Due to their decreased circulation, the New York Times is apparently now just focusing on helping terrorists and exposing any spying operation we have against those who wish to kill us. But why? Did the NYT take out insurance policies on all of us? How do we check that?
This is a good opportunity for President Bush to show leadership in the War on Terror and increase his poll numbers. He should say how he vehemently disagrees with the NYT’s decision to publish details on spying operations done against terrorists. Then he should bomb the NYT headquarters and kill its leaders. The rest of the NYT staff should be hunted down just like Al Qaeda and sent to Gitmo. People will then say, “Wow; Bush really is serious about protecting us. Look how he killed and captured so many people involved with the New York Times.”
At Gitmo, after weeks of intense interrogation, it can then be revealed that Paul Krugman knows absolutely nothing. The same thing can be then determined about Maureen Dowd with a just brief glance at her.
The terrorists pay top dollar to media outlets to kill all of us. After all, they paid enough to Speilberg to convince him to turn against his own blood!
Of course it is outrageous. Check out Michelle’s site for those of you who have not. Frank has a convenient link right here at IMAO. From there you can email the DOJ and let them know how you feel. Michelle has many letters posted already.
Anything to undermine the Bush administration. That is all this is about and nothing more. They are not setting out to help the enemy; but if the enemy is helped by their actions then so be it. The only thing that matters to the NYT is hurting Bush and any other perceived neo-cons. Remember everyone, our President is the enemy as far as the “left” is concerned. None of the bullshit that comes out of the NYT should surprise any of you.
Dear Readers of IMAO,
I feel just awful for publishing that article. We at the New York Times stand by America in all we do in the open. The fact is, we have been working with several double agents in the White House, CIA and NSA to get information to such freedom fighting groups as Al’Queda, but have always done so in secret. Unfortunately, my secretary took the wrong article and had it published. The article we meant to run with was about troop movements in Iraq, though painted as though we were talking about how tragic the latest deaths were.
I apologize profusely for my mistake; you were never supposed to discover that we at the New York Times are a branch of the organization fighting to liberate the world from the infidels, Al’ Queda.
Again, sorry,
Bill Keller
Actually, we do not need Guantanamo for Krugman. Reading his writings will prove that he knows nothing and is simply a partisan shill.
You have just won a walking pilgrimage to Mecca or Fátima.
But would Freud say about your explosion fixation?
The best way to enjoy piglet Club Med style is never to move the corpse more than 25 miles, unless it’s already roasted, and to be sure the piglet eats nothing but mother’s milk.
Echelon contribution: CLUB MED, TC, CFR, NYT, moon base alpha, space, 1999.
I favored NYC getting more assistance on security until I heard Chuck Schumer make the point. Apparently according to him, A) NYC matters more than the rest of the US combined and B) they deserved by virtue (I use that term loosely) of being NYC. The sheer ego dripping without a hint of civility or tact was sickening.
Now with the second gaff by the NYT, and the coverage on http://www.hughhewitt.com of how vain THAT lot are, I officially no longer give a crap if NYC is attacked by terrorists. Liberals claim that the US lost all its goodwill after 9/11 by defending itself. Today I think this is far more accurate of NYC – If the Times gets burned to the ground, they’ll fully deserve it.
Yo, terrorists! Newspaper facilities contain LOTS of flamable paper! Go for it!
I hope they all get sent to Jail. The “people” at the NY Times are a bunch of treasonous bastards who hate you, you, me, and every single American. Sickos
Oh, but just wait… there is a lot more to come! I just got word from one of my anonymous sources at the LA Times, who heard from a guy at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, who heard from a guy at the Atlanta Journal Constitution who has first hand knowledge from the first cousin of the wife of Paul Krugman’s Nephew’s bestfriend’s uncles sister that BOOOOSH financed the entire Al Qaeda operation to enlist monkey’s who were spying for ninjas which were sent to break into the local Quickee mart to steal credit card receipts from dead soldiers in Iraq. All this information was supposed to reveal that President BOOSH himself was in on an assassination attempt of himself. Wow… Word has it that when he was to interrogate himself he would give up all the information that Al Qaeda was really after… Where is this Jack Bauer? But alas, the New York Times got ahold of the story and the Chinese were able to find where Bauer was.
Now, can anyone just explain to me what I just wrote? I think my fingers got to walkin’ again…
Did the NYT take out insurance policies on all of us? How do we check that?
