I thought they said the TEA Party was dead?
Have fun storming the castle!
I thought they said the TEA Party was dead?
Have fun storming the castle!
Actually, it’s Flowers Foods, the company that makes Wonder Bread.
The details of this are that, since 1984, no company has given a higher percentage of its political donations to Republican candidates than Flowers Foods. The New York Times reports that in that time period, only three Democrats have received money from the company, and no Democrats in the last 20 years.
What about the other side of the coin? Who gives money to Democrats? Royal Bank of Scotland.
Citizens Financial Group (properly, RBS Citizens Financial Group Political Committee) has, over time, given a greater percentage to Democrats than Republicans. The gap has been closing, though. In 2008, RBS gave 84% to Democrats and 16% to Republicans. So far in 2014, it’s been 56% Democrat, 44% Republican.
But, no company on either side give as much to one side as Flowers.
Will this change my eating habits? No. I’ve eaten Sunbeam, Durst, and Merita for years. Natures Own, Cobblestone, and Wonder Bread are all brands I’ve bought regularly. Well, not a lot for Cobblestone, but the others.
But, I gotta wonder. Will the left jump on this as a reason to attack Wonder Bread? Of course. It’s what they do. And, the article in the New York Times focused on the right-leaning companies, while barely mentioning the left-leaning ones. Particularly the foreign-owned bank that heavily supports Democrats.
Is there a point to all this? Only that I’m glad to see that a company that I’ve been buying stuff from for years isn’t turning around and giving it to folks that are trying to make my life a living hell. And, that when I’m buying bread, I’ll do like the guy on TV used to tell people: say it with Flowers.
There’s a candidate for Congress over in Alabama that’s getting some attention with a campaign video. Will Brooke — NOT the guy from Montana, although you can bet some stupid liberal will try to make that connection — is from the Birmingham area and has a business degree and a law degree from the University of Alabama, and is an executive with Harbert Management Corporation.
The sixth District is the middle of the state. It starts a little north of Montgomery and runs to above Birmingham, encompassing much of Jefferson County (where Birmingham is, but not Birmingham itself), as well as Bibb, Blount, Chilton, Coosa, and Shelby counties. It’s conservative. No Democrat has received more than 30% of the vote since 1993, when current Congressman Spencer Bachus (a Republican who’s retiring) unseated Democrat Ben Erdreich.
Republicans running include:
I can’t find any Democrats running, so whoever wins the Republican primary will likely be the next Representative for that district.
Oh, yeah. Will Brooke’s video. Have you seen it?
Now, is Will Brooke the man needed in Washington? Maybe. It’s not my district — heck, it’s not even my state — so I don’t have a vote in that race (unless I voted Democrat, then I could vote early, often, and everywhere).
I hope my friends in Alabama make a good decision. And, I hope that whoever is elected to Congress this fall will indeed take down Obamacare.
It’s time for me to come clean. I’m a RINO.
That terrible label that’s been attached to the squishes that always give in and don’t hold true conservative beliefs? R-I-N-O? “Republican In Name Only?”
I think I’m actually the RINO.
I say that because I’m finding more and more that the Republicans aren’t the conservatives. Being a conservative and aligning yourself with a Republican doesn’t make Republicans conservative. It just means you’re aligning with the least liberal, least horrible of the viable options.
I don’t really want to take up the label “RINO” because of what it has represented. But, the reality is, the Republican Party isn’t a bunch of conservatives. But, a bunch of conservatives vote for the Republicans.
We got two options: take over the Republican Party, or form our own party.
The problem is, we’re so independent, it’s hard to get together and all work the same. For instance, some conservatives have varying issues on religion. Some are atheist. Some are agnostic. Some are Catholic. Some are Baptist. Some are Jewish. Some are one of any other number of variations on Christianity, Judaism, as well as other faiths (and lack of faiths).
That, in turn, leads to varying beliefs on issues like homosexuality. I believe it’s contrary to Scripture, and, therefore, a sin. But, I’m not one to yell in my homosexual friends’ and family members’ faces, saying they’re going to hell. I don’t think they are, but I think homosexuality is a sin. However, some disagree strongly with me about it, saying there’s nothing wrong with it. Others disagree the other way, saying I should be getting all up in their faces. And, others disagree in varying degrees one way or another.
I’ll stop there, but it shows how on those two issues, conservatives can’t agree on one common response. If we try to form our own party, effectively splitting from the GOP, we’ll splinter even further into varying forms of conservatism. Kinda like what happens when a Baptist church splits. A town starts with one and suddenly, there’s Baptist churches everywhere. Not always because they’re setting up missions that turn into full-fledged churches, but usually because somebody doesn’t like the new carpet (great Aunt Gladys bought the old carpet), or the preacher’s tie is too wide, or the organist shops at the wrong store, or something equally silly.
