I love Weird Al.
Do you have something you’d like to share? A link? A joke? Some words of wisdom? A topic to discuss? It’s Friday Night Open Thread.
What’s on your mind?
I love Weird Al.
Do you have something you’d like to share? A link? A joke? Some words of wisdom? A topic to discuss? It’s Friday Night Open Thread.
What’s on your mind?
Trump Campaign To Sue CNN For “Substantial Payment” After Project Veritas Undercover Exposé
The Epoch Times | 10-18-19 | Jack PhillipsThe Trump administration plans to sue CNN over bias and “wrongful practices” following revelations contained in a recent Project Veritas undercover exposé.
In a four-page letter to CNN, its CEO Jeff Zucker and Executive VP David Vigilante, Trump attorney Charles J. Harder provided several examples of bias against Trump, who seeks “a substantial payment of damages.”
Listing several examples from the just-released Project Veritas videotapes of CNN insiders describing Zucker’s demand for “impeachment above all else,” Harder wrote that they “are merely the tip of the iceberg of the evidence my clients have accumulated over recent years.”
He added, “Never in the history of this country has a President been the subject of such a sustained barrage of unfair, unfounded, unethical and unlawful attacks by so-called ‘mainstream’ news, as the current situation.”
Utah Leads States in Gun Sale Growth Over Past Decade, Study Shows
KSL.com | 10/17/2019SALT LAKE CITY — As lawmakers heard statistics Wednesday on the state of gun crime in Utah, a new study shows Utah’s rate of gun ownership has increased more than any other state over the past decade.
. . . Utah’s rate of gun sales per 1,000 adults grew 80.4% between 2009 and 2018.
Only the District of Columbia, which recorded a jump of over 600%, had a greater increase.
. . . scientifically proving, by global warming’s standards, that Mitt Romney’s presence anywhere leads to an increase in gun purchases. What the heck is his carbine footprint?
Utah also posted a low age-adjusted rate of gun-related homicides per 100,000 population — 2.2, tied for sixth-fewest . . .
Hmm. You’d think they would have buried that lack of correlation a little bit better.
I’m also curious what an “age-adjusted rate of gun-related homicides” even means. Either you homicide someone or you don’t, even if you’re a newborn with an Uzi. (Catch phrase for preemie Terminator: “I C U!”)
“Without a doubt, the American relationship to guns is long and complex,” the report said in its conclusion, “seemingly growing more complex by the day.”
Sniper rifles are long and complex. Americans’ relationship to them is not.
The relationship does not get a Facebook category of “it’s complicated.” Geez, guns haven’t even changed their preferred pronouns since the country began.
(If the Second Amendment’s twenty-seven words are “growing more complex by the day,” just imagine how complex they’ll be by the time Mandatory Gun Buy-Back Day rolls around!)
NOT from the Babylon Bee:
Hillary Clinton Floats Conspiracy That Tulsi Gabbard Is Being ‘Groomed’ by Russians
Fox News | 10/18/2019Hillary Clinton in a new interview appeared to float a conspiracy theory that the Russians are “grooming” Hawaii congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard to be a third-party candidate in 2020, while claiming 2016 Green Party nominee Jill Stein is “also” a Russian asset.
I can’t stess this enough: this is not from the the Babylon Bee:
“I’m not making any predictions but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said, in apparent reference to Gabbard. “She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”
Not from the Babylon Bee:
She then accused Stein, who ran against her and Donald Trump in 2016, of also being an asset of Russia: “That’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset.”
First of all, Tulsi’s pretty well-groomed already. Stein — well, Russkies must’ve done a poor job, after all these years.
Second of all, Clinton has not yet accused Fox News of being a Russian asset for reporting this, or you for reading it. But stay tuned.
Winston Churchill wrote about Kaiser Wilhelm II, but he could also have been writing about Obama the “I”:
Imagine on every side the thunderous tributes of crowd-loyalty and the skilled unceasing flattery of courtierly adulation.
