[High Praise! to Kotaku.com]
In the town where I grew up, the public library had a VERY extensive collection of Peanuts anthology books, and I read them all, so I’m far more familiar with the pre-1970 comic strips that one would normally expect for someone my age.
And although I never previously thought of it in the specific terms the author of the article puts it in, I recognize that he is exactly right: Snoopy worked better as a dog than as a big-nosed kid.
[Think you have a link that’s IMAO-worthy? Send it to harvolson@gmail.com. If I use your link, you will receive High Praise! (assuming you remember to put your name in the email)]

Like Harvey, I had access to every Peanuts book from the beginning. It is notable how the strip changed, pretty much in the way this author describes well.
I didn’t know the following back-stories, until I happened across a book entitled “The Gospel According to Peanuts” (Robert L. Short, Bantam edition, 1968 [originally published by Knox, 1964]):
Chris Caldwell was on this 15 years ago.
I dunno. By the time I was 11, Snoopy was pretty much the only reason I was still reading them. I always wished some of his more bizarre storylines got more frames.
@3 – Which is exactly the author’s point. Early on, the kids all had distinctive personalities and storylines. Snoopy was just one of many characters. Then he became, essentially, another kid. Then he became the only kid with a personality.
Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, because it was an entertaining personality, but the comic lost a lot of its richness, complexity, and thought-provokingness… and became mere entertainment.
Once upon a time, it had been something much more.