Gulliver

I think I should have read Gulliver’s Travels by now, but I haven’t. I just never go around to it.

It was published October 28, 1726. A lot of the writing from that time is … different. But, not having read the novel, I don’t know if that’s one of that odd type of writing. So, for those reasons, I haven’t read it.

Okay, that’s not true. I haven’t read it because I’m too lazy to get it and read it.

So, should I? Is it any good? I mean, yeah, it’s a classic, sure. But is it really any good. Should I go out and buy it?

12 Comments

  1. I started reading it about 35 years ago and enjoyed what I read. Eventually, however, I didn’t care any longer about what happened next and put it down. In that respect it was similar to Don Quixote, once I’d read half I decided the second half didn’t matter. There’s no test so you can read what you want then stop. Even now, decades later, some of Swift’s descriptions are vivid in my mind. Not many books have that kind of staying power. You owe it to yourself to find out why.

  2. They made us read it in school (probably junior high). That was, no doubt, a good thing (better than not reading it at all), but I don’t think kids have the perspective to appreciate it, Lord of the Flies, 1984, and even Through The Looking Glass.

  3. If you enjoyed the tale as a child about a man who gets shipwrecked onto a land of little people you will be disappointed with the real thing. It is not a child’s story at all. It is misanthropic. It is politically pro-communist. It is like today’s dumb jokes r-rated foul language movie comedies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.