Hail Cindy, Mother of Peace . . .

stcindy.jpg
Thou shall not question the motives or truthfullnes of Cindy Sheehan.
Thou shall not discuss Cindy Sheehan’s anti-semitic rants.
Thou shall not discuss the fact that President Bush met with Cindy Sheehan soon after her son’s death and she had positive things to say regarding that meeting.
Thou shall not discuss the fact that Cindy Sheehan’s account of her meeting with the President has changed to fit the needs of her propagandist publicity campaign.
Thou shall not discuss the family members who are disgusted with Cindy Sheehan’s actions.
Thou shall not discuss the fact that Cindy Sheehan’s son supported the war in Iraq and believed in what he was doing there.
Thou shall not discuss the private interest groups funding Cindy Sheehan’s publicity stunt.
Thou shall not discuss Cindy Sheehan’s call to bring all troops home and essentially surrender to the terrorists.
Thou shall not discuss why the leader of the free world should meet with a publicity hungry media hound.
Thou shall not discuss the hundreds of parents of killed soldiers who support President Bush and the mission in Iraq.
NOTE–This post is not intended to mock a grieving mother or to minimize the sacrifice of her son. It is to point out the ridiculously reverent tone that the MSM has taken in covering the Sheehan publicity stunt, and to shed light on what should be pretty obvious questions regarding her motives and veracity.

21 Comments

  1. Thou shall not post First! without adding a nasty commandment about Cindy…like, Thou shall not call Cindy an embarrassment to mothers everywhere when she writes things like this on huffingtonpost…’So many people wanted to take pictures with me today, now I know how Mickey Mouse feels’…when she is supposed to be ‘grieving’ at her “peaceful occupation of Crawford”.

  2. I have to be the hardliner here don’t I?
    I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR THIS WOMAN AT THIS POINT. She is nothing but a MEDIA WHORE right now who has shamed her family and has mocked the death of her own son.
    I understand people grieving; they say and do extreme things for a time…but this has been a YEAR in the making and she has totally reversed her initial attitude for the adulation of the scumbag liberals and the attention she’s getting from them. It’s like some Munchaussen thing with her…she’s getting her rocks off on the death of her son, and it disgusts me.
    Nuff said…
    TEEEEEEJ

  3. Um. Should we also put
    “Thou shalt not include notes that say we feel for Ms. Sheehan’s loss after we just finished ripping her a new one for her blatant use of her son’s corpse as a propaganda tool.”
    I have to agree with a poster above, I am losing more and more of my sympathy I had felt for this woman each day she becomes more shrill and starts in with the Jewish angle. Sorry.

  4. Cleveland was recently ranked by someone as the 11th most liberal city in America, and we have had quite a few Marine funerals here in the last week. The response of our community has been admirable. People have been lining the streets to pay last respects in some cases, but every single one of these brave young men were hailed as heroes.

  5. I have often heard “conservatives” make pronouncements about the jeering and spitting that greated returning US troops from Viet Nam. I have rarely heard a “conservative” express any regret whatsoever over how those same troops were treated if they joined any of the veterans groups against the war — and I’m not talking about spit, I’m talking about false arrest and arranging for them to be fired from jobs, just to begin with. I put the word in quotes because a true conservative is a little more even handed, having heard in childhood phrases about “do unto others” and “sauce for the goose” and “whose ox is being gored.” I think there were a few “thou shalt nots” in there too . . . hmmm . . . maybe something about honoring thy parents ? Maybe even something about “false witness” . . .
    I see the war mob hasn’t changed.
    As for anti-semetism, I don’t know what Sheehan has said, but I do know that some cult-like Christians and Jews believe that the United States is only allowed to be the biggest power in the world because we protect Israel, which they identify with the biblical Israel. I know that Israeli sympathizers, some Jewish, have been recently accused of passing sensitive information from the Department of Defense to pro-Israeli lobbying groups, and that this is consistent with a fairly lengthly history of Israeli “patriots” who take oaths to be American “patriots” and then (perhaps because they believe America’s purpose is to support Israel) pass classified information to Israel. Some Jews and Christians in the Defense Department simply don’t really see Israel as a separate country, and it doesn’t occur to them that it is a betrayal.
    The fact is, the Jewish and Christian fanatics don’t see anything wrong with saying they are fighting a war for liberty, justice, terrorism, oil, or some other false reason, when in reality they are fighting a war for a cultish religious belief. Fraud in the name of religion is usually considered justified by those doing it. And these people see nothing wrong in using “false witness” to convince others to support their religous wars.
    It is a fair question to ask: “Why are we carrying out a war against Israel’s strongest potential enemy while Osama bin Laden runs free thousands of miles away?”
    The Ten Commandments are God’s Direct Word to us, and the fact he choose a small wandering tribe of ex-slaves to be the ones to spread it and the derived legal and ethical systems to the world is the basis of the view of the Hebrews as special people. I think to make parody of the commandments to help with a bit of character assassination in support of a pack of theives is REALLY anti-semetic, but as a real conservative my views are usually considered pretty weird.
    The reason you cheerleaders ought to be worried about Jewish religous motivations entering the mainstream discussion is not the threat to the Jews — they are mostly educated atheists who hate W anyway — it is because the question will inevitably broaden to consider Christian religous motives as well.

  6. nothing I like to read more than long pronouncements starting off with “As for anti-semetism, I don’t know what Sheehan has said,” …. yep, just gives you a good feeling knowing that they’re going to speak from KNOWLEDGE.
    And, of course, we get the conservative = war mob accusation too …. makes me just want to rush right back and read it over again, and again …. bwahahahahahaha

  7. Somebody at Ace of Spades HQ dubbed her the “Craftsman Madonna.”
    She’s a tool for people who have canonized her by calling her “Mother Sheehan” – hence, St. Tool, or the Craftsman Madonna.
    I like it.

  8. This woman is sinking deeper and deeper into psychosis and no one around her seems to notice. Its terrible to watch. She is obviously mentally unstable and in need of some serious grief councelling. Her ‘handlers’ should be ashamed of themselves.

  9. I have to wonder why the Left isn’t worried that the antagonism this woman’s antics create in most ordinary people will make it more likely they’ll vote Republican in 2006.
    Oh, right: the Left doesn’t know diddly about ordinary people.
    Oh, well. Maybe they’ll learn after the GOP gets another three Senate seats next year. Or maybe not until we win a filibuster-proof majority in 2008, along with the White House. Or maybe not until 2010, or 2012, when the redistricting will increase our Congressional strength still more, or yawn, anyway, let Mrs. Sheehan blather all she wants. How can it be bad to clarify which party supports her and which party politely declines her demands?

  10. asp,
    i think it’s more along the lines of he doesn’t waste his time on pathetic attempts for attention.
    ignoring someone who does not deserve any more of his attention than he has already paid her does not equate cowardice.
    pissing on a fallen son and hundreds of thousands of other women’s children is much more pathetic than anything you might be able to come up with.
    do you think Cindy would take a meeting with the president if he brought along Iraqi mothers who lost their children en masse to Saddam. i don’t think so. she would cower in their presence.
    she is not more equal than the other animals.

  11. asp, if anyone is a chicken shit, it is you and other liberals who refuse to change your position after hearing the facts.
    Bush DID meet with Sheehan the scumbag!
    It doesn’t matter how long teh idiots stay, he’s not going to step into the trap that the liberals have set for him.
    Also, The President of the United States has much better things to do than to meet with some f’ing media whore being funded by MoveOn and other radical left groups..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.