll continue to be open and honest about making stuff up and about our bias.</p>
<p>You can trust us on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2008/11/the-most-trusted-name-in-made-up-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exit Poll Opinion Poll</title>
		<link>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2008/11/exit-poll-opinion-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2008/11/exit-poll-opinion-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spacemonkey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imao.us/?p=1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many of you, I watched the election returns on Tuesday night.  After a while of watching the plethora of exit polling data, I formed a strong opinion about them. Thinking back to that night, I got curious about IMAO reader opinions regarding 2008 exit poll data.  So I thought I&#8217;d ask them-you. [poll id="3"]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many of you, I watched the election returns on Tuesday night.  After a while of watching the plethora of exit polling data, I formed a strong opinion about them.</p>
<p>Thinking back to that night, I got curious about IMAO reader opinions regarding 2008 exit poll data.  So I thought I&#8217;d ask them-you.</p>
<p>[poll id="3"]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imao.us/index.php/2008/11/exit-poll-opinion-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

