I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist, but can there be any doubt that Karl Rove held that judge in California’s family hostage to make him do this ruling against the Pledge of Allegiance? Could the timing be any better for Roberts and Bush? Now Bush can pick the meanest, nastiest, evilest conservative for the other vacancy as use this ruling as a hammer to get him or her in.
That wily Rove; I hope I never cross him.
You forgot to add “BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!”.
First.
Was that in today’s talking points memo? Why would Karl Rove want to out himself?
Never underestimate the dark powers of Sith Rove.
Besides, we will all need to rely on him because THE ANTICHRIST HAS BEEN BORN!
I nominate Frank.
Screw that, I nominate Lair.
You idiot, if the judge had not ruled the way he did it would have been overturned at the next level. He was just following the ruling of the higher court whether you believe that ruling to be correct or not.
You might be a muckadoo if:
* …you come to this site to seriously debate issues.
sigh of relief
I come here to laugh and sometimes throw darts at the Left, but I rest easy knowing I don’t qualify as a muckadoo.
Now I can sleep soundly at night.
Creeping skin infections to muckadoos!! Algae growth to their femoral arteries! May head lice migrate South on their bodies! Yaaahhhhh!
Umm … I think Fance is better at Surrendering than I … does that make me a muckado?
Evan, you should have read the comments in the link. That was already asked (but not answered). By some guy named Veeshir.