Following up on my post yesterday asking which of the two political parties is really racist, I now ask which of the two parties do you think is most sexist? A Tennessee Democrat Rep. Janis Baird Sontany remarked about Republican woman, “You have to lift their skirts to find out if they are women. You sure can’t find out by how they vote.” Similarly, a number of people have been asking if all the Republican women who won the primary last week is a blow to feminism because they don’t have the “right views.”

See, in the minds of Democrats, only white males are allowed to have any viewpoint they want without having their authenticity questioned. Women have to have certain views or they’re not real women. Similarly, if you’re black you have to have certain viewpoints on tax issues or your not a real black person and if you’re Hispanic a nice white liberal will tell you what viewpoint you should have if you want to be an authentic Hispanic. As for Asians… well, just look at the bile Michelle Malkin gets.

Republicans, on the other hand, are enlightened and think women and minorities can have whatever views they want and we won’t attack the authenticity of your race or gender. We might call you a hippie and punch you, but that’s not a race issue — that’s a hippie issue. Republicans aren’t racist or sexist, while the Democrats only exist because of racism (I wrote about that some time ago for Pajamas Media). The only way their party can exist is keeping people in racial groups and not independently examining the issues. That’s why they’re always trying to awkwardly inject race into everything (Against Obamacare? Racist! Don’t like soccer? Also racist!). With all the racism they spread, they’re like the KKK, except more effective and with more taxes.

So Obama sent out a fundraising e-mail about the oil spill. So how does that work?

“I have no idea what I’m doing, but maybe I’ll figure it out if you send me money. Why, with your contribution of $50, you can help lead me down the path to figuring out whose ass to kick.”

Anyway, the letter outlines a bunch of new policy ideas Obama wants to use the oil spill as impetus to as he doesn’t want to let a crisis go to waste, but does that really work when people see you as part of the reason of the crisis? Like he goes on about how we need clean energy because of how awful oil is, but of course oil looks awful when you have a president who just twiddles his thumbs while it’s gushing out into all the ocean. Basically, the oil spill has demonstrated Obama doesn’t know how to do anything useful or competent, so why is his bumbling of this big disaster going to convince us to follow anymore of his ideas? The only proposal he could have that I would see catching on with the public would be for him to say he’ll now sit quietly in the corner while other people handling the important things.

In my latest Pajamas Media Column, I talk about how Obama failing as president is really our fault and explain how we can do something about it.

Soccer Officially Announces It Is Gay

So who should go in Helen Thomas’s empty seat in the front row of the White House Press Corps? My vote, as always, is for Mr. T. I think he’ll get along well with Gibbs since Mr. T pities the fool, but at the same time he won’t put up with any jibber-jabber.

So who do you think should take the seat?

So Southern Republicans are supposed to be a bunch of ignorant racists (like Jackie Knotts), yet it’s looking like soon the South could be having two Republican Indian-American governors. How many Indian-American governors do the Democrats have? None. Is that because Democrats hate people from India?

Probably.

Well, not hate, but more like they’re too racist to elect them. Tunku Varadarajan lays it out pretty well: A good explanation for Indian-Americans doing well in the Republican Party and the Democrat Party is that Republicans don’t vote on race and Democrats do. Despite all the talk about racist Republicans, people like Jackie Knotts are fringe and it doesn’t matter what race you are to conservatives as long as you share their values. So any race can win with them. With Democrats, race is all important. So, since there aren’t large groups of Indian-Americans to vote along racial lines within the Democrat Party, Indian-Americans don’t stand a chance there.

So what’s your opinion: Is it you or the other guys who are racist? I vote that it’s the other guys. I know I’m not racist. When my daughter is born, I’ll love her no matter what race she is.

The point of these videos is to get the politician to say something controversial, and in that these kids failed:

(hat tip Hot Air which has more details)

Little odd. I mean, I’d get violent if someone accused me of supporting the Obama agenda, but it seems a bit out of place with a Democrat Representative. Plus, I think Etheridge would come off as more impressive if he used a Batman voice. “WHO ARE YOU?!!!”

Anyway, if a Democrat has touched you inappropriately, make sure to tell an adult.

And have you seen Harry Reid’s new campaign slogan: “No one can do better.” Isn’t that depressing if true?

“Your Senator is a cranky, doddering old man, and it only goes downhill from there.” Maybe the new Democrat strategy is to assault and depress everyone into submission.

I said it before, and I’ll say it again:

“Any animal that is too slow or too stupid to dodge an oil slick that’s travelling at 0.1 mph deserves to die. Those are the kinds of critters you want out of the gene pool, anyway.”

Do not trifle with the Hand of Darwin.