5 Comments

  1. Stupid idea. When transmitting from an omnidirectional antenna, the power gets spread out over the surface of the sphere as the signal travels. If you’re using a directional antenna, it will be based on the % of the surface of a sphere that the antenna concentrates the signal in, but it won’t matter much. A single light year is almost 6 trillion miles. The formula for the surface of a sphere is 4pir^2. So the surface of a 6 trillion mile radius sphere is 4.5E20 square miles. So if your antenna is 1 square mile (pretty damn big), and we’re broadcasting at 10,000,000 watts (the most powerful transmission I’m aware of is the SPY-1 RADAR of the Aegis system, at 7 MW), a 1 sq. mile antenna would receive a signal 1E7/4.5E20 watts, or 2E-14 watts. Well below the background noise. At 2 light years, the same size antenna would receive 1/4 that amount of power (it’s a square function), and the nearest star to Sol is over 3 light years away. If your directional antenna could restrict the signal to 1% of the surface of a sphere, that changes the power at 1 light year to 2E-12 watts, still below the background noise level.

    Signal all you want, they won’t hear you. Why is SETI too ignorant to know this? I suppose as long as they aren’t wasting my taxes on it, I don’t care, but shouldn’t they let their donors know what they’re doing is spending money and electricity for no purpose at all?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.