Classic Car Competition

“Oh Mr. Walrus HR sent me here. How can I assist you?

“Why Miss Ireland, I think you may have already.”

“Really?”

“Yup. But I do have a job for you. One of our commentators suggested a classic car competition. Can you help present that?”

“Certainly sir, right up my alley.”

“Well then I leave you to it. I’ll just sit back, watch, relax and enjoy.”

“I’m sure you will sir. So why don’t we start with this match up? A couple of real classics on display. Voting will last until next Tuesday and we will see which car is the favorite of our Moon nukers.”

Aston Martin DB5 1964 vs Ferrari 250 GTO 1962

Aston Martin DB5 1964

The Aston Martin DB5 was designed to be a talking point and that’s something that’s never really changed. Not only is this one of the most impressive classic cars, it’s also one of the rarest and the most iconic. 

Name dropped in the James Bond franchise as well as elsewhere in popular culture, its sky-high price has grown an estimated 790 times since it first arrived on the market. Conceptualized by the Italian designer Carrozzeria Touring Superleggera in Milan, this cool old car was always designed to make an entrance. The more time passes, the bigger the entrance promises to be. 

VS

Ferrari 250 GTO 1962

The sleek, stylish Ferrari 250 GTO is one of the most famous classic cars of all time and for a very good reason. This one-of-a-kind model sits worlds apart from the rest, both in its modernized design and expensive price tag (just like the world’s most expensive cars). 

When it first appeared, this car didn’t even have a name. Before it was christened officially, it was known internally as “Il Mostro”—the monster—because of its strange design. From its launch in the 1960s through to modern times, it’s a car that’s pushed forward full throttle, with a current value that even most millionaires wouldn’t be able to justify. Discover the history behind Ferrari to learn more about the brand and the incredible cars that followed in the 250 GTO footsteps.

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
138 votes · 138 answers

Succinct Summary

Someone’s post (on a different website):

We do need to vote, in person, on Election Day – but the cheating takes place during the weeks before the election, and during the days after election.

Long before Election Day, they are flooding the system with unverified and unrequested ballots.

Long before Election Day, they are weakening and suspending verification procedures.

In the days after the election, they are gathering, altering, and counting illegitimate ballots. They are “adjudicating” rejected ballots without proper observance by representatives of both parties.

It’s not enough to vote on Election Day – somebody has to watch them like a hawk before and after – during all the election activities.

And on Election Day, they tabulate votes using computerized scanners, apparently hooked up to the internet in some cases, that tabulate votes using proprietary decision-making code that cannot be examined by the curious.

Food for Thought

Dem Katie Hobbs Blames GOP Opponent​ for Campaign HQ Burglary. But Police Arrest Busts Her Narrative.
The Blaze | October 28, 2022 | Chris Enloe

Commenter:

You know there is trouble ahead when the one charged with counting the votes and certifying your election in her role as Secretary of State is the same person you are running against and is accusing you of breaking into their campaign HQ.

In other news, any of you up for running against Hillary Clinton?