“You are,” they say, “the All-Highest. . . . It is for you to choose the Chancellor and the Ministers of State; it is for you to choose the chiefs of the Army and Navy. . . . Each word you utter is received by all present with rapture, or at least respect. You have but to form a desire, and it is granted. Limitless wealth and splendor attend your every step. . . . Should you weary of the grosser forms of flattery, far more subtle methods will be applied. . . . Intimate friends are at hand to report day by day how deeply impressed this or that great expert was with your marvelous grasp of his subject. The General Staff seem awed by your comprehension of the higher strategy. The diplomats are wonder-struck by your manly candor or patient restraint, as the case may be. . . . And this goes on day after day and year after year. . . .
Foreign policy:
Just strut about and pose and rattle the undrawn sword. All he wished was to feel like Napoleon, and to be like him without having to fight his battles. Surely less than this would not pass muster. If you are the summit of a volcano, the least you can do is to smoke.
And looking towards the future:
What a contrast twelve years would show! A broken man. . . .
An awful fate! Was it the wage of guilt or incapacity? There is, of course, a point where incapacity and levity are so flagrant that they become tantamount to guilt. Nevertheless history should incline toward the more charitable view. . . .
But the defense which can be made will not be flattering to his self-esteem. It is, in short, rather on the lines of the defense which the eminent French counsel presented on behalf of Marshal Bazaine when he was brought to trial for treason in the surrender of Metz: “This is no traitor. Look at him: he is only a blunderer.”
Usually, when a President comes to office, there’s no — you have no vacancies. Or the previous President would have — boom. There should be no vacancy, you know, whatever their ideology is.
But I guess they thought that the crooked one was going to win or something. (Laughter.) So I came in and, in the first couple of days, they said, “By the way…” You know, I had a couple of other things going, too — including the fact that a few minutes after I was sworn in, the Washington Post wrote a story that the impeachment starts right now. You saw that, right? Did you see that?
Right after I got sworn — took the oath of office, they did that story — literally, a very few moments after the swearing-in — that the road to impeachment starts right now.
But I had a lot of other things. But I said during the course of the first very early period, like a week — I said, “By the way, how many federal judgeships do I have?” They said, “Sir, you have 142.” I said, “What?” (Laughter.) “You have 142, sir.” I said, “You’ve got to be kidding. 142? You mean I have two, one, none?” “No, you have 142.”
And President Obama was not very good at getting it done, because, you know, people held him up and everything else. But, with time, you get them all done. You get them done. But he put a big rush on at the end when he saw we were doing well in the polls, and coming up and up, and it wasn’t enough time. So we inherited 142 open federal judgeships, including the court of appeals. (Applause.) First time in history. First time in history anything like that has ever happened.
And then they say, “Oh, he was a great President. Oh, great. He was great.” Great for who? He was great for us. (Laughter.) And in that way, he was. There’s never been a better President for the Republicans in what they consider the most important way . . . Gave us 142 judgeships on the first day in office. (Laughter.)
— Remarks by President Trump at Values Voter Summit
Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington, D.C.
October 12, 2019
The use of Social Security number 078-05-1120 declined sharply in 1977, Social Security officials said — with a sigh of relief. This is the number a wallet manufacturer used forty years [before] on a specimen card that he inserted in each wallet to demonstrate how cards of this size would fit. (It was his secretary’s number.)
Although the card was marked “specimen,” countless purchasers of these wallets believed it was the number assigned to them, and tens of thousands of Social Security deductions were credited to 078-05-1120. It took twenty years to straighten out most of the mess.
Today, things are more or less under control, but Social Security officials estimate that some confusion will continue for many more years. (As for that secretary, she was given a new number. Otherwise, among the payments to her account would have been millions of dollars in retirement benefits.)
— Isaac Azimov’s Book of Facts (1979)