I think there’s a party in place that we can take back. Goldwater put the seeds in place in ’64. Reagan took control in ’80. In the intervening time, we lost it. Whether its because those we put in office start playing the game of staying in power rather than doing the will of the people, or its because they were slimy weasels to begin with, the Republican Party isn’t run by conservatives. We get lip service. And not the good kind.
I may actually be one of the ones who are Republican In Name Only. Because I’m actually a conservative.
We need good, young, strong, principled conservatives running for office and leading the party. Instead of a bunch of weasels who are just enjoying the Party at our expense.
First, you have to recognize the problem.
But, you can’t stop there. You have to do something about it. And that’s where the left will fall short.
Here’s what’s going on.
One of the few things that some on the right and some on the left agree about is that attacking Syria is a bad idea. Only, most of the vocal opposition is coming from the right. Why is that?
Ask Ed Asner, as The Hollywood Reporter did:
Another reason some Hollywood progressives have been reticent to speak out against war in Syria, according to Asner, is fear of being called racist.
“A lot of people don’t want to feel anti-black by being opposed to Obama,” he said.
Well, now, Ed, just who caused that situation? Who made it so that if you oppose Obama on any grounds whatsoever, you get thought of as being racist?
That’s right, Ed. You on the left. May I call you Ed? I’m gonna go ahead and call you Ed. Okay, Ed?
Well, Ed, this Frankenstein’s Monster you created is out of control. You on the left — well, not you specifically, Ed, since you are speaking up, but your buddies on the left — are afraid of being falsely accused of racism, because you take a stand against something you believe is wrong.
What’s it like, Ed? Tell me. I can’t imagine. Except for every day when I experience it because of my opposition to the policies of the Democrats, including Obama.
You and I don’t agree on a lot of stuff, Ed, but we do agree on at least two things.
1 – You shouldn’t hold back from criticism of what you believe is wrong because someone will falsely accuse you of racism.
2 – You shouldn’t be falsely accused of racism.
Okay, maybe you don’t yet think the second. But, maybe this will help you come around.
While I generally don’t support the same things you believe in, Ed, I do believe that you should be able to express your views without unjust criticism. So, Ed, why don’t you on the left stop the unjust criticism?
It’s not fun when something of yours bites you in the ass, is it?
Well, okay, I have to admit: it’s just a little bit fun to watch.
It seems Costa Rica accidentally legalized gay marriage. Really. At least, that’s what some British newspaper is reporting:
This week, the Costa Rican Legislative Assembly voted for a change to its “Law of Young People”, which covers social services and marriage laws. It was only once the bill had passed did unwitting conservative lawmakers realise that their liberal counterparts had inserted language that could open the door to civil unions for gay couples.
And you thought the U.S. was the only country with politicians stupid enough to pass laws without reading them.
Now, who’s got egg on their face?
Maybe I’m just a humorless jerk, but I didn’t find this funny:
You see, the lefties had started a Twitter hashtag #SarahPalinFilms trashing the former governor and GOP vice presidential nominee. Netflix saw fit to join in the Sarah-bashing.
Then, when asked about it, lied. So that’s two strikes. But, the first is enough for me.
Now, had they done such a thing with Barack Obama also, then there’d be the chance that Netflix was ragging on both sides of the political spectrum. But, no. They only poke fun at the right. So, this right wing nutcase isn’t sharing any more of his money with Netflix. After all these years, I’ve canceled my Netflix account:
I’ll be able to find enough to watch without them. It’s a shame, though. I’ve been a customer a long time.
Too bad they don’t respect their customers. At least, their right-wing customers.
The Speaker of the House trusts Barack Obama.
Okay, I know what you’re thinking: “What’s the punchline?” Yeah, there’s not one. John Boehner says he “absolutely” trusts Barack Obama:
Boehner said “hope springs eternal” in regards to the possibility of a budget deal, and told (ABC News correspondent Martha) Raddatz that he has a “very good relationship” with President Obama and that he “absolutely” trusts him. He added that the president’s recent outreach — or so called “charm offensive” — intended to woo Republicans, is a “good thing.”
It’s nice to know that Boehner trusts Obama. I was worried that all the lies and tricks Obama had told and pulled over his life would make him untrustworthy. But Boehner can see right through that, and know that Obama can be trusted.
And that’s good news. Boehner will be able to work with the president to make good things happen. I believe he’ll work with Obama and deliver a good, workable plan for the future of the country. After all, Boehner delivers. Just think about how he managed to deliver his home state in the last election.
Now, don’t you feel better?
As a gag gift — I think it was a gag gift — Hillary Clinton received a football helmet when she returned to her job at the State Department.
