Eric Holder is really sure the Arizona bill is a bad bill worthy of condemnation even though he never read it. It’s kinda like with the Democrats saying how super important it was to pass the health care bill even though none of them knew what was in it.
So why don’t Democrats read bills? I can think of two possibilities:
1. They have magical psychic powers and can know what’s in a bill without reading it.
2. They’re illiterate.
The politicians often argue they’re just too busy to read all these bills they’re voting on and commenting on. Busy doing what, though? Don’t they get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to make laws and enforce laws? Wouldn’t you think part of that generous salary would be maybe reading those laws? What exactly do they do all day to earn their money? They already have these useless jobs where just sit around and talk and occasionally vote; is it really so much to ask they do some honest work and read these important bills? The Arizona one they’re all freaking out about isn’t even that long.
Maybe we should write all our bills in Spanish. Then we can hire illegal aliens to read them since apparently that’s yet another one of those jobs Americans won’t do.
Uno!
Definition of oxy-moron: marxist and reading
Hummmm! I see a never ending cycle, a revolving door so to speak, where we’ll constantly need a new supply of illegal aliens because as soon as we make the current crop of illegal’s…legal…they’ll refuse to do the jobs Americans won’t do. Then we’ll need a new supply of illegal’s to do the jobs Americans won’t do…that the former illegal’s were doing…but no longer want to do…because they are now Americans! Fortunately we have a good reliable supply of illegal’s on our southern border and a federal government that will look the other way as they stream across. So I doubt if we’ll ever have a problem running out of people who will do the jobs that Americans won’t do.
I refuse to classify illiterate Democrats as “Americans”.
He can’t read but he’s articulate. Seriously he can’t answer questions either. The man is a nincompoopcicle.
Give him a break, he read about it in the Huffington Post. He’s also read the Cliff Notes on the Constitution. What more do you want? (please note sarcasm)
“Rules for radicals” does not comes in an audio book so we know they are literate. (side note: not to be confused with economic illiteracy)
The gray nanny “New York Times” does all the hard reading and thinking for them. They trust she will tell them anything they “really” need to know.
It is embarrassing to me that these chiks hi-jacked the media, academia, courts, and elected and unelected government with almost no resistance in one generation.
That is what we get for letting the Republican party be run from the NorthEast. I think it should be moved to the Midwest or west.
In Chicaaago, you don’t need to do no readin’. Get your henchmen to read it to you.
Holder couldn’t be bothered to read it? Come on, it’s like, what, 10 pages or something? How do you expect him to work that in to his schedule? He’s a busy, busy man.
But seriously, 10 pages? Dude, I can read that on the crapper without my legs getting numb.
Sa-Lute to Rep. Ted Poe for asking a tough question; and for insisting on a straight answer.
Good gosh, why should liberals read things like bills? Monkey see; monkey do. No? Their opinions are decided for them.
Eric Holder…………..the only job I can see him in as a fluffer in a gay porn movie. That is about it.
Please don’t insult your gods. Democrat politicians are superior beings to us. If you don’t believe me just ask them, they’ll tell you themselves. So, don’t question what they do or they may smite you.
Read the bills?
Dems will not do, son.
When they won’t read
the Constitution.
Burma-Shave
Pingback: House of Eratosthenes
They don’t read the bills because they’re under no illusion that it will mean what it says. People who can with a straight face explain how “shall not be infringed” really means they have an obligation to take something away from you will never have any difficulty twisting the words (whatever they say) to mean what is politically convenient TODAY. Even if that’s completely at odds with what’s politically convenient tomorrow, there is no conflict– what we want right now is what the law gives us the mandate to do. That’s what makes it so much better to have thousands of pages instead of a couple; they hate it when they have to spend extra time talking you out of your clear understanding of a few precise words.
They don’t need to read it, they just need to feeeeeeeeel it. It’s all about the feelings, not the facts with these idiots.
Eschew Obfuscation.
Can anyone cite anything significant, meaningful or worthwhile that Eric Holder or Hillary Clinton has accomplished since they received their appointments? One thing? Just one thing?
Democrats have good intentions but they are not clever enough to understand that entitlement programs will kill the Republic. They probably can read but do they take the time to understand before they espouse their views. An emphatic no! Holder is the perfect example regarding the AZ law.Holder should be removed from office, he is the chief law enforcement officer and he is passing judgment on bills before he even knows what is in them .Obama and his team Chicago have turned out to be the most disingenuous, deceitful and dishonest bunch of politicians we have ever seen elected in this country bar none! The CBO scored the health care bill again and added and additional $115 BBBillion to the cost! Obama and his staff knew full well that this heath care bill would cost much much more then they told us about!
We should no longer allow Obama to put anymore bills or laws in place until we have full transparency (which he promised) on health care!
They’ve had their names in the paper almost once a week since they were appointed and we all know ” Bad publicity is better than no publicity at all”. As for Holder he’s doing all the dirty work fit to print for team o’vomit (all the other dirty work is done by Rahm and his golums) and Hillary is carrying water for the socialist-progressives all over the world so I’m sure they’ll continue to be useful or kicked to the curb( or under the bus as it were).
I have to agree with ZZYZX about the revolving door of imigrants. However; I would think it is the Republicans that would want to keep the door open to keep the minimum wage supressed. Either way, it is wrong. I’m sometimes mistaken for a Liberal myself. What I am is a thinking American who knows that there are no Republicans or Democrats; only owned subdemons of the Oiligarch Bankster Illuminati, who only do their masters will and take turns pretending to represent the people so they can get reelected to further serve their true masters and Satan whom their masters serve.
The true solution to the imigration problems is for the Christians in America to start acting like Christians and help Mexico become a country from which people need not flee to survive economically. Then maybe America’s new language will not be Spanish.
One thing the immigration problem points up is that the W.A.R. on T.E.R.R.O.R. is a total sham. We can’t keep 11 million Mexicans out of our country, why would we think we could keep out any determined T.E.R.R.O.R.I.S.T.? Because we are stupid and love funnelling Trillions of Dollars into Illuminati Military Industrial Companies, Security Companies, and being scared into authorizing the total plunder of the planet by these Satanists.
Charles Michael Couch
Brooklyn, NY (From Mississippi)
Well Scott, I wouldn’t say it’s meaningful or worthwhile, but Eric Holder has finally accomplished one thing that I thought no one could accomplish….he’s made Janet Reno look competent.
oooooh Cilla! What you said!
(Psst. I think someone left the door open and a Ron Paul troll wandered in.)