In the comments to this post on trolling, reader Jason came out of the closet (politically speaking)
All right, I’m a librul, sort of (more when it comes to human rights, those of Americans and HUMANS in general). Before you “punch me in my monkey face” I would just add that the sort of is because I am also a realist who sees Islam for what it is. Just thought you guys might like this article in the Toronto Star…It concerns the recent arrests of 20 or so suspected terrorists who wanted to clebrate “blow [s***] up day” in Toronto.
Troll out.
Now, we at IMAO have a strict policy about punching liberals in their dumb monkey faces, so this presents a bit of a dilemma – what should we do with liberal hawks?
Should we still punch them, but just not very hard?
Maybe we should merely kick them in their dumb monkey shins?
Do liberal hawks have SMART monkey faces?
I’m confused. Help me out, here.
Oh, and read the article. This should serve as a wake-up call for our moose-worshipping friends up north.
i’d still punch him in his stupid monkey face.
Harvey’s a pre-Jimmy Carter Democrat. Liberal concerning social issues, conservative concerning moral and political issues.
He’s a political manic depressive. The liberal phase is obviously his monkey phase. Wait until he’s depressed to punch him, cause that’s when he’s a monkey face needing to be punched.
When he’s manic, he’s conservative. Put a gun in his hand during this phase and he can work wonders on terrorists in Toronto.
He admits he is a “realist”, the first step to becoming a conservative in self-defense.
Bilbo – actually, my political leanings can best be summed up as “Ayn Rand for President”
Harvey,
Isn’t Ayn Rand dead?
She should be dead.
I’d kick him in his “liberal balls” which would be harmless since we all know that liberals don’t have any balls. This action would be a pre-emptive strike to a “liberal monkey face punching”…
Stake him out on the fire ant hill with the kinky anteater. Warn him about his bad liberal habits. Tell him it’s for his own good.
At least, that’s what they do to me after I do my crossover voting. Somehow, I have trouble with the idea that it’s for my own good. I think it’s just for their perverse enjoyment.
Such is the life of a centrist conservative.
“Harvey,
Isn’t Ayn Rand dead?
She should be dead.”
Frank J discrimates against dead people. He probably wouldn’t even let them vote in Chicago. How terrible! I’m wounded, wounded I say. After all, I will eventually be dead.
I say Ayn Rand is better than the walking zombie of the clinton presidency (Hillary) for 08.
“My dead female trumps your socialist undecided” would make a great bumper sticker.
P.
Hmmmmm, tough one. I agree that he might just be a pre-Carter, or even a Reagan, democrat.
How about instead of punching him, and possibly giving him brain damage which would ensure he’d become a full-fledged liberal, do that Three Stooges thing where you hold your hand low and palm up. Then you flutter it up above your head making that whoop-whoop noise before flipping it palm down and swiftly dropping it, causing him to strain his neck.
Frank – Is there anything in the Constitution preventing me from voting for a dead woman?
Besides, electing a corpse would be a GOOD thing. Just think of all the stupid bills that would never get signed into law.
Why can’t Ayn Rand have kids?
She’s dead.
Would you please stopping making jokes about my dead mother?
To the original point, I say punch first and let God sort out the rest.
Just conduct the “true liberal” test:
Punch the test subject in the face. If he gets hit and goes down crying, he is a liberal. If he dodges, blocks, counters with a terrific right hook, or performs a ninja move and flips you over his head, the subject is not a liberal. (Further tests may be needed to determine if the subject is genuinely conservative instead of merely “non liberal”.)
Liberal Hawks are just old-style Democrats.
Ronald Reagan started out as an old-style Democrat.
Therefore, we should clone Jason and like the Boys from Brazil, we should mold his clones into the image of Reagan in the hope one of them will become The Gipper some day.
I don’t know if punching is a part of Gipper-molding, Peggy Noonan might know.
Do liberal hawks have SMART monkey faces?
SMART monkey faces? Is that an oxymoron, or just a sick joke?
I agree with the post where you just bitch punch first and ask questions later. The fact that the stupid monkey faced liberal described himself as a liberal warrants at least a bitch slap to test his response. As mentioned earlier, if the liberal falls into a pool of his own tears and cries for the solace of Hillary’s teet, then we know we did the right thing. (Ewwww, Hillary’s teet?)
If he is willing to stand up to Islamic Fascism, then he should be welcomed with open arms. All else is periphery.
Of course, “j” proposed a great way of seeing if he had the “stones” to do so.
“Punch the test subject in the face. If he gets hit and goes down crying, he is a liberal. If he dodges, blocks, counters with a terrific right hook, or performs a ninja move and flips you over his head, the subject is not a liberal.”
I like this method of “j.” It is both an attitude and combatives skill tester all rolled into one. Of course, if he does have the guts to fight, after you punch him in the face, you will have to buy him a few beers after the dust settles.
Silly Union.
Someone’s obviously not been paddled in their youth.