She also got a football jersey, but the helmet, I suppose, represented the fact that she fell and hit her head recently. With that helmet protecting her, at least she’ll stay conscious long enough to testify, I suppose.
Anyway, my first thought was of the character that Mike Meyers used to play on Saturday Night Live, Philip, the hyperactive, hypoglycemic kid (“I’m hyper hypo!”), who wore a helmet and a harness.
A helmet might not be a bad idea for members of the Obama administration. Of course, I’m thinking a leash might be better for the whole lot of them.
And a muzzle.
|© 2003 Warner Bros.|
Remember the scene from “A Christmas Story,” after all the opening of the presents, where the Old Man and Ralphie’s Mom are sitting on the couch with Ralphie between them while Randy is passed out amid the trash next to the Frankenstein’s Monster mask with the zeppelin under his arm?
The Old Man asks Ralphie “Did you get everything you wanted?” Turns out Ralphie didn’t. After all, for the previous 1:19:47, Ralphie has been scheming to get an official Red Ryder carbine-action, two hundred shot Range Model air rifle. And there wasn’t one.
Only, the Old Man pointed out to Ralphie that there was one other thing behind the desk, which turned out to be that very gift.
Well, I didn’t get what I wanted for Christmas. We have the same old president. And no one has pointed out a brand new president boxed up behind the desk.
How about you? Did you get what you wanted? Or were you disappointed by not getting that one special thing?
[Source: Michael Ramirez - GoComics]
You’ve heard that phrase — “the beatings will continue until morale improves” — in comics or on signs or in statements made by coworkers.
Well, you’re about to live it. Or, if you already are, others are, too.
Government regulations are the beatings on the economy. And when the government regulations cause the economy to falter, the government will simply issue more beatings, in the form of regulations.
Obamacare is one of the major problems. It’s causing business expenses to increase, and businesses are cutting where they can. That includes wages.
Some businesses are reorganizing internally and reclassifying some positions so that jobs that were salaried are now hourly. Businesses are also cutting back on hours for some employees; some cuts to simply reduce wages, others to exempt those employees from full-time status and the requirement to cover them under Obamacare. Those employees get to pay the Obamacare tax — they call it a fee or a penalty, but it only passed Constitutional muster because it’s actually a tax — so they are covered, as required by law.
When this impacts people, particularly people who voted for Obama, two things will happen.
What will the new regulations do? Make it worse. And then more regulations. And more problems with the economy.
Now, everyone on the left will say how great the economy is because of all the number of people with jobs, even though more of those jobs will be part-time, and even though more and more will stop looking for work because it’s not worth it.
The numbers, because of the way they arrange them, will look good. Well, not all numbers. The numbers on people’s paychecks and in their bank accounts won’t look so good.
But rest assured, the government has a plan to deal with the economy: the beatings will continue until morale improves.
Bush, Bush bo Bush, banana fanna fo Bush
Fee fi mo Bush, Bush!
Come on everybody!
I say now let’s play a game
I betcha I can make a blame out of anybody’s name.
The first four years, I treat it like it was not there
But a lot of silly reasons and excuses will appear
And then I say “No I wasn’t to blame,” and banana fanna blame a foe
And then I say that name and I make it very plain
And a fee fie on a foe
And then I say the name again and now you know my game
And there isn’t any name that I can’t blame
Clinton, Clinton bo Clinton, banana fanna fo Clinton
Fee fi mo Clinton, Clinton!
But if the first two years are ever brought up,
I drop my voice and say the name like
Bush, he killed the economy,
Clinton, she let the Ambassador die,
Osama, I killed him with my bare hands.
The media ignores anything that is contrary.
Everybody do Bush!
Bush, Bush, bo Bush, banana fanna fo Bush
Fee fi mo Bush, Bush!
Pretty good, let’s do the rich!
Rich, rich, bo rich, banana fanna fo rich
Fee fi mo rich, rich!
Very good, let’s do Wall Street!
Wall Street, Wall Street, bo Wall Street, banana fanna fo Wall Street
Fee fi mo Wall Street, Wall Street!
A little trick with YouTube!
YouTube, YouTube, bo YouTube, banana fanna fo YouTube
Fee fi mo YouTube, YouTube!
The blame game…
This late in the campaign, the endorsements are coming out. Recently, Mitt Romney picked up the endorsements of The Orlando Sentinel, The Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch, and The Tampa Tribune. The biggest news out of these is that the Orlando paper had endorsed Obama four years ago.
But, the president isn’t without his supporters. He’s picked up three endorsements, too. And these endorsements carry a lot of influence. Obama has the support of Hugo Chavez, Raul Castro, and Vladimir Putin.
We’re still waiting on the all-important Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Kim Jong-un endorsements. Wonder who they’ll support?