I’m with the Vice-President on this one. If there’s even a 1% chance that the NYT wants us dead, we should act as if they do – and kill the entire staff.
Global warming will kill us all before the terrorists even light the fuse!!! What about the children???
The top 10 reasons the New York times wants us dead:
10)No-one reads the New York Times anymore so they thought it didn’t matter
9) They are trying to brown-nose their arab overlords
8) They’re trying to prove their street creds to the KOS kids
7) They’re typical self-loathing liberals
6) They’ve hired so many illegals that they actually think they live in Mexico
5) Because bodies sell papers
4) Their prescription to xanex ran out
3) The terrorists have a right to know!
2) Poor math skills – they can’t tell the difference between the fourth estate and a fifth column
And the number one reason the New York Times wants us dead: It’s the only way they can think of to stop having their stupid liberal monkey-faces punched in every day.
I think they just want to make sure the war on terrorism is faought fair. I mean, really, don’t you?
Punchy:
Nah, not really. I like to fight dirty, usually involving cheap shots and sucker punches, but that’s just me.
First, the New York Times blames the Bush Administration for faulty intelligence gathering in Iraq.
Then they actively work against the government’s attempts to gather intelligence in the hopes of casting a shadow of civil rights violations on Bush.
Maybe Bill Keller just wanted to expose the operation before they found his link to Al Qaeda vis-a-vis his bank accounts. Now if they find it he’ll just accuse Bush of PLANTING that money in his accounts.
Come on, Keller, come clean and just go ahead and rename the paper “New Jihad Times”.
I am going to order a subcription to the New York Times, so I can CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION to the New York Times!!!
FIGHT BACK!!!
No, wait. I’ve come up with a way to fight back even if you’re NOT subscriber.
If you have a pet, collect the doody, go to the nearby coin-operated NYT dispensary, insert a quarter, open the door and poor the doody on top of the papers.
HA HA!!!!!! Instant decreased circulation.
And remember: It’s not illegal to pile cr@p on cr@p.
I would like to understand why Americans use the word football, resulting from the words foot and ball, to designate a game mainly played with the hands. Who was the dim-witted quadruped with such an idea?
George Bush visits a school and a little kid raises his hand to ask,”Mr. President, why do whiners like Porto keep yammering away at the same loser talking points when the fact is they’ll never have the right answer because those dumb monkey-faced liberals don’t believe in anything that’s right?”
The President pondered this a moment and then smiled lovingly at the child as he answered, “It’s called free speech and even though dumb monkey-faced liberals like Porto don’t believe in free speech that disagrees with their point of view, they just keep on hoping if they whine long and loud enough they’ll get what they want. It’s a good thing little kids like you know better though, ain’t it?”
Shimauma,
I thought you braindead morons would agree and find quite factual that piece that some monkey faced liberals find funny.
There is communication only between equals.
No worries.
That was gay, porto! Very Gay!
Stop being Gay, Porto… That’s a bad Porto!! ::SMACK::
Hey, Porto!
Here are some answers to “Bob’s” questions.
1. Because the US doesn’t need the UN’s support. This may be a shock to you, but the United States is supposed to be a soveriegn country, independent of the United Nations. In other words, the UN is not America’s daddy. — Oh, yeah, the coalition with the US in Iraq? It’s UN sponsored. Even though their support is unnecessary, the US has it anyway.
2. Bob, this is an understandable question. When you get to the point when the schools teach you government, you will find out that the President is elected by the electoral college. Usually, but not always, this process elects the same canidate the popular vote does. In the case of the 2000 election, Florida’s electoral votes were in dispute. According to the courts (and we all know how much they love Republicans), Bush won those votes. Of course, it’s hard to sympathize with the other guy in this election, whose party tried (unsuccessfully, thank you) to discredit votes from the military (overwhelmingly Bush supporting in that election). So, to summarize, Bush won the electoral votes, which is what is necessary to win the Presidential election, not the popular vote. As a side note, however, I would support changing that.
3. Osama Bin Laden is still on the run, hiding out somewhere. Most analysts believe he is in Pakistan, close to the Afghan border.
Of course, Bob would know all this if he was actually receiving an education (gasp!) in the public school system. We should all thank Porto for showing us just how inadequate the public school system has become. Thanks, Porto! Keep up the good fight!
Ha! I said TAKE THAT BIATCH!
This is fun!
Well at least their stock in plummeting. Maybe it’s not just a handful of right wing whackjobs who are upset about this?