You made Nancy cry

Yesterday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi answered a question from a reporter about whether anti-government rhetoric posed a threat of domestic violence. And, in her answer, she choked back tears:


[YouTube link]

After watching that video, I had a few thoughts:

Pelosi thinks San Francisco is typical.

If I thought most of America would act like San Franciscans, I’d cry too.

When Pelosi thinks of a violent political event, she thinks of Milk. I think of MLK.

Reporters think anti-government rhetoric is a threat only if the government is run by liberals.

Reporters don’t remember the anti-government rhetoric or the violent anti-government protests of the 1960s.

You right-wingers made Nancy Pelosi cry. I am so proud.

23 Comments

  1. She goes to the barry hussein school of uh uh uh speaking.

    She knows she is a pos liar, so she can barely get the words out.

    Other than the lying, the false projection and the stuttering, She was really terrible.

  2. Well said, Basil.

    I have to say, though, that Nancy Pelosi has increasingly become the House’s Norma Desmond–a third-rate, passé actress whose a legend in her own mind. Her tears are no more believable than anything else she says or does. And yet, she keeps announcing to an enabling fringe, “I’m ready for my close-up, Mr. DeMille.”

    What a farce…

  3. Unlike my IMAO peers, I DO believe she is legitimately crying. “Please stop fighting with me! We won the election and now we get to tell you what to do.” I think it stretches credulity that she is comparing us to Nazis one week and anti-war protesters the next week. She is such a crazy old bat.

  4. I think everyone has correctly assumed that Madame Speaker is referring to Dan White etal. Left on Right violence (Black Panthers, Weathermen, SDS, etc) doesn’t bother her a bit. Nor Black on White (Zebra killings). It’s those scary Dems (Dan White) killing other Dems.

  5. I can’t believe that you mean rethuglican right wing mobsters made nancy dye. After all she is just trying to make us all into communists, whats wrong with that? She is just trying to represent the anti-American homosexual population of the un the best she can.

    What, OH cry!

    nevermind

    /crazy moonbat Latilla

  6. This has been said on IMAO more than once in the past, but I can’t resist… it just seems appropriate:

    She wasn’t crying; it was a servo glitch because they still haven’t worked out all the bugs with the emotion chip yet.

    In all seriousness, who does she think she’s kidding? Isn’t this the same woman(?) who repeatedly granted leftist protesters access to congressional hearings? Just look at Desiree Fairooz – remember her? She was the retard who taunted Condi with bloody-looking hands as she was on her way into a meeting. And that type of idiocy was a common thing during the last few years. Odd how it will get you arrested now, though…

  7. Yeah, suppose we stormed and took over some Ivy League colleges and threw molotov cocktails at police and storefronts and cars. Wouldn’t that make the libs all dreamy-eyed for the good old days of the 60s?

  8. So, when she’s in the process of helping to purposely destroy a country by forcing its citizens into communism, and as a result the citizens of that country get very, very angry with her, she’s scared? Umm…I’m really, really okay with that.

  9. Our riots will be different. No looting, no setting fire to neighborhood shops, no pulling innocent truck drivers from their cabs and beating them nearly to death. We work for a living. We know how to budget our time and get things done effectively. You haven’t seen a riot until you’ve seen one conducted by people who treat it as an unpleasant chore that just has to be done.
    I’m just saying …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.