Democrats have been in search of a message to take them back to power. Recently it was “Republicans are nothing but white Christians who never worked an honest day in their life.” followed by “We had a guy who almost won a seat in Ohio.” What’s their newest rallying cry?
“This woman should be able to meet with the President twice because her son died in Iraq and she’s against the war.”
Will this be enough to gain back the Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008? Only time and common sense will tell.
(more from Michelle Malkin here and here)
Well, baby bush’s numbers are hitting the floor. Plus, I have been hawking the whole “white Christian” thing for years. They finally listened to my genius!
Now all you need to do is declare Condi Rice is a house n*gga like liberal hero Ted Rall, and you can finish morphing into a complete loser.
I’m going to go out on a limb and predict the next Democrat message:
Those damn Republicans are after our Lucky Charms!!!
I find it quite interesting how this lady and a huge number of liberals think that QUITTING will keep the soldiers who have died thus far from dying in vein. ?
Damned if I can figure that one out. Can someone explain it please?
‘In Vain’ as in ‘Without our Approval’ Only Democratic unilateral military action is approved by the liberal intelligensia.
Or even Slick Willy heaving a few missiles at an aspirin factory.
Wasn’t she “for” the war before she was “against” it? Where have we heard THAT before?