Remember all the talk about the NPVIC? You know, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?
Sure you do. A bunch of dumbass states have signed on to this thing.
Here’s what it does: in the states that sign on, whoever wins the popular vote nationally, wins all the electoral votes in the participating states, regardless of how that state voted.
The idea is to make the Electoral College meaningless.
Why are they doing this? They’re still all pissed off over the 2000 election. Gore seems to have won the popular vote, although Bush won the majority of electoral votes. And they’ve had their panties in a wad ever since.
The Compact has been signed on by eight states and DC. Here’s a list of those states and their electoral votes:
What do you notice about those states? Yep. That’s right. They’re all “blue states.”
Oh, and the bill is currently pending in New York (29) and Pennsylvania (20).
Now, here’s where it gets kinda interesting.
According to the latest Gallup poll, Romney is leading by 7 points nationally. According to the Real Clear Politics average, Romney is leading by a point. Either way, Romney wins the popular vote.
Now, according to the Real Clear Politics electoral map, currently Romney has the lead in electoral votes (excluding toss-ups), and, under the current system, leads 206-201.
If toss-ups stay where they are, Obama has enough electoral votes to win the election under the current system, 294-244.
But — and here’s the fun part — if the states that are part of the Compact were to go ahead and follow it now, Romney wins in a landslide, 376-162:
Oh, and if the two states where the bill is pending were to play along anyway, Romney wins by a larger margin, 425-113.
Told you that was the fun part.
There’s a lesson to be learned from this: liberals don’t think things through.
They joined in on this idea after the 2000 election because they can’t imagine that their silly candidate could actually lose the election. They didn’t like the rules under which Bush won, so they want to change the rules.
But, they didn’t see this coming.
Oh, and there are lots of other problems with the NPVIC, not the least of which is that many states don’t even count absentee ballots if there aren’t enough to change the outcome within the state. For instance, Gore’s popular vote lead in 2000 would shrink if the absentees in New York state had been counted. They weren’t, since there weren’t enough to sway the election in the state. And, since many absentees were military, they’d have swung for Bush.
Remember that whole mess in 2000 where those idiot Florida counties were trying to figure out what a hole in a piece of paper looked like? Remember Minnesota in 2008 stretching into Summer 2009? Look for that all over.
But, Democrats, and liberals in particular, don’t think about stuff like that. It complicates their neat little imaginary lives.
Clint Eastwood’s talk — it wasn’t a speech — at the Republican National Convention went over either great, horrible, or okay, depending on who you talk to.
More on the right than on the left liked it. But even Bill Maher liked it, kinda. Didn’t like what Eastwood said, but he liked Eastwood’s approach.
But, I wonder if this will start a trend.
An empty chair to represent Obama.
What other furniture, appliances, or household items might represent others in the Obama administration? How would you represent Joe Biden? Or Hillary Clinton? Or George Soros?
Looking for ideas. Best one gets … HIGH PRAISE!
Hi, everyone. I want you to meet our nominee, Governor Mitt Romney!
Thank you! I’m proud that I’m going to be your nominee.
You’re no different than Obama!! Vote RONPAUL!!1!!!
Mitt Romney has wrapped it up. He won Florida yesterday, and that means there’s no chance for anyone else in the GOP race.
Newt Gingrich supporters? Hate to break it to you, but it’s time to pack it in.
Rick Santorum followers? The writing’s on the wall.
Ron Paul supporters? The nurse will be by shortly with your medications. And a fresh supply of tin foil.
The 2012 Republican primary season is done. There’s no way anyone can catch Mitt Romney. Just look:
|Graph from The New York Times|
After the big win in Florida, Mitt Romney has 71 delegates. He only needs … let’s see, 1,144 to win, minus 71 already won, leaves 1,073 … Oh. My. Goodness. He only needs 1,073 more delegates to win.
Let’s look at the upcoming primary calendar, do the math, and see where things stand.
If Romney wins every delegate in every race, he would surpass the magic number of 1,144 as early as April 3.
What about Gingrich? If he were to somehow win every delegate in every state from here on out, he wouldn’t reach 1,144 until April 3.
Rick Santorum? Heck, if he won every delegate in every upcoming race, he wouldn’t hit 1,144 until April 3.
Ron Paul? Well, if he went on a winning streak and won every delegate in every primary and caucus, he wouldn’t pass 1,144 until April 3.
So, there you have it.
Romney can mathematically wrap this thing up in just over two months, on April 3, 2012. That’s a done deal.
Meanwhile, none of the the other three could lock it up until April 3, 2012. And that’s an impossible task.
Hey, don’t get angry with me. Numbers don’t lie.
Newscasters and party establishment will, but numbers won’t.